Health service user participation in interprofessional collaborative learning — a systematic review on the use of digital solutions / Die Teilnahme von Gesundheitsdienst-Nutzenden an interprofessionell kollaborativem Lernen — ein systematischer Review über den Gebrauch digitaler Lösungen

Category	Search terms
Population	(profession OR profession* OR employee OR staff OR student OR provider) AND (interprofessional relations[MeSH Terms]) AND (health OR medic* OR care) AND (community OR client OR patient OR person OR family OR user) AND
Intervention	(communicat[Title/Abstract] OR collaborat[Title/Abstract] OR teamwork[Title/Abstract] OR network[Title/Abstract] OR coordinat[Title/Abstract]) AND (educat OR lecture OR course OR learn* OR train* OR teach OR taught) AND (ICF OR function OR functioning) AND (digital OR technology OR mail OR video OR speech OR text messaging OR app OR application OR platform OR wearables OR connected OR computer* OR interface OR ehealth OR e-health OR electronic) AND
Outcome	(expect* OR needs OR reason* OR deci* OR decision-making OR prevent* OR rehabilitat* OR therap* OR monitor) AND (activ OR interven* OR interact* OR exchange OR discuss* OR practice OR understand* OR behavi* OR support OR empower* OR participat* OR cent*)
Limits	NOT veterinary NOT dental NOT dentist* NOT safety NOT critical NOT resuscitation
Filters	Humans, English

Frequency of Involved Professions.

Profession	Frequency	Studies
Medicine	13	Andersson et al., 2021; Bluml et al., 2000; Byerly et al., 2011; Darlow et al., 2015; Javadi et al., 2018; Korstjens et al., 2021; Liaw et al., 2020; Metzelthin et al., 2013; Poss-Doering et al., 2020; Shorten et al., 2015; Swallow et al., 2016; Uslu-Sahan & Terzioglu, 2020; Yang et al., 2017
Nursing	12	Andersson et al., 2021; Javadi et al., 2018; Korstjens et al., 2021; Liaw et al., 2020; Lucas et al., 2020; McGilton et al., 2011; Metzelthin et al., 2013; Saia et al., 2020; Shorten et al., 2015; Swallow et al., 2016; Uslu-Sahan & Terzioglu, 2020; Yang et al., 2017
Pharmacy	6	Bluml et al., 2000; Byerly et al., 2011; Javadi et al., 2018; Lempicki & Holland, 2018; Lucas et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2017
Physiotherapy	6	Byerly et al., 2011; Darlow et al., 2015; Javadi et al., 2018; Lempicki & Holland, 2018; Metzelthin et al., 2013; Sabus et al., 2011
Occupational therapy	4	Javadi et al., 2018; Lempicki & Holland, 2018; Metzelthin et al., 2013; Sabus et al., 2011
Dietetics / Nutrition	3	Darlow et al., 2015; Javadi et al., 2018; Uslu-Sahan & Terzioglu, 2020
Social work	3	Javadi et al., 2018; Saia et al., 2020; Uslu-Sahan & Terzioglu, 2020
Midwifery	2	Korstjens et al., 2021; Shorten et al., 2015
Unspecified health profession	2	Poss-Doering et al., 2020; Swallow et al., 2016
Health insurance agency	1	Poss-Doering et al., 2020
Lactation consultation	1	Javadi et al., 2018
Osteopathy	1	Lempicki & Holland, 2018
Physical assistance	1	Javadi et al., 2018
Primary health care network management	1	Poss-Doering et al., 2020
Psychology	1	Saia et al., 2020
Radiation therapy	1	Darlow et al., 2015
Social pedagogy	1	Saia et al., 2020
Special education	1	Saia et al., 2020
Speech language pathology	1	McGilton et al., 2011
System navigation	1	Javadi et al., 2018
Web development	1	Shorten et al., 2015

Characteristics of Included Studies.

Study		Setting	Aim	Study design	Participants (n)		Digital solution
Authors, Year	Country				User	Provider
Bluml et al., 2000	USA	Ambulatory care	Improve patients’ care	Qualitative	397	26	Point-of-care testing
McGilton et al., 2011	Canada	Continuing care facility	Assess implementation	Mixed methods	9	18	Videos before role play
Sabus et al., 2011	USA	University	Understand tool’s utility	Quantitative	1	69	Virtual reality, avatar
Metzelthin et al., 2013	Netherlands	Ambulatory practices	Examine implementation	Qualitative	13	45	Digital record forms
Darlow et al., 2015	New Zealand	University	Evaluate a programme	Quantitative	1	83	E-learning, videos
Shorten et al., 2015	USA	Urban outpatient clinics	Outline creation process	Qualitative	9	21	Interactive web site
Swallow et al., 2016	UK	Home-based care	Report users’ feasibility	Quantitative	21	23	Web application
Yang et al., 2017	Taiwan	Hospital simulation lab	Evaluate a programme	Quantitative	1	88	E-learning, videos, high-fidelity simulation
Javadi et al., 2018	Canada	Home settings	Test exercise feasibility	Mixed methods	21	106	Tablet, web application
Lempicki & Holland, 2018	USA	University	Evaluate feasibility	Quantitative	2	6	Video conferencing
Liaw et al., 2020	Singapore	University	Evaluate a programme	Quantitative	1	120	Virtual reality, avatar
Lucas et al., 2020	Australia	Hospital simulation lab	Explore perceptions	Mixed methods	2	60	Videos at a simulation
Poss-Doering et al., 2020	Germany	Primary care networks	Explore contributions to antibiotic prescribing	Mixed methods	1	354	E-learning, tablet, digital records
Saia et al., 2020	Estonia	Social rehabilitation	Investigate perceptions	Qualitative	13	9	Communication tools
Uslu-Sahan & Terzioglu, 2020	Turkey	University	Determine effectiveness of simulation methods	Quantitative	2	84	Power-point before a high-fidelity simulation
Andersson et al., 2021	Sweden	Primary care center	Explore partnership when using the system	Qualitative	22	15	Device, mobile phone, database, web portal
Byerly et al., 2021	USA	Nursing home	Explore role fluidity	Qualitative	5	47	Computer, records
Korstjens et al., 2021	Netherlands	Ambulatory practices and hospitals	Understand maternity care collaboration	Qualitative	26	62	Video-clips, pictures in

Excluded Studies.

Argument for exclusion	Studies
Focus on patient education	Hjelle, K. M., Skutle, O., Førland, O., & Alvsvåg, H. (2016). The reablement team’s voice: A qualitative study of how an integrated multidisciplinary team experiences participation in reablement. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 9, 575–585. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S115588 Ho, P., Lambert-Kerzner, A., Carey, E., Fahdi, I., Bryson, C., Melnyk, S., Bosworth, H., Radcliff, T., Davis, R., Mun, H., & et al. (2014). Multifaceted intervention to improve medication adherence and secondary prevention measures after acute coronary syndrome hospital discharge: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(2), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12944 Knoop, J., de Joode, J. W., Brandt, H., Dekker, J., & Ostelo, R. W. J. G. (2022). Patients’ and clinicians’ experiences with stratified exercise therapy in knee osteoarthritis: A qualitative study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23(1), 559. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05496-2 Noviani, L., Diantini, A., & Subarnas, A. (2020). Collaboration between interprofessional healthcare and patients to improve quality of life type 2 diabetes via smartphone application. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 13(1), 645–650. https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2021.13.01.126 Richards, D., Hill, J., Gask, L., Lovell, K., Chew-Graham, C., Bower, P., Cape, J., Pilling, S., Araya, R., Kessler, D., & et al. (2013). Clinical effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in UK primary care (CADET): Cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 347, f4913. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4913
No learning interventions for service providers	Blackstone, S. W., Wilkinson, K. M., Luo, F., Canchola, J., & Roman-Lantzy, C. (2021). Children with cortical visual impairment and complex communication needs: Identifying gaps between needs and current practice. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(2), 612–629. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00088 Bradshaw, A. B., Bonnecaze, A. K., Burns, C. A., & Beardsley, J. R. (2021). Impact of an interprofessional collaborative quality improvement initiative to decrease inappropriate thyroid function testing. Hospital Pharmacy, 56(5), 481–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018578720920795 Heiden, S. M., Holden, R. J., Alder, C. A., Bodke, K., & Boustani, M. (2017). Human factors in mental healthcare: A work system analysis of a community-based program for older adults with depression and dementia. Applied Ergonomics, 64, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.002 Pariser, P., Pham, T. N. T., Brown, J. B., Stewart, M., & Charles, J. (2019). Connecting people with multimorbidity to interprofessional teams using telemedicine. The Annals of Family Medicine, 17(Suppl 1), S57-S62. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2379 Van Dongen, J. J. J., Lenzen, S. A., Van Bokhoven, M. A., Daniëls, R., Van Der Weijden, T., & Beurskens, A. (2016). Interprofessional collaboration regarding patients’ care plans in primary care: A focus group study into influential factors. BMC Family Practice, 17, 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0456-5 Wu, R., Appel, L., Morra, D., Lo, V., Kitto, S., & Quan, S. (2014). Short message service or disService: Issues with text messaging in a complex medical environment. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.003
Interaction with (simulated) service users was not part of the learning process	Carroll, J. C., Talbot, Y., Permaul, J., Tobin, A., Moineddin, R., Blaine, S., Bloom, J., Butt, D., Kay, K., & Telner, D. (2016). Academic family health teams: Part 1: Patient perceptions of core primary care domains. Canadian Family Physician, 62(1), e23–e30. MacNeill, H., Telner, D., Sparaggis-Agaliotis, A., & Hanna, E. (2014). All for one and one for all: understanding health professionals’ experience in individual versus collaborative online learning. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 34(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.21226 Meystre, C., Bourquin, C., Despland, J.-N., Stiefel, F., & De Roten, Y. (2013). Working alliance in communication skills training for oncology clinicians: A controlled trial. Patient Education and Counseling, 90(2), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.10.013 Petersen, L., Birkelund, R., & Schiøttz-Christensen, B. (2020). Challenges to cross-sectoral care experienced by professionals working with patients living with low back pain: A qualitative interview study. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 164. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4988-y Shoemaker, M., de Voest, M., Booth, A., Meny, L., & Victor, J. (2015). A virtual patient educational activity to improve interprofessional competencies: A randomized trial. Journal of interprofessional care, 29(4), 395–397. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.984286 Tempest, S., Harries, P., Kilbride, C., & De Souza, L. (2012). To adopt is to adapt: The process of implementing the ICF with an acute stroke multidisciplinary team in England. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(20), 1686–1694. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.658489 Walker, L. E., Cross, M., & Barnett, T. (2019). Students’ experiences and perceptions of interprofessional education during rural placement: A mixed methods study. Nurse Education Today, 75, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.12.012
Digital solutions did not support interprofessional collaborative learning	Conti, G., Bowers, C., O’Connell, M. B., Bruer, S., Bugdalski-Stutrud, C., Smith, G., Bickes, J., & Mendez, J. (2016). Examining the effects of an experiential interprofessional education activity with older adults. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30(2), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2015.1092428 Floren, L., Mandal, J., Dall’Era, M., Shin, J., Irby, D., Cate, O., & O’Brien, B. (2020). A Mobile Learning Module to Support Interprofessional Knowledge Construction in the Health Professions. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(2), 847519. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe847519 O’Connell, M. B., Fava, J. P., Gilkey, S. J., Dereczyk, A. L., Higgins, R., Burke, C. A., Lucarotti, R. L., & Gaggin, P. E. (2021). Using community pharmacies and team observed structured clinical encounters (TOSCEs) for interprofessional education and training. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning, 13(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.07.018 Posenau, A., & Peters, T. (2016). Communicative positioning of one’s own profession in interprofessional settings. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 33(2), Doc27. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001026 Thomson, K., Gripton, J., Lutchmiah, J., & Caan, W. (2007). Health facilitation in primary care seen from practice and education. British Journal of Nursing, 16(18), 1156–1160. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2007.16.18.27514 Watt-Watson, J., McGillion, M., Lax, L., Oskarsson, J., Hunter, J., MacLennan, C., Knickle, K., & Victor, J. C. (2019). Evaluating an Innovative eLearning Pain Education Interprofessional Resource: A Pre-Post Study. Pain Medicine, 20(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pny105

eISSN:: 2296-990X
Sprachen:: Englisch, Deutsch

Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:: Volume Open
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:: Medizin, Klinische Medizin, andere

Zeitschrift RSS Feed

Health service user participation in interprofessional collaborative learning — a systematic review on the use of digital solutions / Die Teilnahme von Gesundheitsdienst-Nutzenden an interprofessionell kollaborativem Lernen — ein systematischer Review über den Gebrauch digitaler Lösungen

Online veröffentlicht: 28. Dez. 2023

Seitenbereich: 136 - 149

Eingereicht: 11. Mai 2023

Akzeptiert: 20. Okt. 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhp-2023-0010

SchlüsselwörterZusammenarbeit, Kommunikation, Community Netzwerk, digital, interprofessionelle Beziehungen, Patienten/-innenteilnahme, Primärversorgung

© 2023 Anita Kidritsch et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Figure 1:

Search Terms Clustered per PICO Criteria (Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, 2020).

Frequency of Involved Professions.

Characteristics of Included Studies.

Excluded Studies.

Schlüsselwörter
Zusammenarbeit, Kommunikation, Community Netzwerk, digital, interprofessionelle Beziehungen, Patienten/-innenteilnahme, Primärversorgung