<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> This paper concerns the role of hierarchical semantic relations: class inclusion and partwhole relations as factors organising the mental lexicon, and the dependence of their importance on visual perception and visual memories, as demonstrated by the results of a free association task. 58 blind and 58 sighted language users were instructed to give associations for a list of 75 Polish nouns. Semantic analysis showed that more than 40% of the whole corpus of answers was related to stimuli through the part-whole or class inclusion relations. The results of the analysis indicated many similarities, concerning both types of relations, in the feedback obtained from the blind and sighted respondents. However, the blind participants showed a significantly stronger tendency to respond with inclusive terms (hyperonyms of the stimuli) than the sighted respondents. Th e results were interpreted in terms of the specificity of the compensation processes.</abstract>

The Associative Structure of the Mental Lexicon: Hierarchical Semantic Relations in the Minds of Blind and Sighted Language Users

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> Despite their increasing use, little is known about the purpose of word blends, e.g. chillax, which have near-synonymous composite words (relax and chill). Potential explanations for their existence and persistence include: use in different sentence constructions, to provide unique meaning, and to create interest/identity. Th e current study used a vignette methodology with two-hundred and forty-one students to explore the relevance of such hypotheses for ‘guesstimate’, ‘chillax’, ‘ginormous’, and ‘confuzzled’. Our inconsistent results suggest that the semantics of the word blends may diff er from their composites in very subtle ways. However further work is needed to acknowledge and determine the impact of context upon the use and consequences of these word blends.</abstract>

Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, CV1 5FB, England

Why Do Word Blends with Near-Synonymous Composites Exist and Persist? The Case of Guesstimate, Chillax, Ginormous and Confuzzled

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">In the current study it was assumed that participants of the act of communication do not always follow the rules of cooperation, and sometimes build their utterance in a way that misleads the listener. It depends on the communicative competence of the listener and the message sender if an interaction between them takes place. Th e aim of this research was to assess to what extent deliberate, incorrect identification and the mode of communication in which the text is presented makes the audience lose their orientation in both bona-fide (informative) and non-bona-fide (playful) mode formulations. In order to answer these questions, two experiments were conducted using three types of texts: informative text with a humorous digression, humorous informative text, and a real life parody joke. Th e information preceding the presentation of the texts and the order in which they were shown was manipulated. Respondents assessed how funny each of the texts was. 85 high secondary school students participated in the survey. Th e conducted statistical analyses enabled us to establish that the information appearing at the beginning, i.e. the type of message (informative/humorous), can affect the recipient’s reaction and assessment of how funny a particular text was. Th e research results indicate that poor intensity of comicality in the messages may be aggravated by not indicating that they were intended to induce a humorous effect. This reveals the specific nature of humorous messages, bringing about an effect that is categorically inconsistent with the stimulus that precedes it.</abstract>

Faculty of Psychology of the University of Szczecin, Krakowska 69, 71-017 Szczecin, Poland.

Appreciation of Ambiguous Humorous Messages: The Influence of Processing Mode and Presentation

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This study investigated the use of politeness strategies in a corpus of English business letters written by Iranian non-native speakers in comparison with business letters written by English native speakers. The positive and negative politeness strategies proposed by Brown and Levinson’s (1978) theory were employed. A corpus of 46 business letters written by non-native employees of four companies and 46 letters written by native speakers who were in correspondence with these companies were analyzed to examine their use of politeness strategies. Th e results collected from the analysis of letters written by nonnative parties as senders were compared to those written by native speakers as receivers in response. Th e findings showed that although both parties used both types of politeness strategies in their letters, non-native participants employed both types (negative and positive politeness strategies) more than native speakers, especially positive politeness strategies, which were found to be used more frequently than negative ones. Additionally, the results demonstrated that social distance plays an important role in the employment of different strategies, particularly in choosing the type of salutation, which is an act requiring the positive politeness strategy to reduce face threatening act. Th us, more frequent use of positive politeness strategies by non-native speakers could be an effect of this factor.</abstract>

English Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Politeness Strategies in English Business Letters: a Comparative Study of Native and Non-Native Speakers of English

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> Normative studies of the Polish adaptation of Th e Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT) were conducted on 475 men and women aged 16-79, taking into consideration such factors as gender, education, and place of residence. Clinical studies were also performed on a group of patients with left -, right-, or bilateral hemispheric brain lesions, Parkinson’s disease, Huntingon’s disease, progressive obturational lung disease, dementia and depression. Th e results support the utility of the RFFT as a measure of executive functions. Th e validity and reliability indices of the Polish version of the test are similar to those reported by Ruff (1996). However, the sample Polish test performance differs notably from American samples performance and this difference is discussed.</abstract>

Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Stawki 5/7, 00-183 Warsaw, Poland

Psychological Test Laboratory of Polish Psychological Association

Validity and Reliability of the Polish Adaptation of the Ruff Figural Fluency Test

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 28 (2024): Issue 1 (January 2024)

Volume 27 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)

Volume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)

Volume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)

Volume 24 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)

Volume 23 (2019): Issue 1 (January 2019)

Volume 22 (2018): Issue 1 (January 2018)

Volume 21 (2017): Issue 1 (January 2017)

Volume 20 (2016): Issue 3 (December 2016)

Volume 20 (2016): Issue 2 (November 2016)

Volume 20 (2016): Issue 1 (October 2016)

Volume 19 (2015): Issue 3 (December 2015)

Volume 19 (2015): Issue 2 (October 2015)

Volume 19 (2015): Issue 1 (May 2015)

Volume 18 (2014): Issue 3 (December 2014) Children's Language and Communicative Knowledge, Part Two. In childhood and beyond, Issue Editor: Barbara Bokus

Volume 18 (2014): Issue 2 (August 2014) Children's Language and Communicative Knowledge, Part One. In Memory of Professor Grace Wales Shugar, Issue Editor: Barbara Bokus

Volume 18 (2014): Issue 1 (May 2014)

Volume 17 (2013): Issue 3 (December 2013)

Volume 17 (2013): Issue 2 (September 2013)

Volume 17 (2013): Issue 1 (June 2013)

Volume 16 (2012): Issue 3 (December 2012)

Volume 16 (2012): Issue 2 (December 2012) Language as a Tool for Interaction, Issue Editor: Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi

Volume 16 (2012): Issue 1 (June 2012)

Volume 15 (2011): Issue 2 (December 2011)

Volume 15 (2011): Issue 1 (June 2011)

Volume 14 (2010): Issue 2 (December 2010)

Volume 14 (2010): Issue 1 (June 2010)

Volume 13 (2009): Issue 2 (December 2009)

Volume 13 (2009): Issue 1 (June 2009)

Volume 12 (2008): Issue 2 (December 2008)

Volume 12 (2008): Issue 1 (June 2008)

Psychology of Language and Communication

 Psychology of Language and Communication is co-financed by the Polish Ministry of Education and Science (Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki) under the program "Rozwój Czasopism Naukowych" (RCN/SP/0485/2021/1).   Obituary Tribute: Jan E. Okuniewski   Obituary Tribute: Grace Wales Shugar   Psychology of Language and Communication is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal committed to publishing high quality science in the areas of language and communication. We have endorsed and followed the Diamond Open Access standard since our foundation in 1997. Both submitting manuscripts and accessing full-text articles is free of charge.   We publish articles on different aspects of psychological studies on language and communication processes in both children and adults, including language production and comprehension, the brain, cognitive and social bases of speech, the nature and strategies of various types of discourse, language development and disorders of linguistic and communicative competences, corpus studies, social media communication, psychological text analysis, social perception of spoken and written language, as well as human-AI communication.   Psychology of Language and Communication integrates previously disparate perspectives and approaches in the psychology of communication in one place, advancing an interdisciplinary perspective on language and communication and granting a forum for researchers from all over the world. We welcome manuscripts representing perspectives in psychology, linguistics, sociology, philosophy, and computer science, although they should fit within the central scope of psychology. We feel strongly that through these multiple perspectives, we can contribute a more thorough understanding of the role that language and communication processes play in our world. We welcome original empirical studies (as full-length articles or short reports) as well as replication studies and reports of null findings. We are also keen to report on methodological advancements in the areas of language and communication research, theoretical papers, and literature reviews.   We are eager to work with students and Early Career Researchers who have carried out solid work yet might need additional support and feedback to bring their work to the standards necessary for peer-reviewed publication.　   We encourage special issues of two types. First, researchers can suggest calls for papers and to be guest editors and cooperate with us. Secondly, we invite conference and symposium organizers to contact us ahead of time regarding the publication of special issues. We are eager to provide an outlet for high quality, thematically consistent collections of papers following a conference. Possible themes include both novel areas, approaches, and directions in the psychology of language and communication as well as overviews and critical reflections on established topics.   For the previous issues go to plc.psychologia.pl/   Why submit    All submissions, after a preliminary assessment by a member of the Editorial Board are sent out for a thorough evaluation to two or three peer reviewers in a doubleblind review process, i.e., the identities of authors and reviewers are not revealed,   promotion of each published article,   fast publishing,   publishing without charge.      We are indexed in the following databases, among others:    Scopus   DOAJ   PsychINFO   EBSCO      Rejection Rate    60%      Follow us on Twitter   Archiving   Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.   Plagiarism Policy   The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 