Accès libre

Psychometric Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Patient Experiences with Outpatient Healthcare

Gregor Sočan

Gregor Sočan

University of Ljubljana, Department of PsychologyLjubljana, Slovenia
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Sočan, Gregor
, 
Dolf De Boer

Dolf De Boer

Netherlands Institute for Health Services ResearchUtrecht, The Netherlands
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
De Boer, Dolf
, 
Eva Murko

Eva Murko

National Institute of Public HealthLjubljana, Slovenia
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Murko, Eva
, 
Marcel Kralj

Marcel Kralj

National Institute of Public HealthLjubljana, Slovenia
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Kralj, Marcel
, 
Nina Ropret

Nina Ropret

National Institute of Public HealthLjubljana, Slovenia
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Ropret, Nina
 et 
Metka Zaletel

Metka Zaletel

National Institute of Public HealthLjubljana, Slovenia
Profil Orcid
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Zaletel, Metka
  
13 juin 2023
Psychometric Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Patient Experiences with Outpatient Healthcare's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Catégorie d'article: Original scientific article
Publié en ligne: 13 juin 2023
Pages: 153 - 161
Reçu: 06 sept. 2022
Accepté: 11 mai 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0021
Mots clés
© 2023 Gregor Sočan et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Figure 1.

Standardized factor loadings (circles) with 95% confidence intervals (lines). Left: doctor’s work; right: nurses’ work.
Standardized factor loadings (circles) with 95% confidence intervals (lines). Left: doctor’s work; right: nurses’ work.

Figure 2.

Person-item maps for the doctor’s work scale (above) and the nurses’ work scale (below).Legend: Numbered circles indicate transition points where the two adjacent categories are equally likely to be chosen.
Person-item maps for the doctor’s work scale (above) and the nurses’ work scale (below).Legend: Numbered circles indicate transition points where the two adjacent categories are equally likely to be chosen.

Figure 3.

Category scale values for the optimally scaled item responses.Legend: Symbols denote the scale values of subsequent categories: o = “not at all” … x = “yes, certainly”.
Category scale values for the optimally scaled item responses.Legend: Symbols denote the scale values of subsequent categories: o = “not at all” … x = “yes, certainly”.

Frequencies and percentages of item responses_

Item* n M Mtrim Mdn SD Min Max Skewness Kurtosis
doctor’s work 3002 33.88 34.85 36 3.93 9 36 −2.71 8.33
nurses’ work 5628 11.64 11.91 12 0.98 3 12 −3.72 17.25
general rating 8307 9.35 9.62 10 1.23 0 10 −3.04 12.65
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Médecine, Médecine clinique, Hygiène et médecine environnementale
RSS Feed de la revue