1. bookTom 13 (2020): Zeszyt 1 (June 2020)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2029-0454
Pierwsze wydanie
05 Feb 2009
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Otwarty dostęp

Unequal Contributions: Problems within the Division of Shares in Joint Community Property

Data publikacji: 23 Oct 2020
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 13 (2020) - Zeszyt 1 (June 2020)
Zakres stron: 24 - 50
Otrzymano: 19 Aug 2019
Przyjęty: 14 Jul 2020
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2029-0454
Pierwsze wydanie
05 Feb 2009
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski

1. Bayles, Michael D., and W.L. Robison. The Legal Essays of Michael Bayles. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bishop, Susan. “Georgia Divorce: Dividing Property” // http://www.divorcenet.com/resources/divorce/marital-property-division/georgia-divorce-dividing-prope.Search in Google Scholar

3. Boele-Woelki, Katharina. Common Core and Better Law in European Family Law. Oxford: Intersentia, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

4. Branka, Rešetar. “Matrimonial Property in Europe: A Link between Sociology and Family Law.” Electronic Journal of Comparative Law Vol. 12.3 (2008): 1-18.Search in Google Scholar

5. Čivilytė – Gylienė, Viktorija. Trumpas šeimos teisės vadovas. Vilnius: Eugrimas, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

6. Clarkson, Chris, Leicester Jonathan, and Mark Thompson. “Study on Matrimonial Property Regimes and the Property of Unmarried Couples in Private International Law And Internal Law.” Commission Européenne (2001): 1-78.Search in Google Scholar

7. Cooke, Elizabeth, Anne Barlow, and Thérèse Callus. “Community of property A regime for England and Wales?” Great Britain The Nuffield Foundation (2006): 1-52.Search in Google Scholar

8. Dewar, John, and Stephen Parker. Family Law: Processes, Practices, Pressures. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

9. “Dividing Marital Property in The Netherlands – update” // https://veldlaw.nl/en/services/family-law/dividing-marital-property-in-the-netherlands.Search in Google Scholar

10. “Divorce – Austria” (August 2, 2007) // http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/divorce/divorce_aus_en.htm.Search in Google Scholar

11. Fishman, Jay E. Standards of Value: Theory and Applications. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

12. Hahlo, H. R. “Matrimonial Property Regimes: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 11.3 (1973): 455-478.Search in Google Scholar

13. Hawes, Joseph M. The Family in America: An Encyclopedia. Volume 2. California: ABC-CLIO, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

14. Haynes, John M, and Stephanie Charlesworth. The Fundamentals of Family Mediation. Leichhardt: Federation Press, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

15. Herring, Jonathan. Family law. London: Pearson Education, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

16. Jänterä-Jareborg, Maarit, Margareta Brattström, and Kajsa Walleng. “National Report: Sweden.” Uppsala University (2008): 1-49.Search in Google Scholar

17. Jenkins, Jeffrey A. The American Courts: A Procedural Approach. Canada: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

18. Mikelėnas, Valentinas. Šeimos teisė. Vilnius: Justitia, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

19. Miles, Joanna, and Rebecca Probert. Sharing Lives, Dividing Assets: An Inter-Disciplinary Study. USA: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

20. Morley, Jeremy D. “Some Notes on Marriage and Divorce Law in the Netherlands” // http://www.veldlaw.nl/en/services/family-law/dividing-marital-property-inthe-netherlands/.Search in Google Scholar

21. Orecchio, Tom. “What is a ‘Fair’ Division of Property in Divorce?” // http://www.hcplive.com/physicians-money-digest/columns/physicians-wealth-manager/06-2012/Division-of-Property-During-Divorce.Search in Google Scholar

22. Peskind, Steven. Divorce in Illinois: Understandable Answers to Your Legal Questions. USA: Addicus Books, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

23. Rauscher, Thomas. Familienrecht. Berlin: Hüthig Jehle Rehm, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

24. Schechter, Sara. New York Family Law. New York: Delmar, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

25. Scherpe, Jens M. “The Financial Consequences of Divorce in a European Perspective.” European Family Law Vol. 3 (2016): 1-56.Search in Google Scholar

26. Scherpe, Jens M. Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in Comparative Perspective. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

27. Schiratzkis, Johanna. “Swedish report in the European Commission’s”: 1-42. In: Study on Matrimonial Property Regimes and the Property of Unmarried Couples in Private International Law and Internal Law. General Direction Justice and Home Affairs, JAI/A3/2001/03. Brussels: European Commission, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

28. Statsky, William. Family Law: The Essentials. USA: Cengage Learning, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

29. Stretch, Rachael. Family Law. New York: Routledge, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

30. Sussman, Marvin B., et al. Handbook of Marriage and the Family. New York: Plenum Press, 1999.10.1007/978-1-4757-5367-7Search in Google Scholar

31. Tamošiūnienė, Egidija, and Inga Kudinavičiūtė-Michailovienė. Šeimos bylų nagrinėjimo ir teismo sprendimų vykdymo ypatumai. Vilnius: MRU, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

32. Vitkevičius, Pranciškus Stanislovas. Šeimos narių turtiniai teisiniai santykiai. Vilnius: Justitia, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

33. Warendorf, H. C. S., R. L. Thomas (M.A.), and Ian Sumner. The Civil Code of the Netherlands (Alphen: Kluwer Law International, 2009).Search in Google Scholar

34. Woelke, Andrea. “Response to Green Paper on Conflict of Laws in Matters Concerning Matrimonial Property Regimes, Including the Question of Jurisdiction and Mutual Recognition” // http://www.resolution.org.uk/site_content_files/files/resolution_response_to_green_paper_on_mat_pty_regimes_2.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

1. A. L. v R. L. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2006, no. 3K-3-251.Search in Google Scholar

2. A.T. v Z. T. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2017, no. 3K-3-243-969.Search in Google Scholar

3. Charman v Charman. The High Court of Justice London, 2006, EWHC 1879 (Fam).Search in Google Scholar

4. Civil Code of Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, no. VIII-1864.Search in Google Scholar

5. H. B. v J. B. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2011, no. 3K-3-517.Search in Google Scholar

6. Matrimonial Causes Act. United Kingdom, 1973.Search in Google Scholar

7. N. M. v S. M. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania 2014, no. 3K-3-342.Search in Google Scholar

8. NY Code Domestic Relations Law (2010 10 12, New York). Dom. Rel. Law § 109-117).Search in Google Scholar

9. R. A. v A. A. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2010, no. 3K-P-186.Search in Google Scholar

10. R. D. v M. D. District Court of Šiauliai, 2017, no. 2-11-776.Search in Google Scholar

11. R. K. v A. K. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2004, no. 3K-3-435.Search in Google Scholar

12. R. M. v N. M. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2008, no. 3K-3-623.Search in Google Scholar

13. R. Š. v A. Š. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2015, no. 3K-3-27-686.Search in Google Scholar

14. Sutuokinių turtines prievoles reglamentuojančių teisės normų taikymas. The Review of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, Nr. AC-40-1.Search in Google Scholar

15. Sykes v Sykes. Supreme Court, NY Slip Op 50731(U) (2014).Search in Google Scholar

16. The Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB) (1881). Veröffentlicht 1991 01 01, § 1381 Leistungsverweigerung wegen grober Unbilligkeit (2).Search in Google Scholar

17. The Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB) (1881). Veröffentlicht 1991 01 01, § 1416 Gesamtgut (1).Search in Google Scholar

18. The Family Law Act (1975 06 12, Australia). Published No. 53, (Cth) (“FLA”) (1976).Search in Google Scholar

19. V. J. v O. A. J. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2009, no. 3K-3-577.Search in Google Scholar

20. V. Z. v D. Z. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2007, no. 3K-3-463.Search in Google Scholar

21. Ž. V. v J. V. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania 2007, no. 3K-3-220.Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo