Characteristics of Vaginal Microbiome in Women with Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in Korea
, , , , et
17 sept. 2021
À propos de cet article
Catégorie d'article: original-paper
Publié en ligne: 17 sept. 2021
Pages: 345 - 357
Reçu: 30 avr. 2021
Accepté: 14 juil. 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2021-033
Mots clés
© 2021 Sukyung Kim et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

Distributions of bacterial community at different taxonomic levels (phylum, class, order, and family)_
Phylum | Con. | PID | Class | Con. | PID | Order | Con. | PID | Family | Con. | PID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
63.7 | 35.8 | ||||||||||
Lactobacillales | 74.5 | 50.2 | 8.1 | 13.4 | |||||||
Firmicutes | 79.4 | 56.9 | Bacilli | 77.7 | 53.7 | 2.6 | 0 | ||||
Bacillales | 3.1 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 3.1 | |||||||
Tissierellia | 1.0 | 1.5 | Tissierellales | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | ||||
Actinobacteria | 13.0 | 23.2 | Actinobacteria | 10.7 | 16.7 | Bifidobacteriales | 9.8 | 15.8 | 9.8 | 15.8 | |
Coriobacteriia | 2.3 | 6.6 | Coriobacteriales | 2.3 | 6.6 | 2.3 | 6.6 | ||||
Gammaproteobacteria | 4.1 | 11.0 | Pseudomonadales | 2.7 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 0 | ||||
Proteobacteria | 4.6 | 12.8 | Enterobacterales | 1.4 | 9.4 | 0 | 9.2 | ||||
Betaproteobacteria | 0 | 1.6 | Burkholderiales | 0 | 1.6 | 0 | 1.3 | ||||
Bacteroidetes | 1.4 | 4.7 | Bacteroidia | 1.3 | 4.6 | Bacteroidales | 1.3 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 3.7 | |
Fusobacteria | 1.2 | 2.4 | Fusobacteria | 1.2 | 2.4 | Fusobacteriales | 1.2 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 2.2 |
Identification of microbes using STD multiplex PCR and culture method for PID patients_
No. | STD PCR method | Culture method | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MH | UP | UU | GV | CT | NG | TV | CA | ||
1 | + | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
2 | + | + | – | + | + | – | – | – | – |
3 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
4 | – | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
5 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
6 | – | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
7 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
8 | + | + | – | + | + | + | – | – | – |
9 | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | – | – |
10 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
11 | + | + | – | + | + | – | – | – | – |
12 | + | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | |
13 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
14 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – |
15 | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | |
16 | + | – | + | + | + | – | – | – | – |
17 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
18 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
19 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – |
20 | – | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
21 | + | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
22 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | |
23 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | |
24 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
25 | – | + | – | + | + | – | – | – | – |
26 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
27 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
28 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | |
29 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
30 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | |
31 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | |
32 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
33 | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
34 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | |
35 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
36 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
37 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
38 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
39 | – | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
40 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
41 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
The Kruskal-Wallis H tests and LEfSe analysis of the associations between normal control women and PID patients_
Taxon rank | Taxon name | LDA | Control | PID patients | |
Phylum | Firmicutes | 0.04364 | 5.09916 | 79.38 | 56.87 |
Saccharibacteria_TM7 | 0.02254 | 3.25735 | 0.42 | 0.02 | |
Class | Bacilli | 0.04089 | 5.12693 | 77.74 | 53.65 |
Saccharimonas_c | 0.02254 | 3.21094 | 0.42 | 0.02 | |
Lactobacillales | 0.04089 | 5.13602 | 74.52 | 50.17 | |
Order | Saccharimonas_o | 0.02254 | 3.24345 | 0.42 | 0.02 |
Propionibacteriales | 0.00628 | 2.90945 | 0.24 | 0.13 | |
0.01377 | 5.15948 | 63.70 | 35.76 | ||
0.04593 | 4.05126 | 2.40 | 0.68 | ||
Family | 0.00272 | 3.56834 | 0.28 | 0.83 | |
0.02254 | 3.23883 | 0.42 | 0.02 | ||
0.00628 | 2.91443 | 0.24 | 0.12 | ||
0.04997 | 2.84709 | 0.06 | 0.16 | ||
0.02881 | 5.12933 | 61.03 | 34.92 | ||
0.02706 | 4.54975 | 8.36 | 13.89 | ||
Lactobacillaceae_uc | 0.00128 | 3.98329 | 2.67 | 0.84 | |
0.00272 | 3.54428 | 0.28 | 0.83 | ||
0.00445 | 3.31257 | 0.00 | 0.50 | ||
Genus | Enterobacteriaceae_uc | 0.01355 | 3.29397 | 0.15 | 0.50 |
AF125206_g | 0.02254 | 3.25111 | 0.42 | 0.02 | |
0.03362 | 3.04489 | 0.14 | 0.37 | ||
0.04997 | 2.85166 | 0.06 | 0.16 | ||
0.01311 | 2.85157 | 0.19 | 0.11 | ||
0.02287 | 2.50200 | 0.06 | 0.00 |
Clinical profiles of PID patients (n = 41) and women from control group (n = 33)_
Group | Age (years) | Parity | Body mass index | Symptom | Number of women | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PID patients | 35.5 ± 2.4 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 29.5 ± 6.9 | Foul odor (Fish and rotten) | 25 | 61.0 |
Itching and burning sensation | 11 | 26.8 | ||||
Abnormal color of discharge | 5 | 12.2 | ||||
Total | 41 | 100 | ||||
Control group | 39.4 ± 3.2 | 3.1 ±0.2 | 30.1 ± 4.3 | No observable abnormality | 33 | 100 |
Total | 33 | 100 |