1. bookTom 6 (2019): Zeszyt 1 (June 2019)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
Pierwsze wydanie
16 Apr 2015
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Otwarty dostęp

Shaping Strömsö: Examining Elements in a Creative Process for the Design of New Television Content

Data publikacji: 28 Jun 2019
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 6 (2019) - Zeszyt 1 (June 2019)
Zakres stron: 42 - 65
Otrzymano: 30 Aug 2018
Przyjęty: 18 Apr 2019
Informacje o czasopiśmie
Pierwsze wydanie
16 Apr 2015
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku

Aaltonen, J. (2018). Käsikirjoittajan työkalut. Audiovisuaalisen käsikirjoituksen tekijän opas. [Tools for the Screen Writer. A guide for the practitioner of audiovisual screen-writing]. Tampere: SKS.Search in Google Scholar

Abuhamdeh, S., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2004). The artistic personality: A systems perspective. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 31-42). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10692-00310.1037/10692-003Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. doi:10.2307/25699510.2307/256995Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. Y., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1117-1122. doi:10.1177/095679761244602410.1177/0956797612446024Search in Google Scholar

Barron, F. (1963). The need for order and disorder as motives in creativity. In C.W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 153-160). New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Basadur, M. (1995). Optimal ideation-evaluation ratios. Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 63-75. doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0801_510.1207/s15326934crj0801_5Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.Search in Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A. (2014). Creative mortification: An initial exploration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 266-276.10.1037/a0036618Search in Google Scholar

Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Revisiting Mednick’s model on creativity-related differences in associative hierarchies. Evidence for a common path to uncommon thought. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(4), 273-289.Search in Google Scholar

Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Glaveanu, V., Botella, M., Guillou, K., De Biasi, P. M., & Lubart, T. (2014). The creativity maze: Exploring creativity in screenplay writing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 384-399. doi:10.1037/a003783910.1037/a0037839Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cai, D. J., Mednick, S. A., Harrison, E. M., Kanady, J. C., & Mednick, S. C. (2009). REM, not incubation, improves creativity by priming associative networks. PNAS Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 106(25), 10130-10134. doi:10.1073/pnas.090027110610.1073/pnas.0900271106Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cameron, R. (2011). Mixed Methods Research: The Five Ps Framework. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 9(2), 96-108.Search in Google Scholar

Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent Creativity: A Functional Model of Creativity in Terrorism and Crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 105-115. doi.org/10.1080/1040041080205942410.1080/10400410802059424Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1971). Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of creative products: A study with artists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(1), 47-52. doi:10.1037/h003110610.1037/h0031106Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The systems model of creativity and its applications. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 533-545). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118367377.ch2510.1002/9781118367377.ch25Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dane, E. (2010). Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 579-603.Search in Google Scholar

Davey, N. (2006). Unquiet understanding: Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.10.2307/258557Search in Google Scholar

Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 443-475.10.2189/asqu.52.3.443Search in Google Scholar

Gilson, L. L., & Madjar, N. (2011). Radical and incremental creativity: Antecedents and processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 21-28. doi:10.1037/a001786310.1037/a0017863Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Goodell, G. (1998). Independent feature film production. A complete guide from concept through distribution. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin.Search in Google Scholar

Grosser, T. J., Venkataramani, V., & Labianca, G. (2017). An alter-centric perspective on employee innovation: The importance of alters’ creative self-efficacy and network structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(9), 1360-1374. doi:10.1037/apl000022010.1037/apl0000220Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53(4), 267-293. doi:10.1037/h004075510.1037/h0040755Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224.10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224Search in Google Scholar

Henderson, K. A. & Bedini, L. A. (1995) Notes on linking qualitative and quantitative data. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 29(2), 124-130.Search in Google Scholar

Hocevar, D. (1979a). A comparison of statistical infrequency and subjective judgment as criteria in the measurement of originality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43(3), 297-299. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4303_1310.1207/s15327752jpa4303_13Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hocevar, D. (1979b). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 191-196. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.19110.1037/0022-0663.71.2.191Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Huber, J. C. (1998). Invention and inventivity is a random, Poisson process: A potential guide to analysis of general creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(3), 231-241.10.1207/s15326934crj1103_3Search in Google Scholar

Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69-90. doi:10.1080/1040041070933688310.1080/10400410709336883Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Jay, E. & Perkins, D. (1997) Creativity’s compass: A review of problem finding. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Creativity research handbook, Vol. 1, (257-293). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kessel, M., Kratzer, J., & Schultz, C. (2012). Psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and creative performance in healthcare teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2), 147-157. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00635.x10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00635.xOtwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622-629.10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622Search in Google Scholar

Kornilova, T. V., & Kornilov, S. A. (2010). Intelligence and tolerance/intolerance for uncertainty as predictors of creativity. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 3, 240-256. doi:10.11621/pir.2010.001210.11621/pir.2010.0012Search in Google Scholar

Levine, K. J., Heuett, K. B., & Reno, K. M. (2015). Re-operationalizing established groups in brainstorming: Validating Osborn’s claims. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51 (3), 252-262. doi:10.1002/jocb.12210.1002/jocb.122Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 757-767. doi:10.2307/306930910.2307/3069309Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mäkelä, M. & Routarinne, S. (2006). An introduction to the art of research. In M. Mäkelä & S. Routarinne (Eds.) The art of research. Research practices in art and design. (p.22) Helsinki: University of Art and Design.Search in Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1990). Innovation, illegitimacy, and individualism. Creativity Research Journal, 3(2), 118-124. doi:10.1080/1040041900953434310.1080/10400419009534343Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar

McMahon, K., Ruggeri, A., Kämmer, J. E., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2016). Beyond idea generation: The power of groups in developing ideas. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 247-257.10.1080/10400419.2016.1195637Search in Google Scholar

Mednick, S.A. (1962) The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69, 220–232.10.1037/h0048850Search in Google Scholar

Morney, E. (2007). Pitchrundan våren 2007 - ett nytt element i beställningsprocessen på Svenska Yle [Pitching spring 2007 - a new element in the process of ordering new television programs at Yle, Swedish section] (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Industrial Arts, Helsinki.Search in Google Scholar

Morney, E. (2011). Strömsö – Så skapades programkonceptet [Strömsö – This is how the concept was made]. Helsinki: Svenska Yle. Internally published report.Search in Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27-4310.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27Search in Google Scholar

Ness, I. J. & Søreide, G. E. (2014). The Room of Opportunity: Understanding phases of creative knowledge processes in innovation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(8), 545-560. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-10-2013-007710.1108/JWL-10-2013-0077Search in Google Scholar

Oleynick, V. C., Thrash, T. M., LeFew, M. C., Moldovan, E. G., & Kieffaber, P. D. (2014). The scientific study of inspiration in the creative process: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00436/fullSearch in Google Scholar

O’Quin, K., & Besemer, S.P. (2011). Creative products. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 273-281). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, A.F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner’s.Search in Google Scholar

Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity, Phi Beta Kappen, 42, 305-310.Search in Google Scholar

Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1988). Setting the stage for discovery. The Sciences, 28(3), 26-34.10.1002/j.2326-1951.1988.tb03019.xSearch in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1994a). Conclusions concerning problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 271-291). Westport, CT, US: Ablex Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1994b). Creativity and its discontents. In M. P. Shaw & M. A. Runco (Eds.), Creativity and affect (pp. 102-123). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2003). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Education, 47, 317-324.10.1080/00313830308598Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2007). A hierarchical framework for the study of creativity. New Horizons in Education, 55(3), 1-9.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Cayirdag, N. (2012). The theory of personal creativity and implications for the fulfillment of children’s potentials. In O. N. Saracho (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on research in creativity in early childhood education (pp. 31-43). Charlotte, NC: IAP Information Age Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243-267.doi:10.1007/BF0221337310.1007/BF02213373Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. E. (1993). Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(5), 537-546. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90337-310.1016/0191-8869(93)90337-3Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.65009210.1080/10400419.2012.650092Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., & Kim, D. (2011). The four P’s of creativity: Person, product, process, and press. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 534-537). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81. doi:10.1037/a001328210.1037/a0013282Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1976). Philosophical eminence, beliefs, and zeitgeist: An individual-generational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 630-640. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.4.63010.1037/0022-3514.34.4.630Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1979). Multiple discovery and invention: Zeitgeist, genius, or chance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(9), 1603-1616. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.9.160310.1037/0022-3514.37.9.1603Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1980). Thematic fame, melodic originality, and musical zeitgeist: A biographical and transhistorical content analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(6), 972-983. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.97210.1037/0022-3514.38.6.972Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1990). History, chemistry, psychology, and genius: An intellectual autobiography of historiometry. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of Creativity (pp. 92-115). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1998). Creativity, genius, and talent development. Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 21(1), 86-87.Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2004). Exceptional creativity and chance: Creative thought as a stochastic combinatorial process. In L. V. Shavinina & M. Ferrari, (Eds.), Beyond knowledge: Extracognitive aspects of developing high ability (pp. 39-72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2013). Creative thought as blind variation and selective retention: Why creativity is inversely related to sightedness. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 33(4), 253-266. doi:10.1037/a003070510.1037/a0030705Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2015). Thomas Edison’s creative career: The multilayered trajectory of trials, errors, failures, and triumphs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(1), 2.10.1037/a0037722Search in Google Scholar

Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 94-120. doi:10.1037/a001421210.1037/a0014212Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sullivan, G. (2010). Art practice as research: Inquiry in visual arts (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, P., Parker, R., & Cox, S. (2016). Interrogating creative theory and creative work: Inside the games studio. Sociology, 50(2), 316-33210.1177/0038038514565836Search in Google Scholar

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.10.2307/3069429Search in Google Scholar

Tobi, H., & Kampen, J. K. (2018). Research design: the methodology for interdisciplinary research framework. Quality & Quantity, 52(3), 1209-1225. doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0513-810.1007/s11135-017-0513-8Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (1979). The search for satori & creativity. Buffalo, N.Y.: Creative Education Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851.10.1177/1077800410383121Search in Google Scholar

Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. J. Cape: London.Search in Google Scholar

Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. doi:10.2307/25876110.2307/258761Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zhang, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2011). Revisiting the investment theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 229-238.10.1080/10400419.2011.595974Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo