[1. Bayles, Michael D., and W.L. Robison. The Legal Essays of Michael Bayles. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bishop, Susan. “Georgia Divorce: Dividing Property” // http://www.divorcenet.com/resources/divorce/marital-property-division/georgia-divorce-dividing-prope.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Boele-Woelki, Katharina. Common Core and Better Law in European Family Law. Oxford: Intersentia, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Branka, Rešetar. “Matrimonial Property in Europe: A Link between Sociology and Family Law.” Electronic Journal of Comparative Law Vol. 12.3 (2008): 1-18.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Čivilytė – Gylienė, Viktorija. Trumpas šeimos teisės vadovas. Vilnius: Eugrimas, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Clarkson, Chris, Leicester Jonathan, and Mark Thompson. “Study on Matrimonial Property Regimes and the Property of Unmarried Couples in Private International Law And Internal Law.” Commission Européenne (2001): 1-78.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Cooke, Elizabeth, Anne Barlow, and Thérèse Callus. “Community of property A regime for England and Wales?” Great Britain The Nuffield Foundation (2006): 1-52.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Dewar, John, and Stephen Parker. Family Law: Processes, Practices, Pressures. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. “Dividing Marital Property in The Netherlands – update” // https://veldlaw.nl/en/services/family-law/dividing-marital-property-in-the-netherlands.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. “Divorce – Austria” (August 2, 2007) // http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/divorce/divorce_aus_en.htm.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Fishman, Jay E. Standards of Value: Theory and Applications. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Hahlo, H. R. “Matrimonial Property Regimes: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 11.3 (1973): 455-478.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Hawes, Joseph M. The Family in America: An Encyclopedia. Volume 2. California: ABC-CLIO, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Haynes, John M, and Stephanie Charlesworth. The Fundamentals of Family Mediation. Leichhardt: Federation Press, 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Herring, Jonathan. Family law. London: Pearson Education, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Jänterä-Jareborg, Maarit, Margareta Brattström, and Kajsa Walleng. “National Report: Sweden.” Uppsala University (2008): 1-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Jenkins, Jeffrey A. The American Courts: A Procedural Approach. Canada: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Mikelėnas, Valentinas. Šeimos teisė. Vilnius: Justitia, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Miles, Joanna, and Rebecca Probert. Sharing Lives, Dividing Assets: An Inter-Disciplinary Study. USA: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Morley, Jeremy D. “Some Notes on Marriage and Divorce Law in the Netherlands” // http://www.veldlaw.nl/en/services/family-law/dividing-marital-property-inthe-netherlands/.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Orecchio, Tom. “What is a ‘Fair’ Division of Property in Divorce?” // http://www.hcplive.com/physicians-money-digest/columns/physicians-wealth-manager/06-2012/Division-of-Property-During-Divorce.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Peskind, Steven. Divorce in Illinois: Understandable Answers to Your Legal Questions. USA: Addicus Books, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Rauscher, Thomas. Familienrecht. Berlin: Hüthig Jehle Rehm, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Schechter, Sara. New York Family Law. New York: Delmar, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Scherpe, Jens M. “The Financial Consequences of Divorce in a European Perspective.” European Family Law Vol. 3 (2016): 1-56.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Scherpe, Jens M. Marital Agreements and Private Autonomy in Comparative Perspective. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Schiratzkis, Johanna. “Swedish report in the European Commission’s”: 1-42. In: Study on Matrimonial Property Regimes and the Property of Unmarried Couples in Private International Law and Internal Law. General Direction Justice and Home Affairs, JAI/A3/2001/03. Brussels: European Commission, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Statsky, William. Family Law: The Essentials. USA: Cengage Learning, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Stretch, Rachael. Family Law. New York: Routledge, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Sussman, Marvin B., et al. Handbook of Marriage and the Family. New York: Plenum Press, 1999.10.1007/978-1-4757-5367-7]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Tamošiūnienė, Egidija, and Inga Kudinavičiūtė-Michailovienė. Šeimos bylų nagrinėjimo ir teismo sprendimų vykdymo ypatumai. Vilnius: MRU, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Vitkevičius, Pranciškus Stanislovas. Šeimos narių turtiniai teisiniai santykiai. Vilnius: Justitia, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Warendorf, H. C. S., R. L. Thomas (M.A.), and Ian Sumner. The Civil Code of the Netherlands (Alphen: Kluwer Law International, 2009).]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Woelke, Andrea. “Response to Green Paper on Conflict of Laws in Matters Concerning Matrimonial Property Regimes, Including the Question of Jurisdiction and Mutual Recognition” // http://www.resolution.org.uk/site_content_files/files/resolution_response_to_green_paper_on_mat_pty_regimes_2.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[1. A. L. v R. L. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2006, no. 3K-3-251.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. A.T. v Z. T. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2017, no. 3K-3-243-969.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Charman v Charman. The High Court of Justice London, 2006, EWHC 1879 (Fam).]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Civil Code of Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, no. VIII-1864.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. H. B. v J. B. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2011, no. 3K-3-517.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Matrimonial Causes Act. United Kingdom, 1973.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. N. M. v S. M. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania 2014, no. 3K-3-342.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. NY Code Domestic Relations Law (2010 10 12, New York). Dom. Rel. Law § 109-117).]Search in Google Scholar
[9. R. A. v A. A. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2010, no. 3K-P-186.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. R. D. v M. D. District Court of Šiauliai, 2017, no. 2-11-776.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. R. K. v A. K. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2004, no. 3K-3-435.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. R. M. v N. M. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2008, no. 3K-3-623.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. R. Š. v A. Š. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2015, no. 3K-3-27-686.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Sutuokinių turtines prievoles reglamentuojančių teisės normų taikymas. The Review of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, Nr. AC-40-1.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Sykes v Sykes. Supreme Court, NY Slip Op 50731(U) (2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[16. The Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB) (1881). Veröffentlicht 1991 01 01, § 1381 Leistungsverweigerung wegen grober Unbilligkeit (2).]Search in Google Scholar
[17. The Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB) (1881). Veröffentlicht 1991 01 01, § 1416 Gesamtgut (1).]Search in Google Scholar
[18. The Family Law Act (1975 06 12, Australia). Published No. 53, (Cth) (“FLA”) (1976).]Search in Google Scholar
[19. V. J. v O. A. J. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2009, no. 3K-3-577.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. V. Z. v D. Z. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2007, no. 3K-3-463.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Ž. V. v J. V. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania 2007, no. 3K-3-220.]Search in Google Scholar
