[
Anderson, L. D., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley-Longman, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Armstrong, P. (2010). Bloom’s Taxonomy. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved from: https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York, NY: David McKay Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Darwazeh, A. N. (2017). A new revision of the [revised] Bloom’s Taxonomy. Distance Learning, 14(3), 13-28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Köksal, D., & Ulum, Ö. G. (2018). Language assessment through Bloom’s Taxonomy. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 14(2), 76-88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ordem, E. (2017a). Developing critical-thinking dispositions in a listening/speaking class. English Language Teaching, 10(1), 50-55.10.5539/elt.v10n1p50
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ordem, E. (2017b). A longitudinal study of motivation in foreign and second language learning context. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(2), 334-341.10.5539/jel.v6n2p334
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ordem, E. (2017c). A language teacher’s reflection on maladaptive immunity, possible selves and motivation. International Education Studies, 10(9), 1-8.10.5539/ies.v10n9p1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ordem, E. (2021). Participatory action research in a listening-speaking class in second language teaching: Towards a critical syllabus. Educational Action Research, 51(4) 1-17.10.1080/09650792.2021.1898431
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pohl, M. (2000). Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn: Models and Strategies to Develop a Classroom Culture of Thinking. Highett, Vic.: Hawker Brownlow Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tarlinton, D. (2003). Bloom‘s Revised Taxonomy. Pupil Free Day. Australia, Apresentação: Kurwongbah State School. Retrieved from: www.kurwongbss.eq.edu.au/thinking/Bloom/bloomspres.ppt
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ulum, Ö. G. (2016). A descriptive content analysis of the extent of Bloom’s taxonomy in the reading comprehension questions of the course book Q: Skills for Success 4 Reading and Writing. Qualitative Report, 21(9).10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2172
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, C. K., Farmer, J. A., & Wolff, P. M. (1991). Instructional Design: Implications from Cognitive Science. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl-Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised. Understanding the New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Retrieved from: https://thesecondprinciple.com/essential-teaching-skills/blooms-taxonomy-revised/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zareian, G., Davoudi, M., Heshmatifar, Z., & Rahimi, J. (2015). An evaluation of questions in two ESP coursebooks based on Bloom’s new taxonomy of cognitive learning domain. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(8), 313-326.
]Search in Google Scholar
