Comparison between cryoablation and irreversible electroporation of rabbit livers at a location close to the gallbladder
, , , , , , , and
Jan 14, 2016
About this article
Article Category: Research Article
Published Online: Jan 14, 2016
Page range: 40 - 46
Received: Aug 26, 2016
Accepted: Nov 19, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2017-0003
Keywords
© 2017 Jianying Zeng, Zilin Qin, Liang Zhou, Gang Fang, Jibing Chen, Jialiang Li, Lizhi Niu, Bing Liang, Kecheng Xu
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.






Sizes of liver and gallbladder lesions at 7 days after the ablation (X̅± s)
Ablation | Major diameter of liver lesions (cm) | Gallbladder lesions | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
methods | Gallbladder side (n = 12) | Diaphragm side (n = 12) | P value | Major diameter (cm) | P value |
Cryo | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 3.8 ± 0.8 | > 0.05 | 1.5 ± 0.4 (n = 8) | > 0.05 |
IRE | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 4.1 ± 0.7 | > 0.05 | 0.8 ± 0.2 (n = 12) |
Changes in aminotransferase and serum bilirubin levels over time (X̅± s)
Hepatic function | Ablation method | d-1 | d-1 | d-3 | d-5 | d-7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALT | RE | 38.35 ± 3.22 | 167.05 ± 19.50 | 214.83 ± 10.37 | 119.60 ± 12.99 | 68.25 ± 10.08 |
Cryo | 39.20 ± 3.90 | 195.03 ± 9.75 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 289.58 ± 12.81 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 142.35 ± 57.85 P < 0.05 | 94.90 ± 9.78 P < 0.05 | |
AST(U/L) | IRE | 34.10 ± 0.86 | 47.64 ± 0.69 | 60.21 ± 2.55 | 46.78 ± 1.71 | 31.05 ± 0.43 |
Cryo | 35.26 ± 2.45 | 60.11 ± 3.44 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 79.12 ± 2.58 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 52.80 ± 3.41 P < 0.05 | 37.41 ± 2.50 P < 0.05 | |
Serum bilirubin | RE | 8.08 ± 2.19 | 26.01 ± 3.68 | 35.15 ± 5.70 | 29.09 ± 3.27 | 21.41 ± 3.39 |
Cryo | 7.59 ± 2.01 | 32.72 ± 4.08 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 37.34 ± 6.14 P < 0.05 | 35.88 ± 4.28 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 25.86 ± 5.37 P < 0.05 |