Characteristics of Vaginal Microbiome in Women with Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in Korea
, , , , y
17 sept 2021
Acerca de este artículo
Categoría del artículo: original-paper
Publicado en línea: 17 sept 2021
Páginas: 345 - 357
Recibido: 30 abr 2021
Aceptado: 14 jul 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2021-033
Palabras clave
© 2021 Sukyung Kim et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

Distributions of bacterial community at different taxonomic levels (phylum, class, order, and family)_
Phylum | Con. | PID | Class | Con. | PID | Order | Con. | PID | Family | Con. | PID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
63.7 | 35.8 | ||||||||||
Lactobacillales | 74.5 | 50.2 | 8.1 | 13.4 | |||||||
Firmicutes | 79.4 | 56.9 | Bacilli | 77.7 | 53.7 | 2.6 | 0 | ||||
Bacillales | 3.1 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 3.1 | |||||||
Tissierellia | 1.0 | 1.5 | Tissierellales | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | ||||
Actinobacteria | 13.0 | 23.2 | Actinobacteria | 10.7 | 16.7 | Bifidobacteriales | 9.8 | 15.8 | 9.8 | 15.8 | |
Coriobacteriia | 2.3 | 6.6 | Coriobacteriales | 2.3 | 6.6 | 2.3 | 6.6 | ||||
Gammaproteobacteria | 4.1 | 11.0 | Pseudomonadales | 2.7 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 0 | ||||
Proteobacteria | 4.6 | 12.8 | Enterobacterales | 1.4 | 9.4 | 0 | 9.2 | ||||
Betaproteobacteria | 0 | 1.6 | Burkholderiales | 0 | 1.6 | 0 | 1.3 | ||||
Bacteroidetes | 1.4 | 4.7 | Bacteroidia | 1.3 | 4.6 | Bacteroidales | 1.3 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 3.7 | |
Fusobacteria | 1.2 | 2.4 | Fusobacteria | 1.2 | 2.4 | Fusobacteriales | 1.2 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 2.2 |
Identification of microbes using STD multiplex PCR and culture method for PID patients_
No. | STD PCR method | Culture method | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MH | UP | UU | GV | CT | NG | TV | CA | ||
1 | + | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
2 | + | + | – | + | + | – | – | – | – |
3 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
4 | – | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
5 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
6 | – | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
7 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
8 | + | + | – | + | + | + | – | – | – |
9 | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | – | – |
10 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
11 | + | + | – | + | + | – | – | – | – |
12 | + | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | |
13 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
14 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – |
15 | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | |
16 | + | – | + | + | + | – | – | – | – |
17 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
18 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
19 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – |
20 | – | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
21 | + | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
22 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | |
23 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | |
24 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
25 | – | + | – | + | + | – | – | – | – |
26 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
27 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
28 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | |
29 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
30 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | |
31 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | |
32 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
33 | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
34 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | |
35 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
36 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
37 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
38 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
39 | – | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
40 | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – |
41 | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
The Kruskal-Wallis H tests and LEfSe analysis of the associations between normal control women and PID patients_
Taxon rank | Taxon name | LDA | Control | PID patients | |
Phylum | Firmicutes | 0.04364 | 5.09916 | 79.38 | 56.87 |
Saccharibacteria_TM7 | 0.02254 | 3.25735 | 0.42 | 0.02 | |
Class | Bacilli | 0.04089 | 5.12693 | 77.74 | 53.65 |
Saccharimonas_c | 0.02254 | 3.21094 | 0.42 | 0.02 | |
Lactobacillales | 0.04089 | 5.13602 | 74.52 | 50.17 | |
Order | Saccharimonas_o | 0.02254 | 3.24345 | 0.42 | 0.02 |
Propionibacteriales | 0.00628 | 2.90945 | 0.24 | 0.13 | |
0.01377 | 5.15948 | 63.70 | 35.76 | ||
0.04593 | 4.05126 | 2.40 | 0.68 | ||
Family | 0.00272 | 3.56834 | 0.28 | 0.83 | |
0.02254 | 3.23883 | 0.42 | 0.02 | ||
0.00628 | 2.91443 | 0.24 | 0.12 | ||
0.04997 | 2.84709 | 0.06 | 0.16 | ||
0.02881 | 5.12933 | 61.03 | 34.92 | ||
0.02706 | 4.54975 | 8.36 | 13.89 | ||
Lactobacillaceae_uc | 0.00128 | 3.98329 | 2.67 | 0.84 | |
0.00272 | 3.54428 | 0.28 | 0.83 | ||
0.00445 | 3.31257 | 0.00 | 0.50 | ||
Genus | Enterobacteriaceae_uc | 0.01355 | 3.29397 | 0.15 | 0.50 |
AF125206_g | 0.02254 | 3.25111 | 0.42 | 0.02 | |
0.03362 | 3.04489 | 0.14 | 0.37 | ||
0.04997 | 2.85166 | 0.06 | 0.16 | ||
0.01311 | 2.85157 | 0.19 | 0.11 | ||
0.02287 | 2.50200 | 0.06 | 0.00 |
Clinical profiles of PID patients (n = 41) and women from control group (n = 33)_
Group | Age (years) | Parity | Body mass index | Symptom | Number of women | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PID patients | 35.5 ± 2.4 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 29.5 ± 6.9 | Foul odor (Fish and rotten) | 25 | 61.0 |
Itching and burning sensation | 11 | 26.8 | ||||
Abnormal color of discharge | 5 | 12.2 | ||||
Total | 41 | 100 | ||||
Control group | 39.4 ± 3.2 | 3.1 ±0.2 | 30.1 ± 4.3 | No observable abnormality | 33 | 100 |
Total | 33 | 100 |