Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Volume 42 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)
Open Access
Modelling the time-dependent behaviour of soft soils
Katarzyna Staszewska
Katarzyna Staszewska
and
Marcin Cudny
Marcin Cudny
| Jun 30, 2020
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Volume 42 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Article Category:
Research Article
Published Online:
Jun 30, 2020
Page range:
97 - 110
Received:
Jun 17, 2019
Accepted:
Sep 30, 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2019-0034
Keywords
creep
,
soft soil
,
normally consolidated soils
,
elasto-viscoplastic model
© 2020 Katarzyna Staszewska et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Figure 1
Influence of OCR on the creep rate in oedometric conditions.
Figure 2
Undrained shear strength in triaxial extension resulting from the application of isotropic model and the real shear strength.
Figure 3
Results of displacement-controlled load tests on floating CSV (Combined Soil Stabilization with Vertical Columns) micropiles after Vermeer and Leoni [5]. s˙\dot s is the penetration rate and a is its reference value.
Figure 4
Results of the shallow foundation load test on dense sand after Briaud and Gibbens [8].
Figure 5
Creep stages based on the strain versus time curve.
Figure 6
Creep during primary consolidation according to hypotheses A and B after Degago [10].
Figure 7
System of isochrones describing the compressibility characteristics of soft soils after Bjerrum [13].
Figure 8
Instant and delayed deformations according to Bjerrum [13].
Figure 9
Time- and stress-compressibility interrelationship after Mesri and Godlewski [15].
Figure 10
Isotaches concept.
Figure 11
MCC model – the real yield surface known from high accuracy experiments, for example, [38, 43], is indicated with grey colour. MCS is the slope of the CSL [24].
Figure 12
Cap models. Mc and Me are the slopes of M-C criterion in the case of triaxial compression and extension, respectively.
Figure 13
In situ stress state in NC (or slightly OC) and OC soil.
Figure 14
Overstress concept.
Figure 15
Determination of the creep index in oedometric conditions.
Figure 16
The Leoni model [39].
Figure 17
The Sivasithamparam et al.'s model [41].
Figure 18
The Niemunis and Grandas-Tavera model [40]. MCSc and MCSe are the slopes of the CSL for triaxial compression and extension, respectively. MΩ denotes the slope of the CSL by the current Ω.