[
1. M. Wooldridge, Artificial Intelligence requires more than deep learning - but what, exactly?, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 289, p. 103386, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. S. Lalmuanawma, J. Hussain, and L. Chhakchhuak, Applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence for Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic: a review, Chaos Solitons Fractals, vol. 139, pp. 110059, 6, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. V. C. Müller and N. Bostrom, Future progress in artificial intelligence: a survey of expert opinion, in Fundamental issues of artificial intelligence, vol. 376 of Synth. Libr., pp. 553–570, Springer, [Cham], 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-26485-1_33
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. K. T. Mengistu and F. Rudzicz, Comparing humans and automatic speech recognition systems in recognizing dysarthric speech, in Advances in artificial intelligence, vol. 6657 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., pp. 291–300, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. C. Li, Y. Xing, F. He, and D. Cheng, A strategic learning algorithm for state-based games, Automatica J. IFAC, vol. 113, pp. 108615, 9, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Z. M. Fadlullah, B. Mao, F. Tang, and N. Kato, Value iteration architecture based deep learning for intelligent routing exploiting heterogeneous computing platforms, IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 939–950, 2019.10.1109/TC.2018.2874483
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. R. E. Stern, S. Cui, M. L. Delle Monache, R. Bhadani, M. Bunting, M. Churchill, N. Hamilton, R. Haulcy, H. Pohlmann, F. Wu, B. Piccoli, B. Seibold, J. Sprinkle, and D. B. Work, Dissipation of stop-and-go waves via control of autonomous vehicles: Field experiments, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 89, pp. 205 – 221, 2018.10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. S. Mishra, A machine learning framework for data driven acceleration of computations of differential equations, Math. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 118–146, 2019.10.3934/Mine.2018.1.118
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. K. O. Lye, S. Mishra, and D. Ray, Deep learning observables in computational fluid dynamics, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 410, pp. 109339, 26, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. D. Zhang, L. Guo, and G. E. Karniadakis, Learning in modal space: solving time-dependent stochastic PDEs using physics-informed neural networks, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. A639–A665, 2020.10.1137/19M1260141
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 378, pp. 686–707, 2019.10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. N. Discacciati, J. S. Hesthaven, and D. Ray, Controlling oscillations in high-order discontinuous Galerkin schemes using artificial viscosity tuned by neural networks, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 409, pp. 109304, 30, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. D. Ray and J. S. Hesthaven, Detecting troubled-cells on two-dimensional unstructured grids using a neural network, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 397, pp. 108845, 31, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. J. Magiera, D. Ray, J. S. Hesthaven, and C. Rohde, Constraint-aware neural networks for Riemann problems, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 409, pp. 109345, 27, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. D. Ray and J. S. Hesthaven, An artificial neural network as a troubled-cell indicator, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 367, pp. 166–191, 2018.10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.029
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. M. Herty, T. Trimborn, and G. Visconti, Mean-field and kinetic descriptions of neural differential equations, Foundations of Data Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 271–298, 2022.10.3934/fods.2022007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. J. Crevat, Mean-field limit of a spatially-extended Fitzhugh-Nagumo neural network, Kinet. Relat. Models, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1329–1358, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. S. Mei, A. Montanari, and P.-M. Nguyen, A mean field view of the landscape of two-layer neural networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 115, no. 33, pp. E7665–E7671, 2018.10.1073/pnas.1806579115609989830054315
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. J. Sirignano and K. Spiliopoulos, Mean field analysis of neural networks: a law of large numbers, SIAM J. Appl. Math., vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 725–752, 2020.10.1137/18M1192184
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. J. Sirignano and K. Spiliopoulos, Mean field analysis of neural networks: a central limit theorem, Stochastic Process. Appl., vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 1820–1852, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. F. Baccelli and T. Taillefumier, Replica-mean-field limits for intensity-based neural networks, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1756–1797, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. T. Trimborn, S. Gerster, and G. Visconti, Spectral methods to study the robustness of residual neural networks with infinite layers, Foundations of Data Science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 257–278, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. E. Cristiani, B. Piccoli, and A. Tosin, Multiscale Modeling of Pedestrian Dynamics. Springer, Cham, 2014.10.1007/978-3-319-06620-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, Deep residual learning for image recognition, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 770–778, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. E. Haber, F. Lucka, and L. Ruthotto, Never look back - A modified EnKF method and its application to the training of neural networks without back propagation. Preprint arXiv:1805.08034, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. N. B. Kovachki and A. M. Stuart, Ensemble Kalman inversion: a derivative-free technique for machine learning tasks, Inverse Probl., vol. 35, no. 9, p. 095005, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. K. Watanabe and S. G. Tzafestas, Learning algorithms for neural networks with the Kalman filters, J. Intell. Robot. Syst., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 305–319, 1990.10.1007/BF00439421
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. A. Yegenoglu, S. Diaz, K. Krajsek, and M. Herty, Ensemble Kalman filter optimizing deep neural networks, in Conference on Machine Learning, Optimization and Data Science, vol. 12514, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. K. Janocha and W. M. Czarnecki, On loss functions for deep neural networks in classification, Schedae Informaticae, vol. 2016, no. Volume 25, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. T. Q. Chen, Y. Rubanova, J. Bettencourt, and D. K. Duvenaud, Neural ordinary differential equations, in Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 6571–6583, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. H. Lin and S. Jegelka, Resnet with one-neuron hidden layers is a universal approximator, p. 6172–6181, Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc., 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Y. Lu and J. Lu, A universal approximation theorem of deep neural networks for expressing probability distributions, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. F. Balcan, and H. Lin, eds.), vol. 33, pp. 3094–3105, Curran Associates, Inc., 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. P. Kidger and T. Lyons, Universal approximation with deep narrow networks, in Conference on Learning Theory, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. C. Gebhardt, T. Trimborn, F. Weber, A. Bezold, C. Broeckmann, and M. Herty, Simplified ResNet approach for data driven prediction of microstructure-fatigue relationship, Mechanics of Materials, vol. 151, p. 103625, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. K. Bobzin, W. Wietheger, H. Heinemann, S. Dokhanchi, M. Rom, and G. Visconti, Prediction of particle properties in plasma spraying based on machine learning, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2021.10.1007/s11666-021-01239-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli, and G. Savaré, Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures. Lectures in Mathematics ETH Z ˜A¼rich, Birkh ˜A¤user, 2. ed ed., 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. C. Villani, Optimal Transport: Old and New. Springer-Verlag, 2009.10.1007/978-3-540-71050-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. F. Golse, On the dynamics of large particle systems in the mean field limit, in Macroscopic and large scale phenomena: coarse graining, mean field limits and ergodicity, pp. 1–144, Springer, 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-26883-5_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. J. M. Coron, Control and nonlinearity. American Mathematical Society, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. E. Zuazua, Controllability and observability of partial differential equations: Some results and open problems, vol. 3 of Handbook of Differential Equations: Evolutionary Equations, pp. 527–621, North-Holland, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. N. Fournier and A. Guillin, On the rate of convergence in wasserstein distance of the empirical measure, Probability Theory and Related Fields, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 707–738, 2015.10.1007/s00440-014-0583-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. E. Boissard, Simple bounds for convergence of empirical and occupation measures in 1-wasserstain distance, Electronic Journal of Probability, vol. 16, pp. 2296–2333, 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization. Springer New York, 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. I. Cravero, G. Puppo, M. Semplice, and G. Visconti, CWENO: uniformly accurate reconstructions for balance laws, Math. Comp., vol. 87, no. 312, pp. 1689–1719, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. G.-S. Jiang and C.-W. Shu, Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 126, pp. 202–228, 1996.10.1006/jcph.1996.0130
]Search in Google Scholar
