1. bookTom 14 (2021): Zeszyt 2 (December 2021)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2029-0454
Pierwsze wydanie
05 Feb 2009
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
access type Otwarty dostęp

You Shall Not Pass: The Strategic Narratives Defining Russia’s Soft Power in Lithuania

Data publikacji: 17 Mar 2022
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 14 (2021) - Zeszyt 2 (December 2021)
Zakres stron: 1 - 25
Otrzymano: 08 Nov 2021
Przyjęty: 20 Dec 2021
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2029-0454
Pierwsze wydanie
05 Feb 2009
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Abstract

The article argues that states’ narratives about themselves and each other, shaped by the foreign policy decision-makers, create filters for the achievement of soft power goals. A state agent can shape narratives that can be rejected by the state’s target’s society because they would undermine dominating biographical and strategic narratives of the state target. The empirical analysis of the narratives of the president, minister of foreign affairs, and spokesperson of the MFA of Russia illustrates how Russia prevents itself from soft power expansion by “othering” Lithuania. At the same time, analysis of the narratives of presidents and the minister of the foreign affairs of Lithuania illustrates how they shield society from Russia’s narratives and, thus, soft power while searching for “sameness” with the Euro-Atlantic partners.

Keywords

1. Berenskoetter, Felix. “Parameters of a national biography.” European Journal of International Relations 20, No. 1 (2014): 262–288.10.1177/1354066112445290 Search in Google Scholar

2. Browning, Christopher S. “The Region-Building Approach Revisited: The Continued Othering of Russia in Discourses of Region-Building in the European North.” Geopolitics 8, No. 1 (2003): 45–71.10.1080/714001005 Search in Google Scholar

3. Bukkvoll, Tor. “Putin’s Strategic Partnership with the West: The Domestic Politics of Russian Foreign Policy.” Comparative Strategy 22, No. 3 (2003): 223–242.10.1080/01495930390214794 Search in Google Scholar

4. Buzan, Barry. People, States and Fear. An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991. Search in Google Scholar

5. Česnakas, Giedrius, and Vytautas Isoda. “Russia’s Soft Power as a Limited Efficiency Tool in Lithuania.” Politologija 93 (2019): 60–97.10.15388/Polit.2019.93.3 Search in Google Scholar

6. Cheskin, Ammon. “Russian soft power in Ukraine: A structural perspective.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 50, No. 4 (2017): 277–287.10.1016/j.postcomstud.2017.09.001 Search in Google Scholar

7. Chikharev, Ivan A., and Oleg V. Stoletov. “Современная динамика властныx отношений в мировой политике: от «мягкой силы» к «разумной силе»” [Modern Dynamics of Power Pelations in World Politics: from ‘Soft Power’ to ‘Smart power’]. In: Andrey V. Budaev, Andrey V. Demidov, Andrey V. Manoijlo, Oleg V. Stoletov, and Ivan A. Chikharev, eds. «Мягкая сила» в мировой политической динамике [‘Soft Power’ in World Political Dynamics]. Известия, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

8. Ciziunas, Pranas. “Russia and the Baltic States: Is Russian Imperialism Dead?” Comparative Strategy 27, No. 3 (2008): 287–307.10.1080/01495930802185692 Search in Google Scholar

9. Cottey, Andrew. Security in the new Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. Search in Google Scholar

10. Ćwiek-Karpowicz, Jarosław. Limits to Russian Soft Power in the Post-Soviet Area. DGAPanalyse, 2012.10.5771/9783845241968-47 Search in Google Scholar

11. Delehanty, Will K., and Brent J. Steele. “Engaging the narrative in ontological (in)security theory: insights from feminist IR.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22, No. 3 (2009): 523–540.10.1080/09557570903104024 Search in Google Scholar

12. Diez, Thomas. “Europe’s others and the return of geopolitics.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17, No. 2 (2010): 319–335.10.1080/0955757042000245924 Search in Google Scholar

13. Domańska, Maria. “The myth of the Great Patriotic War as a tool of the Kremlin’s great power policy” (December 31, 2019) // https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2019-12-31/myth-great-patriotic-war-a-tool-kremlins-great-power-policy. Search in Google Scholar

14. Feklyunina, Valentina. “Soft power and identity: Russia, Ukraine and the ‘Russian world(s)’.” European Journal of International Relations 22, No. 4 (2016): 773–798.10.1177/1354066115601200 Search in Google Scholar

15. Ganoshchenko, Alexander. “«Мягкая сила»: добровольное взаимодействие и доступ к ресурсам [‘Soft Power’: Voluntary Interaction and Access to Resources].” Международная жизнь [International Life] No. 8 (2017). Search in Google Scholar

16. Hill, Christopher. The Changin Politics of Foreign Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. Search in Google Scholar

17. Kazarinova, Irina V. “Россия и Европейский союз: культурная дипломатия и противоречия стратегического партнерства [Russia and the European Union: Cultural Diplomacy and Contradictions of Strategic Partnership]: 262–276.” In: Andrey V. Lavrov, ed. Россия в современном диалоге цивилизаций [Russia in the Modern Dialogue of Civilizations]. Культурная революция, 2008. Search in Google Scholar

18. Kimmage, Michael. “The People’s Authoritarian: How Russian Society Created Putin.” Foreign Affairs (2018). Search in Google Scholar

19. Kinnvall, Catarina. “Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security.” Political Psychology 25, No. 5 (2004): 741–767.10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00396.x Search in Google Scholar

20. Kolesnikov, Andrei. “Putin Welcomes Stalin Back to the Pantheon. A New Russian Patriotism Embraces the Soviet Past” (October 1, 2019) // https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russian-federation/2019-10-01/putin-welcomes-stalin-back-pantheon. Search in Google Scholar

21. Lavrov, Sergey. “Russia’s Foreign Policy in a Historical Perspective” (March 30, 2016) // https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/russias-foreign-policy-in-a-historical-perspective/. Search in Google Scholar

22. Leonova, Olga. “Мягкая сила - ресурс внешней политики государства” [Soft Power – A Resource of the Foreign Policy of a State]. Obozrevatel - Observer (2013): 27–40. Search in Google Scholar

23. Levada Center. “‘Союзники’ и ‘враги’ среди стран” [‘Allies’ and ‘enemies’ among countries] (June 14, 2019) // https://www.levada.ru/2019/06/14/soyuzniki-i-vragi-sredi-stran/. Search in Google Scholar

24. Levada Center. “Russian Discrimination in the Post-Soviet Space” (April 29, 2015) // https://www.levada.ru/en/2015/04/29/russian-discrimination-in-the-post-soviet-space/. Search in Google Scholar

25. Levada Center. “World War II” (July 12, 2016) // https://www.levada.ru/en/2016/07/12/world-war-ii-2/. Search in Google Scholar

26. Lock, Edward. “Soft power and strategy: Developing a ‘strategic’ concept of power”: 32–50. In: Inderjeet Parmer and Michael Cox, eds. Soft Power and US Foreign Policy: Theoretical, Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. New York: Routledge, 2010. Search in Google Scholar

27. Matar, Hosam. “Limits of US soft power in the Arab world (2003–15).” Contemporary Arab Affairs 9, No. 3 (2016): 428–444.10.1080/17550912.2016.1191786 Search in Google Scholar

28. Matveeva, Anna. “Russia’s Power Projection after the Ukraine Crisis.” Europe-Asia Studies 70, No. 5 (2018): 711–737.10.1080/09668136.2018.1479735 Search in Google Scholar

29. Merkel, Angela. “Policy statement by Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel on the situation in Ukraine” (March 13, 2014) // https://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-en/news/policy-statement-by-federal-chancellor-angela-merkel-on-the-situation-in-ukraine-443796. Search in Google Scholar

30. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Lithuania. “Linas Linkevičius vokiečių transliuotojui: ‘Rusija sulaužė visas įmanomas sutartis’” [Linas Linkevičius to the German broadcaster: ‘Russia has broken all possible contracts’]. 15min.lt (May 24, 2014) // http://urm.lt/default/lt/naujienos/linas-linkevicius-vokieciu-transliuotojui-rusija-sulauze-visas-imanomas-sutartis-15minlt-2014-m-geguzes-24-d. Search in Google Scholar

31. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Lithuania. “Linas Linkevičius: Putinas pateisino sovietų-nacių paktą. Metas vakarams pabusti. theguardian.com, 2014 m. spalio 7 d.” [Linas Linkevičius: Putin has defended the Nazi-Soviet pact. Time for the west to wake up. theguardian.com, October 7, 2014] (November 11, 2014) // http://urm.lt/default/lt/naujienos/linas-linkevicius-putinas-pateisino-sovietu-naciu-pakta-metas-vakarams-pabusti-theguardiancom-2014-m-spalio-7-d. Search in Google Scholar

32. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Lithuania. “Užsienio reikalų ministras L. Linkevičius susitiko su Laisvosios Rusijos forumo dalyviais” [Minister of Foreign Affairs L. Linkevičius met with the participants of the Free Russia Forum] (October 14, 2016) // http://urm.lt/default/lt/naujienos/uzsienio-reikalu-ministras-l-linkevicius-susitiko-su-laisvosios-rusijos-forumo-dalyviais. Search in Google Scholar

33. Miskimmon, Alister, Ben O’Loughlin, and Laura Roselle. Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order. London and New York, NY: Routledge, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

34. Neijmark, Mark A. “«Мягкая сила» в мировой политике. К уточнению проблемного поля. Часть 1” [‘Soft power’ in World Politics. Clarifying the Problem Field. Part 1]. Обозреватель / Observer 312, No. 1 (2016): 31–42. Search in Google Scholar

35. Neumann, Iver B. Uses of the Other. ‘The East’ in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998. Search in Google Scholar

36. Nosovich, Alexander. “The Baltics in 2020. Frontline States and the Double Periphery” (January 20, 2020) // https://russiancouncil.ru/en/analytics-and-comments/analytics/the-baltics-in-2020-frontline-states-and-the-double-periphery/?sphrase_id=39215517. Search in Google Scholar

37. Nye, Joseph S. Bound To Lead– The Changing Nature Of American Power. Basic Books, 1990.10.2307/2151022 Search in Google Scholar

38. Nye, Joseph S. “Smart Power. In search of the balance between hard and soft power.” Democracy Journal (2006). Search in Google Scholar

39. Nye, Joseph S. Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2004. Search in Google Scholar

40. Nye, Joseph S. The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

41. Nye, Joseph S. “What China and Russia Don’t Get about Soft Power.” Foreign Policy (April 2013). Search in Google Scholar

42. Petro, Nicolai N. “Russia’s Orthodox Soft Power.” Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs (March 23, 2015) // https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/articles_papers_reports/727#_ftn1. Search in Google Scholar

43. Petrov, Nikita. “Don’t Speak, Memory. How Russia Represses Its Past.” Foreign Affairs 97, No. 1 (January/February 2018): 16–21. Search in Google Scholar

44. Petrovsky, Vladimir. “«Мягкая сила» по-русски в поисках точки опоры” [‘Soft power’ in Russian in search of a fulcrum]. Международная жизнь [International Life] No. 7 (2013). Search in Google Scholar

45. “PJSC Gazprom Annual Report 2019.” Gazprom (2019) // https://www.gazprom.com/f/posts/72/802627/gazprom-annual-report-2019-en.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

46. Popescu, Gabriel. “Diaspora Geopolitics: Romanian-Americans and NATO Expansion.” Geopolitics 10, No. 3 (2005): 455–481.10.1080/14650040591003480 Search in Google Scholar

47. President of Russia. “Interview to Politika newspaper” (October 15, 2014) // http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/interviews/46806. Search in Google Scholar

48. President of Russia. “Interview to American TV channel CBS and PBS” (September 29, 2015) // http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/interviews/50380. Search in Google Scholar

49. President of Russia. “Remembering the Holocaust: Fighting Antisemitism forum” (January 23, 2020) // http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/62646. Search in Google Scholar

50. President of the Republic of Lithuania. “Narystė ES – vienas geriausių Lietuvos istorijoje sprendimų” [EU membership is one of the best decisions in the history of Lithuania] (April 30, 2014) // https://www.lrp.lt/lt/ziniasklaidos-centras/naujienos/19212. Search in Google Scholar

51. Putin, Vladimir. “Address to the Federal Assembly” (April 25, 2005) // http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2005/04/25/1223_type63372type63374type82634_87049.shtml. Search in Google Scholar

52. Putnam, Robert D. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42, No. 3 (1988): 427–460.10.1017/S0020818300027697 Search in Google Scholar

53. Raik, Kristi. “Liberalism and geopolitics in EU–Russia relations: rereading the ‘Baltic factor’.” European Security 25, No. 2 (2016): 237–255.10.1080/09662839.2016.1179628 Search in Google Scholar

54. Risse, Thomas. “Identity Matters: Exploring the Ambivalence of EU Foreign Policy.” Global Policy 3, No. 1 (2012): 87-95.10.1111/1758-5899.12019 Search in Google Scholar

55. Roselle, Laura, Alister Miskimmon, and Ben O’Loughlin. “Strategic narrative: A new means to understand soft power.” Media, War & Conflict 7, No. 1 (2014): 70–84.10.1177/1750635213516696 Search in Google Scholar

56. Rutland, Peter, and Andrei Kazantsev. “The limits of Russia’s ‘soft power’.” Journal of Political Power 9, No. 3 (2016): 395–413.10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232287 Search in Google Scholar

57. Rytų Europos Studijų Centras [Eastern European Studies Centre]. “Geopolitikos ir tarptautinės politikos bei grėsmių suvokimo tyrimas remiantis reprezentatyviu Lietuvos visuomenės nuomonės tyrimu” [Survey of geopolitics and international politics and perception of threats based on a representative survey] (July 2020) // https://www.eesc.lt/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/RESC-tyrimas.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

58. Schmitt, Olivier. “When are strategic narratives effective? The shaping of political discourse through the interaction between political myths and strategic narratives.” Contemporary Security Policy 39, No. 4 (2018): 487–511.10.1080/13523260.2018.1448925 Search in Google Scholar

59. Seiichi, Kondo. “Wielding Soft Power: The Key Stages of Transmission and Reception”: 191–206. In: Yasushi Watanabe and David L. McConnell, eds. Soft Power Superpowers: Cultural and National Assets of Japan and the United States. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2008. Search in Google Scholar

60. Sergunin, Alexander, and Leonid Karabeshkin. “Understanding Russia’s Soft Power Strategy.” Politics 35, No. 3-4 (2015): 347–363.10.1111/1467-9256.12109 Search in Google Scholar

61. Sidorova, Elena. “EU – Russia Cultural Relations.” International Organisations Research Journal 9, No. 3 (2014): 62–73. Search in Google Scholar

62. Smirnov, Vadim. “Russia’s ‘soft power’ in the Baltic” (May 4, 2012) // https://russiancouncil.ru/en/analytics-and-comments/analytics/russia-s-soft-power-in-the-baltic/?sphrase_id=39221415. Search in Google Scholar

63. Steele, Brent J. Ontological Security in International Relations. Self-identity and the IR state. New York: Routledge, 2008. Search in Google Scholar

64. Szostek, Joanna. “Defence and Promotion of Desired State Identity in Russia’s Strategic Narrative.” Geopolitics 22, No. 3 (2016): 571–593.10.1080/14650045.2016.1214910 Search in Google Scholar

65. Szostek, Joanna. “News media repertoires and strategic narrative reception: A paradox of disbelief in authoritarian Russia.” New media & society (2016): 1–20.10.1177/1461444816656638 Search in Google Scholar

66. Szostek, Joanna. “The Power and Limits of Russia’s Strategic Narrative in Ukraine: The Role of Linkage.” Perspectives on Politics 15, No. 2 (2017): 379–395.10.1017/S153759271700007X Search in Google Scholar

67. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. “Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation” (November 30, 2016) // https://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/official_documents/-/asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/2542248. Search in Google Scholar

68. Tyushka, Andriy. “Russian geopolitical narratives from ‘geopolitics 101’ to postmodern revisionism: Implications for the Baltic-Pontic Region.” Global Affairs (2018): 487–501.10.1080/23340460.2018.1502620 Search in Google Scholar

69. Van Herpen, Marcel. Putin’s Propaganda Machine: Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

70. Vorotnikov, Vladislav. “Twenty Years of Russo-Lithuanian Dialogue: Results and the Outlook for the Future”: 55–58. In: I. Timofeev, T. Makmutov, I. Sorokina, M. Smekalova, and R. Mayka, eds. Evolution of Post-Soviet Space: Past Present and Future. Moscow: RIAC, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

71. Walker, Christopher. “The Authoritarian Threat: The Hijacking of ‘Soft Power’.” Journal of Democracy 27, No. 1 (2016): 49–63.10.1353/jod.2016.0007 Search in Google Scholar

72. Walker, Christopher, and Jessica Ludwig. “Sharp Power: Rising Authoritarian Influence.” International Forum for Democratic Studies (2017) // https://www.ned.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Introduction-Sharp-Power-Rising-Authoritarian-Influence.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

73. Walker, Christopher, and Jessica Ludwig. “The Meaning of Sharp Power How Authoritarian States Project Influence” (November 16, 2017) // https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2017-11-16/meaning-sharp-power. Search in Google Scholar

74. Wendt, Alexander. “Collective Identity Formation and the International State.” The American Political Science Review 88, No. 2 (1994): 384–396.10.2307/2944711 Search in Google Scholar

75. Yablokov, Ilya. “Conspiracy Theories as a Russian Public Diplomacy Tool: The Case of Russia Today (RT).” Politics 35, No. 3-4 (2015): 301–315.10.1111/1467-9256.12097 Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo