Journal & Issues

Volume 69 (2023): Issue 4 (October 2023)

Volume 69 (2023): Issue 3 (August 2023)

Volume 69 (2023): Issue 2 (May 2023)

Volume 69 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)

Volume 68 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)

Volume 68 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)

Volume 68 (2022): Issue 2 (June 2022)

Volume 68 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)

Volume 67 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)

Volume 67 (2021): Issue 3 (September 2021)

Volume 67 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)

Volume 67 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)

Volume 66 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)

Volume 66 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)

Volume 66 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)

Volume 66 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Volume 65 (2019): Issue 3-4 (September 2019)

Volume 65 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)

Volume 65 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)

Volume 64 (2018): Issue 3-4 (September 2018)

Volume 64 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)

Volume 64 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

Volume 63 (2017): Issue 4 (September 2017)

Volume 63 (2017): Issue 2-3 (June 2017)

Volume 63 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

Volume 62 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)

Volume 62 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)

Volume 62 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)

Volume 62 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)

Volume 61 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)

Volume 61 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)

Volume 61 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)

Volume 61 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)

Volume 60 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)

Volume 60 (2014): Issue 3 (September 2014)

Volume 60 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)

Volume 60 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)

Volume 59 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)

Volume 59 (2013): Issue 3 (September 2013)

Volume 59 (2013): Issue 2 (June 2013)

Volume 59 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)

Volume 58 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)

Volume 58 (2012): Issue 3 (September 2012)

Volume 58 (2012): Issue 2 (October 2012)

Volume 58 (2012): Issue 1 (January 2012)

Volume 57 (2011): Issue 4 (January 2011)

Volume 57 (2011): Issue 3 (January 2011)

Volume 57 (2011): Issue 2 (January 2011)

Volume 57 (2011): Issue 1 (January 2011)

Volume 56 (2010): Issue 4 (January 2010)

Volume 56 (2010): Issue 3 (January 2010)

Volume 56 (2010): Issue 2 (January 2010)

Volume 56 (2010): Issue 1 (January 2010)

Volume 55 (2009): Issue 4 (January 2009)

Volume 55 (2009): Issue 3 (January 2009)

Volume 55 (2009): Issue 2 (January 2009)

Volume 55 (2009): Issue 1 (January 2009)

Journal Details
Format
Journal
eISSN
2454-0358
ISSN
0323-1046
First Published
14 Dec 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

Search

Volume 59 (2013): Issue 2 (June 2013)

Journal Details
Format
Journal
eISSN
2454-0358
ISSN
0323-1046
First Published
14 Dec 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

Search

0 Articles
Open Access

The concept of geo-biotope as a possible superior site unit for differentiation of forest management

Published Online: 15 Nov 2013
Page range: 81 - 94

Abstract

Abstract

The paper proposes and justifies an alternative concept of aggregation of forest site types in higher units for purposes of differentiation of forest management. Analysis of variance was performed for both: the natural occurrence of tree species in reserves, as well as the production potential of tree species measured on the representative plots according to Zlatnik´s altitudinal vegetation zones and edaphictrophic series. Based on the results of this analysis, an aggregation of forest site types was suggested along the elevation gradient of climatop, and along the edaphic-trophic and the edaphic-hydric gradients of edaphotop. By intersection of such created 32 categories of geotope with the basic formation groups of forest habitats by Braun-Blanquet geo-botanical school, 53 reconstructive geo-biotopes were formed. The proposed unit was compared using the F-test, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and the index of classification efficiency (EQ) with current typological units in terms of its ability to describe the variability of the analyzed parameters. Finally, the qualitative association of the compared classification models with the European classification systems was assessed. Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that the site unit geo-biotop is at least comparable with currently used unit MGFT, with the number of categories lower by 72%.

Keywords

  • site classification
  • forest site type
  • forest biotope
  • potential vegetation
  • potential productivity
  • forest management
Open Access

Evaluation of forest health condition in the inundation area of Danube, section Dobrohošť – Sap from aerial multispectral images in 2011

Published Online: 15 Nov 2013
Page range: 95 - 106

Abstract

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the forest health condition in the area of Hydropower plant Gabčikovo using the digital multispectral aerial images from 2011 in the section Dobrohošt - Sap. We proposed a new innovative procedure of creating the forest mask in the image processing. It concerns a process of defining tree crowns, where we combined subject and raster oriented approach of the image classification. We evaluated forest health condition on a selected forest mask using the method of twophased sampling with regression. The indicators of health condition were tree defoliation and presence of heavily damaged trees and snags in the stands. Defoliation was used to compare the current forest health condition in the concerned area with the data from 2008. Presence of the snags as the result of severe damage is interpreted in terms of stand types related to site conditions. Field survey proved presence of invasive and non-native tree species and plants. Based on the result, we have formulated recommendations for further forest monitoring in the Danube River inundation.

Keywords

  • floodplain forests
  • Hydropower plant Gabčikovo
  • health condition
  • aerial images
  • Danube River inundation
0 Articles
Open Access

The concept of geo-biotope as a possible superior site unit for differentiation of forest management

Published Online: 15 Nov 2013
Page range: 81 - 94

Abstract

Abstract

The paper proposes and justifies an alternative concept of aggregation of forest site types in higher units for purposes of differentiation of forest management. Analysis of variance was performed for both: the natural occurrence of tree species in reserves, as well as the production potential of tree species measured on the representative plots according to Zlatnik´s altitudinal vegetation zones and edaphictrophic series. Based on the results of this analysis, an aggregation of forest site types was suggested along the elevation gradient of climatop, and along the edaphic-trophic and the edaphic-hydric gradients of edaphotop. By intersection of such created 32 categories of geotope with the basic formation groups of forest habitats by Braun-Blanquet geo-botanical school, 53 reconstructive geo-biotopes were formed. The proposed unit was compared using the F-test, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and the index of classification efficiency (EQ) with current typological units in terms of its ability to describe the variability of the analyzed parameters. Finally, the qualitative association of the compared classification models with the European classification systems was assessed. Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that the site unit geo-biotop is at least comparable with currently used unit MGFT, with the number of categories lower by 72%.

Keywords

  • site classification
  • forest site type
  • forest biotope
  • potential vegetation
  • potential productivity
  • forest management
Open Access

Evaluation of forest health condition in the inundation area of Danube, section Dobrohošť – Sap from aerial multispectral images in 2011

Published Online: 15 Nov 2013
Page range: 95 - 106

Abstract

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the forest health condition in the area of Hydropower plant Gabčikovo using the digital multispectral aerial images from 2011 in the section Dobrohošt - Sap. We proposed a new innovative procedure of creating the forest mask in the image processing. It concerns a process of defining tree crowns, where we combined subject and raster oriented approach of the image classification. We evaluated forest health condition on a selected forest mask using the method of twophased sampling with regression. The indicators of health condition were tree defoliation and presence of heavily damaged trees and snags in the stands. Defoliation was used to compare the current forest health condition in the concerned area with the data from 2008. Presence of the snags as the result of severe damage is interpreted in terms of stand types related to site conditions. Field survey proved presence of invasive and non-native tree species and plants. Based on the result, we have formulated recommendations for further forest monitoring in the Danube River inundation.

Keywords

  • floodplain forests
  • Hydropower plant Gabčikovo
  • health condition
  • aerial images
  • Danube River inundation