Comparison between cryoablation and irreversible electroporation of rabbit livers at a location close to the gallbladder
, , , , , , , y
14 ene 2016
Acerca de este artículo
Categoría del artículo: Research Article
Publicado en línea: 14 ene 2016
Páginas: 40 - 46
Recibido: 26 ago 2016
Aceptado: 19 nov 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2017-0003
Palabras clave
© 2017 Jianying Zeng, Zilin Qin, Liang Zhou, Gang Fang, Jibing Chen, Jialiang Li, Lizhi Niu, Bing Liang, Kecheng Xu
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.






Sizes of liver and gallbladder lesions at 7 days after the ablation (X̅± s)
Ablation | Major diameter of liver lesions (cm) | Gallbladder lesions | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
methods | Gallbladder side (n = 12) | Diaphragm side (n = 12) | P value | Major diameter (cm) | P value |
Cryo | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 3.8 ± 0.8 | > 0.05 | 1.5 ± 0.4 (n = 8) | > 0.05 |
IRE | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 4.1 ± 0.7 | > 0.05 | 0.8 ± 0.2 (n = 12) |
Changes in aminotransferase and serum bilirubin levels over time (X̅± s)
Hepatic function | Ablation method | d-1 | d-1 | d-3 | d-5 | d-7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALT | RE | 38.35 ± 3.22 | 167.05 ± 19.50 | 214.83 ± 10.37 | 119.60 ± 12.99 | 68.25 ± 10.08 |
Cryo | 39.20 ± 3.90 | 195.03 ± 9.75 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 289.58 ± 12.81 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 142.35 ± 57.85 P < 0.05 | 94.90 ± 9.78 P < 0.05 | |
AST(U/L) | IRE | 34.10 ± 0.86 | 47.64 ± 0.69 | 60.21 ± 2.55 | 46.78 ± 1.71 | 31.05 ± 0.43 |
Cryo | 35.26 ± 2.45 | 60.11 ± 3.44 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 79.12 ± 2.58 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 52.80 ± 3.41 P < 0.05 | 37.41 ± 2.50 P < 0.05 | |
Serum bilirubin | RE | 8.08 ± 2.19 | 26.01 ± 3.68 | 35.15 ± 5.70 | 29.09 ± 3.27 | 21.41 ± 3.39 |
Cryo | 7.59 ± 2.01 | 32.72 ± 4.08 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 37.34 ± 6.14 P < 0.05 | 35.88 ± 4.28 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 25.86 ± 5.37 P < 0.05 |