Seismic codes based equivalent nonlinear and stochastic soil structure interaction analysis

[1]Çelebi, E., Goktepe, F., Karahan, N. (2012). Non-linear finite element analysis for prediction of seismic response of buildings considering soil-structure interaction. Natural hazards and earth system science, 12: 3495–3505.ÇelebiE.GoktepeF.KarahanN.2012Non-linear finite element analysis for prediction of seismic response of buildings considering soil-structure interactionNatural hazards and earth system science123495350510.5194/nhess-12-3495-2012Search in Google Scholar

[2]Farghaly, A.A., Ahmed, H.H. (2013). Contribution of soil-structure interaction to seismic response of buildings. Geotechnical engineering, 17(5): 959–971.FarghalyA.A.AhmedH.H.2013Contribution of soil-structure interaction to seismic response of buildingsGeotechnical engineering17595997110.1007/s12205-013-0261-9Search in Google Scholar

[3]Park, J.H., Choo, J.F., Cho, J.R. (2013). Dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis for complex soil profiles using unaligned mesh generation and nonlinear modeling approach. Structural engineering, 17(4): 753–762.ParkJ.H.ChooJ.F.ChoJ.R.2013Dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis for complex soil profiles using unaligned mesh generation and nonlinear modeling approachStructural engineering17475376210.1007/s12205-013-0135-1Search in Google Scholar

[4]Jia, J. (2018). Soil dynamics and foundation modeling, offshore and earthquake engineering Springer nature, Bergen, Norway.JiaJ.2018Soil dynamics and foundation modeling, offshore and earthquake engineering Springer natureBergen, Norway10.1007/978-3-319-40358-8Search in Google Scholar

[5]EC8-2004 (English): Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 5 : Foundation, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects.EC8-2004 (English): Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 5 : Foundation, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects.Search in Google Scholar

[6]FEMA 440 (2005), Recommended Improvements of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Applied Technology Council: California.FEMA 4402005Recommended Improvements of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis ProceduresApplied Technology CouncilCaliforniaSearch in Google Scholar

[7]ASCE (2010): Applied Technology Council. ‘Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings’ ATC-3-06: California.ASCE2010Applied Technology Council‘Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings’ ATC-3-06CaliforniaSearch in Google Scholar

[8]Breysse, D., La Borderie, C., Elachachi, S.M., Niandou, H. (2007). Spatial variation in soil properties and their influence on structural reliability. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 2(24): 73–86.BreysseD.La BorderieC.ElachachiS.M.NiandouH.2007Spatial variation in soil properties and their influence on structural reliabilityInternational Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems224738610.1080/10286600601156673Search in Google Scholar

[9]Cottereau, R., Clouteau, D., Soize, C. (2007). Probabilistic impedance of foundation: impact on the seismic design on uncertain soils. Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics, 1: 1–17.CottereauR.ClouteauD.SoizeC.2007Probabilistic impedance of foundation: impact on the seismic design on uncertain soilsEarthquake engineering and structural dynamics111710.1002/eqe.794Search in Google Scholar

[10]Guellil, M.E., Harichane, Z., Djilali, B., Sadouki, A. (2017). Soil and structure uncetrtainty effects on the soil foundation structure dynamic response. Earthquake and structure, 2: 153–163.GuellilM.E.HarichaneZ.DjilaliB.SadoukiA.2017Soil and structure uncetrtainty effects on the soil foundation structure dynamic responseEarthquake and structure215316310.12989/eas.2017.12.2.153Search in Google Scholar

[11]Harichane, Z., Guellil, M.E., Gadouri, H. (2018). Benefits of probabilistic soil-foundation-structure interaction analysis. Inter Jour of Geotechnical earthquake engineering, 9(1): 43–64.HarichaneZ.GuellilM.E.GadouriH.2018Benefits of probabilistic soil-foundation-structure interaction analysisInter Jour of Geotechnical earthquake engineering91436410.4018/IJGEE.2018010103Search in Google Scholar

[12]Pitilakisa, D., Dietz, M., Wood, D.M., Clouteau, C., Modaressi, A. (2008). Numerical simulation of dynamic soil–structure interaction in shaking table testing. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28: 453–467.PitilakisaD.DietzM.WoodD.M.ClouteauC.ModaressiA.2008Numerical simulation of dynamic soil–structure interaction in shaking table testingSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering2845346710.1016/j.soildyn.2007.07.011Search in Google Scholar

[13]Van Nguyen, Q., Ftahi, B., Hokmabadi, A.S. (2017). Influence of Size and Load-Bearing Mechanism of Piles on Seismic Performance of Buildings Considering Soil–Pile Structure Interaction. International Journal of Geomechanics (ASCE), DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000869.Van NguyenQ.FtahiB.HokmabadiA.S.2017Influence of Size and Load-Bearing Mechanism of Piles on Seismic Performance of Buildings Considering Soil–Pile Structure InteractionInternational Journal of Geomechanics (ASCE)10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000869Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14]Chehata, A., Harichane, Z., Karray, M. (2017). Non-linear soil modelling by correction of the hysteretic damping using a modified Iwan model together with Masing rules. InternatIonal Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1–13.ChehataA.HarichaneZ.KarrayM.2017Non-linear soil modelling by correction of the hysteretic damping using a modified Iwan model together with Masing rulesInternatIonal Journal of Geotechnical Engineering11310.1080/19386362.2017.1376393Search in Google Scholar

[15]Brennan, A.J. Thusyanthan, N.I. Madabhushi, S.P.J. (2005). Evaluation of shear modulus and damping in dynamic centrifuge tests. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1488).BrennanA.J.ThusyanthanN.I.MadabhushiS.P.J.2005Evaluation of shear modulus and damping in dynamic centrifuge testsJournal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1488)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16]Kishida, T. (2016). Comparaison and correction of modulus reduction models for clays and silts. J. geotechnical and geoenvironemental Engineering.KishidaT.2016Comparaison and correction of modulus reduction models for clays and siltsJ. geotechnical and geoenvironemental EngineeringSearch in Google Scholar

[17]RPA99, version (2003) Règlement parasismique Algérienne. Central national de recherche appliquée en génie parasismique.RPA99, version2003Règlement parasismique AlgérienneCentral national de recherche appliquée en génie parasismiqueSearch in Google Scholar

[18]International Building Code (IBC) (2015) Chapter 16 – Section 1613 ICC Central Regional Office, Country Club Hills (IL, USA).International Building Code (IBC)2015Chapter 16 – Section 1613 ICC Central Regional OfficeCountry Club Hills (IL, USA)Search in Google Scholar

[19]IS 1893-2002 Part-1 Criteria For Earthquake Resistant Deign of Structures Part-1 General Provisions And Buildings Fifth Revision.IS 1893-2002 Part-1 Criteria For Earthquake Resistant Deign of Structures Part-1 General Provisions And Buildings Fifth RevisionSearch in Google Scholar

[20]Zhang, L., Ahmari, S. (2011). Nonlinear analysis of laterally loaded rigid piles in cohesive soil. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech, DOI: 10.1002/nag.1094ZhangL.AhmariS.2011Nonlinear analysis of laterally loaded rigid piles in cohesive soilInt. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech10.1002/nag.1094Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21]Ravikumar, C.R., Gunneswara, T.D.R. (2012). Study of soil interaction in a model building frame with plinth beam supported by pile group. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 4(11): 1–15.RavikumarC.R.GunneswaraT.D.R.2012Study of soil interaction in a model building frame with plinth beam supported by pile groupInternational Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering411115Search in Google Scholar

[22]Truty, A. (2018). On consistent nonlinear analysis of soil–structure interaction problems. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 40(2): 86–95.TrutyA.2018On consistent nonlinear analysis of soil–structure interaction problemsStudia Geotechnica et Mechanica402869510.2478/sgem-2018-0019Search in Google Scholar

[23]Haldar, S., Basu, D. (2016). Analysis of Beams on Heterogeneous and Nonlinear Soil. International Journal of Geomechanics. International Journal of Geomechanics, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000599.HaldarS.BasuD.2016Analysis of Beams on Heterogeneous and Nonlinear Soil. International Journal of GeomechanicsInternational Journal of Geomechanics10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000599Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[24]Tsai, C.C., Liu in, H.W. (2017). Site response analysis of vertical ground motion in consideration of soil nonlinearity. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 102: 124–136.TsaiC.C.Liu inH.W.2017Site response analysis of vertical ground motion in consideration of soil nonlinearitySoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering10212413610.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.024Search in Google Scholar

[25]Jastrzębska, M., Lupieżowiec, M., Uliniarz, R., Jaroń, A. (2014). Analysis of the vibration propagation in the subsoil. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 26(3): 9–19. DOI: 10.2478/sgem-2014-0023.JastrzębskaM.LupieżowiecM.UliniarzR.JarońA.2014Analysis of the vibration propagation in the subsoilStudia Geotechnica et Mechanica26391910.2478/sgem-2014-0023Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[26]Okada, T., Fujita, K., Takewaki, I. (2016). Robustness evaluation of seismic pile response considering uncertainty mechanism of soil properties. Innovative infrastructure solutions, DOI 10.1007/s41062-016-0009-8.OkadaT.FujitaK.TakewakiI.2016Robustness evaluation of seismic pile response considering uncertainty mechanism of soil propertiesInnovative infrastructure solutions10.1007/s41062-016-0009-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[27]Chowdhury, I., Dasgupta, S.P. (2009). Dynamics of structure and foundation – A Unified Approach, 2. Applications. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK.ChowdhuryI.DasguptaS.P.2009Dynamics of structure and foundation – A Unified Approach, 2. ApplicationsTaylor & Francis GroupLondon, UKSearch in Google Scholar

[28]Raychowdhury, P., Singh, P. (2012). Effect of nonlinear soil-structure interaction on seismic response of low-rise SMRF buildings. Earthquake Engineering And Engineering Vibration, 11(4) : 541–551. DOI: 10.1007/s11803-012-0140-2.RaychowdhuryP.SinghP.2012Effect of nonlinear soil-structure interaction on seismic response of low-rise SMRF buildingsEarthquake Engineering And Engineering Vibration11454155110.1007/s11803-012-0140-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[29]Hu, Q., Li, H., Yang, G., Cai, Y. (2019). Effects of uncertainty of dynamic shear modulus ratio on design ground motion. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 56(2): 82–90. DOI 10.1007/s11204-019-09574-x.HuQ.LiH.YangG.CaiY.2019Effects of uncertainty of dynamic shear modulus ratio on design ground motionSoil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering562829010.1007/s11204-019-09574-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30]Uzielli, M., Lacasse, S., Nadim, F., Phoon, K.K. (2016). Soil variability analysis for geotechnical practice. Conference: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, At Singapore. DOI: 10.1201/NOE0415426916.ch3.UzielliM.LacasseS.NadimF.PhoonK.K.2016Soil variability analysis for geotechnical practiceConference: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural SoilsAt Singapore10.1201/NOE0415426916.ch3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[31]Manolis, G.D. (2002). Stochastic soil dynamic. International Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(1): 3–15.ManolisG.D.2002Stochastic soil dynamicInternational Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering22131510.1016/S0267-7261(01)00055-0Search in Google Scholar

[32]Cao, Z., Wang, Y., Li, D. (2016). Efficient Monte Carlo Simulation of Parameter Sensitivity in Probabilistic Slope Stability Analysis. Probabilistic Approaches for Geotechnical Site Characterization and Slope Stability Analysis, 169–184.CaoZ.WangY.LiD.2016Efficient Monte Carlo Simulation of Parameter Sensitivity in Probabilistic Slope Stability AnalysisProbabilistic Approaches for Geotechnical Site Characterization and Slope Stability Analysis16918410.1007/978-3-662-52914-0_8Search in Google Scholar

[33]Djilali Berkane, H., Harichane, Z., Guellil, M.E., Sadouki, A. (2018). Investigation of Soil Layers Stochasticity Effects on the SpatiallyVarying Seismic Response Spectra. Indian geotechnical journal.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-018-0301-y.Djilali BerkaneH.HarichaneZ.GuellilM.E.SadoukiA.2018Investigation of Soil Layers Stochasticity Effects on the SpatiallyVarying Seismic Response SpectraIndian geotechnical journalhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-018-0301-y10.1007/s40098-018-0301-ySearch in Google Scholar

[34]Górska, K., Muszyński, Z., Rybak, J. (2012). Displacement monitoring and sensitivity analysis in the observational mathod. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 35(3), 14(4): 25–43. DOI: 10.2478/sgem-2013-0028.GórskaK.MuszyńskiZ.RybakJ.2012Displacement monitoring and sensitivity analysis in the observational mathodStudia Geotechnica et Mechanica353144254310.2478/sgem-2013-0028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[35]Baecher, G.R., Christian, J.T. (2003). Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England.BaecherG.R.ChristianJ.T.2003Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineeringJohn Wiley & Sons LtdEnglandSearch in Google Scholar

[36]Martín, J. Pérez, C.J. (2008). Application of a generalized lognormal distribution to engineering data fitting. Proceedings of the European safety and reliability conference, Esrel 2008, and 17th SRA-Europe, Valencia, Spain, September, 22–25, 2008.MartínJ.PérezC.J.2008Application of a generalized lognormal distribution to engineering data fittingProceedings of the European safety and reliability conference, Esrel 2008, and 17th SRA-EuropeValencia, SpainSeptember, 22–25, 2008Search in Google Scholar

[37]Bulleit, W. (2008). Uncertainty in Structural Engineering. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, ASCE, 13(1): 24–30. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680.BulleitW.2008Uncertainty in Structural EngineeringPractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, ASCE131243010.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[38]Stewart, J.P., Kim, S., Bielak, J., Dobry, R., Power, M.S. (2003). Revisions to soil-structure interaction procedures in NEHRP design provisions. Earthquake Spectra, 19(3): 677–96.StewartJ.P.KimS.BielakJ.DobryR.PowerM.S.2003Revisions to soil-structure interaction procedures in NEHRP design provisionsEarthquake Spectra1936779610.1193/1.1596213Search in Google Scholar

[39]Lutes, L.D., Sarkani, S., Jin, S. (2000). Response variability of an SSI system with uncertain structural and soil properties. Engineering Structures, 22(6): 605–620.LutesL.D.SarkaniS.JinS.2000Response variability of an SSI system with uncertain structural and soil propertiesEngineering Structures22660562010.1016/S0141-0296(99)00003-6Search in Google Scholar

[40]Badaoui, M., Berrah, M.K., Mébarki, A. (2009). Soil height randomness influence on seismic response: Case of an Algiers site. Computers and Geotechnics, 36: 102–12.BadaouiM.BerrahM.K.MébarkiA.2009Soil height randomness influence on seismic response: Case of an Algiers siteComputers and Geotechnics361021210.1016/j.compgeo.2008.04.001Search in Google Scholar

[41]Moghaddasi, M., Cubrinovski, M., Chase, J.G., Pampanin, S., Carr, A. (2011). Effects of soil-foundation-structure interaction on seismic structural response via robust Monte Carlo simulation. Engineering Structure, 33: 1338–1347.MoghaddasiM.CubrinovskiM.ChaseJ.G.PampaninS.CarrA.2011Effects of soil-foundation-structure interaction on seismic structural response via robust Monte Carlo simulationEngineering Structure331338134710.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.011Search in Google Scholar

[42]Mirzai, F., Mahsuli, M., Ghannad, M.A. (2016). Probabilistic analysis of soil-structure interaction effects on the seismic performance of structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2807.MirzaiF.MahsuliM.GhannadM.A.2016Probabilistic analysis of soil-structure interaction effects on the seismic performance of structuresEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics10.1002/eqe.2807Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[43]Kumar, M., Dass, Goel, M., Matsagar, V.A., Rao, K.S. (2014). Response of semi-buried structures subjected to multiple blast loading considering soil–structure interaction. Indian geotechnical journal, DOI10.1007/s40098-014-0143-1.KumarM.Dass GoelM.MatsagarV.A.RaoK.S.2014Response of semi-buried structures subjected to multiple blast loading considering soil–structure interactionIndian geotechnical journal10.1007/s40098-014-0143-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[44]Wolf, J. P., Deeks, A. J. (2004). Foundation Vibration Analysis : a Strength of Materials Approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier.WolfJ. P.DeeksA. J.2004Foundation Vibration Analysis : a Strength of Materials ApproachAmsterdamElsevierSearch in Google Scholar

[45]Pradhan, P.K., Baidya, D.K., Ghosh, D.P. (2004). Dynamic response of foundation resting on layered soil by cone model. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng, 24(6): 425–34.PradhanP.K.BaidyaD.K.GhoshD.P.2004Dynamic response of foundation resting on layered soil by cone modelSoil Dyn. Earthq. Eng2464253410.1016/j.soildyn.2004.03.001Search in Google Scholar

[46]Pradhan, P.K., Mandal, A., Baidya, D.K., Ghosh, D.P. (2008). Dynamic response of machine foundation on layered soil. Geotech. Geol. Eng, 26(4): 453–68.PradhanP.K.MandalA.BaidyaD.K.GhoshD.P.2008Dynamic response of machine foundation on layered soilGeotech. Geol. Eng2644536810.1007/s10706-008-9181-8Search in Google Scholar

[47]Azarhoosh, Z., Ghodrati Amiri, G.R. (2010). Elastic Response of Soil-Structure Systems Subjected to Near-Fault Rupture Directivity Pulses. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering - Proceedings of Sessions of Geoshanghai 2010. Geotechnical special publication; 201: American Society of Civil Engineers 1801 Alexander Bell Drive Reston, Virginia, 20191-4400.AzarhooshZ.Ghodrati AmiriG.R.2010Elastic Response of Soil-Structure Systems Subjected to Near-Fault Rupture Directivity PulsesSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering - Proceedings of Sessions of Geoshanghai 2010. Geotechnical special publication201: American Society of Civil Engineers 1801 Alexander Bell Drive Reston, Virginia, 20191-4400Search in Google Scholar

[48]Meek JW, Wolf JP. Cone models for homogeneous soil I. Geotechnical Engng Div, ASCE 1992; 118(5): 667–85.MeekJWWolfJPCone models for homogeneous soil I. Geotechnical Engng DivASCE199211856678510.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:5(667)Search in Google Scholar

[49]Meek JW, Wolf JP. Cone models for soil layer on rigid rock II. Geotechnical Engng Div, ASCE 1992; 118(5): 686–703.MeekJWWolfJPCone models for soil layer on rigid rock II. Geotechnical Engng DivASCE1992118568670310.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:5(686)Search in Google Scholar

[50]Wolf JP, Meek JW. Cone models for a soil layer on a flexible rock half-space. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn 1993; 22: 185–93.WolfJPMeekJWCone models for a soil layer on a flexible rock half-spaceEarthquake Engng Struct Dyn1993221859310.1002/eqe.4290220302Search in Google Scholar

[51]Meek JW, Wolf JP. Cone models for a embedded foundation. Geotechnical Engng Div, ASCE 1994; 120(1): 60–80.MeekJWWolfJPCone models for a embedded foundation. Geotechnical Engng DivASCE19941201608010.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:1(60)Search in Google Scholar

[52]Wolf JP, Meek JW. Dynamic stiffness of foundation on layered soil half-space using cone frustums. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn 1994; 23: 1079–95.WolfJPMeekJWDynamic stiffness of foundation on layered soil half-space using cone frustumsEarthquake Engng Struct Dyn19942310799510.1002/eqe.4290231004Search in Google Scholar

[53]Mohasseb, S. Ghazanfari, N. Rostami, M. Rostami, S. (2020). Effect of Soil–Pile–Structure Interaction on Seismic Design of Tall and Massive Buildings Through Case Studies. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology 1: 13–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-019-00086-7MohassebS.GhazanfariN.RostamiM.RostamiS.2020Effect of Soil–Pile–Structure Interaction on Seismic Design of Tall and Massive Buildings Through Case StudiesTransportation Infrastructure Geotechnology11345https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-019-00086-710.1007/s40515-019-00086-7Search in Google Scholar

[54]Mittal, R.K., Rawat, A., Rawat, S. (2016). Soil Structure Interaction in Indian Seismic code: Recommendations for Inclusion of Potential Factors. International journal of earth sciences and engineering, 09(03): 124–130.MittalR.K.RawatA.RawatS.2016Soil Structure Interaction in Indian Seismic code: Recommendations for Inclusion of Potential FactorsInternational journal of earth sciences and engineering0903124130Search in Google Scholar

[55]Zafarkhah, E., Dehkordi, M.R. (2017). Evaluation and numerical simulation of soil type effects on seismic soil-structure interaction response of RC structures. Journal of Vibroengineering, 19(7): 5208–5230. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2017.18286.ZafarkhahE.DehkordiM.R.2017Evaluation and numerical simulation of soil type effects on seismic soil-structure interaction response of RC structuresJournal of Vibroengineering19752085230https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2017.1828610.21595/jve.2017.18286Search in Google Scholar

[56]Fattah, M. Y., Al-Mosawi, M. J., Al-Ameri, A. F. I., (2017), ‘Dynamic Response of Saturated Soil - Foundation System Acted upon by Vibration’, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 7, pp. 1158–1188, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2016.1210060.FattahM. Y.Al-MosawiM. J.Al-AmeriA. F. I.2017‘Dynamic Response of Saturated Soil - Foundation System Acted upon by Vibration’Journal of Earthquake Engineering21711581188Taylor & Francis Group, LLC10.1080/13632469.2016.1210060Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[57]Li, P., Lu, X. Chen, Y. (2004). Computer simulation on dynamic soil-structure interaction system. 13^th World conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, Canada.LiP.LuX.ChenY.2004Computer simulation on dynamic soil-structure interaction system13th World conference on Earthquake EngineeringVancouver, CanadaSearch in Google Scholar

[58]Fattah, M.Y. Al-Mosawi, M.J. Al-Ameri, F.I. (2016). Vibration response of saturated sand - foundation system. Int J of Earthquakes and Structures; 11(1): 83–107.FattahM.Y.Al-MosawiM.J.Al-AmeriF.I.2016Vibration response of saturated sand - foundation systemInt J of Earthquakes and Structures1118310710.12989/eas.2016.11.1.083Search in Google Scholar

[59]Fattah, M.Y. Zabar, B.Z. Mustafa, F.M. (2017). Effect of saturation on response of a single pile embedded in saturated sandy soil to vertical vibration. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering; 24(3): 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2017.1391126.FattahM.Y.ZabarB.Z.MustafaF.M.2017Effect of saturation on response of a single pile embedded in saturated sandy soil to vertical vibrationEuropean Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering243381400https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2017.139112610.1080/19648189.2017.1391126Search in Google Scholar

[60]Fattah, M.Y. Al-Neami, M.A. Jajjawi, N.H. (2014). Prediction of liquefaction potential and pore water pressure beneath machine foundations. Central European Journal of Engineering. DOI: 10.2478/s13531-013-0165-y.FattahM.Y.Al-NeamiM.A.JajjawiN.H.2014Prediction of liquefaction potential and pore water pressure beneath machine foundationsCentral European Journal of Engineering10.2478/s13531-013-0165-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[61]2015 NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions (2016) ‘Design Examples (FEMA P- 1051/July 2016)’.2015 NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions (2016) ‘Design Examples (FEMA P- 1051/July 2016)’.Search in Google Scholar

[62]Mittal, R.K., Gajinkar, V. (2014). Evaluation of soil-structure interaction guidelines in indian seismic codes. International journal of civil engineering and technology, 5(5): 97–104.MittalR.K.GajinkarV.2014Evaluation of soil-structure interaction guidelines in indian seismic codesInternational journal of civil engineering and technology5597104Search in Google Scholar

[63]Worku, A. (2014). Soil-structure- interaction provisions: A potential tool to consider for economical seismic design of buildings. Journal of the South African institution of civil engineering, 1(56): 54–62.WorkuA.2014Soil-structure- interaction provisions: A potential tool to consider for economical seismic design of buildingsJournal of the South African institution of civil engineering1565462Search in Google Scholar

[64]Jayalekshmi, B.R., Chinmayi, H.K. (2014). Soil–Structure Interaction effect on seismic force evaluation of rc framed buildings with various shapes of shear wall: as Per IS 1893 and IBC. Indian geotechnical journal. DOI10.1007/s40098-014-0134-2.JayalekshmiB.R.ChinmayiH.K.2014Soil–Structure Interaction effect on seismic force evaluation of rc framed buildings with various shapes of shear wall: as Per IS 1893 and IBCIndian geotechnical journal10.1007/s40098-014-0134-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[65]International Building Code (2006) International Code Council Inc. Falls Church, Virginia.International Building Code2006International Code Council IncFalls Church, VirginiaSearch in Google Scholar