1. bookTom 21 (2017): Zeszyt 2 (December 2017)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2344-150X
Pierwsze wydanie
30 Jul 2013
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
access type Otwarty dostęp

A Research on the Social Responsibility Efficiency of Chinese Listed Food Companies

Data publikacji: 29 Dec 2017
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 21 (2017) - Zeszyt 2 (December 2017)
Zakres stron: 83 - 90
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2344-150X
Pierwsze wydanie
30 Jul 2013
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Abstract

On the basis of establishing an input-output index system of listed food companies’ social responsibility, this paper uses the DEA model to assess 22 Chinese listed food companies’ social responsibility efficiency between 2014 and 2016. Results show that the social responsibility efficiency of Chinese listed food companies is generally lower and the average of the 22 companies is only 0.665. The social responsibility management in 81.80% of listed food companies is in a relatively ineffective state. There is a big room for improvement. In addition, the social responsibility efficiencies of listed companies with different sizes are quite different. The social responsibility efficiency of large-sized listed food company is obviously higher than that of the small and medium-sized. The study also shows that the social responsibility efficiencies of most listed food companies are in the stage of increasing returns to scale and more input would be necessary in order to achieve higher efficiency.

Keywords

1. André, R. (2012). Assessing the accountability of the benefit corporation: will this new gray sector organization enhance corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 133-150. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1254-1.10.1007/s10551-012-1254-1Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Bowen, H. R., Gond, J. P., & Bowen, P. G. (1954). Social responsibilities of the businessman. American Catholic Sociological Review, 15(1), 42. DOI: 10.2307/3708003.10.2307/3708003Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505. DOI: 10.2307/257850.10.2307/257850Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Clement, W. (1979). The royal commission on corporate concentration: comment. Canadian Public Policy, 5(1), 120-126. DOI: 10.2307/355022810.2307/3550228Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Corporate Governance, 27(3), 129-138. DOI: 10.2307/255956.10.2307/255956Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Dodd, E. M. (1932). For whom are corporate managers trustees?. Harvard Law Review, 45(7), 1145-1163. DOI: 10.2307/1331697.10.2307/1331697Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Fogler, H. R., & Nutt, F. (1975). A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 18(1), 155-160. DOI: 10.2307/25563510.2307/255635Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard - measure that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, (January-February), 71–79. DOI: 00178012.Search in Google Scholar

9. Lopez, B. & Fornes, G. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in emerging markets: case studies of Spanish MNCs in Latin America. European Business Review. 27(2), 214-230. DOI:10.1108/EBR-03-2013-0053.10.1108/EBR-03-2013-0053Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Peters, S. Miller, M., & Kusyk, S. (2011). How relevant is corporate governance and corporate social responsibility in emerging markets? Corporate Governance, 11(4), 429–445. DOI:/10.1108/14720701111159262.Search in Google Scholar

11. Patten, D. M., Ren, Y. & Zhao, N. (2015). Standalone corporate social responsibility reporting in China: an exploratory analysis of its relation to legitimation. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal. 35 (1), 17-31. DOI:10.1080/1540496X.2015.1021594.10.1080/1540496X.2015.1021594Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Sheldon, O. (1924). The Philosophy of Management. London: Sir Isaac Pit-man and Sons Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo