This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ā.Meikališa, K.Strada-Rozenberga (2010). Research. Mantas konfiskācijas tiesiskais regulējums Latvijā un Eiropas Savienībā, tās izpildes mehānisma efektivitātes nodrošināšana. 2010. (https://www.tm.gov.lv/sites/tm/files/2020-01/Documents/lv_ministrija_imateriali_mantkonf.pdf) [rev. 20.06.2023]MeikališaĀ.Strada-RozenbergaK.2010Research. Mantas konfiskācijas tiesiskais regulējums Latvijā un Eiropas Savienībā, tās izpildes mehānisma efektivitātes nodrošināšana2010(https://www.tm.gov.lv/sites/tm/files/2020-01/Documents/lv_ministrija_imateriali_mantkonf.pdf) [rev. 20.06.2023]Search in Google Scholar
Colin King. (2015). How Far Is Too Far? Theorising Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture. International Journal of Law in Context.KingColin2015How Far Is Too Far? Theorising Non-Conviction-Based Asset ForfeitureInternational Journal of Law in ContextSearch in Google Scholar
Commission staff working document. Analysis of non-conviction-based confiscation measures in the European Union. European Commission. 2019 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/package-organised-crime/file-common-rules-for-non-conviction-based-confiscation) [rev. 20.06.2023]Commission staff working document. Analysis of non-conviction-based confiscation measures in the European UnionEuropean Commission2019(https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/package-organised-crime/file-common-rules-for-non-conviction-based-confiscation) [rev. 20.06.2023]Search in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. 2020. Case-law of the Constitutional Court. Article 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia: the right to a fair trial.Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia2020Case-law of the Constitutional Court. Article 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia: the right to a fair trialSearch in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2003-08-01, paragraph 2.Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2003-08-01, paragraph 2Search in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2011-11-01, paragraph 11.1.Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2011-11-01, paragraph 11.1Search in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2011-21-01, paragraph 7.Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2011-21-01, paragraph 7Search in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2015-06-01.Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2015-06-01Search in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2016-06-01 paragraph 30.Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2016-06-01 paragraph 30Search in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2016-13-01. Paragraph 11, 14.2.Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2016-13-01. Paragraph 11, 14.2Search in Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2017-23-01, paragraph 12.3.Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2017-23-01, paragraph 12.3Search in Google Scholar
Directive 2014/42/Eu of The European Parliament And Of The Council of 3 April 2014 on the freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union (https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudr/2014/42) [rev. 20.06.2023];Directive 2014/42/Eu of The European Parliament And Of The Council of 3 April 2014 on the freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union(https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudr/2014/42) [rev. 20.06.2023];Search in Google Scholar
Economic Crime and Cooperation Division Action against Crime Department Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe (2020) The Use of Non-Conviction Based Seizure and Confiscation. (https://rm.coe.int/the-use-of-non-conviction-based-seizure-and-confiscation-2020/1680a0b9d3). [rev. 20.06.2023];Economic Crime and Cooperation Division Action against Crime Department Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe2020The Use of Non-Conviction Based Seizure and Confiscation(https://rm.coe.int/the-use-of-non-conviction-based-seizure-and-confiscation-2020/1680a0b9d3). [rev. 20.06.2023];Search in Google Scholar
FATF recommendations. International standards on combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism & proliferation. (https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/FATF%20Recommendations%202012.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf) [rev. 20.06.2023]FATF recommendationsInternational standards on combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism & proliferation(https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/FATF%20Recommendations%202012.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf) [rev. 20.06.2023]Search in Google Scholar
Fernandez-Bertier, M. The confiscation and recovery of criminal property: a European Union state of the art. ERA Forum17, 323–342 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-016-0436-1Fernandez-BertierM.The confiscation and recovery of criminal property: a European Union state of the artERA Forum173233422016https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-016-0436-1Search in Google Scholar
George N. Aylesworth (1991) Forfeiture of Real Property: An Overview. US Department of Justice, p. 3;AylesworthGeorge N.1991Forfeiture of Real Property: An OverviewUS Department of Justice3Search in Google Scholar
Gunārs Kūtris (2020) Possibilities and grounds for confiscation of the proceeds of crime. (Noziedzīgi iegūtā konfiskācijas iespējas un pamats). (https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.78.22) [rev. 20.06.2023];KūtrisGunārs2020Possibilities and grounds for confiscation of the proceeds of crime. (Noziedzīgi iegūtā konfiskācijas iespējas un pamats)(https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.78.22) [rev. 20.06.2023];Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber). Fintan Duff and Others v. Minister for Agriculture and Food, Ireland, and the Attorney General, C-63/93, 1996. ECR I-00569, 20.punkts (https://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf;jsessionid=36A8114F0C4BDD63F15EF10A7D419745?text=&docid=98935&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=10456) [rev. 20.06.2023]Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber)Fintan Duff and Others v. Minister for Agriculture and Food, Ireland, and the Attorney General, C-63/93, 1996. ECR I-00569, 20.punkts(https://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf;jsessionid=36A8114F0C4BDD63F15EF10A7D419745?text=&docid=98935&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=10456) [rev. 20.06.2023]Search in Google Scholar
Juridisko terminu vārdnīca (2002) Kamene. Rīga.;Juridisko terminu vārdnīca2002KameneRīgaSearch in Google Scholar
Law of the Republic of Latvia: Criminal Law. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 199/200, 08.07.1998.Law of the Republic of Latvia: Criminal Law. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 199/200, 08.07.1998Search in Google Scholar
Law of the Republic of Latvia: Criminal Procedure Law. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 74, 11.05.2005.Law of the Republic of Latvia: Criminal Procedure Law. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 74, 11.05.2005Search in Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Latvia. 2019. Handbook for the Handling of Property in Criminal Proceedings (Rokasgrāmata rīcībai ar mantu kriminālprocesā. Latvijas Republikas Tieslietu ministrija) (https://www.tm.gov.lv/lv/media/4207/download) [rev. 20.06.2023]Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Latvia2019Handbook for the Handling of Property in Criminal Proceedings (Rokasgrāmata rīcībai ar mantu kriminālprocesā. Latvijas Republikas Tieslietu ministrija)(https://www.tm.gov.lv/lv/media/4207/download) [rev. 20.06.2023]Search in Google Scholar
Prof. K.Torgans. Prepared by a team of authors (2016) Commentaries to the Civil Procedure Law. Part I (Chapters 1–28). Second supplemented edition. Riga. Tiesu namu aģentūra;TorgansK.Prof.Prepared by a team of authors2016Commentaries to the Civil Procedure Law. Part I (Chapters 1–28)Second supplemented editionRigaTiesu namu aģentūraSearch in Google Scholar
Riga Regional Court Criminal Division. (2021) Case No. 11270001820.Riga Regional Court Criminal Division. (2021) Case No. 11270001820Search in Google Scholar
Saema of Republic of Latvia. Annotation to amendment of Criminal Procedure Law. 2017; https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS12/SaeimaLIVS12.nsf/0/AB2871419A747C7FC2258011002DD2FA?OpenDocument#b [rev. 20.06.2023]Saema of Republic of LatviaAnnotation to amendment of Criminal Procedure Law2017https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS12/SaeimaLIVS12.nsf/0/AB2871419A747C7FC2258011002DD2FA?OpenDocument#b [rev. 20.06.2023]Search in Google Scholar
Saema of Republic of Latvia. Annotation to amendment of Criminal Procedure Law. 2019; https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS13/SaeimaLIVS13.nsf/0/975546D70032A290C22583FB00490334?OpenDocument [rev. 20.06.2023]Saema of Republic of LatviaAnnotation to amendment of Criminal Procedure Law2019https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS13/SaeimaLIVS13.nsf/0/975546D70032A290C22583FB00490334?OpenDocument [rev. 20.06.2023]Search in Google Scholar
Stepaniuk O.S. (2007) K voprosu o formulirovke opredelenija ocenochnogo ponjatija ugolovnogo zakona. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universitet;StepaniukO.S.2007K voprosu o formulirovke opredelenija ocenochnogo ponjatija ugolovnogo zakona. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universitetaNauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universitetSearch in Google Scholar
Stukāns J. (2020) Prezumētā noziedzīgi iegūtā manta un procesa par noziedzīgi iegūtu mantu piemērošana. Jurista Vārds, 02.06.2020, No. 22 (1132).StukānsJ.2020Prezumētā noziedzīgi iegūtā manta un procesa par noziedzīgi iegūtu mantu piemērošanaJurista Vārds02062020221132Search in Google Scholar
Supreme Court Senate, Criminal Cases Department. Case No SKK-2/2009.Supreme Court Senate, Criminal Cases Department. Case No SKK-2/2009Search in Google Scholar
The Court of Economic Affairs (2021) Case No. 11903012020.The Court of Economic Affairs2021Case No. 11903012020Search in Google Scholar
Theodore S. Greenberg, Linda M. Samuel, Wingate Grant, Larissa Gray. (2009) Stolen Asset Recovery. A Good Practices Guide for Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture. STAR, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.GreenbergTheodore S.SamuelLinda M.GrantWingateGrayLarissa2009Stolen Asset Recovery. A Good Practices Guide for Non-Conviction Based Asset ForfeitureSTAR, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World BankSearch in Google Scholar
Zemgale district court. (2021) Case No. 11310046418.Zemgale district court2021Case No. 11310046418.Search in Google Scholar