About this article
Article Category: original-paper
Published Online: Aug 05, 2020
Page range: 251 - 261
Received: Mar 14, 2020
Accepted: May 28, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2020-027
Keywords
© 2020 Carlos Vegas et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1.

Molecular methods for the identification of yeasts isolated from Amazonian native fruits_
Strain profile | Method of identification | Identification consensus | |
---|---|---|---|
Restriction profile | D1/D2 26S ribosomal RNA sequencing | ||
P01 | Not determined | ||
P04 | Not determined | ||
P05 | Not determined | ||
P06 | |||
P07 | Not determined | ||
P08 | |||
P09 | |||
P10 | |||
P11 | Not determined | ||
P12 | Not determined | ||
P13 | |||
P14 | |||
P15 | |||
P16 | |||
P17 | |||
P18 | |||
P19 | Not determined | ||
P20 | |||
P21 | |||
P22 | |||
P23 | Not determined | ||
P24 | |||
P25 | |||
P26 | – | ||
P27 | |||
P28 | |||
P29 | |||
P30 | |||
P32 |
Biochemical tests performed on yeasts isolated from ANF_
Species | Strain profile | Fermentation of carbohydrates | Temperature (°C) | Osm | Acid prod | Tol | Tri | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Glu | Suc | Mal | Sta | Cel | 4 | 15 | 30 | 37 | ||||||
P11 | + | + | + | – | – | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | – | – | + | – | + | |
P07 | + | + | – | – | – | – | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | – | + | + | – | – | |
P12 | + | + | – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | – | + | – | – | – | |
P04 | + | + | + | – | + | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | – | – | + | – | – | |
P05 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | + | + | – | – | |
P19 | + | + | – | – | – | – | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | + | – | – | – | |
P01 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | + | – | – | – | |
P06 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | + | – | – | – | |
P10 | + | + | + | – | – | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | + | + | + | – | |
P15 | + | + | + | – | – | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | – | + | – | – | |
P08 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓ | + | – | + | – | |
P09 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓ | ✓✓ | – | + | – | – | – | |
P20 | + | + | – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | + | – | – | – | |
P22 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓ | ✓✓ | – | + | – | – | – | |
P13 | + | + | – | – | – | – | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | – | + | + | + | – | |
P14 | + | + | – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓ | + | + | – | – | |
P18 | + | + | – | – | + | – | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | – | – | + | – | – | |
P24 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | – | + | – | + | – | |
P27 | + | – | – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | – | + | + | – | – | |
P30 | + | – | – | – | + | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓ | – | + | – | – | |
P16 | + | – | – | – | + | – | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | – | – | + | + | – | |
P17 | + | – | – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | – | + | – | – | |
P26 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | – | + | – | – | – | |
P28 | + | – | – | – | – | – | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | – | + | – | – | |
P29 | + | – | – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | – | – | + | – | – | |
P25 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓ | + | – | – | – | |
P21 | + | + | – | – | – | – | ✓ | ✓✓ | – | + | – | – | – | |
P32 | – | – | + | + | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | – | – | – | + | – | |
P23 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | – | + | – | – | – |
Source and incidence of yeast species and strains isolated from ANF_
Species | Restriction profile | Strain profile | Number of isolates from each fruit | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total (%) | |||||||||||||
I | P11 | 4 | 4.9 | ||||||||||
II | P07, P12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.7 | ||||||||
III | P04 | 1 | 1.2 | ||||||||||
IV | P05 | 1 | 1.2 | ||||||||||
V | P19 | 1 | 1.2 | ||||||||||
VI | P01 | 6 | 7.4 | ||||||||||
VII | P06, P10, P15 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 16.0 | |||||||
VIII | P08, P09 | 9 | 11.1 | ||||||||||
VIII | P20, P22 | 5 | 6.2 | ||||||||||
IX | P13, P14, P18, P24, P27 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 24.7 | ||||||
X | P30 | 3 | 3.7 | ||||||||||
IX | P16, P17, P26, P28, P29 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 11.1 | ||||||||
IX | P25 | 1 | 1.2 | ||||||||||
XI | P21 | 1 | 1.2 | ||||||||||
XII | P32 | 2 | 2.5 | ||||||||||
II | P23 | 2 | 2.5 |