Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Bacterial Community Analysis and Potential Functions of Core Taxa in Different Parts of the Fungus Cantharellus cibarius

WEI GE

WEI GE

Institute of Fungus Resources, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Guizhou UniversityGuiyang, China
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
GE, WEI
, 
ZHI-YUAN ZHANG

ZHI-YUAN ZHANG

Institute of Fungus Resources, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Guizhou UniversityGuiyang, China
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
ZHANG, ZHI-YUAN
, 
CHUN-BO DONG

CHUN-BO DONG

Institute of Fungus Resources, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Guizhou UniversityGuiyang, China
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
DONG, CHUN-BO
, 
YAN-FENG HAN

YAN-FENG HAN

Institute of Fungus Resources, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Guizhou UniversityGuiyang, China
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
HAN, YAN-FENG
, 
SUNIL K. DESHMUKH

SUNIL K. DESHMUKH

TERI-Deakin Nano Biotechnology Centre, The Energy and Resources InstituteNew Delhi, India
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
DESHMUKH, SUNIL K.
 und 
ZONG-QI LIANG

ZONG-QI LIANG

Institute of Fungus Resources, Department of Ecology, College of Life Sciences, Guizhou UniversityGuiyang, China
Suche nach diesem Autor auf
Sciendo|Google Scholar
LIANG, ZONG-QI
  
17. Sept. 2021
Bacterial Community Analysis and Potential Functions of Core Taxa in Different Parts of the Fungus Cantharellus cibarius's Cover Image
Über diesen Artikel
Vorheriger Artikel
Nächster Artikel
Zitieren
COVER HERUNTERLADEN
Artikel-Kategorie: original-paper
Online veröffentlicht: 17. Sept. 2021
Seitenbereich: 373 - 385
Eingereicht: 17. Apr. 2021
Akzeptiert: 25. Juli 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2021-035
Schlüsselwörter
© 2021 Wei Ge et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
undefined

Fig. 1.

Alpha-diversity comparison among the fruit bodies, rhizomorphs of Cantharellus cibarius, and mycosphere samples based on a) the Shannon and b) Ace indexes using the 16S rRNA gene amplicons sequencing data. Samples with the same letter do not differ significantly by Tukey’s test at p > 0.05; samples with different letters are significantly different by Tukey’s test at p < 0.05. The center value of each sample represents the median for the different indexes.
Alpha-diversity comparison among the fruit bodies, rhizomorphs of Cantharellus cibarius, and mycosphere samples based on a) the Shannon and b) Ace indexes using the 16S rRNA gene amplicons sequencing data. Samples with the same letter do not differ significantly by Tukey’s test at p > 0.05; samples with different letters are significantly different by Tukey’s test at p < 0.05. The center value of each sample represents the median for the different indexes.

Fig. 2.

Bacterial communities of Cantharellus cibarius at a) the phylum and b) genus levels. Others represent all phyla or genera with less than 2% abundance. Each part was an average of five replicates.
Bacterial communities of Cantharellus cibarius at a) the phylum and b) genus levels. Others represent all phyla or genera with less than 2% abundance. Each part was an average of five replicates.

Fig. 3.

Statistical comparison of the relative abundance of microbiota among the three sampled parts of Cantharellus cibarius.Comparison of a) dominant phyla and b) dominant genera in the fruit bodies, rhizomorphs, and mycosphere samples. The y-axis represents names of taxa at the dominant phyla or genera level; the x-axis represents average relative abundance; colored columns represent different sampled parts of C. cibarius. Values on the far right are the p values, *0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, **0.001 < p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.
Statistical comparison of the relative abundance of microbiota among the three sampled parts of Cantharellus cibarius.Comparison of a) dominant phyla and b) dominant genera in the fruit bodies, rhizomorphs, and mycosphere samples. The y-axis represents names of taxa at the dominant phyla or genera level; the x-axis represents average relative abundance; colored columns represent different sampled parts of C. cibarius. Values on the far right are the p values, *0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, **0.001 < p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.

Fig. 4.

Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of microbial communities in three sampled parts of Cantharellus cibarius. Circles, triangles, and diamonds represent the fruit bodies, rhizomorphs, and mycosphere, respectively. Distances between symbols on the ordination plot reflect relative dissimilarities in community structures.
Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of microbial communities in three sampled parts of Cantharellus cibarius. Circles, triangles, and diamonds represent the fruit bodies, rhizomorphs, and mycosphere, respectively. Distances between symbols on the ordination plot reflect relative dissimilarities in community structures.

Fig. 5.

Shared and unique genera in fruit bodies, rhizomorphs, and mycosphere of Cantharellus cibarius. The bar chart shows the total number of genera (shared and unique) in each sample.
Shared and unique genera in fruit bodies, rhizomorphs, and mycosphere of Cantharellus cibarius. The bar chart shows the total number of genera (shared and unique) in each sample.

Fig. 6

(a) Heatmaps representing the differences in core bacterial group members and potential functions between a) fruit bodies and b) rhizomorphs of Cantharellus cibarius. The abscissa represents the members of the core bacterial group in each sampled part of C. cibarius, and the ordinate represents the potential functional types.
(a) Heatmaps representing the differences in core bacterial group members and potential functions between a) fruit bodies and b) rhizomorphs of Cantharellus cibarius. The abscissa represents the members of the core bacterial group in each sampled part of C. cibarius, and the ordinate represents the potential functional types.

Fig. 6

(b) Heatmaps representing the differences in core bacterial group members and potential functions between a) fruit bodies and b) rhizomorphs of Cantharellus cibarius. The abscissa represents the members of the core bacterial group in each sampled part of C. cibarius, and the ordinate represents the potential functional types.
(b) Heatmaps representing the differences in core bacterial group members and potential functions between a) fruit bodies and b) rhizomorphs of Cantharellus cibarius. The abscissa represents the members of the core bacterial group in each sampled part of C. cibarius, and the ordinate represents the potential functional types.

Top five abundant genera in the fruit body, rhizomorph, and mycosphere of Cantharellus cibarius_

Sample partsGenusRelative abundance (%)
Fruit bodyAllorhizobium-Neorhizobium-Pararhizobium-Rhizobium32.68
Magnetospirillaceae-family10.44
Chitinophaga7.31
Mucilaginibacter5.49
Bradyrhizobium1.37
RhizomorphBradyrhizobium9.06
Acidothermus5.32
Subgroup-order3.33
Elsterales-order2.57
Acidobacteriales-order1.88
Mycospherenorank_o Subgroup15.78
norank_o__Elsterales6.74
norank_o__Acidobacteriales6.11
Acidothermus4.43
Bradyrhizobium4.19
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Biologie, Mikrobiologie und Virologie
Zeitschrift RSS Feed