Learning transitivity schemas: The role of the number of nominals and word order

Abbot-Smith, K., Chang, F., Rowland, C., Ferguson, H., & Pine, J. (2017). Do two and three year old children use an incremental first-NP-as-agent bias to process active transitive and passive sentences?: A permutation analysis. PloS One, 12(10): e0186129. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186129 Search in Google Scholar

Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2001). What preschool children do and do not do with ungrammatical word orders. Cognitive Development, 16, 679–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(01)00054-5. Search in Google Scholar

Aguado-Orea, J., Witherstone, H., Bourgeois, L., & Baselga, A. (2019). Learning to construct sentences in Spanish: A replication of the Weird Word Order technique. Journal of Child Language, 46(6), 1249–1259. Search in Google Scholar

Akhtar, N. (1999). Acquiring basic word order: Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language, 26(2), 339–56. Search in Google Scholar

Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1997). Young children’s productivity with word order and verb morphology. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 952–965. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.33.6.952 Search in Google Scholar

Ambridge, B., Noble, C., & Lieven, E. (2014). The semantics of the transitive causative construction: Evidence from a forced-choice pointing study with adults and children. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(2), 293–311. Search in Google Scholar

Ammon, M. S., & Slobin, D. I. (1979). A cross-linguistic study of the processing of causative sentences. Cognition, 7, 3–17. Search in Google Scholar

Arunachalam, S., Escovar, E., Hansen, M., & Waxman, S. (2013). Out of sight, but not out of mind: 21-month-olds use syntactic information to learn verbs even in the absence of a corresponding event. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(4), 417–425. Search in Google Scholar

Arunachalam, S., Leddon, E., Song, H., Lee, Y., & Waxman, S. (2013). Doing more with less: Verb learning in Korean-acquiring 24-month-olds. Language Acquisition, 20(4), 292–304. Search in Google Scholar

Arunachalam, S., Syrett, K., & Chen, Y. (2016). Lexical disambiguation in verb learning: Evidence from the conjoined-subject intransitive frame in English and Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00138 Search in Google Scholar

Arunachalam, S., & Waxman, S. (2010). Meaning from syntax: Evidence from 2-year-olds. Cognition, 114(3), 442–446. Search in Google Scholar

Audisio, C. P., & Migdalek, M. J. (2020). Do simple syntactic heuristics to verb meaning hold up? Testing the structure mapping account over spontaneous speech to Spanish-learning children. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 65(4), 556–582. https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2020.21 Search in Google Scholar

Babineau, M., de Carvalho, A., Trueswell, J., & Christophe, A. (2021). Familiar words can serve as a semantic seed for syntactic bootstrapping. Developmental Science, 24(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13010 Search in Google Scholar

Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, B., Bates, E. (Eds.) The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3–73). Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devescovi, A., Natale, F., & Venza, V. (1984). A cross-linguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 55, 341–54. Search in Google Scholar

Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A., & Smith, S. (1982). Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition, 11, 245–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(82)90017-8. Search in Google Scholar

Bavin, E., & Growcott, C. (2000). Infants of 24-30 months understand verb frames.In M. Perkins & S. Howard (Eds.), New directions in language development and disorders (pp. 169–177). Wolters Kluwer. Search in Google Scholar

Benavides-Varela, S., & Gervain, J. (2017). Learning word order at birth: A NIRS study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 198–208. Search in Google Scholar

Bernard, C., & Gervain, J. (2012). Prosodic cues to word order: What level of representation? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 451. Search in Google Scholar

Bever, T. (1970). The cognitive bias for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–362). Wiley. Search in Google Scholar

Brandt, S., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2016). German children’s use of word order and case marking to interpret simple and complex sentences: Testing differences between constructions and lexical items. Language Learning and Development, 12(2), 156–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2015.1052448 Search in Google Scholar

Bridges, A. (1980). SVO comprehension strategies reconsidered: The evidence of individual patterns of response. Journal of Child Language, 7, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900007042 Search in Google Scholar

Bridges, A. (1984). Preschool children’s comprehension of agency. Journal of Child Language, 11, 593–610. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900005973 Search in Google Scholar

Brusini, P., Seminck, O., Amsili, P., & Christophe, A. (2021). The acquisition of noun and verb categories by bootstrapping from a few known words: A computational model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661479 Search in Google Scholar

Cameron‐Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2003). A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science, 27(6), 843–873. Search in Google Scholar

Candan, A., Küntay, A., Yeh, Y.-C., Cheung, H., Wagner, L., & Naigles, L. (2012). Language and age effects in children’s processing of word order. Cognitive Development, 27(3), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGDEV.2011.12.001 Search in Google Scholar

Chan, A., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Children’s understanding of the agent-patient relations in the transitive construction: Cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German, and English. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(2), 267–300. https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.015 Search in Google Scholar

Chan, A., Meints, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Young children’s comprehension of English SVO word order revisited: Testing the same children in act-out and intermodal preferential looking tasks. Cognitive Development, 25, 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGDEV.2009.10.002 Search in Google Scholar

Chang, F., Kobayashi, T., & Amano, S. (2009). Social factors in the acquisition of a new word order. First Language, 29(4), 427–445. Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Y., LaTourrette, A. S, & Trueswell, J. (2023). Evidence for cross-situational syntactic bootstrapping: Three-year olds generalize verb meaning across different syntactic frames. In M. Goldwater, F. K. Anggoro, B. K. Hayes, & D. C. Ong (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1243–1249). University of California. Search in Google Scholar

Christodoulopoulos, C., Roth, D., & Fisher, C. (2016). An incremental model of syntactic bootstrapping. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Learning (pp. 38–43). Search in Google Scholar

Connor, M., Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Roth, D. (2008). Baby SRL: Modeling early language acquisition. In A. Clark & K. Toutanova (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CoNLL (pp. 81–88). Association for Computational Linguistics. Search in Google Scholar

Connor, M., Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Roth, D. (2010). Starting from scratch in semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, ACL (pp. 989-998). Search in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Rapid learning of an abstract language-specific category: Polish children’s acquisition of the instrumental construction. Journal of Child Language, 35(3), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.021 Search in Google Scholar

Dautriche, I., Cristia, A., Brusini, P., Yuan, S., Fisher, C., & Christophe, A. (2014). Toddlers default to canonical surface‐to‐meaning mapping when learning verbs. Child Development, 85(3), 1168–1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12164 Search in Google Scholar

De Carvalho, A., Dautriche, I., Fiévet, A.-C., & Christophe, A. (2021). Toddlers exploit referential and syntactic cues to flexibly adapt their interpretation of novel verb meanings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 203, 105017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105017 Search in Google Scholar

De Cat, C. (2007). French dislocation. Interpretation, syntax, acquisition. Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Devescovi, A. E., D’Amico, S., Smith, S., Mimica, I., & Bates, E. (1998). The development of sentence comprehension in Italian and SerboCroatian: Local versus distributed cues. In D. Hillert (Ed.), Sentence processing: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 345–377). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585492230_020 Search in Google Scholar

Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008a). German children’s comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. Child Development, 79(4), 1152–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01181.x Search in Google Scholar

Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008b). Young German children’s early syntactic competence: A preferential looking study. Developmental Science, 11(4), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00703.x Search in Google Scholar

Fedzechkina, M., Newport, E., & Jaeger, T. (2017). Balancing effort and information transmission during language acquisition: Evidence from word order and case marking. Cognitive Science, 41(2), 416–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12346 Search in Google Scholar

Feldman, H., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Gleitman, L. (1978). Beyond Herodotus: The creation of language by linguistically deprived deaf children. In A. Locke (Ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language (pp. 102–123). Academic. Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, C. (1996). Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of analogy in children’s interpretations of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 31(1). 41–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0012 Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, C. (2002). Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of abstract structure in 2.5-year-olds’ interpretations of novel verbs. Developmental Science, 5(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00209 Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, C., Hall, D., Rakowitz, S., & Gleitman, L. (1994). When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth. Lingua, 92(1–4), 333–375. Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, C., Jin, K., & Scott, R. (2020). The developmental origins of syntactic bootstrapping. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 48–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12447 Search in Google Scholar

Franck, J., Millotte, S., & Lassotta, R. (2011). Early word order representations: Novel arguments against old contradictions. Language Acquisition, 18(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2011.530536 Search in Google Scholar

Franck, J., Millotte, S., Posada, A., & Rizzi, L. (2013). Abstract knowledge of word order by 19 months: An eye-tracking study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(2), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000713 Search in Google Scholar

Garcia, R., Dery, J., Roeser, J., & Höhle, B. (2018). Word order preferences of Tagalog-speaking adults and children. First Language, 38(6), 617–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723718790317 Search in Google Scholar

Garcia, R., & Kidd, E. (2022). Acquiring verb-argument structure in Tagalog: A multivariate corpus analysis of caregiver and child speech. Linguistics, 60(6), 1855–1906. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0107 Search in Google Scholar

Garcia, R., Roeser, J., & Höhle, B. (2019). Thematic role assignment in the L1 acquisition of Tagalog: Use of word order and morphosyntactic markers. Language Acquisition, 26(3), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2018.1525613 Search in Google Scholar

Gavarró, A., Leela, M., Rizzi, L., & Franck, J. (2015). Knowledge of the OV parameter setting at 19 months: Evidence from Hindi–Urdu. Lingua, 154, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.001 Search in Google Scholar

Gertner, Y., & Fisher, C. (2012). Predicted errors in children’s early sentence comprehension. Cognition, 124(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.010 Search in Google Scholar

Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science, 17(8), 684–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01767.x Search in Google Scholar

Gervain, J., Nespor, M., Mazuka, R., Horie, R., & Mehler, J. (2008). Bootstrapping word order in prelexical infants: A Japanese–Italian cross-linguistic study. Cognitive Psychology, 57(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.001 Search in Google Scholar

Göksun, T., Küntay, A., & Naigles, L. (2008). Turkish children use morphosyntactic bootstrapping in interpreting verb meaning. Journal of Child Language, 35(2), 291–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000907008471 Search in Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). What language creation in the manual modality tells us about the foundations of language? The Linguistic Review, 22(2–4), 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.199 Search in Google Scholar

Hakuta, K. (1982). Interaction between particles and word order in the comprehension and production of simple sentences in Japanese children. Developmental Psychology, 18, 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.1.62 Search in Google Scholar

He, A., & Wittenberg, E. (2020). The acquisition of event nominals and light verb constructions. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14(2), e12363. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12363 Search in Google Scholar

Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. (1996). Single-Word Speakers’ Comprehension of Word Order. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. Golinkoff (Eds.), The origins of grammar: Evidence from early language comprehension (pp. 99–122). MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., & Naigles, L. (1996). Young children’s use of syntactic frames to derive meaning. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. Golinkoff (Eds.), The origins of grammar: Evidence from early language comprehension (pp. 123–158). MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Horowitz, A., & Frank, M. (2015). Young children’s developing sensitivity to discourse continuity as a cue for inferring reference. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 129, 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.08.003 Search in Google Scholar

Hsu, D. (2018). Children’s syntactic representation of the transitive constructions in Mandarin Chinese. PloS One, 13(11): e0206788. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0206788 Search in Google Scholar

Imai, M., Li, L., Haryu, E., Okada, H., Hirsh‐Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., & Shigematsu, J. (2008). Novel noun and verb learning in Chinese‐, English‐, and Japanese‐speaking children. Child Development, 79(4), 979–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01171.x Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, L., & Haryu, E. (2010). Young Chinese-speaking children’s understanding of the correspondence between verb meaning and argument structure [Conference presentation]. Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA. Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, L., & Haryu, E. (2014). Revisiting Chinese-speaking children’s understanding of argument structure. Japanese Psychological Research, 56(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12036 Search in Google Scholar

Jin, K. (2015). The role of syntactic and discourse information in verb learning. [Ph.D. Dissertation]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Search in Google Scholar

Jin, K., & Fisher, C. (2014). Early evidence for syntactic bootstrapping: 15-month- olds use sentence structure in verb learning. In W. Orman & M. Valleau (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Cascadilla Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kail, M. (1989). Cue validity, cue cost, and processing types in sentence comprehension in French and Spanish. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence comprehension (pp. 77–117). Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kail, M., & Charvillat, A. (1986). Linguistic cues in sentence processing in French children and adults from a crosslinguistic perspective. In I. Kurcz, G. W. Shugar & J. H. Danks (Eds.), Knowledge and language (pp. 349–374). North-Holland. Search in Google Scholar

Kail, M., & Charvillat, A. (1988). Local and topological processing in sentence comprehension by French and Spanish children. Journal of Child Language, 15(3), 637–662. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012605 Search in Google Scholar

Kayama, Y., & Oshima-Takane, Y. (2022). The acquisition of argument structures of intransitive and transitive verbs in Japanese: The role of parental input. First Language, 42(1), 144–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237211059970 Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Y.-J. (2000). Subject/object drop in the acquisition of Korean: A crosslinguistic comparison. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 9(4), 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008304903779 Search in Google Scholar

Koulaguina, E., Legendre, G., Barrière, I., & Nazzi, T. (2019). Towards abstract syntax at 24 months: Evidence from subject-verb agreement with conjoined subjects. Language Learning and Development, 15(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2019.1571417 Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J., & Naigles, L. (2005). The input to verb learning in Mandarin Chinese: A role for syntactic bootstrapping. Developmental Psychology, 41, 529–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.3.529 Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J., & Naigles, L. (2008). Mandarin learners use syntactic bootstrapping in verb acquisition. Cognition, 106(2), 1028–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.004 Search in Google Scholar

Leischner, F., Weissenborn, J., & Naigles, L. (2016). Universal and language--specific patterns in the acquisition of verb argument structures in German. Language Learning and Development, 12(2), 153–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2015.1052450 Search in Google Scholar

Lempert, H., & Kinsbourne, M. (1978). Children’s comprehension of word order: A developmental investigation. Child Development, 49, 1235–1238. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8624.1978.TB04097.X Search in Google Scholar

Lidz, J., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. (2003). Understanding how input matters: Verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar. Cognition, 87(3). 151–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00230-5 Search in Google Scholar

Lin, K., Chang, Y., & Deen, K. (2022). The child acquisition of voice in Paiwan.In Y. Gong & F. Kpogo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 46th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Cascadilla Press. Search in Google Scholar

Lindner, K. (2003). The development of sentence-interpretation strategies in monolingual German-learning children with and without specific language impairment. Linguistics, 41, 213–254. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2003.008 Search in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, B., Pleh, C., & Bates, E. (1985). The development of sentence interpretation in Hungarian. Cognitive Psychology, 17(2), 178–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90007-6 Search in Google Scholar

Mahowald, K., Diachek, E., Gibson, E., Fedorenko, E., & Futrell, R. (2022). Grammatical cues are largely, but not completely, redundant with word meanings in natural language. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.12911 Search in Google Scholar

Marcus, G., Vijayan, S., Bandi Rao, S., & Vishton, P. (1999). Rule learning by seven- month-old infants. Science, 283(5398), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5398.77 Search in Google Scholar

Martin, A., Igarashi, Y., Jincho, N., & Mazuka, R. (2016). Utterances in infant-directed speech are shorter, not slower. Cognition, 156, 52–59. Search in Google Scholar

Matsuo, A., Kita, S., Shinya, Y., Wood, G., & Naigles, L. (2012). Japanese two-year-olds use morphosyntax to learn novel verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 39, 637–663. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000213 Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2005). The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 20(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.08.001 Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2007). French children’s use and correction of weird word orders: A constructivist account. Journal of Child Language, 34, 381–409. https://doi.org/1.1017/S030500090600794X Search in Google Scholar

McDonald, J. (1986). The development of sentence comprehension strategies in English and Dutch. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(86)90043-3 Search in Google Scholar

Mintz, T. (2003). Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition 90, 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00140-9 Search in Google Scholar

Naigles, L. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 17(2), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900013817 Search in Google Scholar

Naigles, L., Fowler, A., & Helm, A. (1992). Developmental shifts in the construction of verb meanings. Cognitive Development, 7(4), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(92)80001-V Search in Google Scholar

Naigles, L., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. (1993). Children acquire word meaning components from syntactic evidence. In E. Dromi (Ed.), Language and cognition: A developmental perspective (pp. 104–140 ). Ablex. Search in Google Scholar

Naigles, L., & Kako, E. (1993). First contact in verb acquisition: Defining a role for syntax. Child Development, 64, 1665–1687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04206.x Search in Google Scholar

Nappa, R., Wessel, A., McEldoon, K., Gleitman, L., & Trueswell, J. (2009). Use of speaker’s gaze and syntax in verb learning. Language Learning and Development, 5(4), 203–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440903167528 Search in Google Scholar

Narasimhan, B., Budwig, N., & Murty, L. (2005). Argument realization in Hindi caregiver–child discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(4), 461–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.01.005 Search in Google Scholar

Noble, C., Iqbal, F., Lieven, E., & Theakston, A. (2016). Converging and competing cues in the acquisition of syntactic structures: The conjoined agent intransitive. Journal of Child Language, 43(4), 811–842. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000288 Search in Google Scholar

Noble, C., Rowland, C., & Pine, J. (2011). Comprehension of argument structure and semantic roles: Evidence from English‐learning children and the forced‐ choice pointing paradigm. Cognitive Science, 35(5), 963–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01175.x Search in Google Scholar

Olguin, R., & Tomasello, M. (1993). Twenty-five-month-old children do not have a grammatical category of verb. Cognitive Development, 8(3), 245–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(93)80001-A Search in Google Scholar

Omaki, A., Lassotta, R., Kobayashi, T., Rizzi, L., & Franck, J. (2012). Delay of word order in Japanese? Evidence from a preferential looking study with 19 and 30-month-old children. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2826). Cognitive Science Society. Search in Google Scholar

Özdemir-Yilmazer, M. & Başol, H. (2017). Acquisition of verbs and argument structures in Turkish. International Journal of Language Academy, 5(18), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.18033/ijla.3615 Search in Google Scholar

Özge, D., Küntay, A., & Snedeker, J. (2019). Why wait for the verb? Turkish speaking children use case markers for incremental language comprehension. Cognition, 183, 152–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.026 Search in Google Scholar

Perkins, L., Feldman, N., & Lidz, J. (2017). Learning an input filter for argument structure acquisition. Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics, CMCL (pp. 11–19). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-0702 Search in Google Scholar

Perkins, L., Feldman, N., & Lidz, J. (2022). The power of ignoring: Filtering input for argument structure acquisition. Cognitive Science, 46(1), e13080. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13080 Search in Google Scholar

Perkins, L., Knowlton, T., Williams, A., & Lidz, J. (2022). Thematic content, not number matching, drives syntactic bootstrapping. LingBuzz. https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/006679 Search in Google Scholar

Pozzan, L., Gleitman, L., & Trueswell, J. (2016). Semantic ambiguity and syntactic bootstrapping: The case of conjoined-subject intransitive sentences. Language Learning and Development, 12(1), 14–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2015.1018420 Search in Google Scholar

Reddy, A. & Deen, K. (2023). Effect of dependent case marking on frame compliance.In P. Gappmayr, & J. Kellogg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 47th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 632–644). Cascadilla Press. Search in Google Scholar

Rispoli, M. (1989). Encounters with Japanese verbs: Caregiver sentences and the categorization of transitive and intransitive action verbs. First Language, 9(25), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272378900902506 Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, K. (1983). Comprehension and production of word order in Stage I. Child Development, 54, 443–449. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129705 Search in Google Scholar

Šagi, L. (2017). The acquisition process of word order and the information status of arguments in English and Hungarian. In S. Halupka-Rešetar & S. Martinez-Ferreiro (Eds.), Studies in language and mind (pp. 129–173). Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad. Search in Google Scholar

Scott, R., Gertner, Y., & Fisher, C. (2018). Not all subjects are agents: Transitivity and meaning in early language comprehension. In K. Syrrett & S. Arunachalam (Eds.), Semantics in language acquisition (pp. 154–176). John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

Shi, H., He, A., Song, H., Jin, K., & Arunachalam, S. (2023). Learning verbs in English and Korean: The roles of word order and argument drop. Language Learning and Development, 20(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2023.2165926 Search in Google Scholar

Shin, G.-H. (2021). Limits on the agent-first strategy: Evidence from children’s comprehension of a transitive construction in Korean. Cognitive Science, 45(9), e13038. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13038 Search in Google Scholar

Shin, G.-H. (2022). Awareness is one thing and mastery is another: Korean--speaking children’s comprehension of a suffixal passive construction in Korean. Cognitive Development, 62, 101184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101184 Search in Google Scholar

Shin, G.-H., & Mun, S. (2022). Korean-speaking children’s constructional knowledge about a transitive event: Corpus analysis and Bayesian modelling. Journal of Child Language, 50(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500092100088X Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, H., & Bronckart, J. (1972). SVO A linguistic universal? A study in developmental psycholinguistics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 14(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(72)90055-0 Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. (1982). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 128–172). Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, D., & Bever, T. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12, 229–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(82)90033-6 Search in Google Scholar

Smolík, F. (2015). Word order and information structure in Czech 3- and 4-year-olds’ comprehension. First Language, 35(3), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723715596098 Search in Google Scholar

Sokolov, J. (1988). Cue validity in Hebrew sentence comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 15, 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012095 Search in Google Scholar

Strohner, H. & Nelson, K. (1974). The young child’s development of sentence comprehension: The influence of event probability, non-verbal context, syntactic form and strategies. Child Development, 45, 567–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127821 Search in Google Scholar

Tal, S., & Arnon, I. (2022). Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking. Cognition, 224, 105055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105055 Search in Google Scholar

Thomsen, D., & Poulsen, M. (2015). Cue conflicts in context: Interplay between morphosyntax and discourse context in Danish preschoolers’ semantic role assignment. Journal of Child Language, 42(6), 1237–1266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000914000786 Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. & Abbot-Smith, K. (2002). A tale of two theories: Response to Fisher. Cognition, 83(2), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)-00172-X Search in Google Scholar

Trueswell, J., Kaufman, D., Hafri, A., & Lidz, J. (2012). Development of parsing abilities interacts with grammar learning: Evidence from Tagalog and Kannada. In A. K. Biller, E. Y. Chung, & A. E. Kimball (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 620–632). Cascadilla Press. Search in Google Scholar

Ural, A., Yuret, D., Ketrez, F., Koçbaş, D., & Küntay, A. (2009). Morphological cues vs. number of nominals in learning verb types in Turkish: The syntactic bootstrapping mechanism revisited. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(10), 1393–1405. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960902775525. Search in Google Scholar

Vion, M. (1992). The role of intonation in processing left and right dislocations in French. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 53(1), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(05)80004-9 Search in Google Scholar

Weisleder, A., & Waxman, S. (2010). What’s in the input? Frequent frames in child-directed speech offer distributional cues to grammatical categories in Spanish and English. Journal of Child Language, 37(5), 1089–1108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909990067 Search in Google Scholar

Weist, R. (1983). The word order myth. Journal of Child Language, 10(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090000516X Search in Google Scholar

Wittek, A., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Young children’s sensitivity to listener knowledge and perceptual context in choosing referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716405050290 Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, S., & Fisher, C. (2009). “Really? She blicked the baby?” Two-year-olds learn combinatorial facts about verbs by listening. Psychological Science, 20(5). 619–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02341.x Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, S., Fisher, C., & Snedeker, J. (2012). Counting the nouns: Simple structural cues to verb meaning. Child Development, 83(4), 1382–1399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01783.x Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, J., Franck, J., Rizzi, L., & Gavarró, A. (2022). Do infants have abstract grammatical knowledge of word order at 17 months? Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 49, 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000756 Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, J., & Gavarró, A. (2019). Testing language acquisition models: Null and overt topics in Mandarin. Journal of Child Language, 46(4), 707–732. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000114 Search in Google Scholar