Accesso libero

Psychometric Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Patient Experiences with Outpatient Healthcare

Gregor Sočan

Gregor Sočan

University of Ljubljana, Department of PsychologyLjubljana, Slovenia
Profilo Orcid
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Sočan, Gregor
, 
Dolf De Boer

Dolf De Boer

Netherlands Institute for Health Services ResearchUtrecht, The Netherlands
Profilo Orcid
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
De Boer, Dolf
, 
Eva Murko

Eva Murko

National Institute of Public HealthLjubljana, Slovenia
Profilo Orcid
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Murko, Eva
, 
Marcel Kralj

Marcel Kralj

National Institute of Public HealthLjubljana, Slovenia
Profilo Orcid
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Kralj, Marcel
, 
Nina Ropret

Nina Ropret

National Institute of Public HealthLjubljana, Slovenia
Profilo Orcid
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Ropret, Nina
 e 
Metka Zaletel

Metka Zaletel

National Institute of Public HealthLjubljana, Slovenia
Profilo Orcid
Cerca questo autore su
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Zaletel, Metka
  
13 giu 2023
Psychometric Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Patient Experiences with Outpatient Healthcare's Cover Image
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Cita
Scarica la copertina
Categoria dell'articolo: Original scientific article
Pubblicato online: 13 giu 2023
Pagine: 153 - 161
Ricevuto: 06 set 2022
Accettato: 11 mag 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0021
Parole chiave
© 2023 Gregor Sočan et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Figure 1.

Standardized factor loadings (circles) with 95% confidence intervals (lines). Left: doctor’s work; right: nurses’ work.
Standardized factor loadings (circles) with 95% confidence intervals (lines). Left: doctor’s work; right: nurses’ work.

Figure 2.

Person-item maps for the doctor’s work scale (above) and the nurses’ work scale (below).Legend: Numbered circles indicate transition points where the two adjacent categories are equally likely to be chosen.
Person-item maps for the doctor’s work scale (above) and the nurses’ work scale (below).Legend: Numbered circles indicate transition points where the two adjacent categories are equally likely to be chosen.

Figure 3.

Category scale values for the optimally scaled item responses.Legend: Symbols denote the scale values of subsequent categories: o = “not at all” … x = “yes, certainly”.
Category scale values for the optimally scaled item responses.Legend: Symbols denote the scale values of subsequent categories: o = “not at all” … x = “yes, certainly”.

Frequencies and percentages of item responses_

Item* n M Mtrim Mdn SD Min Max Skewness Kurtosis
doctor’s work 3002 33.88 34.85 36 3.93 9 36 −2.71 8.33
nurses’ work 5628 11.64 11.91 12 0.98 3 12 −3.72 17.25
general rating 8307 9.35 9.62 10 1.23 0 10 −3.04 12.65
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Medicina, Medicina clinica, Medicina dell'igiene e dell'ambiente
Feed RSS della rivista