Zeszyty

Zeszyty czasopisma

Tom 25 (2023): Zeszyt 1 (March 2023)

Tom 24 (2022): Zeszyt 1 (October 2022)

Tom 23 (2020): Zeszyt 2 (December 2020)

Tom 23 (2020): Zeszyt 1 (July 2020)

Tom 22 (2019): Zeszyt 2 (December 2019)

Tom 22 (2019): Zeszyt 1 (July 2019)

Tom 21 (2018): Zeszyt 2 (December 2018)

Tom 21 (2018): Zeszyt 1 (July 2018)

Tom 20 (2017): Zeszyt 2 (December 2017)

Tom 20 (2017): Zeszyt 1 (June 2017)

Tom 19 (2016): Zeszyt 2 (December 2016)

Tom 19 (2016): Zeszyt 1 (July 2016)

Tom 18 (2015): Zeszyt 2 (December 2015)

Tom 18 (2015): Zeszyt 1 (July 2015)

Tom 17 (2014): Zeszyt 2 (December 2014)

Tom 17 (2014): Zeszyt 1 (July 2014)

Informacje o czasopiśmie
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
1027-5207
Pierwsze wydanie
11 Dec 2014
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski

Wyszukiwanie

Tom 25 (2023): Zeszyt 1 (March 2023)

Informacje o czasopiśmie
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
1027-5207
Pierwsze wydanie
11 Dec 2014
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski

Wyszukiwanie

4 Artykułów
Otwarty dostęp

Measuring usage versus preferences for online study materials among business-majored undergraduates

Data publikacji: 30 Mar 2023
Zakres stron: 16 - 30

Abstrakt

Abstract

As online learning becomes a recurrent component of higher education, there have been growing interests in the interaction between students and educational resources within digital environments so as to understand and facilitate students’ initiative in managing those resources. The present study is an explorative inquiry into the relationships between students’ self-reported preferences of study materials, their actual usage of those materials and their learning performances in online learning. It focuses on analysing the learning management system’s log files, test results and students’ responses to an evaluative survey of a bachelor business course at a large Belgian university, which was a blended course turned fully online due to the pandemic circumstance. The first research question concerns how preferences relate to the usage of materials. A cluster analysis was conducted to classify students based on their perceived interest and actual access to learning resources. The results show three clusters of students with different preferences and levels of usage towards the four types of study materials provided in the course. However, the majority showed strong favour for multimedia online learning, with Web lectures being prioritised both in perception and access behaviour, while discussion boards receive mixed opinions and the lowest actual participation. The second question follows these up by linking the preference–usage patterns with academic performances. A multivariate analysis of variance was conducted to compare the learning performances of students with different preference–usage patterns. The results show no significant differences, which means the students’ preferences and/or usage of study materials has little to no impact on their learning performances in the online course.

Słowa kluczowe

  • Online learning
  • Media preferences
  • Tool use
  • Access behaviour
  • LMS data learning
4 Artykułów
Otwarty dostęp

Measuring usage versus preferences for online study materials among business-majored undergraduates

Data publikacji: 30 Mar 2023
Zakres stron: 16 - 30

Abstrakt

Abstract

As online learning becomes a recurrent component of higher education, there have been growing interests in the interaction between students and educational resources within digital environments so as to understand and facilitate students’ initiative in managing those resources. The present study is an explorative inquiry into the relationships between students’ self-reported preferences of study materials, their actual usage of those materials and their learning performances in online learning. It focuses on analysing the learning management system’s log files, test results and students’ responses to an evaluative survey of a bachelor business course at a large Belgian university, which was a blended course turned fully online due to the pandemic circumstance. The first research question concerns how preferences relate to the usage of materials. A cluster analysis was conducted to classify students based on their perceived interest and actual access to learning resources. The results show three clusters of students with different preferences and levels of usage towards the four types of study materials provided in the course. However, the majority showed strong favour for multimedia online learning, with Web lectures being prioritised both in perception and access behaviour, while discussion boards receive mixed opinions and the lowest actual participation. The second question follows these up by linking the preference–usage patterns with academic performances. A multivariate analysis of variance was conducted to compare the learning performances of students with different preference–usage patterns. The results show no significant differences, which means the students’ preferences and/or usage of study materials has little to no impact on their learning performances in the online course.

Słowa kluczowe

  • Online learning
  • Media preferences
  • Tool use
  • Access behaviour
  • LMS data learning

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo