This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Moran V, Wunderlich R, Rubbelke C. Simulation in Nursing Education. Simulation: Best Practices in Nursing Education: Springer, Cham; 2018.MoranVWunderlichRRubbelkeCSpringerCham201810.1007/978-3-319-89821-6Search in Google Scholar
Dearmon V, Graves RJ, Hayden S, et al. Effectiveness of simulation-based orientation of baccalaureate nursing students preparing for their first clinical experience. J Nurs Educ. 2013; 52:29–38.DearmonVGravesRJHaydenSEffectiveness of simulation-based orientation of baccalaureate nursing students preparing for their first clinical experience201352293810.3928/01484834-20121212-0223230885Search in Google Scholar
Bland AJ, Topping A, Wood B. A concept analysis of simulation as a learning strategy in the education of undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today. 2011;31:664–670.BlandAJToppingAWoodBA concept analysis of simulation as a learning strategy in the education of undergraduate nursing students20113166467010.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.01321056920Search in Google Scholar
Hicks FD, Coke L, Li S. The Effect of High-Fidelity Simulation on Nursing Students’ Knowledge and Performance: A Pilot Study. National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc (NCSBN); 2009.HicksFDCokeLLiSNational Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc (NCSBN)2009Search in Google Scholar
Najjar RH, Lyman B, Miehl N. Nursing students’ experiences with high-fidelity simulation. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2015;12:27–35.NajjarRHLymanBMiehlNNursing students’ experiences with high-fidelity simulation201512273510.1515/ijnes-2015-001025803087Search in Google Scholar
Cant RP, Cooper SJ. Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: an umbrella systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;49:63–71.CantRPCooperSJUse of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: an umbrella systematic review201749637110.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.01527902949Search in Google Scholar
Massoth C, Röder H, Ohlenburg H, et al. High-fidelity is not superior to low-fidelity simulation but leads to overconfidence in medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:29.MassothCRöderHOhlenburgHHigh-fidelity is not superior to low-fidelity simulation but leads to overconfidence in medical students2019192910.1186/s12909-019-1464-7634172030665397Search in Google Scholar
Arnold JJ, Tucker SJ, Johnson LM, Chesak SS, Dierkhising RA. Comparison of three simulation-based teaching methodologies for emergency response. Clin Simul Nurs. 2013;9:e85–e93.ArnoldJJTuckerSJJohnsonLMChesakSSDierkhisingRAComparison of three simulation-based teaching methodologies for emergency response20139e85e9310.1016/j.ecns.2011.09.004Search in Google Scholar
Huang J, Tang Y, Tang J, et al. Educational efficacy of high-fidelity simulation in neonatal resuscitation training: a systematic review and metaanalysis. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:323.HuangJTangYTangJEducational efficacy of high-fidelity simulation in neonatal resuscitation training: a systematic review and metaanalysis20191932310.1186/s12909-019-1763-z671694431464614Search in Google Scholar
Kim J, Park J-H, Shin S. Effectiveness of simulation-based nursing education depending on fidelity: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2016; 16:176–182.KimJParkJ-HShinSEffectiveness of simulation-based nursing education depending on fidelity: a meta-analysis20161617618210.1186/s12909-016-0672-7487781027215280Search in Google Scholar
Shin S, Park J-H, Kim J-H. Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:176–182.ShinSParkJ-HKimJ-HEffectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: meta-analysis20153517618210.1016/j.nedt.2014.09.00925459172Search in Google Scholar
Higgins JP, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. 2019:205–228.HigginsJPSavovićJPageMJ201920522810.1002/9781119536604.ch8Search in Google Scholar
Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. Br Med J. 2016;7:355.SterneJACHernánMAReevesBCROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions2016735510.1136/bmj.i4919506205427733354Search in Google Scholar
JBI TJBI. Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies (non-randomized experimental studies). Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies; 2017:7.JBI TJBIChecklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies (non-randomized experimental studies)20177Search in Google Scholar
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, et al. Chapter 3: systematic reviews of effectiveness. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, eds. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2017.TufanaruCMunnZAromatarisEChapter 3: systematic reviews of effectivenessIn:AromatarisEMunnZeds.The Joanna Briggs Institute2017Search in Google Scholar
Bruce N, Pope D, Stanistreet D. Quantitative Methods for Health Research: A Practical Interactive Guide to Epidemiology and Statistics. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2018.BruceNPopeDStanistreetDUKJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd201810.1002/9781118665374Search in Google Scholar
Durlak JA. How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009;34:917–928.DurlakJAHow to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes20093491792810.1093/jpepsy/jsp00419223279Search in Google Scholar
Idris, NRN. Performance of the trim and fill method in adjusting for the publication bias in meta-analysis of continuous data. Am J Appl Sci. 2012;9:1512.IdrisNRNPerformance of the trim and fill method in adjusting for the publication bias in meta-analysis of continuous data20129151210.3844/ajassp.2012.1512.1517Search in Google Scholar
Brahmi F, Gall C. EndNote® and reference Manager® citation formats compared to “instructions to authors” in top medical journals. Med Ref Serv Q. 2006;25:49–57.BrahmiFGallCEndNote® and reference Manager® citation formats compared to “instructions to authors” in top medical journals200625495710.1300/J115v25n02_0416782666Search in Google Scholar
Bogossian FE, Cooper SJ, Cant R, Porter J, Forbes H, FIRST2ACT™ Research Team. A trial of e-simulation of sudden patient deterioration (FIRST2ACT WEB) on student learning. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:e36–e42.BogossianFECooperSJCantRPorterJForbesHFIRST2ACT™ Research TeamA trial of e-simulation of sudden patient deterioration (FIRST2ACT WEB) on student learning201535e36e4210.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.00326296543Search in Google Scholar
Toubasi S, Alosta MR, Darawad MW, Demeh W. Impact of simulation training on Jordanian nurses’ performance of basic life support skills: a pilot study. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:999–1003.ToubasiSAlostaMRDarawadMWDemehWImpact of simulation training on Jordanian nurses’ performance of basic life support skills: a pilot study201535999100310.1016/j.nedt.2015.03.01725935665Search in Google Scholar
Woda A, Hansen J, Dreifuerst KT, et al. The impact of simulation on knowledge and performance gain regarding diabetic patient care. Clin Simul Nurs. 2019;34:6.WodaAHansenJDreifuerstKTThe impact of simulation on knowledge and performance gain regarding diabetic patient care201934610.1016/j.ecns.2019.05.001Search in Google Scholar
Meyer MN, Connors H, Hou Q, Gajewski B. The effect of simulation on clinical performance: a junior nursing student clinical comparison study. Simul Healthc. 2011;6:269–277.MeyerMNConnorsHHouQGajewskiBThe effect of simulation on clinical performance: a junior nursing student clinical comparison study2011626927710.1097/SIH.0b013e318223a04821785388Search in Google Scholar
Boyde M, Cooper E, Putland H, et al. Simulation for emergency nurses (SIREN): a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;68:100–104.BoydeMCooperEPutlandHSimulation for emergency nurses (SIREN): a quasi-experimental study20186810010410.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.03029902738Search in Google Scholar
Ismailoglu G, Zaybak A. Comparison of the effectiveness of a virtual simulator with a plastic arm model in teaching intravenous catheter insertion skills. Comput Inform Nurs. 2018;36:98–105.IsmailogluGZaybakAComparison of the effectiveness of a virtual simulator with a plastic arm model in teaching intravenous catheter insertion skills2018369810510.1097/CIN.000000000000040529176359Search in Google Scholar
Morton SB, Powers K, Jordan K, et al. The effect of high-fidelity simulation on medical-surgical nurses’ mock code performance and self-confidence. MEDSURG Nurs. 2019;28:6.MortonSBPowersKJordanKThe effect of high-fidelity simulation on medical-surgical nurses’ mock code performance and self-confidence2019286Search in Google Scholar
Aqel AA, Ahmad MM. High-fidelity simulation effects on CPR knowledge, skills, acquisition, and retention in nursing students. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014;11:394–400.AqelAAAhmadMMHigh-fidelity simulation effects on CPR knowledge, skills, acquisition, and retention in nursing students20141139440010.1111/wvn.1206325213578Search in Google Scholar
Basak T, Aslan O, Unver V, Yildiz D. Effectiveness of the training material in drug-dose calculation skills. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2016;13:324–330.BasakTAslanOUnverVYildizDEffectiveness of the training material in drug-dose calculation skills20161332433010.1111/jjns.1211226782270Search in Google Scholar
Zhang YY, Yan M, Li J, et al. Effects of walking exercise on bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy: evidence from systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Nurs. 2020;7:39–48.ZhangYYYanMLiJEffects of walking exercise on bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy: evidence from systematic review and meta-analysis20207394810.2478/fon-2020-0009Search in Google Scholar
Basak T, Demirtas A, Iyigun E. The effect of simulation based education on patient teaching skills of nursing students: a randomized controlled study. J Prof Nurs. 2019;35:417–424.BasakTDemirtasAIyigunEThe effect of simulation based education on patient teaching skills of nursing students: a randomized controlled study20193541742410.1016/j.profnurs.2019.02.00431519347Search in Google Scholar
Bowling A. The effect of simulation on skill performance: a need for change in pediatric nursing education. J Pediatr Nurs. 2015;30:439–446.BowlingAThe effect of simulation on skill performance: a need for change in pediatric nursing education20153043944610.1016/j.pedn.2014.12.01025595245Search in Google Scholar
Chen R, Grierson LE, Norman GR. Evaluating the impact of high- and low-fidelity instruction in the development of auscultation skills. Med Educ. 2015;49:276–285.ChenRGriersonLENormanGREvaluating the impact of high- and low-fidelity instruction in the development of auscultation skills20154927628510.1111/medu.1265325693987Search in Google Scholar
Durmaz A, Dicle A, Cakan E, Cakir Ş. Effect of screen-based computer simulation on knowledge and skill in nursing students’ learning of preoperative and postoperative care management a randomized controlled study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2012;30:196–203.DurmazADicleACakanECakirŞEffect of screen-based computer simulation on knowledge and skill in nursing students’ learning of preoperative and postoperative care management a randomized controlled study20123019620310.1097/NCN.0b013e318241913422228217Search in Google Scholar
Jaberi A, Momennasab M. Effectiveness of standardized patient in abdominal physical examination education: a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Med Res. 2019;17:1–10.JaberiAMomennasabMEffectiveness of standardized patient in abdominal physical examination education: a randomized, controlled trial20191711010.3121/cmr.2019.1446654628231160473Search in Google Scholar
Karabacak U, Unver V, Ugur E, et al. Examining the effect of simulation based learning on self-efficacy and performance of first-year nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019;36:139–143.KarabacakUUnverVUgurEExamining the effect of simulation based learning on self-efficacy and performance of first-year nursing students20193613914310.1016/j.nepr.2019.03.01230978577Search in Google Scholar
Keleekai NL, Schuster CA, Murray CL, et al. Improving nurses’ peripheral intravenous catheter insertion knowledge, confidence, and skills using a simulation-based blended learning program: a randomized trial. Simul Healthc. 2016;11:376–384.KeleekaiNLSchusterCAMurrayCLImproving nurses’ peripheral intravenous catheter insertion knowledge, confidence, and skills using a simulation-based blended learning program: a randomized trial20161137638410.1097/SIH.0000000000000186534588427504890Search in Google Scholar
Lee BO, Liang HF, Chu TP, Huang CC. Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019;41:102646.LeeBOLiangHFChuTPHuangCCEffects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance20194110264610.1016/j.nepr.2019.10264631698255Search in Google Scholar
Liaw SY, Wong LF, Ang SBL, Ho JTY, Siau C, Ang ENK. Strengthening the afferent limb of rapid response systems: an educational intervention using web-based learning for early recognition and responding to deteriorating patients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:448–456.LiawSYWongLFAngSBLHoJTYSiauCAngENKStrengthening the afferent limb of rapid response systems: an educational intervention using web-based learning for early recognition and responding to deteriorating patients20162544845610.1136/bmjqs-2015-00407326297379Search in Google Scholar
Lubbers J, Rossman C. The effects of pediatric community simulation experience on the self-confidence and satisfaction of baccalaureate nursing students: a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;39:93–98.LubbersJRossmanCThe effects of pediatric community simulation experience on the self-confidence and satisfaction of baccalaureate nursing students: a quasi-experimental study201639939810.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.01327006038Search in Google Scholar
Sarmasoglu S, Dinc L, Elcin M. Using standardized patients in nursing education: effects on students’ psychomotor skill development. Nurse Educ. 2016;41:E1–E5.SarmasogluSDincLElcinMUsing standardized patients in nursing education: effects on students’ psychomotor skill development201641E1E510.1097/NNE.000000000000018826102639Search in Google Scholar
Stayt LC, Merriman C, Ricketts B, Morton S, Simpson T. Recognizing and managing a deteriorating patient: a randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of clinical simulation in improving clinical performance in undergraduate nursing students. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71:2563–2574.StaytLCMerrimanCRickettsBMortonSSimpsonTRecognizing and managing a deteriorating patient: a randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of clinical simulation in improving clinical performance in undergraduate nursing students2015712563257410.1111/jan.1272226147977Search in Google Scholar
Sumner L, Burke SM, Chang LT, McAdams M, Jones DA. Evaluation of basic arrhythmia knowledge retention and clinical application by registered nurses. J Nurs Staff Dev. 2012;28:E5–E9.SumnerLBurkeSMChangLTMcAdamsMJonesDAEvaluation of basic arrhythmia knowledge retention and clinical application by registered nurses201228E5E910.1097/NND.0b013e31824b41e122449890Search in Google Scholar
Unver V, Basak T, Iyigun E, et al. An evaluation of a course on the rational use of medication in nursing from the perspective of the students. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33:1362–1368.UnverVBasakTIyigunEAn evaluation of a course on the rational use of medication in nursing from the perspective of the students2013331362136810.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.00522884567Search in Google Scholar
Vidal VL, Ohaeri BM, John P, Helen D. Virtual reality and the traditional method for phlebotomy training among college of nursing students in Kuwait: implication for practice. Art Sci Infus Nurs. 2013;36:349–355.VidalVLOhaeriBMJohnPHelenDVirtual reality and the traditional method for phlebotomy training among college of nursing students in Kuwait: implication for practice20133634935510.1097/NAN.0b013e318243172f24006114Search in Google Scholar
Eyikara E, Baykara ZG. The importance of simulation in nursing education. World J Educ Technol. 2017;9:6.EyikaraEBaykaraZGThe importance of simulation in nursing education20179610.18844/wjet.v9i1.543Search in Google Scholar
Orique SB, Phillips LJ. The effectiveness of simulation on recognizing and managing clinical deterioration: meta-analyses. West J Nurs Res. 2018;40:582–609.OriqueSBPhillipsLJThe effectiveness of simulation on recognizing and managing clinical deterioration: meta-analyses20184058260910.1177/019394591769722428359188Search in Google Scholar
Hegland PA, Aarlie H, Strømme H, Jamtvedt G. Simulation-based training for nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;54:6–20.HeglandPAAarlieHStrømmeHJamtvedtGSimulation-based training for nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis20175462010.1016/j.nedt.2017.04.00428456053Search in Google Scholar
Yuan HB, Williams BA, Fang JB, Ye QH. A systematic review of selected evidence on improving knowledge and skills through high-fidelity simulation. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32:294–298.YuanHBWilliamsBAFangJBYeQHA systematic review of selected evidence on improving knowledge and skills through high-fidelity simulation20123229429810.1016/j.nedt.2011.07.01021862186Search in Google Scholar
Munshi F, Lababidi H, Alyousef S. Low-versus high-fidelity simulations in teaching and assessing clinical skills. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2015;10:12–15.MunshiFLababidiHAlyousefSLow-versus high-fidelity simulations in teaching and assessing clinical skills201510121510.1016/j.jtumed.2015.01.008Search in Google Scholar
SimSTAFF. What is the difference between low-fidelity and high-fidelity simulations? 2020. https://simstaff.com/difference-between-low-fidelity-and-high-fidelity-simulations/. Accessed March 1, 2020.SimSTAFF2020https://simstaff.com/difference-between-low-fidelity-and-high-fidelity-simulations/. Accessed March 1, 2020.Search in Google Scholar
Nimbalkar A, Patel D, Kungwani A, Phatak A, Vasa R, Nimbalkar S. Randomized control trial of high fidelity vs low fidelity simulation for training undergraduate students in neonatal resuscitation. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:636.NimbalkarAPatelDKungwaniAPhatakAVasaRNimbalkarSRandomized control trial of high fidelity vs low fidelity simulation for training undergraduate students in neonatal resuscitation2015863610.1186/s13104-015-1623-9463088526526494Search in Google Scholar
Rischer K. Why less fidelity in simulation may improve student learning. https://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning. Accessed December 6, 2020.RischerKhttps://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning. Accessed December 6, 2020.Search in Google Scholar
Koh JH, Hur HK. Effects of simulation-based training for basic life support utilizing video-assisted debriefing on non-technical and technical skills of nursing students. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2016;28:169–179.KohJHHurHKEffects of simulation-based training for basic life support utilizing video-assisted debriefing on non-technical and technical skills of nursing students20162816917910.7475/kjan.2016.28.2.169Search in Google Scholar
Oh P-J, Jeon KD, Koh MS. The effects of simulation-based learning using standardized patients in nursing students: a meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:e6–e15.OhP-JJeonKDKohMSThe effects of simulation-based learning using standardized patients in nursing students: a meta-analysis201535e6e1510.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.01925680831Search in Google Scholar