[Andrew, Erik, Aslam Anis, Tom M. D. Chalmers, Mildred Cho, Mike Clarke, David Felson et al. 1994. A Proposal for Structured Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials. Jama 272(24): 1926–1931.10.1001/jama.1994.03520240054041]Search in Google Scholar
[Argentin, Gianluca, Barbieri, Gianna, Falzetti, Patrizia, Pavolini, Emmanuele, and Roberto Ricci. 2017. I divari territoriali nelle competenze degli studenti italiani: tra fattori di contesto e ruolo delle istituzioni scolastiche. Politiche Sociali, Social Policies 1: 7–28.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldassarri, Delia, and Maria Abascal. 2017. Field Experiments Across the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 43: 41–73.10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112445]Search in Google Scholar
[Ballarino, Gabriele. 2015. Higher Education, Between Conservatism and Permanent Reform. Pp. 209–236 in The Italian Welfare State in a European Perspective: A Comparative Analysis, edited by Ugo Ascoli, and Emmanuele Pavolini, Cambridge: Polity Press.10.46692/9781447316893.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Berk, Richard A. 2005. Randomized Experiments as the Bronze Standard. Journal of Experimental Criminology 1(4): 417–433.10.1007/s11292-005-3538-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Bratti, Massimiliano, Daniele Checchi, and Filippin, Antonio. 2007. Geographical Differences in Italian Students’ Mathematical Competencies: Evidence from Pisa 2003. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 66(3): 299–333.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Blasio, Guido, Antonio Niscita, and Pammolli, Guido (eds.). 2021. Evidence-Based Policy! Ovvero perché politiche pubbliche basate sull’evidenza empirica rendono migliore l’Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gangl, Markus. 2010. Causal Inference in Sociological Research. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 21–47.10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102702]Search in Google Scholar
[Jackson, Michelle, and David R. Cox. 2013. The Principles of Experimental Design and Their Application to Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 39: 27–49.10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145443]Search in Google Scholar
[Kellogg Foundation. 2001. Logic Model Development Guide. Using Logic Models to Bring Together Planning, Evaluation, & Action. Kellogg Foundation]Search in Google Scholar
[Martini, Alberto. 2008. How Counterfactuals Got Lost on the Way to Brussels. Paper presented at the Policy and programme evaluation in Europe: cultures and prospects. Strasbourg, July 3–4, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martini, Alberto, and Marco Sisti. 2009. Valutare il successo delle politiche pubbliche. Metodi e casi. Bologna: Il Mulino.]Search in Google Scholar
[Merton, Robert K. 1987. Three Fragments From a Sociologist’s Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials. Annual Review of Sociology 13(1): 1–29.10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.000245]Search in Google Scholar
[Moher, David, Sally Hopewell, Kenneth F. Schulz, Victor Montori, Peter C. Gøtzsche, Philip J. Devereaux, Diana Elbourne, Matthias Egger, and Douglas G. Altman. “CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.” International journal of surgery 10, no. 1 (2012): 28–55.10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Ravallion, Martin. 2008. Evaluation in the Practice of Development. The World Bank Research Observer 24(1): 29–53.10.1093/wbro/lkp002]Search in Google Scholar
[Schulz, Kenneth F., Douglas G. Altman, David Moher, and the CONSORT Group. 2010. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 152(11): 726–732.10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiss, Carol H. 1998. Evaluation. Methods for Studying Programs and Policies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar