Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Volume 42 (2020): Numero 2 (June 2020)
Accesso libero
Modelling the time-dependent behaviour of soft soils
Katarzyna Staszewska
Katarzyna Staszewska
e
Marcin Cudny
Marcin Cudny
| 30 giu 2020
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Volume 42 (2020): Numero 2 (June 2020)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Article Category:
Research Article
Pubblicato online:
30 giu 2020
Pagine:
97 - 110
Ricevuto:
17 giu 2019
Accettato:
30 set 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2019-0034
Parole chiave
creep
,
soft soil
,
normally consolidated soils
,
elasto-viscoplastic model
© 2020 Katarzyna Staszewska et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Figure 1
Influence of OCR on the creep rate in oedometric conditions.
Figure 2
Undrained shear strength in triaxial extension resulting from the application of isotropic model and the real shear strength.
Figure 3
Results of displacement-controlled load tests on floating CSV (Combined Soil Stabilization with Vertical Columns) micropiles after Vermeer and Leoni [5]. s˙\dot s is the penetration rate and a is its reference value.
Figure 4
Results of the shallow foundation load test on dense sand after Briaud and Gibbens [8].
Figure 5
Creep stages based on the strain versus time curve.
Figure 6
Creep during primary consolidation according to hypotheses A and B after Degago [10].
Figure 7
System of isochrones describing the compressibility characteristics of soft soils after Bjerrum [13].
Figure 8
Instant and delayed deformations according to Bjerrum [13].
Figure 9
Time- and stress-compressibility interrelationship after Mesri and Godlewski [15].
Figure 10
Isotaches concept.
Figure 11
MCC model – the real yield surface known from high accuracy experiments, for example, [38, 43], is indicated with grey colour. MCS is the slope of the CSL [24].
Figure 12
Cap models. Mc and Me are the slopes of M-C criterion in the case of triaxial compression and extension, respectively.
Figure 13
In situ stress state in NC (or slightly OC) and OC soil.
Figure 14
Overstress concept.
Figure 15
Determination of the creep index in oedometric conditions.
Figure 16
The Leoni model [39].
Figure 17
The Sivasithamparam et al.'s model [41].
Figure 18
The Niemunis and Grandas-Tavera model [40]. MCSc and MCSe are the slopes of the CSL for triaxial compression and extension, respectively. MΩ denotes the slope of the CSL by the current Ω.