Comparison between cryoablation and irreversible electroporation of rabbit livers at a location close to the gallbladder
, , , , , , , e
14 gen 2016
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Categoria dell'articolo: Research Article
Pubblicato online: 14 gen 2016
Pagine: 40 - 46
Ricevuto: 26 ago 2016
Accettato: 19 nov 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2017-0003
Parole chiave
© 2017 Jianying Zeng, Zilin Qin, Liang Zhou, Gang Fang, Jibing Chen, Jialiang Li, Lizhi Niu, Bing Liang, Kecheng Xu
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.






Sizes of liver and gallbladder lesions at 7 days after the ablation (X̅± s)
Ablation | Major diameter of liver lesions (cm) | Gallbladder lesions | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
methods | Gallbladder side (n = 12) | Diaphragm side (n = 12) | P value | Major diameter (cm) | P value |
Cryo | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 3.8 ± 0.8 | > 0.05 | 1.5 ± 0.4 (n = 8) | > 0.05 |
IRE | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 4.1 ± 0.7 | > 0.05 | 0.8 ± 0.2 (n = 12) |
Changes in aminotransferase and serum bilirubin levels over time (X̅± s)
Hepatic function | Ablation method | d-1 | d-1 | d-3 | d-5 | d-7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALT | RE | 38.35 ± 3.22 | 167.05 ± 19.50 | 214.83 ± 10.37 | 119.60 ± 12.99 | 68.25 ± 10.08 |
Cryo | 39.20 ± 3.90 | 195.03 ± 9.75 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 289.58 ± 12.81 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 142.35 ± 57.85 P < 0.05 | 94.90 ± 9.78 P < 0.05 | |
AST(U/L) | IRE | 34.10 ± 0.86 | 47.64 ± 0.69 | 60.21 ± 2.55 | 46.78 ± 1.71 | 31.05 ± 0.43 |
Cryo | 35.26 ± 2.45 | 60.11 ± 3.44 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 79.12 ± 2.58 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 52.80 ± 3.41 P < 0.05 | 37.41 ± 2.50 P < 0.05 | |
Serum bilirubin | RE | 8.08 ± 2.19 | 26.01 ± 3.68 | 35.15 ± 5.70 | 29.09 ± 3.27 | 21.41 ± 3.39 |
Cryo | 7.59 ± 2.01 | 32.72 ± 4.08 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 37.34 ± 6.14 P < 0.05 | 35.88 ± 4.28 P < 0.01, compared with the IRE group | 25.86 ± 5.37 P < 0.05 |