Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
Volume 2 (2017): Numero 2 (July 2017)
Accesso libero
Bifurcation Analysis of Hysteretic Systems with Saddle Dynamics
Marina Esteban
Marina Esteban
,
Enrique Ponce
Enrique Ponce
e
Francisco Torres
Francisco Torres
| 04 nov 2017
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
Volume 2 (2017): Numero 2 (July 2017)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Pubblicato online:
04 nov 2017
Pagine:
449 - 464
Ricevuto:
06 apr 2017
Accettato:
04 nov 2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21042/AMNS.2017.2.00036
Parole chiave
Bifurcations
,
Hysteresis
,
Periodic Orbits
© 2017 Marina Esteban, Enrique Ponce, Francisco Torres, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1
The transition mechanism between systems (SU) and (SL). We use blue colour for solutions of the upper system and red colour for solutions of the lower one. We can see also the falls at the line Σ+ and the rises at the line Σ−.
Fig. 2
The ‘graph’ of a normalized hysteresis function. The hysteresis value H(x) is unambiguous for x < −1 and x > 1. However, for −1 ⩽ x ⩽ 1 the output depends on the past, as explained in the text.
Fig. 3
The saddle point (xE, yE) and its invariant manifolds for the upper system (SU). Other distinguished values are emphasized.
Fig. 4
Bifurcation set in the parameter plane (γ, yE) for xE < −1. We emphasized the number of symmetric periodic orbits in each region.
Fig. 5
The transition map U for different values of the parameter yE and γ ∈ (−1, 0). The black points in this figure represent the point u*=(u−*,u+*) $u^*=(u^*_-,u^*_+)$ for each case.
Fig. 6
The transition map U for different values of yE. Again, the terminal black points in this figure represent the point u*=(u−*,u+*) $u^*=(u^*_-,u^*_+)$ for each case.
Fig. 7
The two symmetric periodic orbits existing for (xE, yE) = (−2, −1) and γ = 0.8. One of them takes the three zones and is unstable. The other one takes only the central zone and is stable. The blue lines (resp. red lines) correspond to valid solutions for the SU−system (resp. SL−system).
Fig. 8
Typical graph for φ(Z) and surfaceX=φ(Z).