Acceso abierto

Psychometric Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Patient Experiences with Outpatient Healthcare

Gregor Sočan

Gregor Sočan

University of Ljubljana, Department of PsychologyLjubljana, Slovenia
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Sočan, Gregor
, 
Dolf De Boer

Dolf De Boer

Netherlands Institute for Health Services ResearchUtrecht, The Netherlands
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
De Boer, Dolf
, 
Eva Murko

Eva Murko

National Institute of Public HealthLjubljana, Slovenia
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Murko, Eva
, 
Marcel Kralj

Marcel Kralj

National Institute of Public HealthLjubljana, Slovenia
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Kralj, Marcel
, 
Nina Ropret

Nina Ropret

National Institute of Public HealthLjubljana, Slovenia
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Ropret, Nina
 y 
Metka Zaletel

Metka Zaletel

National Institute of Public HealthLjubljana, Slovenia
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Zaletel, Metka
  
13 jun 2023
Psychometric Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Patient Experiences with Outpatient Healthcare's Cover Image
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Cite
Descargar portada
Categoría del artículo: Original scientific article
Publicado en línea: 13 jun 2023
Páginas: 153 - 161
Recibido: 06 sept 2022
Aceptado: 11 may 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0021
Palabras clave
© 2023 Gregor Sočan et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Figure 1.

Standardized factor loadings (circles) with 95% confidence intervals (lines). Left: doctor’s work; right: nurses’ work.
Standardized factor loadings (circles) with 95% confidence intervals (lines). Left: doctor’s work; right: nurses’ work.

Figure 2.

Person-item maps for the doctor’s work scale (above) and the nurses’ work scale (below).Legend: Numbered circles indicate transition points where the two adjacent categories are equally likely to be chosen.
Person-item maps for the doctor’s work scale (above) and the nurses’ work scale (below).Legend: Numbered circles indicate transition points where the two adjacent categories are equally likely to be chosen.

Figure 3.

Category scale values for the optimally scaled item responses.Legend: Symbols denote the scale values of subsequent categories: o = “not at all” … x = “yes, certainly”.
Category scale values for the optimally scaled item responses.Legend: Symbols denote the scale values of subsequent categories: o = “not at all” … x = “yes, certainly”.

Frequencies and percentages of item responses_

Item* n M Mtrim Mdn SD Min Max Skewness Kurtosis
doctor’s work 3002 33.88 34.85 36 3.93 9 36 −2.71 8.33
nurses’ work 5628 11.64 11.91 12 0.98 3 12 −3.72 17.25
general rating 8307 9.35 9.62 10 1.23 0 10 −3.04 12.65
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Medicina, Medicina Clínica, Higiene y medicina ambiental
RSS Feed de revista