[
1. Berenskoetter, Felix. “Parameters of a national biography.” European Journal of International Relations 20, No. 1 (2014): 262–288.10.1177/1354066112445290
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Browning, Christopher S. “The Region-Building Approach Revisited: The Continued Othering of Russia in Discourses of Region-Building in the European North.” Geopolitics 8, No. 1 (2003): 45–71.10.1080/714001005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Bukkvoll, Tor. “Putin’s Strategic Partnership with the West: The Domestic Politics of Russian Foreign Policy.” Comparative Strategy 22, No. 3 (2003): 223–242.10.1080/01495930390214794
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Buzan, Barry. People, States and Fear. An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Česnakas, Giedrius, and Vytautas Isoda. “Russia’s Soft Power as a Limited Efficiency Tool in Lithuania.” Politologija 93 (2019): 60–97.10.15388/Polit.2019.93.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Cheskin, Ammon. “Russian soft power in Ukraine: A structural perspective.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 50, No. 4 (2017): 277–287.10.1016/j.postcomstud.2017.09.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Chikharev, Ivan A., and Oleg V. Stoletov. “Современная динамика властныx отношений в мировой политике: от «мягкой силы» к «разумной силе»” [Modern Dynamics of Power Pelations in World Politics: from ‘Soft Power’ to ‘Smart power’]. In: Andrey V. Budaev, Andrey V. Demidov, Andrey V. Manoijlo, Oleg V. Stoletov, and Ivan A. Chikharev, eds. «Мягкая сила» в мировой политической динамике [‘Soft Power’ in World Political Dynamics]. Известия, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Ciziunas, Pranas. “Russia and the Baltic States: Is Russian Imperialism Dead?” Comparative Strategy 27, No. 3 (2008): 287–307.10.1080/01495930802185692
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Cottey, Andrew. Security in the new Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Ćwiek-Karpowicz, Jarosław. Limits to Russian Soft Power in the Post-Soviet Area. DGAPanalyse, 2012.10.5771/9783845241968-47
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Delehanty, Will K., and Brent J. Steele. “Engaging the narrative in ontological (in)security theory: insights from feminist IR.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22, No. 3 (2009): 523–540.10.1080/09557570903104024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Diez, Thomas. “Europe’s others and the return of geopolitics.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17, No. 2 (2010): 319–335.10.1080/0955757042000245924
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Domańska, Maria. “The myth of the Great Patriotic War as a tool of the Kremlin’s great power policy” (December 31, 2019) // https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2019-12-31/myth-great-patriotic-war-a-tool-kremlins-great-power-policy.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Feklyunina, Valentina. “Soft power and identity: Russia, Ukraine and the ‘Russian world(s)’.” European Journal of International Relations 22, No. 4 (2016): 773–798.10.1177/1354066115601200
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Ganoshchenko, Alexander. “«Мягкая сила»: добровольное взаимодействие и доступ к ресурсам [‘Soft Power’: Voluntary Interaction and Access to Resources].” Международная жизнь [International Life] No. 8 (2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Hill, Christopher. The Changin Politics of Foreign Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Kazarinova, Irina V. “Россия и Европейский союз: культурная дипломатия и противоречия стратегического партнерства [Russia and the European Union: Cultural Diplomacy and Contradictions of Strategic Partnership]: 262–276.” In: Andrey V. Lavrov, ed. Россия в современном диалоге цивилизаций [Russia in the Modern Dialogue of Civilizations]. Культурная революция, 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Kimmage, Michael. “The People’s Authoritarian: How Russian Society Created Putin.” Foreign Affairs (2018).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Kinnvall, Catarina. “Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security.” Political Psychology 25, No. 5 (2004): 741–767.10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00396.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Kolesnikov, Andrei. “Putin Welcomes Stalin Back to the Pantheon. A New Russian Patriotism Embraces the Soviet Past” (October 1, 2019) // https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russian-federation/2019-10-01/putin-welcomes-stalin-back-pantheon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Lavrov, Sergey. “Russia’s Foreign Policy in a Historical Perspective” (March 30, 2016) // https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/russias-foreign-policy-in-a-historical-perspective/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Leonova, Olga. “Мягкая сила - ресурс внешней политики государства” [Soft Power – A Resource of the Foreign Policy of a State]. Obozrevatel - Observer (2013): 27–40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Levada Center. “‘Союзники’ и ‘враги’ среди стран” [‘Allies’ and ‘enemies’ among countries] (June 14, 2019) // https://www.levada.ru/2019/06/14/soyuzniki-i-vragi-sredi-stran/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Levada Center. “Russian Discrimination in the Post-Soviet Space” (April 29, 2015) // https://www.levada.ru/en/2015/04/29/russian-discrimination-in-the-post-soviet-space/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Levada Center. “World War II” (July 12, 2016) // https://www.levada.ru/en/2016/07/12/world-war-ii-2/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Lock, Edward. “Soft power and strategy: Developing a ‘strategic’ concept of power”: 32–50. In: Inderjeet Parmer and Michael Cox, eds. Soft Power and US Foreign Policy: Theoretical, Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. New York: Routledge, 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Matar, Hosam. “Limits of US soft power in the Arab world (2003–15).” Contemporary Arab Affairs 9, No. 3 (2016): 428–444.10.1080/17550912.2016.1191786
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Matveeva, Anna. “Russia’s Power Projection after the Ukraine Crisis.” Europe-Asia Studies 70, No. 5 (2018): 711–737.10.1080/09668136.2018.1479735
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Merkel, Angela. “Policy statement by Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel on the situation in Ukraine” (March 13, 2014) // https://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-en/news/policy-statement-by-federal-chancellor-angela-merkel-on-the-situation-in-ukraine-443796.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Lithuania. “Linas Linkevičius vokiečių transliuotojui: ‘Rusija sulaužė visas įmanomas sutartis’” [Linas Linkevičius to the German broadcaster: ‘Russia has broken all possible contracts’]. 15min.lt (May 24, 2014) // http://urm.lt/default/lt/naujienos/linas-linkevicius-vokieciu-transliuotojui-rusija-sulauze-visas-imanomas-sutartis-15minlt-2014-m-geguzes-24-d.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Lithuania. “Linas Linkevičius: Putinas pateisino sovietų-nacių paktą. Metas vakarams pabusti. theguardian.com, 2014 m. spalio 7 d.” [Linas Linkevičius: Putin has defended the Nazi-Soviet pact. Time for the west to wake up. theguardian.com, October 7, 2014] (November 11, 2014) // http://urm.lt/default/lt/naujienos/linas-linkevicius-putinas-pateisino-sovietu-naciu-pakta-metas-vakarams-pabusti-theguardiancom-2014-m-spalio-7-d.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Lithuania. “Užsienio reikalų ministras L. Linkevičius susitiko su Laisvosios Rusijos forumo dalyviais” [Minister of Foreign Affairs L. Linkevičius met with the participants of the Free Russia Forum] (October 14, 2016) // http://urm.lt/default/lt/naujienos/uzsienio-reikalu-ministras-l-linkevicius-susitiko-su-laisvosios-rusijos-forumo-dalyviais.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Miskimmon, Alister, Ben O’Loughlin, and Laura Roselle. Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order. London and New York, NY: Routledge, 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Neijmark, Mark A. “«Мягкая сила» в мировой политике. К уточнению проблемного поля. Часть 1” [‘Soft power’ in World Politics. Clarifying the Problem Field. Part 1]. Обозреватель / Observer 312, No. 1 (2016): 31–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Neumann, Iver B. Uses of the Other. ‘The East’ in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Nosovich, Alexander. “The Baltics in 2020. Frontline States and the Double Periphery” (January 20, 2020) // https://russiancouncil.ru/en/analytics-and-comments/analytics/the-baltics-in-2020-frontline-states-and-the-double-periphery/?sphrase_id=39215517.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Nye, Joseph S. Bound To Lead– The Changing Nature Of American Power. Basic Books, 1990.10.2307/2151022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Nye, Joseph S. “Smart Power. In search of the balance between hard and soft power.” Democracy Journal (2006).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Nye, Joseph S. Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2004.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Nye, Joseph S. The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs, 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Nye, Joseph S. “What China and Russia Don’t Get about Soft Power.” Foreign Policy (April 2013).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Petro, Nicolai N. “Russia’s Orthodox Soft Power.” Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs (March 23, 2015) // https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/articles_papers_reports/727#_ftn1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Petrov, Nikita. “Don’t Speak, Memory. How Russia Represses Its Past.” Foreign Affairs 97, No. 1 (January/February 2018): 16–21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Petrovsky, Vladimir. “«Мягкая сила» по-русски в поисках точки опоры” [‘Soft power’ in Russian in search of a fulcrum]. Международная жизнь [International Life] No. 7 (2013).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. “PJSC Gazprom Annual Report 2019.” Gazprom (2019) // https://www.gazprom.com/f/posts/72/802627/gazprom-annual-report-2019-en.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Popescu, Gabriel. “Diaspora Geopolitics: Romanian-Americans and NATO Expansion.” Geopolitics 10, No. 3 (2005): 455–481.10.1080/14650040591003480
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. President of Russia. “Interview to Politika newspaper” (October 15, 2014) // http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/interviews/46806.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. President of Russia. “Interview to American TV channel CBS and PBS” (September 29, 2015) // http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/interviews/50380.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. President of Russia. “Remembering the Holocaust: Fighting Antisemitism forum” (January 23, 2020) // http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/62646.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. President of the Republic of Lithuania. “Narystė ES – vienas geriausių Lietuvos istorijoje sprendimų” [EU membership is one of the best decisions in the history of Lithuania] (April 30, 2014) // https://www.lrp.lt/lt/ziniasklaidos-centras/naujienos/19212.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Putin, Vladimir. “Address to the Federal Assembly” (April 25, 2005) // http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2005/04/25/1223_type63372type63374type82634_87049.shtml.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Putnam, Robert D. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42, No. 3 (1988): 427–460.10.1017/S0020818300027697
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Raik, Kristi. “Liberalism and geopolitics in EU–Russia relations: rereading the ‘Baltic factor’.” European Security 25, No. 2 (2016): 237–255.10.1080/09662839.2016.1179628
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Risse, Thomas. “Identity Matters: Exploring the Ambivalence of EU Foreign Policy.” Global Policy 3, No. 1 (2012): 87-95.10.1111/1758-5899.12019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Roselle, Laura, Alister Miskimmon, and Ben O’Loughlin. “Strategic narrative: A new means to understand soft power.” Media, War & Conflict 7, No. 1 (2014): 70–84.10.1177/1750635213516696
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Rutland, Peter, and Andrei Kazantsev. “The limits of Russia’s ‘soft power’.” Journal of Political Power 9, No. 3 (2016): 395–413.10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232287
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Rytų Europos Studijų Centras [Eastern European Studies Centre]. “Geopolitikos ir tarptautinės politikos bei grėsmių suvokimo tyrimas remiantis reprezentatyviu Lietuvos visuomenės nuomonės tyrimu” [Survey of geopolitics and international politics and perception of threats based on a representative survey] (July 2020) // https://www.eesc.lt/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/RESC-tyrimas.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. Schmitt, Olivier. “When are strategic narratives effective? The shaping of political discourse through the interaction between political myths and strategic narratives.” Contemporary Security Policy 39, No. 4 (2018): 487–511.10.1080/13523260.2018.1448925
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. Seiichi, Kondo. “Wielding Soft Power: The Key Stages of Transmission and Reception”: 191–206. In: Yasushi Watanabe and David L. McConnell, eds. Soft Power Superpowers: Cultural and National Assets of Japan and the United States. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. Sergunin, Alexander, and Leonid Karabeshkin. “Understanding Russia’s Soft Power Strategy.” Politics 35, No. 3-4 (2015): 347–363.10.1111/1467-9256.12109
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. Sidorova, Elena. “EU – Russia Cultural Relations.” International Organisations Research Journal 9, No. 3 (2014): 62–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
62. Smirnov, Vadim. “Russia’s ‘soft power’ in the Baltic” (May 4, 2012) // https://russiancouncil.ru/en/analytics-and-comments/analytics/russia-s-soft-power-in-the-baltic/?sphrase_id=39221415.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
63. Steele, Brent J. Ontological Security in International Relations. Self-identity and the IR state. New York: Routledge, 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
64. Szostek, Joanna. “Defence and Promotion of Desired State Identity in Russia’s Strategic Narrative.” Geopolitics 22, No. 3 (2016): 571–593.10.1080/14650045.2016.1214910
]Search in Google Scholar
[
65. Szostek, Joanna. “News media repertoires and strategic narrative reception: A paradox of disbelief in authoritarian Russia.” New media & society (2016): 1–20.10.1177/1461444816656638
]Search in Google Scholar
[
66. Szostek, Joanna. “The Power and Limits of Russia’s Strategic Narrative in Ukraine: The Role of Linkage.” Perspectives on Politics 15, No. 2 (2017): 379–395.10.1017/S153759271700007X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
67. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. “Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation” (November 30, 2016) // https://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/official_documents/-/asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/2542248.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
68. Tyushka, Andriy. “Russian geopolitical narratives from ‘geopolitics 101’ to postmodern revisionism: Implications for the Baltic-Pontic Region.” Global Affairs (2018): 487–501.10.1080/23340460.2018.1502620
]Search in Google Scholar
[
69. Van Herpen, Marcel. Putin’s Propaganda Machine: Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
70. Vorotnikov, Vladislav. “Twenty Years of Russo-Lithuanian Dialogue: Results and the Outlook for the Future”: 55–58. In: I. Timofeev, T. Makmutov, I. Sorokina, M. Smekalova, and R. Mayka, eds. Evolution of Post-Soviet Space: Past Present and Future. Moscow: RIAC, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
71. Walker, Christopher. “The Authoritarian Threat: The Hijacking of ‘Soft Power’.” Journal of Democracy 27, No. 1 (2016): 49–63.10.1353/jod.2016.0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
72. Walker, Christopher, and Jessica Ludwig. “Sharp Power: Rising Authoritarian Influence.” International Forum for Democratic Studies (2017) // https://www.ned.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Introduction-Sharp-Power-Rising-Authoritarian-Influence.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
73. Walker, Christopher, and Jessica Ludwig. “The Meaning of Sharp Power How Authoritarian States Project Influence” (November 16, 2017) // https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2017-11-16/meaning-sharp-power.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
74. Wendt, Alexander. “Collective Identity Formation and the International State.” The American Political Science Review 88, No. 2 (1994): 384–396.10.2307/2944711
]Search in Google Scholar
[
75. Yablokov, Ilya. “Conspiracy Theories as a Russian Public Diplomacy Tool: The Case of Russia Today (RT).” Politics 35, No. 3-4 (2015): 301–315.10.1111/1467-9256.12097
]Search in Google Scholar
