The impact of Lower Standard of Proof in Proceedings Regarding Criminally Acquired Property

Ā.Meikališa, K.Strada-Rozenberga (2010). Research. Mantas konfiskācijas tiesiskais regulējums Latvijā un Eiropas Savienībā, tās izpildes mehānisma efektivitātes nodrošināšana. 2010. (https://www.tm.gov.lv/sites/tm/files/2020-01/Documents/lv_ministrija_imateriali_mantkonf.pdf) [rev. 20.06.2023] MeikališaĀ. Strada-RozenbergaK. 2010 Research. Mantas konfiskācijas tiesiskais regulējums Latvijā un Eiropas Savienībā, tās izpildes mehānisma efektivitātes nodrošināšana 2010 (https://www.tm.gov.lv/sites/tm/files/2020-01/Documents/lv_ministrija_imateriali_mantkonf.pdf) [rev. 20.06.2023] Search in Google Scholar

Colin King. (2015). How Far Is Too Far? Theorising Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture. International Journal of Law in Context. KingColin 2015 How Far Is Too Far? Theorising Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture International Journal of Law in Context Search in Google Scholar

Commission staff working document. Analysis of non-conviction-based confiscation measures in the European Union. European Commission. 2019 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/package-organised-crime/file-common-rules-for-non-conviction-based-confiscation) [rev. 20.06.2023] Commission staff working document. Analysis of non-conviction-based confiscation measures in the European Union European Commission 2019 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/package-organised-crime/file-common-rules-for-non-conviction-based-confiscation) [rev. 20.06.2023] Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. 2020. Case-law of the Constitutional Court. Article 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia: the right to a fair trial. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia 2020 Case-law of the Constitutional Court. Article 92 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia: the right to a fair trial Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2003-08-01, paragraph 2. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2003-08-01, paragraph 2 Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2011-11-01, paragraph 11.1. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2011-11-01, paragraph 11.1 Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2011-21-01, paragraph 7. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2011-21-01, paragraph 7 Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2015-06-01. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2015-06-01 Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2016-06-01 paragraph 30. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2016-06-01 paragraph 30 Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2016-13-01. Paragraph 11, 14.2. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2016-13-01. Paragraph 11, 14.2 Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2017-23-01, paragraph 12.3. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. Case No 2017-23-01, paragraph 12.3 Search in Google Scholar

Directive 2014/42/Eu of The European Parliament And Of The Council of 3 April 2014 on the freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union (https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudr/2014/42) [rev. 20.06.2023]; Directive 2014/42/Eu of The European Parliament And Of The Council of 3 April 2014 on the freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union (https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudr/2014/42) [rev. 20.06.2023]; Search in Google Scholar

Economic Crime and Cooperation Division Action against Crime Department Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe (2020) The Use of Non-Conviction Based Seizure and Confiscation. (https://rm.coe.int/the-use-of-non-conviction-based-seizure-and-confiscation-2020/1680a0b9d3). [rev. 20.06.2023]; Economic Crime and Cooperation Division Action against Crime Department Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe 2020 The Use of Non-Conviction Based Seizure and Confiscation (https://rm.coe.int/the-use-of-non-conviction-based-seizure-and-confiscation-2020/1680a0b9d3). [rev. 20.06.2023]; Search in Google Scholar

FATF recommendations. International standards on combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism & proliferation. (https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/FATF%20Recommendations%202012.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf) [rev. 20.06.2023] FATF recommendations International standards on combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism & proliferation (https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/FATF%20Recommendations%202012.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf) [rev. 20.06.2023] Search in Google Scholar

Fernandez-Bertier, M. The confiscation and recovery of criminal property: a European Union state of the art. ERA Forum 17, 323–342 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-016-0436-1 Fernandez-BertierM. The confiscation and recovery of criminal property: a European Union state of the art ERA Forum 17 323 342 2016 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-016-0436-1 Search in Google Scholar

George N. Aylesworth (1991) Forfeiture of Real Property: An Overview. US Department of Justice, p. 3; AylesworthGeorge N. 1991 Forfeiture of Real Property: An Overview US Department of Justice 3 Search in Google Scholar

Gunārs Kūtris (2020) Possibilities and grounds for confiscation of the proceeds of crime. (Noziedzīgi iegūtā konfiskācijas iespējas un pamats). (https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.78.22) [rev. 20.06.2023]; KūtrisGunārs 2020 Possibilities and grounds for confiscation of the proceeds of crime. (Noziedzīgi iegūtā konfiskācijas iespējas un pamats) (https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.78.22) [rev. 20.06.2023]; Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber). Fintan Duff and Others v. Minister for Agriculture and Food, Ireland, and the Attorney General, C-63/93, 1996. ECR I-00569, 20.punkts (https://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf;jsessionid=36A8114F0C4BDD63F15EF10A7D419745?text=&docid=98935&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=10456) [rev. 20.06.2023] Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) Fintan Duff and Others v. Minister for Agriculture and Food, Ireland, and the Attorney General, C-63/93, 1996. ECR I-00569, 20.punkts (https://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf;jsessionid=36A8114F0C4BDD63F15EF10A7D419745?text=&docid=98935&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=10456) [rev. 20.06.2023] Search in Google Scholar

Juridisko terminu vārdnīca (2002) Kamene. Rīga.; Juridisko terminu vārdnīca 2002 Kamene Rīga Search in Google Scholar

Law of the Republic of Latvia: Criminal Law. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 199/200, 08.07.1998. Law of the Republic of Latvia: Criminal Law. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 199/200, 08.07.1998 Search in Google Scholar

Law of the Republic of Latvia: Criminal Procedure Law. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 74, 11.05.2005. Law of the Republic of Latvia: Criminal Procedure Law. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 74, 11.05.2005 Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Latvia. 2019. Handbook for the Handling of Property in Criminal Proceedings (Rokasgrāmata rīcībai ar mantu kriminālprocesā. Latvijas Republikas Tieslietu ministrija) (https://www.tm.gov.lv/lv/media/4207/download) [rev. 20.06.2023] Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Latvia 2019 Handbook for the Handling of Property in Criminal Proceedings (Rokasgrāmata rīcībai ar mantu kriminālprocesā. Latvijas Republikas Tieslietu ministrija) (https://www.tm.gov.lv/lv/media/4207/download) [rev. 20.06.2023] Search in Google Scholar

Prof. K.Torgans. Prepared by a team of authors (2016) Commentaries to the Civil Procedure Law. Part I (Chapters 1–28). Second supplemented edition. Riga. Tiesu namu aģentūra; TorgansK.Prof. Prepared by a team of authors 2016 Commentaries to the Civil Procedure Law. Part I (Chapters 1–28) Second supplemented edition Riga Tiesu namu aģentūra Search in Google Scholar

Riga Regional Court Criminal Division. (2021) Case No. 11270001820. Riga Regional Court Criminal Division. (2021) Case No. 11270001820 Search in Google Scholar

Saema of Republic of Latvia. Annotation to amendment of Criminal Procedure Law. 2017; https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS12/SaeimaLIVS12.nsf/0/AB2871419A747C7FC2258011002DD2FA?OpenDocument#b [rev. 20.06.2023] Saema of Republic of Latvia Annotation to amendment of Criminal Procedure Law 2017 https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS12/SaeimaLIVS12.nsf/0/AB2871419A747C7FC2258011002DD2FA?OpenDocument#b [rev. 20.06.2023] Search in Google Scholar

Saema of Republic of Latvia. Annotation to amendment of Criminal Procedure Law. 2019; https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS13/SaeimaLIVS13.nsf/0/975546D70032A290C22583FB00490334?OpenDocument [rev. 20.06.2023] Saema of Republic of Latvia Annotation to amendment of Criminal Procedure Law 2019 https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS13/SaeimaLIVS13.nsf/0/975546D70032A290C22583FB00490334?OpenDocument [rev. 20.06.2023] Search in Google Scholar

Stepaniuk O.S. (2007) K voprosu o formulirovke opredelenija ocenochnogo ponjatija ugolovnogo zakona. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universitet; StepaniukO.S. 2007 K voprosu o formulirovke opredelenija ocenochnogo ponjatija ugolovnogo zakona. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universitet Search in Google Scholar

Stukāns J. (2020) Prezumētā noziedzīgi iegūtā manta un procesa par noziedzīgi iegūtu mantu piemērošana. Jurista Vārds, 02.06.2020, No. 22 (1132). StukānsJ. 2020 Prezumētā noziedzīgi iegūtā manta un procesa par noziedzīgi iegūtu mantu piemērošana Jurista Vārds 02 06 2020 22 1132 Search in Google Scholar

Supreme Court Senate, Criminal Cases Department. Case No SKK-2/2009. Supreme Court Senate, Criminal Cases Department. Case No SKK-2/2009 Search in Google Scholar

The Court of Economic Affairs (2021) Case No. 11903012020. The Court of Economic Affairs 2021 Case No. 11903012020 Search in Google Scholar

Theodore S. Greenberg, Linda M. Samuel, Wingate Grant, Larissa Gray. (2009) Stolen Asset Recovery. A Good Practices Guide for Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture. STAR, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. GreenbergTheodore S. SamuelLinda M. GrantWingate GrayLarissa 2009 Stolen Asset Recovery. A Good Practices Guide for Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture STAR, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank Search in Google Scholar

Zemgale district court. (2021) Case No. 11310046418. Zemgale district court 2021 Case No. 11310046418. Search in Google Scholar