Effect of simulation-based teaching on nursing skill performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

1 Moran V, Wunderlich R, Rubbelke C. Simulation in Nursing Education. Simulation: Best Practices in Nursing Education: Springer, Cham; 2018. MoranV WunderlichR RubbelkeC Simulation in Nursing Education. Simulation: Best Practices in Nursing Education Springer Cham 2018 10.1007/978-3-319-89821-6 Search in Google Scholar

2 Dearmon V, Graves RJ, Hayden S, et al. Effectiveness of simulation-based orientation of baccalaureate nursing students preparing for their first clinical experience. J Nurs Educ. 2013; 52:29–38. DearmonV GravesRJ HaydenS Effectiveness of simulation-based orientation of baccalaureate nursing students preparing for their first clinical experience J Nurs Educ 2013 52 29 38 10.3928/01484834-20121212-0223230885 Search in Google Scholar

3 Bland AJ, Topping A, Wood B. A concept analysis of simulation as a learning strategy in the education of undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today. 2011;31:664–670. BlandAJ ToppingA WoodB A concept analysis of simulation as a learning strategy in the education of undergraduate nursing students Nurse Education Today 2011 31 664 670 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.01321056920 Search in Google Scholar

4 Hicks FD, Coke L, Li S. The Effect of High-Fidelity Simulation on Nursing Students’ Knowledge and Performance: A Pilot Study. National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc (NCSBN); 2009. HicksFD CokeL LiS The Effect of High-Fidelity Simulation on Nursing Students’ Knowledge and Performance: A Pilot Study National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc (NCSBN) 2009 Search in Google Scholar

5 Najjar RH, Lyman B, Miehl N. Nursing students’ experiences with high-fidelity simulation. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2015;12:27–35. NajjarRH LymanB MiehlN Nursing students’ experiences with high-fidelity simulation Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2015 12 27 35 10.1515/ijnes-2015-001025803087 Search in Google Scholar

6 Cant RP, Cooper SJ. Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: an umbrella systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;49:63–71. CantRP CooperSJ Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: an umbrella systematic review Nurse Educ Today 2017 49 63 71 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.01527902949 Search in Google Scholar

7 Massoth C, Röder H, Ohlenburg H, et al. High-fidelity is not superior to low-fidelity simulation but leads to overconfidence in medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:29. MassothC RöderH OhlenburgH High-fidelity is not superior to low-fidelity simulation but leads to overconfidence in medical students BMC Med Educ 2019 19 29 10.1186/s12909-019-1464-7634172030665397 Search in Google Scholar

8 Arnold JJ, Tucker SJ, Johnson LM, Chesak SS, Dierkhising RA. Comparison of three simulation-based teaching methodologies for emergency response. Clin Simul Nurs. 2013;9:e85–e93. ArnoldJJ TuckerSJ JohnsonLM ChesakSS DierkhisingRA Comparison of three simulation-based teaching methodologies for emergency response Clin Simul Nurs 2013 9 e85 e93 10.1016/j.ecns.2011.09.004 Search in Google Scholar

9 Huang J, Tang Y, Tang J, et al. Educational efficacy of high-fidelity simulation in neonatal resuscitation training: a systematic review and metaanalysis. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:323. HuangJ TangY TangJ Educational efficacy of high-fidelity simulation in neonatal resuscitation training: a systematic review and metaanalysis BMC Med Educ 2019 19 323 10.1186/s12909-019-1763-z671694431464614 Search in Google Scholar

10 Kim J, Park J-H, Shin S. Effectiveness of simulation-based nursing education depending on fidelity: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2016; 16:176–182. KimJ ParkJ-H ShinS Effectiveness of simulation-based nursing education depending on fidelity: a meta-analysis BMC Med Educ 2016 16 176 182 10.1186/s12909-016-0672-7487781027215280 Search in Google Scholar

11 Shin S, Park J-H, Kim J-H. Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:176–182. ShinS ParkJ-H KimJ-H Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: meta-analysis Nurse Educ Today 2015 35 176 182 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.09.00925459172 Search in Google Scholar

12 Higgins JP, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. 2019:205–228. HigginsJP SavovićJ PageMJ Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial 2019 205 228 10.1002/9781119536604.ch8 Search in Google Scholar

13 Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. Br Med J. 2016;7:355. SterneJAC HernánMA ReevesBC ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions Br Med J 2016 7 355 10.1136/bmj.i4919506205427733354 Search in Google Scholar

14 JBI TJBI. Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies (non-randomized experimental studies). Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies; 2017:7. JBI TJBI Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies (non-randomized experimental studies) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies 2017 7 Search in Google Scholar

15 Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, et al. Chapter 3: systematic reviews of effectiveness. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, eds. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2017. TufanaruC MunnZ AromatarisE Chapter 3: systematic reviews of effectiveness In: AromatarisE MunnZ eds. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual The Joanna Briggs Institute 2017 Search in Google Scholar

16 Bruce N, Pope D, Stanistreet D. Quantitative Methods for Health Research: A Practical Interactive Guide to Epidemiology and Statistics. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2018. BruceN PopeD StanistreetD Quantitative Methods for Health Research: A Practical Interactive Guide to Epidemiology and Statistics UK John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2018 10.1002/9781118665374 Search in Google Scholar

17 Durlak JA. How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009;34:917–928. DurlakJA How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes J Pediatr Psychol 2009 34 917 928 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp00419223279 Search in Google Scholar

18 Idris, NRN. Performance of the trim and fill method in adjusting for the publication bias in meta-analysis of continuous data. Am J Appl Sci. 2012;9:1512. IdrisNRN Performance of the trim and fill method in adjusting for the publication bias in meta-analysis of continuous data Am J Appl Sci 2012 9 1512 10.3844/ajassp.2012.1512.1517 Search in Google Scholar

19 Brahmi F, Gall C. EndNote® and reference Manager® citation formats compared to “instructions to authors” in top medical journals. Med Ref Serv Q. 2006;25:49–57. BrahmiF GallC EndNote® and reference Manager® citation formats compared to “instructions to authors” in top medical journals Med Ref Serv Q 2006 25 49 57 10.1300/J115v25n02_0416782666 Search in Google Scholar

20 Bogossian FE, Cooper SJ, Cant R, Porter J, Forbes H, FIRST2ACT™ Research Team. A trial of e-simulation of sudden patient deterioration (FIRST2ACT WEB) on student learning. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:e36–e42. BogossianFE CooperSJ CantR PorterJ ForbesH FIRST2ACT™ Research Team A trial of e-simulation of sudden patient deterioration (FIRST2ACT WEB) on student learning Nurse Educ Today 2015 35 e36 e42 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.00326296543 Search in Google Scholar

21 Toubasi S, Alosta MR, Darawad MW, Demeh W. Impact of simulation training on Jordanian nurses’ performance of basic life support skills: a pilot study. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:999–1003. ToubasiS AlostaMR DarawadMW DemehW Impact of simulation training on Jordanian nurses’ performance of basic life support skills: a pilot study Nurse Educ Today 2015 35 999 1003 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.03.01725935665 Search in Google Scholar

22 Woda A, Hansen J, Dreifuerst KT, et al. The impact of simulation on knowledge and performance gain regarding diabetic patient care. Clin Simul Nurs. 2019;34:6. WodaA HansenJ DreifuerstKT The impact of simulation on knowledge and performance gain regarding diabetic patient care Clin Simul Nurs 2019 34 6 10.1016/j.ecns.2019.05.001 Search in Google Scholar

23 Meyer MN, Connors H, Hou Q, Gajewski B. The effect of simulation on clinical performance: a junior nursing student clinical comparison study. Simul Healthc. 2011;6:269–277. MeyerMN ConnorsH HouQ GajewskiB The effect of simulation on clinical performance: a junior nursing student clinical comparison study Simul Healthc 2011 6 269 277 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318223a04821785388 Search in Google Scholar

24 Boyde M, Cooper E, Putland H, et al. Simulation for emergency nurses (SIREN): a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;68:100–104. BoydeM CooperE PutlandH Simulation for emergency nurses (SIREN): a quasi-experimental study Nurse Educ Today 2018 68 100 104 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.03029902738 Search in Google Scholar

25 Ismailoglu G, Zaybak A. Comparison of the effectiveness of a virtual simulator with a plastic arm model in teaching intravenous catheter insertion skills. Comput Inform Nurs. 2018;36:98–105. IsmailogluG ZaybakA Comparison of the effectiveness of a virtual simulator with a plastic arm model in teaching intravenous catheter insertion skills Comput Inform Nurs 2018 36 98 105 10.1097/CIN.000000000000040529176359 Search in Google Scholar

26 Morton SB, Powers K, Jordan K, et al. The effect of high-fidelity simulation on medical-surgical nurses’ mock code performance and self-confidence. MEDSURG Nurs. 2019;28:6. MortonSB PowersK JordanK The effect of high-fidelity simulation on medical-surgical nurses’ mock code performance and self-confidence MEDSURG Nurs 2019 28 6 Search in Google Scholar

27 Aqel AA, Ahmad MM. High-fidelity simulation effects on CPR knowledge, skills, acquisition, and retention in nursing students. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014;11:394–400. AqelAA AhmadMM High-fidelity simulation effects on CPR knowledge, skills, acquisition, and retention in nursing students Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2014 11 394 400 10.1111/wvn.1206325213578 Search in Google Scholar

28 Basak T, Aslan O, Unver V, Yildiz D. Effectiveness of the training material in drug-dose calculation skills. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2016;13:324–330. BasakT AslanO UnverV YildizD Effectiveness of the training material in drug-dose calculation skills Jpn J Nurs Sci 2016 13 324 330 10.1111/jjns.1211226782270 Search in Google Scholar

29 Zhang YY, Yan M, Li J, et al. Effects of walking exercise on bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy: evidence from systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Nurs. 2020;7:39–48. ZhangYY YanM LiJ Effects of walking exercise on bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy: evidence from systematic review and meta-analysis Front Nurs 2020 7 39 48 10.2478/fon-2020-0009 Search in Google Scholar

30 Basak T, Demirtas A, Iyigun E. The effect of simulation based education on patient teaching skills of nursing students: a randomized controlled study. J Prof Nurs. 2019;35:417–424. BasakT DemirtasA IyigunE The effect of simulation based education on patient teaching skills of nursing students: a randomized controlled study J Prof Nurs 2019 35 417 424 10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.02.00431519347 Search in Google Scholar

31 Bowling A. The effect of simulation on skill performance: a need for change in pediatric nursing education. J Pediatr Nurs. 2015;30:439–446. BowlingA The effect of simulation on skill performance: a need for change in pediatric nursing education J Pediatr Nurs 2015 30 439 446 10.1016/j.pedn.2014.12.01025595245 Search in Google Scholar

32 Chen R, Grierson LE, Norman GR. Evaluating the impact of high- and low-fidelity instruction in the development of auscultation skills. Med Educ. 2015;49:276–285. ChenR GriersonLE NormanGR Evaluating the impact of high- and low-fidelity instruction in the development of auscultation skills Med Educ 2015 49 276 285 10.1111/medu.1265325693987 Search in Google Scholar

33 Durmaz A, Dicle A, Cakan E, Cakir Ş. Effect of screen-based computer simulation on knowledge and skill in nursing students’ learning of preoperative and postoperative care management a randomized controlled study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2012;30:196–203. DurmazA DicleA CakanE CakirŞ Effect of screen-based computer simulation on knowledge and skill in nursing students’ learning of preoperative and postoperative care management a randomized controlled study Comput Inform Nurs 2012 30 196 203 10.1097/NCN.0b013e318241913422228217 Search in Google Scholar

34 Jaberi A, Momennasab M. Effectiveness of standardized patient in abdominal physical examination education: a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Med Res. 2019;17:1–10. JaberiA MomennasabM Effectiveness of standardized patient in abdominal physical examination education: a randomized, controlled trial Clin Med Res 2019 17 1 10 10.3121/cmr.2019.1446654628231160473 Search in Google Scholar

35 Karabacak U, Unver V, Ugur E, et al. Examining the effect of simulation based learning on self-efficacy and performance of first-year nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019;36:139–143. KarabacakU UnverV UgurE Examining the effect of simulation based learning on self-efficacy and performance of first-year nursing students Nurse Educ Pract 2019 36 139 143 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.03.01230978577 Search in Google Scholar

36 Keleekai NL, Schuster CA, Murray CL, et al. Improving nurses’ peripheral intravenous catheter insertion knowledge, confidence, and skills using a simulation-based blended learning program: a randomized trial. Simul Healthc. 2016;11:376–384. KeleekaiNL SchusterCA MurrayCL Improving nurses’ peripheral intravenous catheter insertion knowledge, confidence, and skills using a simulation-based blended learning program: a randomized trial Simul Healthc 2016 11 376 384 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000186534588427504890 Search in Google Scholar

37 Lee BO, Liang HF, Chu TP, Huang CC. Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019;41:102646. LeeBO LiangHF ChuTP HuangCC Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance Nurse Educ Pract 2019 41 102646 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.10264631698255 Search in Google Scholar

38 Liaw SY, Wong LF, Ang SBL, Ho JTY, Siau C, Ang ENK. Strengthening the afferent limb of rapid response systems: an educational intervention using web-based learning for early recognition and responding to deteriorating patients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:448–456. LiawSY WongLF AngSBL HoJTY SiauC AngENK Strengthening the afferent limb of rapid response systems: an educational intervention using web-based learning for early recognition and responding to deteriorating patients BMJ Qual Saf 2016 25 448 456 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-00407326297379 Search in Google Scholar

39 Lubbers J, Rossman C. The effects of pediatric community simulation experience on the self-confidence and satisfaction of baccalaureate nursing students: a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;39:93–98. LubbersJ RossmanC The effects of pediatric community simulation experience on the self-confidence and satisfaction of baccalaureate nursing students: a quasi-experimental study Nurse Educ Today 2016 39 93 98 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.01327006038 Search in Google Scholar

40 Sarmasoglu S, Dinc L, Elcin M. Using standardized patients in nursing education: effects on students’ psychomotor skill development. Nurse Educ. 2016;41:E1–E5. SarmasogluS DincL ElcinM Using standardized patients in nursing education: effects on students’ psychomotor skill development Nurse Educ 2016 41 E1 E5 10.1097/NNE.000000000000018826102639 Search in Google Scholar

41 Stayt LC, Merriman C, Ricketts B, Morton S, Simpson T. Recognizing and managing a deteriorating patient: a randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of clinical simulation in improving clinical performance in undergraduate nursing students. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71:2563–2574. StaytLC MerrimanC RickettsB MortonS SimpsonT Recognizing and managing a deteriorating patient: a randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of clinical simulation in improving clinical performance in undergraduate nursing students J Adv Nurs 2015 71 2563 2574 10.1111/jan.1272226147977 Search in Google Scholar

42 Sumner L, Burke SM, Chang LT, McAdams M, Jones DA. Evaluation of basic arrhythmia knowledge retention and clinical application by registered nurses. J Nurs Staff Dev. 2012;28:E5–E9. SumnerL BurkeSM ChangLT McAdamsM JonesDA Evaluation of basic arrhythmia knowledge retention and clinical application by registered nurses J Nurs Staff Dev 2012 28 E5 E9 10.1097/NND.0b013e31824b41e122449890 Search in Google Scholar

43 Unver V, Basak T, Iyigun E, et al. An evaluation of a course on the rational use of medication in nursing from the perspective of the students. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33:1362–1368. UnverV BasakT IyigunE An evaluation of a course on the rational use of medication in nursing from the perspective of the students Nurse Educ Today 2013 33 1362 1368 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.00522884567 Search in Google Scholar

44 Vidal VL, Ohaeri BM, John P, Helen D. Virtual reality and the traditional method for phlebotomy training among college of nursing students in Kuwait: implication for practice. Art Sci Infus Nurs. 2013;36:349–355. VidalVL OhaeriBM JohnP HelenD Virtual reality and the traditional method for phlebotomy training among college of nursing students in Kuwait: implication for practice Art Sci Infus Nurs 2013 36 349 355 10.1097/NAN.0b013e318243172f24006114 Search in Google Scholar

45 Eyikara E, Baykara ZG. The importance of simulation in nursing education. World J Educ Technol. 2017;9:6. EyikaraE BaykaraZG The importance of simulation in nursing education World J Educ Technol 2017 9 6 10.18844/wjet.v9i1.543 Search in Google Scholar

46 Orique SB, Phillips LJ. The effectiveness of simulation on recognizing and managing clinical deterioration: meta-analyses. West J Nurs Res. 2018;40:582–609. OriqueSB PhillipsLJ The effectiveness of simulation on recognizing and managing clinical deterioration: meta-analyses West J Nurs Res 2018 40 582 609 10.1177/019394591769722428359188 Search in Google Scholar

47 Hegland PA, Aarlie H, Strømme H, Jamtvedt G. Simulation-based training for nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;54:6–20. HeglandPA AarlieH StrømmeH JamtvedtG Simulation-based training for nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis Nurse Educ Today 2017 54 6 20 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.04.00428456053 Search in Google Scholar

48 Yuan HB, Williams BA, Fang JB, Ye QH. A systematic review of selected evidence on improving knowledge and skills through high-fidelity simulation. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32:294–298. YuanHB WilliamsBA FangJB YeQH A systematic review of selected evidence on improving knowledge and skills through high-fidelity simulation Nurse Educ Today 2012 32 294 298 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.07.01021862186 Search in Google Scholar

49 Munshi F, Lababidi H, Alyousef S. Low-versus high-fidelity simulations in teaching and assessing clinical skills. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2015;10:12–15. MunshiF LababidiH AlyousefS Low-versus high-fidelity simulations in teaching and assessing clinical skills J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2015 10 12 15 10.1016/j.jtumed.2015.01.008 Search in Google Scholar

50 SimSTAFF. What is the difference between low-fidelity and high-fidelity simulations? 2020. https://simstaff.com/difference-between-low-fidelity-and-high-fidelity-simulations/. Accessed March 1, 2020. SimSTAFF What is the difference between low-fidelity and high-fidelity simulations? 2020 https://simstaff.com/difference-between-low-fidelity-and-high-fidelity-simulations/. Accessed March 1, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

51 Nimbalkar A, Patel D, Kungwani A, Phatak A, Vasa R, Nimbalkar S. Randomized control trial of high fidelity vs low fidelity simulation for training undergraduate students in neonatal resuscitation. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:636. NimbalkarA PatelD KungwaniA PhatakA VasaR NimbalkarS Randomized control trial of high fidelity vs low fidelity simulation for training undergraduate students in neonatal resuscitation BMC Res Notes 2015 8 636 10.1186/s13104-015-1623-9463088526526494 Search in Google Scholar

52 Rischer K. Why less fidelity in simulation may improve student learning. https://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning. Accessed December 6, 2020. RischerK Why less fidelity in simulation may improve student learning https://www.keithrn.com/2019/03/why-less-fidelity-in-simulation-may-be-better-to-strengthen-student-learning. Accessed December 6, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

53 Koh JH, Hur HK. Effects of simulation-based training for basic life support utilizing video-assisted debriefing on non-technical and technical skills of nursing students. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2016;28:169–179. KohJH HurHK Effects of simulation-based training for basic life support utilizing video-assisted debriefing on non-technical and technical skills of nursing students Korean J Adult Nurs 2016 28 169 179 10.7475/kjan.2016.28.2.169 Search in Google Scholar

54 Oh P-J, Jeon KD, Koh MS. The effects of simulation-based learning using standardized patients in nursing students: a meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:e6–e15. OhP-J JeonKD KohMS The effects of simulation-based learning using standardized patients in nursing students: a meta-analysis Nurse Educ Today 2015 35 e6 e15 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.01925680831 Search in Google Scholar