Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal
Volume 15 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)
Open Access
Theoretical approach to a lower limit of KPIs for controlling complex organisational systems
Wolfgang Eber
Wolfgang Eber
| Nov 25, 2023
Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal
Volume 15 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Article Category:
Research Paper
Published Online:
Nov 25, 2023
Page range:
169 - 177
Received:
Dec 02, 2022
Accepted:
Jan 29, 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2023-0012
Keywords
controlling
,
Systems Theory
,
KPI
,
construction management
,
real estate management
,
complexity
© 2023 Wolfgang Eber, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1:
Externalising damping loops increase the stability of a system by breaking long causal chains.
Fig. 2:
Coupling value χi,j = τc/tRes as the coverage of the deviation controlled by the given time reserves.
Fig. 3:
Comparison of the transition probability χ^i,j=e−1/χi,j${\hat \chi _{i,j}} = {e^{ - 1/{\chi _{i,j}}}}$ to the coupling value χi,j.
Fig. 4:
Characteristic roles of participating nodes based on active sums and passive sums.
Fig. 5.
Structure of a causally expanding (a)/converging (b) tree, reflecting the most simple causal system.
Fig. 6.
Cross impact analysis of a causal expanding/converging tree vs. impact (ξ(= ζ).
Fig. 7.
Causal remains of criticality vs. length of causal chains (maximum rank) of expanding/converging trees.