This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ā.Meikališa, K.Strada-Rozenberga (2010). Research. Mantas konfiskācijas tiesiskais regulējums Latvijā un Eiropas Savienībā, tās izpildes mehānisma efektivitātes nodrošināšana. 2010. (https://www.tm.gov.lv/sites/tm/files/2020-01/Documents/lv_ministrija_imateriali_mantkonf.pdf) [rev. 20.06.2023]MeikališaĀ.Strada-RozenbergaK.20102010(https://www.tm.gov.lv/sites/tm/files/2020-01/Documents/lv_ministrija_imateriali_mantkonf.pdf) [rev. 20.06.2023]Search in Google Scholar
Colin King. (2015). How Far Is Too Far? Theorising Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture. International Journal of Law in Context.KingColin2015How Far Is Too Far? Theorising Non-Conviction-Based Asset ForfeitureSearch in Google Scholar
Commission staff working document. Analysis of non-conviction-based confiscation measures in the European Union. European Commission. 2019 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/package-organised-crime/file-common-rules-for-non-conviction-based-confiscation) [rev. 20.06.2023]European Commission2019(https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/package-organised-crime/file-common-rules-for-non-conviction-based-confiscation) [rev. 20.06.2023]Search in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. 2020. Case-law of the Constitutional Court. Article 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia: the right to a fair trial.Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia2020Search in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2003-08-01, paragraph 2.Search in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2011-11-01, paragraph 11.1.Search in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2011-21-01, paragraph 7.Search in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2016-06-01 paragraph 30.Search in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2016-13-01. Paragraph 11, 14.2.Search in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2017-23-01, paragraph 12.3.Search in Google Scholar
Directive 2014/42/Eu of The European Parliament And Of The Council of 3 April 2014 on the freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union (https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudr/2014/42) [rev. 20.06.2023];(https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudr/2014/42) [rev. 20.06.2023];Search in Google Scholar
Economic Crime and Cooperation Division Action against Crime Department Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe (2020) The Use of Non-Conviction Based Seizure and Confiscation. (https://rm.coe.int/the-use-of-non-conviction-based-seizure-and-confiscation-2020/1680a0b9d3). [rev. 20.06.2023];Economic Crime and Cooperation Division Action against Crime Department Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe2020(https://rm.coe.int/the-use-of-non-conviction-based-seizure-and-confiscation-2020/1680a0b9d3). [rev. 20.06.2023];Search in Google Scholar
FATF recommendations. International standards on combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism & proliferation. (https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/FATF%20Recommendations%202012.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf) [rev. 20.06.2023]FATF recommendations(https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/FATF%20Recommendations%202012.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf) [rev. 20.06.2023]Search in Google Scholar
Fernandez-Bertier, M. The confiscation and recovery of criminal property: a European Union state of the art. ERA Forum17, 323–342 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-016-0436-1Fernandez-BertierM.The confiscation and recovery of criminal property: a European Union state of the art173233422016https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-016-0436-1Search in Google Scholar
George N. Aylesworth (1991) Forfeiture of Real Property: An Overview. US Department of Justice, p. 3;AylesworthGeorge N.1991US Department of Justice3Search in Google Scholar
Gunārs Kūtris (2020) Possibilities and grounds for confiscation of the proceeds of crime. (Noziedzīgi iegūtā konfiskācijas iespējas un pamats). (https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.78.22) [rev. 20.06.2023];KūtrisGunārs2020(https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.78.22) [rev. 20.06.2023];Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber). Fintan Duff and Others v. Minister for Agriculture and Food, Ireland, and the Attorney General, C-63/93, 1996. ECR I-00569, 20.punkts (https://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf;jsessionid=36A8114F0C4BDD63F15EF10A7D419745?text=&docid=98935&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=10456) [rev. 20.06.2023]Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber)(https://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf;jsessionid=36A8114F0C4BDD63F15EF10A7D419745?text=&docid=98935&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=10456) [rev. 20.06.2023]Search in Google Scholar
Juridisko terminu vārdnīca (2002) Kamene. Rīga.;Juridisko terminu vārdnīca2002RīgaSearch in Google Scholar
Law of the Republic of Latvia: Criminal Law. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 199/200, 08.07.1998.Search in Google Scholar
Law of the Republic of Latvia: Criminal Procedure Law. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 74, 11.05.2005.Search in Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Latvia. 2019. Handbook for the Handling of Property in Criminal Proceedings (Rokasgrāmata rīcībai ar mantu kriminālprocesā. Latvijas Republikas Tieslietu ministrija) (https://www.tm.gov.lv/lv/media/4207/download) [rev. 20.06.2023]Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Latvia2019(https://www.tm.gov.lv/lv/media/4207/download) [rev. 20.06.2023]Search in Google Scholar
Prof. K.Torgans. Prepared by a team of authors (2016) Commentaries to the Civil Procedure Law. Part I (Chapters 1–28). Second supplemented edition. Riga. Tiesu namu aģentūra;TorgansK.Prof.Prepared by a team of authors2016Second supplemented editionRigaTiesu namu aģentūraSearch in Google Scholar
Saema of Republic of Latvia. Annotation to amendment of Criminal Procedure Law. 2017; https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS12/SaeimaLIVS12.nsf/0/AB2871419A747C7FC2258011002DD2FA?OpenDocument#b [rev. 20.06.2023]Saema of Republic of Latvia2017https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS12/SaeimaLIVS12.nsf/0/AB2871419A747C7FC2258011002DD2FA?OpenDocument#b [rev. 20.06.2023]Search in Google Scholar
Saema of Republic of Latvia. Annotation to amendment of Criminal Procedure Law. 2019; https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS13/SaeimaLIVS13.nsf/0/975546D70032A290C22583FB00490334?OpenDocument [rev. 20.06.2023]Saema of Republic of Latvia2019https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS13/SaeimaLIVS13.nsf/0/975546D70032A290C22583FB00490334?OpenDocument [rev. 20.06.2023]Search in Google Scholar
Stepaniuk O.S. (2007) K voprosu o formulirovke opredelenija ocenochnogo ponjatija ugolovnogo zakona. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universitet;StepaniukO.S.2007Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universitetSearch in Google Scholar
Stukāns J. (2020) Prezumētā noziedzīgi iegūtā manta un procesa par noziedzīgi iegūtu mantu piemērošana. Jurista Vārds, 02.06.2020, No. 22 (1132).StukānsJ.2020Prezumētā noziedzīgi iegūtā manta un procesa par noziedzīgi iegūtu mantu piemērošana02062020221132Search in Google Scholar
The Court of Economic Affairs (2021) Case No. 11903012020.The Court of Economic Affairs2021Search in Google Scholar
Theodore S. Greenberg, Linda M. Samuel, Wingate Grant, Larissa Gray. (2009) Stolen Asset Recovery. A Good Practices Guide for Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture. STAR, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.GreenbergTheodore S.SamuelLinda M.GrantWingateGrayLarissa2009STAR, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World BankSearch in Google Scholar
Zemgale district court. (2021) Case No. 11310046418.2021Case No. 11310046418.Search in Google Scholar