[
Abd-El-Khalick, F. et al. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. DOI: 10.1002/sce.10118
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Abels, S. (2015). Scaffolding inquiry-based science and chemistry education in inclusive classrooms. In N. L. Yates (Ed.), New developments in science education research (pp. 77–96). New York: Nova.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Abrams, E., Southerland, S. A. & Evans, C. A. (2008). Introduction: Inquiry in the Classroom: Identifying Necessary Components of a Useful Definition. In Abrams, E., Southerland, S. A. & Silva, P. C. (Eds.), Inquiry in the Classroom: Realities and Opportunities (pp. xi–xlii). Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.1023/a:1015171124982
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Barron, B. & Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Prospects and challenges for inquiry-based approaches to learning. In Dumont, H., Istance, D. & Benavides, F. (Eds.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice (pp. 199–225): OECD Publishing.10.1787/9789264086487-11-en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BIFIE. (2011). Kompetenzmodell Naturwissenschaften 8. Schulstufe [Competency model Science Grade 8]. Wien: BIFIE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blanchard, M. R. et al. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94(4), 577-616. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20390
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
BMB. (2016). Bundesgesetzblatt für die Republik Österreich Nr. 219/2016 Teil II. [Federal Law Gazette of the Republic of Austria No. 219/2016, Part II.]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J. & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do different levels of inquiry lead to different learning outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937–1959.10.1080/09500693.2014.886347
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bybee, R. W. et al. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS, 5, 88–98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheung, D. (2011). Teacher beliefs about implementing guided-inquiry laboratory experiments for secondary school chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(11), 1462–1468. DOI: 10.1021/ed1008409
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science scope, 23(6), 42–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crawford, B. A. (2014). From Inquiry to Scientific Practices in the Science Classroom. In Lederman, N. G. & Abell, S. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (Vol. 2, pp. 515–541). New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DiBiase, W. & McDonald, J. R. (2015). Science Teacher Attitudes Toward Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 88(2), 29–38. DOI: 10.1080/00098655.2014.987717
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Engeln, K., Euler, M. & Maass, K. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in mathematics and science: a comparative baseline study of teachers’ beliefs and practices across 12 European countries. ZDM, 45(6), 823–836. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-013-0507-5
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furtak, E. M. et al. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching a meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 82(3), 300–329. DOI: 10.3102/0034654312457206
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G. & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. DOI: 10.1080/00461520701263368
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Hofer, E., Lembens, A. & Abels, S. (2016). Enquiry-based science education in Austrian teacher professional development courses. In Eilks, I., Markic, S. & Ralle, B. (Eds.), Science education research and practical work: a collection of invited papers inspired by the 23rd Symposium on Chemistry and Science Education held at the TU Dortmund University, May 26-28, 2016 (pp. 271–277). Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jiang, F. & McComas, W. F. (2015). The effects of inquiry teaching on student science achievement and attitudes: Evidence from propensity score analysis of PISA data. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 554–576.10.1080/09500693.2014.1000426
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J. & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
KMK. (2005). Bildungsstandards im Fach Chemie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss: Beschluss vom 16.12.2004 [Educational standards for the Subject Chemistry for the Intermediate School leaving certificate: decree of16/12/2004]. München: Luchterhand.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lederman, N. G. (2008). What did you do in science today? In Abrams, E., Southerland, S. A. & Silva, P. (Eds.), Inquiry in the classroom. Realities and opportunities. (pp. 25–35). Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lipowsky, F. (2010). Lernen im Beruf – Empirische Befunde zur Wirksamkeit von Lehrerfortbildung [Learning in the job − empirical findings on the effectiveness of teacher professional development]. In Müller, F. H., Eichenberger, A., Lüders, M. & Mayr, J. (Eds.), Lehrerinnen und Lehrer lernen – Konzepte und Befunde zur Lehrerfortbildung [Teachers learn − concepts and findings of teacher professional development] (pp. 51–72). Münster: Waxmann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayer, J. & Ziemek, H.-P. (2006). Offenes Experimentieren. Forschendes Lernen im Biologieunterricht [Open-ended experiments. Inquiry-based learning in biology lessons]. Unterricht Biologie, 317, 1–9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis. Principles and Techniques] (11th ed.). Weinheim und Basel: Beltz.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J. & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction − what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20347
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards: National Academy Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: National Academy Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
National Research Council (NRC). (2013). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington: National Academies Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Science Framework. In: PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oguz-Unver, A. & Arabacioglu, S. (2014). A comparison of inquiry-based learning (IBL), problem-based learning (PBL) and project-based learning (PJBL) in science education. Academia Journal of Educational Research, 2(7), 120–128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roberts, D. A. & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In Lederman, N. G. & Abell, S. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (Vol. 2, pp. 545–558). New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S. & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground–A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161–197.10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schroeder, C. M. et al. (2007). A meta-analysis of national research: Effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1436-1460. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20212
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In Schwab, J. J. & Brandwein, P. F. (Eds.), The teaching of science, (pp. 3-103). New York: Simon and Schuster.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scruggs, T. E. & Mastropieri, M. A. (2007). Science learning in special education: The case for constructed versus instructed learning. Exceptionality, 15(2), 57–74. DOI: 10.1080/09362830701294144
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Wallace, C. S. & Kang, N. H. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 936–960.10.1002/tea.20032
]Search in Google Scholar
