Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
Volume 8 (2023): Numero 1 (January 2023)
Accesso libero
Study on inefficient land use determination method for cities and towns from a city examination perspective
Hong Jiao
Hong Jiao
e
Jiali Huang
Jiali Huang
| 05 set 2022
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
Volume 8 (2023): Numero 1 (January 2023)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Pubblicato online:
05 set 2022
Pagine:
2425 - 2438
Ricevuto:
03 mar 2022
Accettato:
15 mag 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2022.1.00014
Parole chiave
City examination
,
inefficient urban land use
,
evaluation index system pore
© 2023 Hong Jiao et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1
Framework of evaluation index system for ineffective urban land use.
Fig. 2
Schematic diagram of AHP hierarchical structure model of inefficient urban land use evaluation.
Fig. 3
Vectorised schematic diagram of internal construction land for central downtown in Suiling County.
Fig. 4
Public facility distribution in Suiling County.
Fig. 5
Distribution of distance factor evaluation of central commercial facilities.
Fig. 6
Distribution of distance factor evaluation of public service facilities.
Fig. 7
Distribution of distance factor evaluation of primary and secondary schools.
Fig. 8
Distribution of urban arterial roads.
Fig. 9
Distribution of distance factor evaluation of arterial roads.
Fig. 10
Distribution of population distribution factor evaluation.
Fig. 11
Distribution of plot ratio factor evaluation.
Fig. 12
Distribution of construction quality factor evaluation.
Fig. 13
Distribution of renovation cost factor evaluation.
Fig. 14
Distribution of green coverage factor evaluation.
Fig. 15
Distribution of central greenbelt coverage factor evaluation.
Fig. 16
Comprehensive index distribution of construction land use efficiency of central downtown in Suiling County.