Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Usability of a telerehabilitation program for patients with musculoskeletal or oncological diseases: A mixed-methods evaluation / Benutzerfreundlichkeit eines Telerehabilitations-Programmes für Patient*innen mit muskuloskelettalen oder onkologischen Erkrankungen: Eine Mixed-Methods Evaluation

Doreen Stöhr
Doreen Stöhr
, 
Martin Matzka
Martin Matzka
, 
Stefan Gschwenter
Stefan Gschwenter
, 
Alexandra Edlmayer
Alexandra Edlmayer
, 
David Felder
David Felder
, 
Andreas Spary
Andreas Spary
, 
Gabriele Reiger
Gabriele Reiger
, 
Martina Honegger
Martina Honegger
 und 
Martin Skoumal
Martin Skoumal
   | 28. Apr. 2024
International Journal of Health Professions's Cover Image
Über diesen Artikel
Vorheriger Artikel
Nächster Artikel
Zitieren
Online veröffentlicht: 28. Apr. 2024
Seitenbereich: 49 - 60
Eingereicht: 12. Juli 2023
Akzeptiert: 24. Jan. 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhp-2024-0002
Schlüsselwörter
© 2024 Doreen Stöhr et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Figure 1:

Convergent mixed-methods design (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2017).
Convergent mixed-methods design (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2017).

Figure 2:

Patients’ individual motives for participating in telerehabilitation (multiple responses possible, n = 86).
Patients’ individual motives for participating in telerehabilitation (multiple responses possible, n = 86).

Figure 3:

Treatment team’s individual motives for participating in telerehabilitation (multiple responses possible, n = 31).
Treatment team’s individual motives for participating in telerehabilitation (multiple responses possible, n = 31).

Figure 4:

Technical infrastructure available for telerehabilitation (multiple responses possible).
Technical infrastructure available for telerehabilitation (multiple responses possible).

The treatment team’s assessment of the feasibility and comprehensibility of different session formats.

Rating Response, n (%)
Very good Good Neither Bad Very bad Total
Feasibility and comprehensibility of different session formats assessed by the treatment team
Patient education seminars 13 (59) 6 (27) 2 (9) 1 (5) 0 (0) 23 (100)
Individual therapy and counseling 10 (36) 9 (32) 4 (14) 5 (18) 0 (0) 28 (100)
Group training sessions 5 (20) 6 (24) 13 (52) 1 (4) 0 (0) 25 (100)

Patients’ characteristics.

Characteristics Category n (%)
Sex
Female 55 (64)
Male 31 (36)
Total 86 (100)
Indication
Musculoskeletal diseases 67 (78)
Oncological diseases 19 (22)
Total 86 (100)
Highest educational level
Compulsory school 4 (5)
Apprenticeship 20 (24)
Vocational middle school 13 (15)
University entrance qualification 18 (21)
University degree 26 (31)
Other qualification after university entrance qualification 4 (5)
Total 85 (100)
Employment situation
White-collar 67 (79)
Blue-collar 12 (14)
Currently not employed 3 (4)
Receiving social benefits 3 (4)
Total 85 (100)

Comparison of the treatment team’s and patients’ views on the use of telerehabilitation.

Agreement Response, n (%)
Agree Partly agree Neither Partly disagree Disagree Total
Ability to quickly learn how to use the telerehabilitation system
Patients 74 (86) 9 (10) 2 (2) 1 (1) 0 (0) 86 (100)
Treatment team 12 (39) 14 (45) 5 (16) 0 (0) 0 (0) 31 (100)
Information exchange was comprehensible
Patients 68 (79) 16 (19) 1 (1) 1 (1) 0 (0) 86 (100)
Treatment team 3 (9) 16 (50) 8 (25) 4 (13) 1 (3) 32 (100)
Therapeutic contents were adequately conveyed
Patients 68 (79) 17 (20) 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 86 (100)
Treatment team 4 (13) 11 (35) 12 (39) 4 (13) 0 (0) 31 (100)
Amount of time spent on telerehabilitation was appropriate
Patients 41 (48) 29 (34) 11 (13) 4 (5) 1 (1) 86 (100)
Time for conducting telerehabilitation was comparable to face-to-face sessions
Treatment team 3 (10) 4 (13) 5 (16) 11 (35) 8 (26) 31 (100)
eISSN:
2296-990X
Sprachen:
Englisch, Deutsch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
Volume Open
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Medizin, Klinische Medizin, andere
Zeitschrift RSS Feed