1. bookTom 6 (2019): Zeszyt 1 (June 2019)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2354-0036
Pierwsze wydanie
16 Apr 2015
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Otwarty dostęp

Judging Popular Novels as Creative Products: Which Creative Attributes Contribute to their Success?

Data publikacji: 28 Jun 2019
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 6 (2019) - Zeszyt 1 (June 2019)
Zakres stron: 20 - 41
Otrzymano: 22 Aug 2018
Przyjęty: 10 May 2019
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2354-0036
Pierwsze wydanie
16 Apr 2015
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski

Acar, S., Burnett, C., & Cabra, J. F. (2017). Ingredients of Creativity: Originality and more. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.130277610.1080/10400419.2017.1302776Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Agnoli, S., & Corazza, G. E. (2019). Emotions: The Spinal Cord of the Creative Thinking Process. In R. A. Beghetto & G. E. Corazza (Eds.), Dynamic Perspectives on Creativity (pp. 47-65). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Albrecht, R. (1977). Buch und Leser in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Book and reader in the Federal Republic of Germany] (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany).Search in Google Scholar

Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355-429.10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430Search in Google Scholar

Beck, J. (2006). The sales effect of word of mouth: A model for creative goods and estimates for novels. Journal of Cultural Economics, 31, 5-23.10.1007/s10824-006-9029-0Search in Google Scholar

Besemer, S. P. (1998). Creative Product Analysis Matrix: Testing the model structure and a comparison among products - Three novel chairs. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj110410.1207/s15326934crj1104Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Besemer, S. P. (2000). To buy or not to buy: Predicting the willingness to buy from creative product variables. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 10, 5-18.Search in Google Scholar

Besemer, S. P., & O’Quin, K. (1986). Analyzing creative products: Refinement and test of a judging instrument. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00426.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00426.xOtwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Besemer, S. P., & O’Quin, K. (1999). Confirming the three-factor Creative Product Analysis Matrix Model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj120410.1207/s15326934crj1204Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Besemer, S. P., & Treffinger, D. J. (1981). Analysis of creative products: Review and synthesis. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 15, 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1981.tb00287.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.1981.tb00287.xOtwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Birney, D. P, Beckmann, J. F., & Seah, Y.-Z. (2016). More than the eye of the beholder: The interplay of person, task, and situation factors in evaluative judgements of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 400-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.00710.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.007Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Blair, C. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Errors in idea evaluation: Preference for the unoriginal? Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01288.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01288.xOtwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(71)90019-310.1016/0010-0285(71)90019-3Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Burke, M. (2015). The neuroaesthetics of prose fiction: pitfalls, parameters and prospects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.0044210.3389/fnhum.2015.00442Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Carson, S., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50.10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4Search in Google Scholar

Chevalier, J., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.34510.1509/jmkr.43.3.345Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Clement, M., Proppe, D., & Sambeth, F. (2006). Der Einfluss von Meinungsführern auf den Erfolg von hedonischen Produkten [The impact of opinion leaders on the success of hedonic products]. Journal of Business Economics, 76, 797–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-006-0038-410.1007/s11573-006-0038-4Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2008). Elements of a universal aesthetic of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.3.15510.1037/1931-3896.2.3.155Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cropley, D., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Measuring functional creativity: Non-expert raters and the Creative Solution Diagnosis Scale. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(2), 119-137.10.1002/jocb.9Search in Google Scholar

Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In J. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Faces of the muse: How people think, work and act creatively in diverse domains (pp. 169–185). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Das, J. P., Rath, R., & Das, R. S. (1955). Understanding versus suggestion in the judgement of literary passages. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 51, 624–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/h004934410.1037/h0049344Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Diedrich, J., Benedek, M., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2015). Are creative ideas novel and useful? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/a003868810.1037/a0038688Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2013). G*Power 3.1.7 Software. Retrieved from http://gpower.hhu.de/Search in Google Scholar

Forgeard, M. J. C., Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). The psychology of creative writing. In G. Harper (Ed.), A companion to creative writing (pp. 320–333). New York, NY: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Form, S. (2018). Reaching wuthering heights with brave new words: The influence of originality of words on the success of paramount bestsellers. The Journal of Creative Behavior. ŁŁ, 0, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.23010.1002/jocb.230Search in Google Scholar

Form, S., Schlichting, K., & Kaernbach, C. (2017). Mentoring functions: Interpersonal tensions are associated with mentees’ creative achievement. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 440-450.10.1037/aca0000103Search in Google Scholar

Funke, C. (2003). Tintenherz [Inkheart]. Hamburg, Germany: Cessilie Dressler.Search in Google Scholar

Fürst, G., Ghisletta, P., & Lubart, T. (2017). An experimental study of the creative process in writing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 202–215.10.1037/aca0000106Search in Google Scholar

Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. The American Journal of Psychology, 10, 389-407.10.2307/1423013Search in Google Scholar

Hohendahl, P. U. (1973). Promoter, Konsumenten und Kritiker: Zur Rezeption des Bestsellers [Promoters, consumers and critics: To the reception of the bestseller]. In J. Grimm, Reinhold; Hermand (Ed.), 4th Wisconsin Workshop (pp. 169–209). Madison, WI: Athenäum.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2006a). Consumer-based assessment of product creativity: A review and reappraisal. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 16, 155-175.10.1002/hfm.20047Search in Google Scholar

Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2006b). Product creativity: conceptual model, measurement and characteristics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 7, 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922050007819510.1080/14639220500078195Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Measuring consumer perception of product creativity: Impact on satisfaction and purchasability. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 19, 223–240.10.1002/hfm.20150Search in Google Scholar

Kamphuis, J. (1991). Satisfaction with books: Some empirical findings. Poetics, 20, 471–485.10.1016/0304-422X(91)90021-GSearch in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.64923710.1080/10400419.2012.649237Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Cole, J. C. (2009). Expertise, domains, and the Consensual Assessment Technique. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01316.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01316.xOtwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Keuschnigg, M. (2012). Das Bestseller-Phänomen: Die Entstehung von Nachfragekonzentration im Buchmarkt [The bestseller phenomenon: The emergence of demand concentration in the book market]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93499-0_210.1007/978-3-531-93499-0_2Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lauterbach, B. R. (1979). Bestseller: Produktions- und Verkaufsstrategien [Bestseller: Production and sales strategies]. Tübingen: Tübinger Vereinigung für Volkskunde.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, C.-C., & Luh, D.-B. (2012). A comparison of assessment methods and raters in product creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.73032710.1080/10400419.2012.730327Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84Search in Google Scholar

Mandler, J. M., & Ritchey, G. H. (1977). Long-term memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 3, 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.3.4.38610.1037/0278-7393.3.4.386Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York, NY: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1995). Fame more fickle than fortune: On the distribution of literary eminence. Poetics, 23, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00026-310.1016/0304-422X(94)00026-3Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (2007). Creativity, primordial cognition, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1777–1785.10.1016/j.paid.2007.05.014Search in Google Scholar

Martindale, C., Brewer, W. F., Helson, R., Rosenberg, S., Simonton, D. K., Keeley, A., Leigh, J., & Ohtsuka, K. (1988). Structure, theme, style, and reader response in Hungarian and American short stories. In C. Martindale (Ed.), Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives (pp. 267–289). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, S. (2005). Twilight. New York, NY: Little, Brown.Search in Google Scholar

Michael, W. B., Rosenthal, B. G., & De Camp, M. A. (1949). An experimental investigation of prestige-suggestion for two types of literary material. The Journal of Psychology, 28, 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1949.991601210.1080/00223980.1949.9916012Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nell, V. (1988). The psychology of reading for pleasure: Needs and gratifications. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 6–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/74790310.2307/747903Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

O’Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (1989). The development, reliability, and validity of the revised Creative Product Semantic Scale. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040041890953432310.1080/10400418909534323Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

O’Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (2006). Using the Creative Product Semantic Scale as a metric for results-oriented business. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00367.x10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00367.xOtwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Paton, E. (2012). “When the book takes over”: Creativity, the writing process and flow in Australian fiction writing. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 22, 61–76.Search in Google Scholar

Plucker, J. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Temple, J. S. (2009). Do experts and novices evaluate movies the same way? Psychology & Marketing, 26, 470–478.10.1002/mar.20283Search in Google Scholar

Rietzschel, E., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2010). The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712609X41420410.1348/000712609X414204Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rollka, B. (1975). Vom Elend der Literaturkritik: Buchwerbung und Buchbesprechungen in der Welt am Sonntag [About the misery of literary criticism: book advertising and book reviews in the Welt am Sonntag]. Berlin: Volker Spiess.Search in Google Scholar

Rowling, J. K. (1997). Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. London, UK: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66–75.10.1080/10400419.2012.652929Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96.10.1080/10400419.2012.650092Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_1610.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sachs, J. S. (1974). Memory in reading and listening to discourse. Memory & Cognition, 2, 95–100. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF0319749810.3758/BF03197498Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Scherer, M. R. (1994). The influences of the relationship between primary and secondary process content on aesthetic success in novels. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 12, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.2190/D156-0C3R-F5KG-RBQE10.2190/156-03-5-RBQEOtwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Schmidt-Stölting, C., Blömeke, E., & Clement, M. (2011). Success drivers of fiction books: An empirical analysis of hardcover and paperback editions in Germany. Journal of Media Economics, 24, 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/08997764.2011.54942810.1080/08997764.2011.549428Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1986). Popularity, content, and context in 37 Shakespeare plays. Poetics, 15, 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(86)90008-210.1016/0304-422X(86)90008-2Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1988). Aesthetic success in 36 Hungarian and American short stories. In C. Martindale (Ed.), Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives (pp. 66–73). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1990). Lexical choices and aesthetic success: A computer content analysis of 154 Shakespeare sonnets. Computers and the Humanities, 24, 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0012341210.1007/BF00123412Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the U.S. patent office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97–106.10.1080/10400419.2012.676974Search in Google Scholar

Smith, B. L. (1993). Interpersonal behaviors that damage the productivity of creative problem solving groups. Journal of Creative Behavior, 27, 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1993.tb00705.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.1993.tb00705.xOtwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sorensen, A. T. (2007). Bestseller lists and product variety. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 55, 715–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2007.00327.x10.1111/j.1467-6451.2007.00327.xOtwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Staw, B. M. (1995). Why no one really wants creativity. In C. M. Ford & D. Gioia (Eds.), Creative action in organizations (pp. 161–166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Stokmans, M. J. W. (1999). Reading attitude and its effect on leisure time reading. Poetics, 26, 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00005-410.1016/S0304-422X(99)00005-4Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sutherland, J. (1981). Bestsellers: Popular Fiction of the 1970s. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Tolkien, J. R. R. (1937). The Hobbit. George Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (2008). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual, verbal forms A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Search in Google Scholar

Van Rees, C. J. (1983). How a literacy work becomes a masterpiece: On the threefold selection practised by literary criticism. Poetics, 12, 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(83)90015-310.1016/0304-422X(83)90015-3Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Van Rees, C. J. (1987). How reviewers reach consensus on the value of literary works. Poetics, 16, 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(87)90008-810.1016/0304-422X(87)90008-8Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Verdaasdonk, H. (1983). Social and economic factors in the attribution of literary quality. Poetics, 12, 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(83)90014-110.1016/0304-422X(83)90014-1Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

White, A., Shen, F., & Smith, B. L. (2002). Judging advertising creativity using the creative product semantic scale. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01067.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01067.xOtwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo