[
Aarts, E.H.L. and van Laarhoven, P.J.M. (1987). Simulated annealing: A pedestrian review of the theory and some applications, in P.A. Devijver and J. Kittler (Eds), Pattern Recognition Theory and Applications, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 179–192.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Abdullah, A.S., Selvakumar, S., Karthikeyan, P. and Venkatesh, M. (2017). Comparing the efficacy of decision tree and its variants using medical data, Indian Journal of Science and Technology 10: 1–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Akshaikhdeeb, B. and Ahmad, K. (2017). Feature selection for chemical compound extraction using wrapper approach with naive Bayes classifier, 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI), Langkawi, Malaysia, pp. 1–6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anthony, T., Tian, Z. and Barber, D. (2017). Thinking fast and slow with deep learning and tree search, Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Azhagusundari, B. and Thanamani, A.S. (2013). Feature selection based on information gain, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering 2(2): 18–21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bilalli, B., Abelló, A. and Aluja-Banet, T. (2017). On the predictive power of metafeatures in OpenML, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 27(4): 697–712, DOI: 10.1515/amcs-2017-0048.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Bo, L. and Rein, L. (2005). Comparison of the Luus–Jaakola optimization procedure and the genetic algorithm, Engineering Optimization 37(4): 381–396.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bo, Z.W., Hua, L.Z. and Yu, Z.G. (2006). Optimization of process route by genetic algorithms, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 22: 180–188.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolón-Canedo, V. and Alonso-Betanzos, A. (2019). Ensembles for feature selection: A review and future trends, Information Fusion 52: 1–12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brazdil, P., Giraud-Carrier, C., Soares, C. and Vilalta, R. (2009). Metalearning: Applications to Data Minings, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chandrashekar, G. and Sahin, F. (2014). A survey on feature selection methods, Computers & Electrical Engineering 40(1): 16–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chengzhang, L. and Jiucheng, X. (2019). Feature selection with the Fisher score followed by the maximal clique centrality algorithm can accurately identify the hub genes of hepatocellular carcinoma, Scientific Reports 9: 17283.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drori, I., Krishnamurthy, Y., Rampin, R., de Paula Lourenco, R., Ono, J.P., Cho, K., Silva, C. and Freire, J. (2018). AlphaD3M: Machine learning pipeline synthesis, AutoML Workshop at ICML, Stockholm, Sweden.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Engels, R. and Theusinger, C. (1998). Using a data metric for preprocessing advice for data mining applications, European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Brighton, UK, pp. 23–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erickson, N., Mueller, J., Shirkov, A., Zhang, H., Larroy, P., Li, M. and Smola, A. (2020). AutoGluon-tabular: Robust and accurate AutoML for structured data, arXiv: 2003.06505.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feurer, M., Eggensperger, K., Falkner, S., Lindauer, M. and Hutter, F. (2020). Auto-Sklearn 2.0: Hands-free AutoML via meta-learning, arXiv: 2007.04074.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feurer, M., Klevin, A., Eggensperger, K., Springenberg, J.T., Blum, M. and Hutter, F. (2019). Auto-sklearn: Efficient and robust automated machine learning, in F. Hutter et al. (Eds), Automated Machine Learning, Springer, Cham, pp. 113–134.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feurer, M., Springenberg, J.T. and Hutter, F. (2014). Using meta-learning to initialize Bayesian optimization of hyperparameters, International Conference on Metalearning and Algorithm Selection, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 3–10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feurer, M., Springenberg, J.T. and Hutter, F. (2015). Initializing Bayesian hyperparameter optimization via meta-learning, Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Austin, USA, pp. 1128–1135.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freitas, A.A. (2014). Comprehensible classification models: A position paper, ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 15(1): 1–10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fushiki, T. (2011). Estimation of prediction error by using k-fold cross-validation, Statistical Computation 21: 137–146.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ghaheri, A., Shoar, S., Naderan, M. and Hoseini, S.S. (2005). The applications of genetic algorithms in medicine, Oman Medical Journal 30(6): 406–416.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gil, Y., Yao, K.-T., Ratnakar, V., Garijo, D., Steeg, G.V., Szekely, P., Brekelmans, R., Kejriwal, M., Lau, F. and Huang, I.-H. (2018). P4ml: A phased performance-based pipeline planner for automated machine learning, AutoML Workshop at ICML, Stockholm, Sweden.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grabmeier, J.L. and Lambe, L.A. (2007). Decision trees for binary classification variables grow equally with the Gini impurity measure and Pearson’s chi-square test, International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining 2(2): 213–226.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gu, Q., Li, Z. and Han, J. (2011). Generalized Fisher score for feature selection, Proceedings of the 27th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Barcelona, Spain, p. 266–273.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
He, X., Zhao, K. and Chu, X. (2021). AutoML: A survey of the state-of-the-art, Knowledge-Based Systems 212: 106622.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holland, J.H. (1992). Genetic algorithms, Scientific American 267(1): 66–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ivosev, G., Burton, L. and Bonner, R. (2008). Dimensionality reduction and visualization in principal component analysis, Analytical Chemistry 80(13): 4933–4944.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kang, Y., Cai, Z., Tan, C.-W., Huang, Q. and Liu, H. (2020). Natural language processing (NLP) in management research: A literature review, Journal of Management Analytics 7(2): 139–172.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kanna, S.S. and Ramaraj, N. (2010). Feature selection algorithms: A survey and experimental evaluation, Knowledge-Based Systems 23(6): 580–585.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keren Simon, L., Liberzon, A. and Lazebnik, T. (2023). A computational framework for physics-informed symbolic regression with straightforward integration of domain knowledge, Scientific Reports 13(1): 1249.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kietz, J.-U., Serban, F., Bernstein, A. and Fischer, S. (2012). Designing KDD workflows via HTN-planning for intelligent discovery assistance, 5th Planning to Learn Workshop at the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montpellier, France.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kumar, V. and Minz, S. (2014). Feature selection: A literature review, Smart Computing Review 4(3): 211–229.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kusy, M. and Zajdel, R. (2021). A weighted wrapper approach to feature selection, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 31(4): 685–696, DOI: 10.34768/amcs-2021-0047.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Lazebnik, T., Zaher, B., Bunimovich-Mendrazitsky, S. and Halachmi, S. (2022). Predicting acute kidney injury following open partial nephrectomy treatment using sat-pruned explainable machine learning model, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 22: 133.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lemka, C., Budka, M. and Gabrys, B. (2015). Metalearning: A survey of trends and technologies, Artificial Intelligence Review 44(1): 117–130.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin, X., Li, C., Ren, W., Luo, X. and Qi, Y. (2019). A new feature selection method based on symmetrical uncertainty and interaction gain, Computational Biology and Chemistry 83: 107149.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu, Y., Mu, Y., Chen, K., Li, Y. and Guo, J. (2020). Daily activity feature selection in smart homes based on Pearson correlation coefficient, Neural Processing Letters 51: 1771–1787.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Luo, G. (2016). A review of automatic selection methods for machine learning algorithms and hyper-parameter values, Network Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics 5(1): 18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ma, L., Li, M., Gao, Y., Chen, T., Ma, X. and Qu, L. (2017). A novel wrapper approach for feature selection in object-based image classification using polygon-based cross-validation, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 14(3): 409 – 413.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maile, H., Li, J.O., Gore, D., Leucci, M., Mulholland, P., Hau, S., Szabo, A., Moghul, I., Balaskas, K., Fujinami, K., Hysi, P., Davidson, A., Liskova, P. Hardcastle, A., Tuft, S. and Pontikos, N. (2021). Machine learning algorithms to detect subclinical keratoconus: Systematic review, JMIR Medical Informatics 9(12): e27363.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molina, L.C., Belanche, L. and Nebot, A. (2002). Feature selection algorithms: A survey and experimental evaluation, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Maebashi City, Japan, pp. 306–313.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mussa, D.J. and Jameel, N. G.M. (2019). Relevant SMS spam feature selection using wrapper approach and XGBoost algorithm, Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research 4(2): 110–120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muthukrishnan, R. and Rohini, R. (2016). Lasso: A feature selection technique in predictive modeling for machine learning, IEEE International Conference on Advances in Computer Applications (ICACA), Coimbatore, India, pp. 18–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neumann, J., Schnorr, C. and Steidl, G. (2005). Combined SVM-based feature selection and classification, Machine Learning 61: 129–150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nguyen, P., Hilario, M. and Kalousis, A. (2014). Using meta-mining to support data mining workflow planning and optimization, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 51: 605–644.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nisioti, E., Chatzidimitriou, K.C. and Symeonidis, A.L. (2018). Predicting hyperparameters from meta-features in binary classification problems, AutoML Workshop at International Conference on Machine Learning, Stockholm, Sweden.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oliveto, P. S. and Witt, C. (2015). Improved time complexity analysis of the simple genetic algorithm, Theoretical Computer Science 605: 21–41,
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Olson, R.S. and Moore, J.H. (2016). TPOT: A tree-based pipeline optimization tool for automating machine learning, JMLR: Workshop and Conference Proceedings 64: 66–74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ometto, G., Moghul, I., Montesano, G., Hunter, A., Pontikos, N., Jones, P. R., Keane, P.A., Liu, X., Denniston, A.K. and Crabb, D.P. (2019). ReLayer: A free, online tool for extracting retinal thickness from cross-platform oct images, Translational Vision Science and Technology 8(3): 25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python, Journal of Machine Learning Research 12: 2825–2830.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pinto, F., Cerqueira, V., Soares, C. and Mendes-Moreira, J. (2017). Autobagging: Learning to rank bagging workflows with metalearning, arXiv: 1706.09367.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plackett, R.L. (1983). Karl Pearson and the chi-squared test, International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique 51: 59–72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reif, M., Shafait, F. and Dengel, A. (2012). Meta-learning for evolutionary parameter optimization of classifiers, Machine Learning 87: 357–380.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rice, J.R. (1976). The algorithm selection problem, Advances in Computers 15: 65–118.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rokach, L. (2016). Decision forest: Twenty years of research, Information Fusion 27: 111–125.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosenfeld, A. (2021). Better metrics for evaluating explainable artificial intelligence, AAMAS’21: 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 45–50, (virtual).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosenfeld, A. and Freiman, M. (2021). Explainable feature ensembles through homogeneous and heterogeneous intersections, JCAI-PRICAI 2020 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence, (online).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosenfeld, A., Graham, D.G., Hamoudi, R., Butawan, R., Eneh, V., Khan, S., Miah, H., Niranjan, M. and Lovat, L.B. (2015). MIAT: A novel attribute selection approach to better predict upper gastrointestinal cancer, International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics, Paris, France.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosenfeld, A. and Richardson, A. (2019). Explainability in human-agent systems, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 33(6): 673–705.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saeys, Y., Abeel, T. and de Peer, Y.V. (2008). Robust feature selection using ensemble feature selection techniques, in W. Daelemans et al. (Eds), Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Springer, Berlin, pp. 313–325.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Savchenko, E. and Lazebnik, T. (2022). Computer aided functional style identification and correction in modern Russian texts, Journal of Data, Information and Management 4: 25–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seijo-Pardo, B., Porto-Díaz, I., Bolón-Canedo, V. and Alonso-Betanzos, A. (2017). Ensemble feature selection: Homogeneous and heterogeneous approaches, Knowledge-Based Systems 118: 124–139.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Serban, F., Vanschoren, J., Kietz, J.U. and Bernstein, A.A. (2013). A survey of intelligent assistants for data analysis, ACM Computing Surveys 45(3): 1–35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sharma, A., Imoto, S. and Miyano, S. (2012). A top-r feature selection algorithm for microarray gene expression data, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 9(3): 754–764.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shatte, A.B.R., Hutchinson, D.M. and Teague, S.J. (2019). Machine learning in mental health: A scoping review of methods and applications, Psychological Medicine 49(9): 1426–1448.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shen, Z., Chen, X. and Garibaldi, J.M. (2020). A novel meta learning framework for feature selection using data synthesis and fuzzy similarity, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, (online).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shilbayeh, S. and Vadera, S. (2014). Feature selection in meta learning framework, Science and Information Conference, London, UK, pp. 269–275.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith-Miles, K.A. (2009). Cross-disciplinary perspectives on meta-learning for algorithm selection, ACM Computational Surveys 41(1): 6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soares, C., Brazdil, P.B. and Kuba, P. (2004). A meta-learning method to select the kernel width in support vector regression, Machine Learning 54: 195–209.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strang, B., van der Putten, P., van Rijn, J.N. and Hutter, F. (2018). Don’t rule out simple models prematurely: A large scale benchmark comparing linear and non-linear classifiers in OpenML, in W. Duivesteijn et al. (Eds), Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis XVII, Springer, Berlin, pp. 303–315.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swain, P. H. and Hauska, H. (1977). The decision tree classifier: Design and potential, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics 15(3): 142–147.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, J., Alelyani, S. and Liu, H. (2014). Feature Selection for Classification: A Review, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teisseyre, P. (2022). Joint feature selection and classification for positive unlabelled multi-label data using weighted penalized empirical risk minimization, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 32(2): 311–322, DOI: 10.34768/amcs-2022-0023.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Tokarev, K.E., Zotov, V.M., Khavronina, V.N. and Rodionova, O.V. (2021). Convolutional neural network of deep learning in computer vision and image classification problems, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 786(1): 012040.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vanschoren, J. (2018). Meta-learning: A survey, arXiv: 1810.03548.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vasan, K.K. and Surendiran, B. (2016). Dimensionality reduction using principal component analysis for network intrusion detection, Perspectives in Science 8: 510–512.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waring, J., Lindvall, C. and Umeton, R. (2020). Automated machine learning: Review of the state-of-the-art and opportunities for healthcare, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 104: 101822.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wasimuddin, M., Elleithy, K., Abuzneid, A.-S., Faezipour, M. and Abuzaghleh, O. (2020). Stages-based ECG signal analysis from traditional signal processing to machine learning approaches: A survey, IEEE Access 8: 177782–177803.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu, S., Roberts, K., Datta, S., Du, J., Ji, Z., Si, Y., Soni, S., Wang, Q., Wei, Q., Xiang, Y., Zhao, B. and Xu, H. (2020). Deep learning in clinical natural language processing: A methodical review, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 27(3): 457–470.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zebari, R.R., Abdulazeez, A.M., Zeebaree, D.Q., Zebari, D.A. and Saeed, J.N. (2020). A comprehensive review of dimensionality reduction techniques for feature selection and feature extraction, Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends 1(2): 56–70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhu, X., Huang, Z., T., S.H., Cheng, J. and Xu, C. (2012). Dimensionality reduction by mixed kernel canonical correlation analysis, Pattern Recognition 45(8): 3003–3016.
]Search in Google Scholar
