This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Çelebi, E., Goktepe, F., Karahan, N. (2012). Non-linear finite element analysis for prediction of seismic response of buildings considering soil-structure interaction. Natural hazards and earth system science, 12: 3495–3505.ÇelebiE.GoktepeF.KarahanN.2012Non-linear finite element analysis for prediction of seismic response of buildings considering soil-structure interaction123495350510.5194/nhess-12-3495-2012Search in Google Scholar
Farghaly, A.A., Ahmed, H.H. (2013). Contribution of soil-structure interaction to seismic response of buildings. Geotechnical engineering, 17(5): 959–971.FarghalyA.A.AhmedH.H.2013Contribution of soil-structure interaction to seismic response of buildings17595997110.1007/s12205-013-0261-9Search in Google Scholar
Park, J.H., Choo, J.F., Cho, J.R. (2013). Dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis for complex soil profiles using unaligned mesh generation and nonlinear modeling approach. Structural engineering, 17(4): 753–762.ParkJ.H.ChooJ.F.ChoJ.R.2013Dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis for complex soil profiles using unaligned mesh generation and nonlinear modeling approach17475376210.1007/s12205-013-0135-1Search in Google Scholar
Jia, J. (2018). Soil dynamics and foundation modeling, offshore and earthquake engineering Springer nature, Bergen, Norway.JiaJ.2018Bergen, Norway10.1007/978-3-319-40358-8Search in Google Scholar
EC8-2004 (English): Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 5 : Foundation, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects.Search in Google Scholar
FEMA 440 (2005), Recommended Improvements of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Applied Technology Council: California.FEMA 4402005Applied Technology CouncilCaliforniaSearch in Google Scholar
ASCE (2010): Applied Technology Council. ‘Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings’ ATC-3-06: California.ASCE2010‘Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings’ ATC-3-06CaliforniaSearch in Google Scholar
Breysse, D., La Borderie, C., Elachachi, S.M., Niandou, H. (2007). Spatial variation in soil properties and their influence on structural reliability. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 2(24): 73–86.BreysseD.La BorderieC.ElachachiS.M.NiandouH.2007Spatial variation in soil properties and their influence on structural reliability224738610.1080/10286600601156673Search in Google Scholar
Cottereau, R., Clouteau, D., Soize, C. (2007). Probabilistic impedance of foundation: impact on the seismic design on uncertain soils. Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics, 1: 1–17.CottereauR.ClouteauD.SoizeC.2007Probabilistic impedance of foundation: impact on the seismic design on uncertain soils111710.1002/eqe.794Search in Google Scholar
Guellil, M.E., Harichane, Z., Djilali, B., Sadouki, A. (2017). Soil and structure uncetrtainty effects on the soil foundation structure dynamic response. Earthquake and structure, 2: 153–163.GuellilM.E.HarichaneZ.DjilaliB.SadoukiA.2017Soil and structure uncetrtainty effects on the soil foundation structure dynamic response215316310.12989/eas.2017.12.2.153Search in Google Scholar
Harichane, Z., Guellil, M.E., Gadouri, H. (2018). Benefits of probabilistic soil-foundation-structure interaction analysis. Inter Jour of Geotechnical earthquake engineering, 9(1): 43–64.HarichaneZ.GuellilM.E.GadouriH.2018Benefits of probabilistic soil-foundation-structure interaction analysis91436410.4018/IJGEE.2018010103Search in Google Scholar
Pitilakisa, D., Dietz, M., Wood, D.M., Clouteau, C., Modaressi, A. (2008). Numerical simulation of dynamic soil–structure interaction in shaking table testing. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28: 453–467.PitilakisaD.DietzM.WoodD.M.ClouteauC.ModaressiA.2008Numerical simulation of dynamic soil–structure interaction in shaking table testing2845346710.1016/j.soildyn.2007.07.011Search in Google Scholar
Van Nguyen, Q., Ftahi, B., Hokmabadi, A.S. (2017). Influence of Size and Load-Bearing Mechanism of Piles on Seismic Performance of Buildings Considering Soil–Pile Structure Interaction. International Journal of Geomechanics (ASCE), DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000869.Van NguyenQ.FtahiB.HokmabadiA.S.2017Influence of Size and Load-Bearing Mechanism of Piles on Seismic Performance of Buildings Considering Soil–Pile Structure Interaction10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000869Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chehata, A., Harichane, Z., Karray, M. (2017). Non-linear soil modelling by correction of the hysteretic damping using a modified Iwan model together with Masing rules. InternatIonal Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1–13.ChehataA.HarichaneZ.KarrayM.2017Non-linear soil modelling by correction of the hysteretic damping using a modified Iwan model together with Masing rules11310.1080/19386362.2017.1376393Search in Google Scholar
Brennan, A.J. Thusyanthan, N.I. Madabhushi, S.P.J. (2005). Evaluation of shear modulus and damping in dynamic centrifuge tests. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1488).BrennanA.J.ThusyanthanN.I.MadabhushiS.P.J.2005Evaluation of shear modulus and damping in dynamic centrifuge tests10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1488)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kishida, T. (2016). Comparaison and correction of modulus reduction models for clays and silts. J. geotechnical and geoenvironemental Engineering.KishidaT.2016Comparaison and correction of modulus reduction models for clays and siltsSearch in Google Scholar
RPA99, version (2003) Règlement parasismique Algérienne. Central national de recherche appliquée en génie parasismique.RPA99, version2003Central national de recherche appliquée en génie parasismiqueSearch in Google Scholar
International Building Code (IBC) (2015) Chapter 16 – Section 1613 ICC Central Regional Office, Country Club Hills (IL, USA).International Building Code (IBC)2015Country Club Hills (IL, USA)Search in Google Scholar
IS 1893-2002 Part-1 Criteria For Earthquake Resistant Deign of Structures Part-1 General Provisions And Buildings Fifth Revision.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Ahmari, S. (2011). Nonlinear analysis of laterally loaded rigid piles in cohesive soil. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech, DOI: 10.1002/nag.1094ZhangL.AhmariS.2011Nonlinear analysis of laterally loaded rigid piles in cohesive soil10.1002/nag.1094Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ravikumar, C.R., Gunneswara, T.D.R. (2012). Study of soil interaction in a model building frame with plinth beam supported by pile group. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 4(11): 1–15.RavikumarC.R.GunneswaraT.D.R.2012Study of soil interaction in a model building frame with plinth beam supported by pile group411115Search in Google Scholar
Truty, A. (2018). On consistent nonlinear analysis of soil–structure interaction problems. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 40(2): 86–95.TrutyA.2018On consistent nonlinear analysis of soil–structure interaction problems402869510.2478/sgem-2018-0019Search in Google Scholar
Haldar, S., Basu, D. (2016). Analysis of Beams on Heterogeneous and Nonlinear Soil. International Journal of Geomechanics. International Journal of Geomechanics, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000599.HaldarS.BasuD.2016Analysis of Beams on Heterogeneous and Nonlinear Soil. International Journal of Geomechanics10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000599Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tsai, C.C., Liu in, H.W. (2017). Site response analysis of vertical ground motion in consideration of soil nonlinearity. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 102: 124–136.TsaiC.C.Liu inH.W.2017Site response analysis of vertical ground motion in consideration of soil nonlinearity10212413610.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.024Search in Google Scholar
Jastrzębska, M., Lupieżowiec, M., Uliniarz, R., Jaroń, A. (2014). Analysis of the vibration propagation in the subsoil. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 26(3): 9–19. DOI: 10.2478/sgem-2014-0023.JastrzębskaM.LupieżowiecM.UliniarzR.JarońA.2014Analysis of the vibration propagation in the subsoil26391910.2478/sgem-2014-0023Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Okada, T., Fujita, K., Takewaki, I. (2016). Robustness evaluation of seismic pile response considering uncertainty mechanism of soil properties. Innovative infrastructure solutions, DOI 10.1007/s41062-016-0009-8.OkadaT.FujitaK.TakewakiI.2016Robustness evaluation of seismic pile response considering uncertainty mechanism of soil properties10.1007/s41062-016-0009-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chowdhury, I., Dasgupta, S.P. (2009). Dynamics of structure and foundation – A Unified Approach, 2. Applications. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK.ChowdhuryI.DasguptaS.P.2009Taylor & Francis GroupLondon, UKSearch in Google Scholar
Raychowdhury, P., Singh, P. (2012). Effect of nonlinear soil-structure interaction on seismic response of low-rise SMRF buildings. Earthquake Engineering And Engineering Vibration, 11(4) : 541–551. DOI: 10.1007/s11803-012-0140-2.RaychowdhuryP.SinghP.2012Effect of nonlinear soil-structure interaction on seismic response of low-rise SMRF buildings11454155110.1007/s11803-012-0140-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hu, Q., Li, H., Yang, G., Cai, Y. (2019). Effects of uncertainty of dynamic shear modulus ratio on design ground motion. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 56(2): 82–90. DOI 10.1007/s11204-019-09574-x.HuQ.LiH.YangG.CaiY.2019Effects of uncertainty of dynamic shear modulus ratio on design ground motion562829010.1007/s11204-019-09574-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Uzielli, M., Lacasse, S., Nadim, F., Phoon, K.K. (2016). Soil variability analysis for geotechnical practice. Conference: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, At Singapore. DOI: 10.1201/NOE0415426916.ch3.UzielliM.LacasseS.NadimF.PhoonK.K.2016Conference: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural SoilsAt Singapore10.1201/NOE0415426916.ch3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Manolis, G.D. (2002). Stochastic soil dynamic. International Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(1): 3–15.ManolisG.D.2002Stochastic soil dynamic22131510.1016/S0267-7261(01)00055-0Search in Google Scholar
Cao, Z., Wang, Y., Li, D. (2016). Efficient Monte Carlo Simulation of Parameter Sensitivity in Probabilistic Slope Stability Analysis. Probabilistic Approaches for Geotechnical Site Characterization and Slope Stability Analysis, 169–184.CaoZ.WangY.LiD.2016Efficient Monte Carlo Simulation of Parameter Sensitivity in Probabilistic Slope Stability Analysis16918410.1007/978-3-662-52914-0_8Search in Google Scholar
Djilali Berkane, H., Harichane, Z., Guellil, M.E., Sadouki, A. (2018). Investigation of Soil Layers Stochasticity Effects on the SpatiallyVarying Seismic Response Spectra. Indian geotechnical journal.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-018-0301-y.Djilali BerkaneH.HarichaneZ.GuellilM.E.SadoukiA.2018Investigation of Soil Layers Stochasticity Effects on the SpatiallyVarying Seismic Response Spectrahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-018-0301-y10.1007/s40098-018-0301-ySearch in Google Scholar
Górska, K., Muszyński, Z., Rybak, J. (2012). Displacement monitoring and sensitivity analysis in the observational mathod. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 35(3), 14(4): 25–43. DOI: 10.2478/sgem-2013-0028.GórskaK.MuszyńskiZ.RybakJ.2012Displacement monitoring and sensitivity analysis in the observational mathod353144254310.2478/sgem-2013-0028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Baecher, G.R., Christian, J.T. (2003). Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England.BaecherG.R.ChristianJ.T.2003John Wiley & Sons LtdEnglandSearch in Google Scholar
Martín, J. Pérez, C.J. (2008). Application of a generalized lognormal distribution to engineering data fitting. Proceedings of the European safety and reliability conference, Esrel 2008, and 17th SRA-Europe, Valencia, Spain, September, 22–25, 2008.MartínJ.PérezC.J.2008Proceedings of the European safety and reliability conference, Esrel 2008, and 17th SRA-EuropeValencia, SpainSeptember, 22–25, 2008Search in Google Scholar
Bulleit, W. (2008). Uncertainty in Structural Engineering. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, ASCE, 13(1): 24–30. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680.BulleitW.2008Uncertainty in Structural Engineering131243010.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Stewart, J.P., Kim, S., Bielak, J., Dobry, R., Power, M.S. (2003). Revisions to soil-structure interaction procedures in NEHRP design provisions. Earthquake Spectra, 19(3): 677–96.StewartJ.P.KimS.BielakJ.DobryR.PowerM.S.2003Revisions to soil-structure interaction procedures in NEHRP design provisions1936779610.1193/1.1596213Search in Google Scholar
Lutes, L.D., Sarkani, S., Jin, S. (2000). Response variability of an SSI system with uncertain structural and soil properties. Engineering Structures, 22(6): 605–620.LutesL.D.SarkaniS.JinS.2000Response variability of an SSI system with uncertain structural and soil properties22660562010.1016/S0141-0296(99)00003-6Search in Google Scholar
Badaoui, M., Berrah, M.K., Mébarki, A. (2009). Soil height randomness influence on seismic response: Case of an Algiers site. Computers and Geotechnics, 36: 102–12.BadaouiM.BerrahM.K.MébarkiA.2009Soil height randomness influence on seismic response: Case of an Algiers site361021210.1016/j.compgeo.2008.04.001Search in Google Scholar
Moghaddasi, M., Cubrinovski, M., Chase, J.G., Pampanin, S., Carr, A. (2011). Effects of soil-foundation-structure interaction on seismic structural response via robust Monte Carlo simulation. Engineering Structure, 33: 1338–1347.MoghaddasiM.CubrinovskiM.ChaseJ.G.PampaninS.CarrA.2011Effects of soil-foundation-structure interaction on seismic structural response via robust Monte Carlo simulation331338134710.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.011Search in Google Scholar
Mirzai, F., Mahsuli, M., Ghannad, M.A. (2016). Probabilistic analysis of soil-structure interaction effects on the seismic performance of structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2807.MirzaiF.MahsuliM.GhannadM.A.2016Probabilistic analysis of soil-structure interaction effects on the seismic performance of structures10.1002/eqe.2807Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kumar, M., Dass, Goel, M., Matsagar, V.A., Rao, K.S. (2014). Response of semi-buried structures subjected to multiple blast loading considering soil–structure interaction. Indian geotechnical journal, DOI10.1007/s40098-014-0143-1.KumarM.Dass GoelM.MatsagarV.A.RaoK.S.2014Response of semi-buried structures subjected to multiple blast loading considering soil–structure interaction10.1007/s40098-014-0143-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wolf, J. P., Deeks, A. J. (2004). Foundation Vibration Analysis : a Strength of Materials Approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier.WolfJ. P.DeeksA. J.2004AmsterdamElsevierSearch in Google Scholar
Pradhan, P.K., Baidya, D.K., Ghosh, D.P. (2004). Dynamic response of foundation resting on layered soil by cone model. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng, 24(6): 425–34.PradhanP.K.BaidyaD.K.GhoshD.P.2004Dynamic response of foundation resting on layered soil by cone model2464253410.1016/j.soildyn.2004.03.001Search in Google Scholar
Pradhan, P.K., Mandal, A., Baidya, D.K., Ghosh, D.P. (2008). Dynamic response of machine foundation on layered soil. Geotech. Geol. Eng, 26(4): 453–68.PradhanP.K.MandalA.BaidyaD.K.GhoshD.P.2008Dynamic response of machine foundation on layered soil2644536810.1007/s10706-008-9181-8Search in Google Scholar
Azarhoosh, Z., Ghodrati Amiri, G.R. (2010). Elastic Response of Soil-Structure Systems Subjected to Near-Fault Rupture Directivity Pulses. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering - Proceedings of Sessions of Geoshanghai 2010. Geotechnical special publication; 201: American Society of Civil Engineers 1801 Alexander Bell Drive Reston, Virginia, 20191-4400.AzarhooshZ.Ghodrati AmiriG.R.2010Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering - Proceedings of Sessions of Geoshanghai 2010. Geotechnical special publication201: American Society of Civil Engineers 1801 Alexander Bell Drive Reston, Virginia, 20191-4400Search in Google Scholar
Meek JW, Wolf JP. Cone models for homogeneous soil I. Geotechnical Engng Div, ASCE 1992; 118(5): 667–85.MeekJWWolfJPCone models for homogeneous soil I. Geotechnical Engng Div199211856678510.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:5(667)Search in Google Scholar
Meek JW, Wolf JP. Cone models for soil layer on rigid rock II. Geotechnical Engng Div, ASCE 1992; 118(5): 686–703.MeekJWWolfJPCone models for soil layer on rigid rock II. Geotechnical Engng Div1992118568670310.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:5(686)Search in Google Scholar
Wolf JP, Meek JW. Cone models for a soil layer on a flexible rock half-space. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn 1993; 22: 185–93.WolfJPMeekJWCone models for a soil layer on a flexible rock half-space1993221859310.1002/eqe.4290220302Search in Google Scholar
Meek JW, Wolf JP. Cone models for a embedded foundation. Geotechnical Engng Div, ASCE 1994; 120(1): 60–80.MeekJWWolfJPCone models for a embedded foundation. Geotechnical Engng Div19941201608010.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:1(60)Search in Google Scholar
Wolf JP, Meek JW. Dynamic stiffness of foundation on layered soil half-space using cone frustums. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn 1994; 23: 1079–95.WolfJPMeekJWDynamic stiffness of foundation on layered soil half-space using cone frustums19942310799510.1002/eqe.4290231004Search in Google Scholar
Mohasseb, S. Ghazanfari, N. Rostami, M. Rostami, S. (2020). Effect of Soil–Pile–Structure Interaction on Seismic Design of Tall and Massive Buildings Through Case Studies. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology 1: 13–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-019-00086-7MohassebS.GhazanfariN.RostamiM.RostamiS.2020Effect of Soil–Pile–Structure Interaction on Seismic Design of Tall and Massive Buildings Through Case Studies11345https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-019-00086-710.1007/s40515-019-00086-7Search in Google Scholar
Mittal, R.K., Rawat, A., Rawat, S. (2016). Soil Structure Interaction in Indian Seismic code: Recommendations for Inclusion of Potential Factors. International journal of earth sciences and engineering, 09(03): 124–130.MittalR.K.RawatA.RawatS.2016Soil Structure Interaction in Indian Seismic code: Recommendations for Inclusion of Potential Factors0903124130Search in Google Scholar
Zafarkhah, E., Dehkordi, M.R. (2017). Evaluation and numerical simulation of soil type effects on seismic soil-structure interaction response of RC structures. Journal of Vibroengineering, 19(7): 5208–5230. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2017.18286.ZafarkhahE.DehkordiM.R.2017Evaluation and numerical simulation of soil type effects on seismic soil-structure interaction response of RC structures19752085230https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2017.1828610.21595/jve.2017.18286Search in Google Scholar
Fattah, M. Y., Al-Mosawi, M. J., Al-Ameri, A. F. I., (2017), ‘Dynamic Response of Saturated Soil - Foundation System Acted upon by Vibration’, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 7, pp. 1158–1188, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1210060.FattahM. Y.Al-MosawiM. J.Al-AmeriA. F. I.2017‘Dynamic Response of Saturated Soil - Foundation System Acted upon by Vibration’21711581188Taylor & Francis Group, LLC10.1080/13632469.2016.1210060Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Li, P., Lu, X. Chen, Y. (2004). Computer simulation on dynamic soil-structure interaction system. 13th World conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, Canada.LiP.LuX.ChenY.200413th World conference on Earthquake EngineeringVancouver, CanadaSearch in Google Scholar
Fattah, M.Y. Al-Mosawi, M.J. Al-Ameri, F.I. (2016). Vibration response of saturated sand - foundation system. Int J of Earthquakes and Structures; 11(1): 83–107.FattahM.Y.Al-MosawiM.J.Al-AmeriF.I.2016Vibration response of saturated sand - foundation system1118310710.12989/eas.2016.11.1.083Search in Google Scholar
Fattah, M.Y. Zabar, B.Z. Mustafa, F.M. (2017). Effect of saturation on response of a single pile embedded in saturated sandy soil to vertical vibration. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering; 24(3): 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2017.1391126.FattahM.Y.ZabarB.Z.MustafaF.M.2017Effect of saturation on response of a single pile embedded in saturated sandy soil to vertical vibration243381400https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2017.139112610.1080/19648189.2017.1391126Search in Google Scholar
Fattah, M.Y. Al-Neami, M.A. Jajjawi, N.H. (2014). Prediction of liquefaction potential and pore water pressure beneath machine foundations. Central European Journal of Engineering. DOI: 10.2478/s13531-013-0165-y.FattahM.Y.Al-NeamiM.A.JajjawiN.H.2014Prediction of liquefaction potential and pore water pressure beneath machine foundations10.2478/s13531-013-0165-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
2015 NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions (2016) ‘Design Examples (FEMA P- 1051/July 2016)’.Search in Google Scholar
Mittal, R.K., Gajinkar, V. (2014). Evaluation of soil-structure interaction guidelines in indian seismic codes. International journal of civil engineering and technology, 5(5): 97–104.MittalR.K.GajinkarV.2014Evaluation of soil-structure interaction guidelines in indian seismic codes5597104Search in Google Scholar
Worku, A. (2014). Soil-structure- interaction provisions: A potential tool to consider for economical seismic design of buildings. Journal of the South African institution of civil engineering, 1(56): 54–62.WorkuA.2014Soil-structure- interaction provisions: A potential tool to consider for economical seismic design of buildings1565462Search in Google Scholar
Jayalekshmi, B.R., Chinmayi, H.K. (2014). Soil–Structure Interaction effect on seismic force evaluation of rc framed buildings with various shapes of shear wall: as Per IS 1893 and IBC. Indian geotechnical journal. DOI10.1007/s40098-014-0134-2.JayalekshmiB.R.ChinmayiH.K.2014Soil–Structure Interaction effect on seismic force evaluation of rc framed buildings with various shapes of shear wall: as Per IS 1893 and IBC10.1007/s40098-014-0134-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
International Building Code (2006) International Code Council Inc. Falls Church, Virginia.International Building Code2006Falls Church, VirginiaSearch in Google Scholar