Open Access

Bacterial Community Analysis and Potential Functions of Core Taxa in Different Parts of the Fungus Cantharellus cibarius

WEI GE

WEI GE

Institute of Fungus Resources, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Guizhou UniversityGuiyang, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
GE, WEI
, 
ZHI-YUAN ZHANG

ZHI-YUAN ZHANG

Institute of Fungus Resources, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Guizhou UniversityGuiyang, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
ZHANG, ZHI-YUAN
, 
CHUN-BO DONG

CHUN-BO DONG

Institute of Fungus Resources, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Guizhou UniversityGuiyang, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
DONG, CHUN-BO
, 
YAN-FENG HAN

YAN-FENG HAN

Institute of Fungus Resources, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Guizhou UniversityGuiyang, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
HAN, YAN-FENG
, 
SUNIL K. DESHMUKH

SUNIL K. DESHMUKH

TERI-Deakin Nano Biotechnology Centre, The Energy and Resources InstituteNew Delhi, India
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
DESHMUKH, SUNIL K.
 and 
ZONG-QI LIANG

ZONG-QI LIANG

Institute of Fungus Resources, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Guizhou UniversityGuiyang, China
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
LIANG, ZONG-QI
  
Sep 17, 2021
Bacterial Community Analysis and Potential Functions of Core Taxa in Different Parts of the Fungus Cantharellus cibarius's Cover Image
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Cite
Download Cover
Article Category: original-paper
Published Online: Sep 17, 2021
Page range: 373 - 385
Received: Apr 17, 2021
Accepted: Jul 25, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2021-035
Keywords
© 2021 Wei Ge et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
undefined

Fig. 1.

Alpha-diversity comparison among the fruit bodies, rhizomorphs of Cantharellus cibarius, and mycosphere samples based on a) the Shannon and b) Ace indexes using the 16S rRNA gene amplicons sequencing data. Samples with the same letter do not differ significantly by Tukey’s test at p > 0.05; samples with different letters are significantly different by Tukey’s test at p < 0.05. The center value of each sample represents the median for the different indexes.
Alpha-diversity comparison among the fruit bodies, rhizomorphs of Cantharellus cibarius, and mycosphere samples based on a) the Shannon and b) Ace indexes using the 16S rRNA gene amplicons sequencing data. Samples with the same letter do not differ significantly by Tukey’s test at p > 0.05; samples with different letters are significantly different by Tukey’s test at p < 0.05. The center value of each sample represents the median for the different indexes.

Fig. 2.

Bacterial communities of Cantharellus cibarius at a) the phylum and b) genus levels. Others represent all phyla or genera with less than 2% abundance. Each part was an average of five replicates.
Bacterial communities of Cantharellus cibarius at a) the phylum and b) genus levels. Others represent all phyla or genera with less than 2% abundance. Each part was an average of five replicates.

Fig. 3.

Statistical comparison of the relative abundance of microbiota among the three sampled parts of Cantharellus cibarius.Comparison of a) dominant phyla and b) dominant genera in the fruit bodies, rhizomorphs, and mycosphere samples. The y-axis represents names of taxa at the dominant phyla or genera level; the x-axis represents average relative abundance; colored columns represent different sampled parts of C. cibarius. Values on the far right are the p values, *0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, **0.001 < p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.
Statistical comparison of the relative abundance of microbiota among the three sampled parts of Cantharellus cibarius.Comparison of a) dominant phyla and b) dominant genera in the fruit bodies, rhizomorphs, and mycosphere samples. The y-axis represents names of taxa at the dominant phyla or genera level; the x-axis represents average relative abundance; colored columns represent different sampled parts of C. cibarius. Values on the far right are the p values, *0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, **0.001 < p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.

Fig. 4.

Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of microbial communities in three sampled parts of Cantharellus cibarius. Circles, triangles, and diamonds represent the fruit bodies, rhizomorphs, and mycosphere, respectively. Distances between symbols on the ordination plot reflect relative dissimilarities in community structures.
Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of microbial communities in three sampled parts of Cantharellus cibarius. Circles, triangles, and diamonds represent the fruit bodies, rhizomorphs, and mycosphere, respectively. Distances between symbols on the ordination plot reflect relative dissimilarities in community structures.

Fig. 5.

Shared and unique genera in fruit bodies, rhizomorphs, and mycosphere of Cantharellus cibarius. The bar chart shows the total number of genera (shared and unique) in each sample.
Shared and unique genera in fruit bodies, rhizomorphs, and mycosphere of Cantharellus cibarius. The bar chart shows the total number of genera (shared and unique) in each sample.

Fig. 6

(a) Heatmaps representing the differences in core bacterial group members and potential functions between a) fruit bodies and b) rhizomorphs of Cantharellus cibarius. The abscissa represents the members of the core bacterial group in each sampled part of C. cibarius, and the ordinate represents the potential functional types.
(a) Heatmaps representing the differences in core bacterial group members and potential functions between a) fruit bodies and b) rhizomorphs of Cantharellus cibarius. The abscissa represents the members of the core bacterial group in each sampled part of C. cibarius, and the ordinate represents the potential functional types.

Fig. 6

(b) Heatmaps representing the differences in core bacterial group members and potential functions between a) fruit bodies and b) rhizomorphs of Cantharellus cibarius. The abscissa represents the members of the core bacterial group in each sampled part of C. cibarius, and the ordinate represents the potential functional types.
(b) Heatmaps representing the differences in core bacterial group members and potential functions between a) fruit bodies and b) rhizomorphs of Cantharellus cibarius. The abscissa represents the members of the core bacterial group in each sampled part of C. cibarius, and the ordinate represents the potential functional types.

Top five abundant genera in the fruit body, rhizomorph, and mycosphere of Cantharellus cibarius_

Sample partsGenusRelative abundance (%)
Fruit bodyAllorhizobium-Neorhizobium-Pararhizobium-Rhizobium32.68
Magnetospirillaceae-family10.44
Chitinophaga7.31
Mucilaginibacter5.49
Bradyrhizobium1.37
RhizomorphBradyrhizobium9.06
Acidothermus5.32
Subgroup-order3.33
Elsterales-order2.57
Acidobacteriales-order1.88
Mycospherenorank_o Subgroup15.78
norank_o__Elsterales6.74
norank_o__Acidobacteriales6.11
Acidothermus4.43
Bradyrhizobium4.19
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Microbiology and Virology
Journal RSS Feed