1. bookTom 14 (2021): Zeszyt 2 (December 2021)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2029-0454
Pierwsze wydanie
05 Feb 2009
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
access type Otwarty dostęp

Protection of Human Dignity at the End of Life of the Terminally Ill: Ethical and Legal Considerations about the Law and Policy on Advance Directives in Lithuania

Data publikacji: 17 Mar 2022
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 14 (2021) - Zeszyt 2 (December 2021)
Zakres stron: 26 - 48
Otrzymano: 01 Dec 2021
Przyjęty: 30 Dec 2021
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2029-0454
Pierwsze wydanie
05 Feb 2009
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Abstract

Recently amended legal regulations established the opportunity of application of advance directives for terminally ill patients in Lithuania. Provisionally, advance directives should enhance patient’s rights while making complex end of life decisions, however, implications for legal and moral responsibility to empower a patient’s autonomy are not clearly established yet. The article discusses the legal and ethical justification of implementation of advance directives and, in their absence, the surrogate decision making for the best interests of the patient and the best representation of the patient’s will. The reflections of recent empirical studies indicate the importance of a patient-centered approach that can provide the hints for harmonization of the national legal system, including a supportive decision-making culture, raising public awareness and confidence, more effective professional communication, and broader public involvement into end-of-life deliberations. Analysis of legal and ethical arguments imposes the conclusion that the specific question of respect of dignity in the end of life is not just a problem of health care management or the quality of health care services, but a fundamental challenge of human rights that should be discussed at the policy decision making level. Overall, we assume that application of advance directives should be elaborated in accordance with the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), the ideals of welfare society, and other national laws as well as public interests.

Keywords

1. Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995. Search in Google Scholar

2. Andorno, Roberto, and Stefania Negri. “Regulating advance directives at the Council of Europe.” Queen Mary studies in international law (2012): 73–85 // doi.org/10.5167/UZH-68937. Search in Google Scholar

3. Andorno, Roberto, David M. Shaw, and Bernice Elger. “Protecting prisoners’ autonomy with advance directives: ethical dilemmas and policy issues.” Medicine, health care and philosophy 18.1 (2015): 33–39.10.1007/s11019-014-9571-z Search in Google Scholar

4. Andorno, Roberto. “Human Dignity and Human Rights” (2021) // https://www.academia.edu/8973976/Human_Dignity_and_Human_Rights. Search in Google Scholar

5. Astromskė, Kristina, et al. “Sunkiomis ir nepagydomomis ligomis sergančių asmenų orumo apsaugos reikalavimas – tarptautinės ir nacionalinės teisės normos bei praktiniai jų taikymo aspektai.” Law Review 23, No. 1 (2021): 3–21 // https://doi.org/10.7220/2029-4239.23.1.10.7220/2029-4239.23.1 Search in Google Scholar

6. Barnes, Sarah, et al. “Enhancing patient-professional communication about end-of-life issues in life-limiting conditions: a critical review of the literature.” Journal of pain and symptom management 44.6 (2012): 866–879.10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.11.009 Search in Google Scholar

7. Billings, Andrew J. “The need for safeguards in advance care planning.” Journal of general internal medicine 27.5 (2012): 595–600.10.1007/s11606-011-1976-2 Search in Google Scholar

8. Brown, Samuel M. “Whose Advance Directives Are They, after All?” The Lancet Respiratory Medicine 5, No. 6 (June 2017): 464–66 // https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30176-5.10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30176-5 Search in Google Scholar

9. Butkevičienė, Rūta, et al. “Being Heard: A Qualitative Study of Lithuanian Health Care Professionals’ Perceptions of Dignity at the End-of-Life.” Medicina 57.12 (2021) // doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121318. Search in Google Scholar

10. Delgado, Janet. “Re-thinking relational autonomy: Challenging the triumph of autonomy through vulnerability.” Bioethics Update 5.1 (2019): 50–65.10.1016/j.bioet.2018.12.001 Search in Google Scholar

11. Drahos, Peter, Martin Krygier. “Regulation, Institutions and Networks”: 1–22. In: Peter Drahos, ed. Regulatory theory: foundations and applications. Acton: ANU Press, 2017 // http://hdl.handle.net/1814/50511. Search in Google Scholar

12. Fetherstonhaugh, Deirdre, et al. “Decision-making on behalf of people living with dementia: how do surrogate decision-makers decide?” Journal of Medical Ethics 43.1 (2017): 35–40.10.1136/medethics-2015-103301 Search in Google Scholar

13. Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality. London: Penguin, 1990. Search in Google Scholar

14. Fritch, Jenna, et al. “Making decisions for hospitalized older adults: ethical factors considered by family surrogates.” The Journal of clinical ethics 24.2 (2013): 125–134. Search in Google Scholar

15. Guide on the decision-making process regarding medical treatment in end-of-life situations. Council of Europe, May 2014. Search in Google Scholar

16. Hemati, Zeinab, et al. “Dying with dignity: a concept analysis.” Journal of clinical nursing 25.9-10 (2016): 1218–1228 // https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13143.10.1111/jocn.13143 Search in Google Scholar

17. Horn, Ruth. “‘Why Should I Question a Patient’s Wish?’ A Comparative Study on Physicians’ Perspectives on Their Duties to Respect Advance Directives.” European Journal of Health Law 24.5 (2017): 523–540.10.1163/15718093-12341437 Search in Google Scholar

18. Houben, Carmen H., et al. “Efficacy of advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 15.7 (2014): 477–489.10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.008 Search in Google Scholar

19. Izumi, Shigeko, et al. “Defining end-of-life care from perspectives of nursing ethics.” Nursing ethics 19.5 (2012): 608–618.10.1177/0969733011436205 Search in Google Scholar

20. Jonsen, Albert R., Mark Siegler, and William J. Winslade. Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisionsin Clinical Medicine. 8th ed. NY: McGraw-Hill, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

21. Kudukytė-Gasperė, Renata, Danguolė Jankauskienė, and Kęstutis Štaras. “Assessment of nursing and social policy changes in Centro out-patient clinics.” Sveikatos Politika ir Valdymas (Health Policy and Management) 1.4 (2012): 127–146. Search in Google Scholar

22. Kuhl, David, Matthew B. Stanbrook, and Paul C. Hébert. “What people want at the end of life.” CMAJ 182 (16) (November 2010): 1707 // doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101201.10.1503/cmaj.101201 Search in Google Scholar

23. Lunder, Urška, Branka Červ, and Hana Kodba-Čeh. “Impact of advance care planning on end-of-life management.” Current opinion in supportive and palliative care 11.4 (2017): 293–298 // doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000306. Search in Google Scholar

24. Miller, David Gibbes, Rebecca Dresser, and Scott YH Kim. “Advance euthanasia directives: a controversial case and its ethical implications.” Journal of medical ethics 45.2 (2019): 84–89 // http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2017-104644.10.1136/medethics-2017-104644 Search in Google Scholar

25. Moisă, Stefana, et al. “Advance directives in Romania and Lithuania.” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Philosophia 64.1 (2019): 89–98.10.24193/subbphil.2019.1.05 Search in Google Scholar

26. Moore, K. J., E. L. Sampson, N. Kupeli, and N. Davies. “Supporting families in end-of-life care and bereavement in the COVID-19 era.” International psychogeriatrics 32(10) (2020): 1245-1248 // DOI:10.1017/S1041610220000745.10.1017/S1041610220000745 Search in Google Scholar

27. Morrison, R.Sean. “Advance directives/care planning: clear, simple, and wrong.” Journal of Palliative Medicine 23.7 (2020): 878–879.10.1089/jpm.2020.0272 Search in Google Scholar

28. Neuhäuser, Christian. “The Right to a Dignified Life On the Relation of Respect, Human Rights, and Justice”: 13–32. In: The Human Right to a Dignified Existence in an International Context. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

29. Peicius, Eimantas, Aurelija Blazeviciene, and Raimondas Kaminskas. “Are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals.” BMC medical ethics 18.1 (2017): 1–7 // DOI:10.1186/s12910-017-0197-6.10.1186/s12910-017-0197-6 Search in Google Scholar

30. Rabow, Michael W., Joshua M. Hauser, and Jocelia Adams. “Supporting family caregivers at the end of life: They don’t know what they don’t know.” JAMA 291.4 (2004): 483–491 // DOI:10.1001/jama.291.4.483.10.1001/jama.291.4.483 Search in Google Scholar

31. Republic of Lithuania Law on the Establishment of Death of a Human Being, and on Critical Conditions. 25 March 1997, No. VIII-157. Search in Google Scholar

32. Republic of Lithuania Law on the Rights of Patients and Compensation for the Damage to Their Health. 3 October 1996, No. I-1562. Search in Google Scholar

33. Republic of Lithuania Minister of Health Order on the Establishment of the Standards of Resuscitation. 31 August 2011, No. V-822. Search in Google Scholar

34. Resolution 1859 concerning “Protecting human rights and dignity by taking into account previously expressed wishes of patients”. Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly (25 January 2012) // http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/Documents/AdoptedText/ta12/ERES1859.htm. Search in Google Scholar

35. Simon, A. “Historical Review of Advance Directives”: 3–16. In: Peter Lack, Nikola Biller-Andorno, and Susanne Brauer, eds. Advance Directives. Vol. 54 (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014) // https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7377-6_1.10.1007/978-94-007-7377-6_1 Search in Google Scholar

36. Singer, Peter A., Gerald Robertson, and David J. Roy. “Bioethics for clinicians: 6. Advance care planning.” CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal 155.12 (1996): 1689–1692. Search in Google Scholar

37. Sulmasy, Daniel P., and Lois Snyder. “Substituted interests and best judgments: an integrated model of surrogate decision making.” JAMA 304.17 (2010): 1946–1947 // doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1595.10.1001/jama.2010.1595 Search in Google Scholar

38. Vergallo, Gianluca Montanari. “Advance healthcare directives: binding or informational value?” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29.1 (2020): 98–109.10.1017/S0963180119000823 Search in Google Scholar

39. Winter, Laraine. “Patient values and preferences for end-of-life treatments: are values better predictors than a living will?” Journal of palliative medicine 16.4 (2013): 362–368 // https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2012.030310.1089/jpm.2012.0303 Search in Google Scholar

40. WMA. “The World Medical Association Statement on Advance Directives (‘Living Wills’).” By the WMA General Assembly, Helsinki (2003) // https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-statement-on-advance-directives-living-wills/ Search in Google Scholar

41. Wolf, Susan M., Nancy Berlinger, and Bruce Jennings. “Forty years of work on end-of-life care – from patients’ rights to systemic reform.” N Engl J Med (2015): 678–682 // https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMms1410321.10.1056/NEJMms1410321 Search in Google Scholar

42. Zivkovic, Tanya. “Forecasting and Foreclosing Futures: The Temporal Dissonance of Advance Care Directives.” Social Science & Medicine 215 (2018): 16–22 // https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.035.10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.035 Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo