1. bookVolume 43 (2021): Issue 1 (April 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
09 Nov 2012
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Influence of Waste Toothbrush Fiber on Strength and Freezing–Thawing Behavior in High Plasticity Clay

Published Online: 23 Oct 2020
Page range: 15 - 21
Received: 03 Jun 2020
Accepted: 15 Sep 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
09 Nov 2012
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo
Abstract

The use of waste materials in civil engineering applications has gained importance nowadays. Consuming limited natural resources and increasing waste disposal costs have led researchers to evaluate waste materials for different geotechnical applications. In this respect, some waste materials are used as reinforcement in soils to improve their engineering properties. The main objective of this paper was to investigate the usability of waste polypropylene fiber as a reinforcement material in high plasticity fine-grained soils. For this purpose, waste toothbrush bristle (WTB) was used as a polypropylene fiber reinforcement material and added to fine-grained soil at ratios of 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6% and 0.8% by dry total weight. The effect of WTB on freezing–thawing behavior and unconfined compression strength of unreinforced and reinforced clayey soil was evaluated. The results indicated that addition of WTB to high plasticity clay improved its behavior against freezing–thawing. Also, undrained shear strength increases with respect to increment in WTB ratio.

Keywords

Introduction

In some cases in geotechnical applications, structures must be constructed on problematic soils that may have less bearing capacity or excessive settlements. In order to improve the geotechnical properties of these kinds of soils, waste materials such as borogypsum [1,2,3], phosphogypsum [4,5,6,7,8], silica fume [9,10,11,12,13,14], fly ash [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24] and scrap tire rubber [25,26] have been used.

On the other hand, a wide range of reinforcements has been used to improve soil performance. Increasing the soil strength has caused increased interest in identifying new accessible resources for reinforcement. Due to offering faster, more effective and more economical solutions, these kinds of materials are preferred when compared with conventional methods. In the literature, metal strips [27], metal bars [28], rope fibers [29,30], geotextiles [31,32] and geogrids [33,34,35,36,37] are usually used as soil reinforcement materials.

Economic growth and changes in people's consumption and production patterns are resulting in rapid increase in the generation of solid waste in the world. The storage of these kinds of wastes creates some environmental problems and threatens human health. Recycling of solid waste materials decreases consumption of natural resources and also avoids the environmental problems that occur due to the storage of solid waste materials. Toothbrush is one of the domestic wastes produced by people. Davis and Hudson [38] indicated that approximately 50 million pounds of plastic toothbrushes are discarded each year in the United States. Even the cities with low economic growth have started producing toothbrush waste due to increased use of toothbrushes. As a result of the increasing importance given to oral and dental health all over the world, it is seen that every year millions of tons of waste toothbrushes are produced. This implies that on one hand, more toothbrushes are being used to meet the increased demand of oral and dental health, and on the other hand, more toothbrush waste is being generated.

In this study, the usability of toothbrush bristle, which is a waste material, as a propylene fiber reinforcement material in fine-grained soil was investigated. Therefore, fine-grained soil was mixed with waste toothbrush bristle (WTB) at ratios of 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6% and 0.8% by dry total weight. The effect of toothbrush bristle on freezing–thawing behavior and unconfined compression strength (UCS) of reinforced samples with WTB was evaluated.

Materials and Methods

The high plasticity clayey soil used in these experiments was obtained locally from a landfill area, and it has been classified as CH according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) with ASTM D2487 [39]. Some geotechnical properties of this clayey soil are summarized in Table 1. The toothbrush bristle was obtained by cutting from waste toothbrushes using a lancet. The length of bristles was approximately 10 mm (Figure 1a).

Figure 1

Toothbrush bristles (a) after cutting, (b) after mixing with dry soil, (c) after adding optimum water content.

Some properties of clayey soil used in tests.

PropertiesValue
Liquid limit1, wL (%)57.8
Plastic limit2, wP (%)24.4
Plasticity index, IP (%)33.4
Optimum water content3, wopt (%)23.6
Maximum dry unit weight3, γdmax (kN/m3)15.3
Soil class (USCS)CH

wL per BS 1377 (Part 2-1990) [42].

wP per ASTM D 4318-00 (2000) [41].

Obtained from Standard Proctor Tests [40].

The reinforced samples were prepared with WTB at ratios of 0%, 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6% and 0.8% by weight of dry soil. Waste toothbrush bristle was mixed with soil randomly for unconfined compression and freezing–thawing tests. The dry clay was initially mixed with WTB manually (Figure 1b). After the dry mixing procedure, an appropriate amount of water was added to the WTB–clay mixture in order to get it to optimum water content. Maximum care was taken to ensure a homogeneous distribution of the toothbrush bristle in the clay. The WTB–clay mixtures were stored in a covered container for 24 h (Figure 1c). Mixtures were compacted in three layers into a 38 mm diameter and 76 mm high cylindrical mold at optimum water content. The sample preparation method was adapted from the standard compaction test method (ASTM D-698) [40].

The unconfined compression test was performed according to ASTM D 2166 [43]. Unreinforced and reinforced samples were tested in an unconfined compression machine with 0.8 mm/min loading rate. The UCS ratio was used to examine the effect of WTB with respect to the number of freezing–thawing cycles. The UCS ratio was defined as the ratio of the UCS of reinforced samples to unreinforced samples (Eq.1). The UCS ratio value of unreinforced samples was assumed as 1.00.

UCSRatio=UCSofReinforcedSampleUCSofUnreinforcedSample.UCS\,Ratio = {{UCS\,of\,Reinforced\,Sample} \over {UCS\,of\,Unreinforced\,Sample}}.

The freezing–thawing tests were conducted in a programmable freezing–thawing cabinet. These tests were carried out on unreinforced and reinforced clay. Samples were wrapped in aluminum foil to prevent changes in their water content [44]. A thin film layer of Vaseline was spread on the foil to prevent samples from sticking to the aluminum foil [45,46]. The prepared samples were placed in the programmable freezing cabinet to remain at −20°C for 6 h and at 25 °C for 6 h (Figure 2). This operation was named as one cycle [47]. Numbers of freeze–thaw cycles were chosen in accordance with the literature as 3, 6, 9 and 12 freezing–thawing cycles [47,48,49].

Figure 2

Closed system full automatic freezing–thawing test cabinet.

The freezing–thawing mass loss (FTML) of the reinforced and unreinforced samples was also determined. For this reason, the weights of each sample were measured before and after freezing–thawing cycles. In order to calculate the FTML of the samples, Eq. (2) was used [50]. FTML(%)=IWAWIW×100,FTML(\% ) = {{IW - AW} \over {IW}} \times 100, where IW (i.e., initial weight) is the weight of samples before freezing–thawing cycles and AW (i.e., after weight) is the weight of samples after freezing–thawing cycles.

The prepared reinforced and unreinforced samples and WTB ratios are summarized in Table 2. As can be seen from Table 2, one unreinforced sample and four different reinforced samples were used in this study. For each of the reinforced and unreinforced samples, five different test samples were prepared due to five different freezing–thawing cycles. Also, one more test sample was prepared for each of the unreinforced and reinforced samples and at the end these two test samples’ averages were used for calculation. As a result, a total number of 50 test samples were prepared and tested in this study.

Prepared samples, WTB ratios and number of freezing–thawing cycles.

Sample DescriptionWTB Ratio (%)Number of Cycles
Unreinforced0.00–3–6–9–12
Reinforced-10.20–3–6–9–12
Reinforced-20.40–3–6–9–12
Reinforced-30.60–3–6–9–12
Reinforced-40.80–3–6–9–12
Results and Discussions

The stress–strain curves of reinforced and unreinforced samples at five different freezing–thawing cycles are given in Figure 3.

Figure 3

Stress–strain curves of samples at (a) 0 cycle, (b) 3 cycles, (c) 6 cycles, (d) 9 cycles, (e)12 cycles.

It is seen in Figure 3 that an increment in WTB ratio generally increases the peak shear stress at each freezing–thawing cycle. Furthermore, the reinforced samples tend to show higher shear stress than the unreinforced samples, especially at large strains. This behavior was also found by [51,52]. Figure 3 indicates that an increase in freezing–thawing cycles generally leads to a decrease in peak shear stress of reinforced and unreinforced samples. Similar behavior was also observed by [47,51,52,53,54,55,56].

The photos of reinforced and unreinforced samples after the unconfined compression test are presented in Figure 4. It has been observed in parallel to the findings available in the literature that the reinforced samples exhibit more ductile behavior than the unreinforced samples at each freezing–thawing cycle [57,58,59], as seen in Figure 4. It is assumed that WTB forms bonds and is randomly distributed into the soil, acting as a bridge between soil particles.

Figure 4

Unconfined compression test: (a) unreinforced sample (9 cycles), (b) reinforced sample (toothbrush bristles 0.8% ratio, 9 cycles).

The peak stress values are used to calculate the undrained shear strength (cu) of the reinforced and unreinforced samples. The relationship between cu and WTB content is shown in Figure 5. It is clearly seen in Figure 5 that a significant increase is observed in cu with increasing WTB ratio at 0 and 3 freezing–thawing cycles. The increment in cu values is approximately 63% and 42% at 0 and 3 cycles, respectively. On the other hand, an increase in freezing–thawing cycles causes a decrease in cu values at high freezing–thawing cycles (i.e., 6–9 and 12). It may be attributed to the fact that pore water freezes and forms ice lenses in the pore space between the soil particles; then these ice lenses expand in volume and push particles of the soil and act like springs, increasing gaps among soil particles [60].

Figure 5

Waste toothbrush bristle ratio vs. undrained shear strength.

The UCS ratios for peak strengths are shown in Figure 6a. It can be seen from Figure 6a that the peak UCS ratios of all reinforced samples are higher than the unreinforced sample at zero cycle. However, the UCS ratio values start to decrease steadily between 0 and 9 cycles while there is an increase between 9 and 12 cycles. The relationship between the ultimate UCS ratio and freezing–thawing cycles is illustrated in Figure 6b. The ultimate UCS ratio values of all reinforced samples are generally higher than the unreinforced samples at all freezing–thawing cycles. It is seen that the ultimate UCS ratio values of reinforced samples are higher than the peak UCS values when Figures 6a and 6b are compared. This situation does not mean that the UCS of reinforced samples of ultimate strain is higher than the peak ones. This means that the strength loss of unreinforced samples at large strains is more pronounced than those at the peak strains.

Figure 6

Relationship between (a) the peak UCS ratio, (b) the ultimate UCS ratio and freezing–thawing cycles.

The relationship of FTML with freezing–thawing cycles is shown in Figure 7. It should be noted that the lower the FTML value, the better the durability to freezing–thawing effect. Experimental results show that the FTML values of reinforced samples are generally lower than unreinforced samples (Figure 7). This means that the reinforced samples are more durable than the unreinforced samples.

Figure 7

Relationship between FTML and freezing–thawing cycles.

Conclusions

In this study, a series of unconfined compression and freezing–thawing experiments were conducted in the laboratory in order to observe the freezing–thawing behavior of fine-grained soils reinforced with WTB in different ratios. The general results from the experiments are as follows:

The results indicate that WTB mixed with clayey soils can be used as a reinforcement fiber material.

Increment in toothbrush bristle ratio generally increases the peak shear stress at all freezing–thawing cycles.

The reinforced samples tend to exhibit higher shear stress at large strains when compared with the unreinforced samples.

An increase in freezing–thawing cycles generally leads to a decrease in peak shear stress of reinforced and unreinforced samples.

The reinforced samples exhibit more ductile behavior than unreinforced samples at each freezing–thawing cycle.

A significant increase is observed in cu with increasing toothbrush bristle ratio at 0 and 3 freezing–thawing cycles.

The FTML values of reinforced samples are generally lower than unreinforced samples.

In order to achieve more realistic judgments on the subject, experiments are recommended to be continued for further studies with different soil types, numbers of freezing–thawing cycles and WTB contents.

Figure 1

Toothbrush bristles (a) after cutting, (b) after mixing with dry soil, (c) after adding optimum water content.
Toothbrush bristles (a) after cutting, (b) after mixing with dry soil, (c) after adding optimum water content.

Figure 2

Closed system full automatic freezing–thawing test cabinet.
Closed system full automatic freezing–thawing test cabinet.

Figure 3

Stress–strain curves of samples at (a) 0 cycle, (b) 3 cycles, (c) 6 cycles, (d) 9 cycles, (e)12 cycles.
Stress–strain curves of samples at (a) 0 cycle, (b) 3 cycles, (c) 6 cycles, (d) 9 cycles, (e)12 cycles.

Figure 4

Unconfined compression test: (a) unreinforced sample (9 cycles), (b) reinforced sample (toothbrush bristles 0.8% ratio, 9 cycles).
Unconfined compression test: (a) unreinforced sample (9 cycles), (b) reinforced sample (toothbrush bristles 0.8% ratio, 9 cycles).

Figure 5

Waste toothbrush bristle ratio vs. undrained shear strength.
Waste toothbrush bristle ratio vs. undrained shear strength.

Figure 6

Relationship between (a) the peak UCS ratio, (b) the ultimate UCS ratio and freezing–thawing cycles.
Relationship between (a) the peak UCS ratio, (b) the ultimate UCS ratio and freezing–thawing cycles.

Figure 7

Relationship between FTML and freezing–thawing cycles.
Relationship between FTML and freezing–thawing cycles.

Prepared samples, WTB ratios and number of freezing–thawing cycles.

Sample DescriptionWTB Ratio (%)Number of Cycles
Unreinforced0.00–3–6–9–12
Reinforced-10.20–3–6–9–12
Reinforced-20.40–3–6–9–12
Reinforced-30.60–3–6–9–12
Reinforced-40.80–3–6–9–12

Some properties of clayey soil used in tests.

PropertiesValue
Liquid limit1, wL (%)57.8
Plastic limit2, wP (%)24.4
Plasticity index, IP (%)33.4
Optimum water content3, wopt (%)23.6
Maximum dry unit weight3, γdmax (kN/m3)15.3
Soil class (USCS)CH

Tulek, M. (2007). A study of the use of chemical waste gypsums in soil stabilization. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü (Doctoral dissertation, Yüksek lisans Tezi).[in Turkish].TulekM.2007A study of the use of chemical waste gypsums in soil stabilization. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü(Doctoral dissertation, Yüksek lisans Tezi).[in Turkish].Search in Google Scholar

Coruh E., Hinisoglu, S., Kocakerim, M., Arasan, S., Oltulu, M. (2013). Investigation of the usage of borogypsum in the subbase course as a stabilization material. EÜFBED – The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Journal, 6(2), 221–231.CoruhE.HinisogluS.KocakerimM.ArasanS.OltuluM.2013Investigation of the usage of borogypsum in the subbase course as a stabilization materialEÜFBED – The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Journal62221231Search in Google Scholar

Kütük-Sert, T., & Kütük, S. (2013). Physical and marshall properties of borogypsum used as filler aggregate in asphalt concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25(2), 266–273.Kütük-SertT.KütükS.2013Physical and marshall properties of borogypsum used as filler aggregate in asphalt concreteJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering252266273Search in Google Scholar

Gregory, C. A., Saylak, D., & Ledbetter, W. B. (1984). The use of by-product phosphogypsum for road bases and subbases. Transportation Research Record, 998, 47–52.GregoryC. A.SaylakD.LedbetterW. B.1984The use of by-product phosphogypsum for road bases and subbasesTransportation Research Record9984752Search in Google Scholar

Degirmenci, N., Okucu, A., & Turabi, A. (2007). Application of phosphogypsum in soil stabilization. Building and environment, 42(9), 3393–3398.DegirmenciN.OkucuA.TurabiA.2007Application of phosphogypsum in soil stabilizationBuilding and environment42933933398Search in Google Scholar

Shen, W., Zhou, M., & Zhao, Q. (2007). Study on lime–fly ash–phosphogypsum binder. Construction and Building Materials, 21(7), 1480–1485.ShenW.ZhouM.ZhaoQ.2007Study on lime–fly ash–phosphogypsum binderConstruction and Building Materials21714801485Search in Google Scholar

Yilmaz, I., & Civelekoglu, B. (2009). Gypsum: an additive for stabilization of swelling clay soils. Applied clay science, 44(1–2), 166–172.YilmazI.CivelekogluB.2009Gypsum: an additive for stabilization of swelling clay soilsApplied clay science441–2166172Search in Google Scholar

Shen, W., Zhou, M., Ma, W., Hu, J., & Cai, Z. (2009). Investigation on the application of steel slag–fly ash–phosphogypsum solidified material as road base material. Journal of hazardous materials, 164(1), 99–104.ShenW.ZhouM.MaW.HuJ.CaiZ.2009Investigation on the application of steel slag–fly ash–phosphogypsum solidified material as road base materialJournal of hazardous materials164199104Search in Google Scholar

Kalkan, E., & Akbulut, S. (2004). The positive effects of silica fume on the permeability, swelling pressure and compressive strength of natural clay liners. Engineering Geology, 73(1–2), 145–156.KalkanE.AkbulutS.2004The positive effects of silica fume on the permeability, swelling pressure and compressive strength of natural clay linersEngineering Geology731–2145156Search in Google Scholar

Kalantari, B., Prasad, A., & Huat, B. B. (2011). Stabilising peat soil with cement and silica fume. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 164(1), 33–39.KalantariB.PrasadA.HuatB. B.2011Stabilising peat soil with cement and silica fumeProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering16413339Search in Google Scholar

Sattar, M. A. A., Daud, K. A., & Al-Azzawi, A. A. (2012). Effect of silica fume addition on the behavior of siltyclayey soils. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 16(1), 92–105.SattarM. A. A.DaudK. A.Al-AzzawiA. A.2012Effect of silica fume addition on the behavior of siltyclayey soilsJournal of Engineering and Sustainable Development16192105Search in Google Scholar

Negi, C., Yadav, R.K. and Singhai, A.K.,a (2013). Effect of silica fume on engineering properties of black cotton soil. Inter. J. of Computational Eng. Research, 3(7), 1.NegiC.YadavR.K.SinghaiA.K.2013aEffect of silica fume on engineering properties of black cotton soilInter. J. of Computational Eng. Research371Search in Google Scholar

Negi, C., Yadav, R.K., and Singhai, A.K.,b (2013). Effect of silica fume on index properties of black cotton soil. Inter. J. of Scientific & Eng. Research, 4(8).NegiC.YadavR.K.SinghaiA.K.2013bEffect of silica fume on index properties of black cotton soilInter. J. of Scientific & Eng. Research48Search in Google Scholar

Gupta, C., & Sharma, R. K. (2014). Influence of micro silica fume on sub grade characteristics of expansive soil. International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 5(1), 77–82.GuptaC.SharmaR. K.2014Influence of micro silica fume on sub grade characteristics of expansive soilInternational Journal of Civil Engineering Research517782Search in Google Scholar

Cokca, E. (1999). Effect of fly ash on swell pressure of an expansive soil. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 4, 14.CokcaE.1999Effect of fly ash on swell pressure of an expansive soilElectronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering414Search in Google Scholar

Consoli, N. C., Prietto, P. D. M., Carraro, J. A. H., & Heineck, K. S. (2001). Behavior of compacted soil-fly ash-carbide lime mixtures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(9), 774–782.ConsoliN. C.PriettoP. D. M.CarraroJ. A. H.HeineckK. S.2001Behavior of compacted soil-fly ash-carbide lime mixturesJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering1279774782Search in Google Scholar

Phani Kumar, B. R., & Sharma, R. S. (2004). Effect of fly ash on engineering properties of expansive soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130(7), 764–767.Phani KumarB. R.SharmaR. S.2004Effect of fly ash on engineering properties of expansive soilsJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering1307764767Search in Google Scholar

Nalbantoğlu, Z. (2004). Effectiveness of class C fly ash as an expansive soil stabilizer. Construction and Building Materials, 18(6), 377–381.NalbantoğluZ.2004Effectiveness of class C fly ash as an expansive soil stabilizerConstruction and Building Materials186377381Search in Google Scholar

Prabakar, J., Dendorkar, N., & Morchhale, R. K. (2004). Influence of fly ash on strength behavior of typical soils. Construction and Building Materials, 18(4), 263–267.PrabakarJ.DendorkarN.MorchhaleR. K.2004Influence of fly ash on strength behavior of typical soilsConstruction and Building Materials184263267Search in Google Scholar

Kolias, S., Kasselouri-Rigopoulou, V., & Karahalios, A. (2005). Stabilisation of clayey soils with high calcium fly ash and cement. Cement and Concrete Composites, 27(2), 301–313.KoliasS.Kasselouri-RigopoulouV.KarahaliosA.2005Stabilisation of clayey soils with high calcium fly ash and cementCement and Concrete Composites272301313Search in Google Scholar

Edil, T. B., Acosta, H. A., & Benson, C. H. (2006). Stabilizing soft fine-grained soils with fly ash. Journal of materials in civil engineering, 18(2), 283–294.EdilT. B.AcostaH. A.BensonC. H.2006Stabilizing soft fine-grained soils with fly ashJournal of materials in civil engineering182283294Search in Google Scholar

Chauhan, M. S., Mittal, S., & Mohanty, B. (2008). Performance evaluation of silty sand subgrade reinforced with fly ash and fibre. Geotextiles and geomembranes, 26(5), 429–435.ChauhanM. S.MittalS.MohantyB.2008Performance evaluation of silty sand subgrade reinforced with fly ash and fibreGeotextiles and geomembranes265429435Search in Google Scholar

Brooks, R. M. (2009). Soil stabilization with fly ash and rice husk ash. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences, 1(3), 209–217.BrooksR. M.2009Soil stabilization with fly ash and rice husk ashInternational Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences13209217Search in Google Scholar

Cristelo, N., Glendinning, S., Miranda, T., Oliveira, D., & Silva, R. (2012). Soil stabilisation using alkaline activation of fly ash for self compacting rammed earth construction. Construction and building materials, 36, 727–735.CristeloN.GlendinningS.MirandaT.OliveiraD.SilvaR.2012Soil stabilisation using alkaline activation of fly ash for self compacting rammed earth constructionConstruction and building materials36727735Search in Google Scholar

Akbulut, S., Arasan, S., & Kalkan, E. (2007). Modification of clayey soils using scrap tire rubber and synthetic fibers. Applied Clay Science, 38(1–2), 23–32.AkbulutS.ArasanS.KalkanE.2007Modification of clayey soils using scrap tire rubber and synthetic fibersApplied Clay Science381–22332Search in Google Scholar

Kalkan, E. (2013). Preparation of scrap tire rubber fiber–silica fume mixtures for modification of clayey soils. Applied Clay Science, 80, 117–125.KalkanE.2013Preparation of scrap tire rubber fiber–silica fume mixtures for modification of clayey soilsApplied Clay Science80117125Search in Google Scholar

Fragaszy, R. J., & Lawton, E. (1984). Bearing capacity of reinforced sand subgrades. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 110(10), 1500–1507.FragaszyR. J.LawtonE.1984Bearing capacity of reinforced sand subgradesJournal of Geotechnical Engineering1101015001507Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C. C., & Tatsuoka, F. (1990). Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy ground. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 9(1), 51–82.HuangC. C.TatsuokaF.1990Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy groundGeotextiles and Geomembranes915182Search in Google Scholar

Akinmusuru, J. O., & Akinbolade, J. A. (1981). Stability of loaded footings on reinforced soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 107(ASCE 16320 Proceeding).AkinmusuruJ. O.AkinboladeJ. A.1981Stability of loaded footings on reinforced soilJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering107(ASCE 16320 Proceeding)Search in Google Scholar

Yetimoglu, T., Inanir, M., & Inanir, O. E. (2005). A study on bearing capacity of randomly distributed fiber-reinforced sand fills overlying soft clay. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 23(2), 174–183.YetimogluT.InanirM.InanirO. E.2005A study on bearing capacity of randomly distributed fiber-reinforced sand fills overlying soft clayGeotextiles and Geomembranes232174183Search in Google Scholar

Guido, V.A., Chang, D.K., Sweeny, M.A. (1986). Comparison of geogrid and geotextile reinforced slabs. Canadian Geotech. J. 20, 435–440.GuidoV.A.ChangD.K.SweenyM.A.1986Comparison of geogrid and geotextile reinforced slabsCanadian Geotech. J.20435440Search in Google Scholar

Ghosh, A., Ghosh, A., & Bera, A. K. (2005). Bearing capacity of square footing on pond ash reinforced with jutegeotextile. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 23(2), 144–173.GhoshA.GhoshA.BeraA. K.2005Bearing capacity of square footing on pond ash reinforced with jutegeotextileGeotextiles and Geomembranes232144173Search in Google Scholar

Omar, M.T., Das, B.M., Yen, S.C., Puri, V.K., Cook, E.E., a (1993). Ultimate bearing capacity of rectangular foundations on geogrid reinforced sand. Geotechnical Testing J, ASTM 16 (2), 246–252.OmarM.T.DasB.M.YenS.C.PuriV.K.CookE.E.1993aUltimate bearing capacity of rectangular foundations on geogrid reinforced sandGeotechnical Testing J, ASTM162246252Search in Google Scholar

Omar, M.T., Das, B.M., Puri, V.K., Yen, S.C., b, (1993). Ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on sand with geogrid reinforcement. Canadian Geotech. J. 30, 545–549.OmarM.T.DasB.M.PuriV.K.YenS.C.1993bUltimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on sand with geogrid reinforcementCanadian Geotech. J.30545549Search in Google Scholar

Yetimoglu, T., Wu, J. T., & Saglamer, A. (1994). Bearing capacity of rectangular footings on geogrid-reinforced sand. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120(12), 2083–2099.YetimogluT.WuJ. T.SaglamerA.1994Bearing capacity of rectangular footings on geogrid-reinforced sandJournal of Geotechnical Engineering1201220832099Search in Google Scholar

Adams, M. T., & Collin, J. G. (1997). Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123(1), 66–72.AdamsM. T.CollinJ. G.1997Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundationsJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering12316672Search in Google Scholar

Patra, C. R., Das, B. M., Bhoi, M., & Shin, E. C. (2006). Eccentrically loaded strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 24(4), 254–259.PatraC. R.DasB. M.BhoiM.ShinE. C.2006Eccentrically loaded strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sandGeotextiles and Geomembranes244254259Search in Google Scholar

Davis, E. A., & Hudson, E. C. (2000). Development of new colors and style for recycled polypropylene toothbrushes. UMass Lowell, Chelsea Center for Recycling and Economic Development.DavisE. A.HudsonE. C.2000Development of new colors and style for recycled polypropylene toothbrushesUMass Lowell, Chelsea Center for Recycling and Economic DevelopmentSearch in Google Scholar

ASTM, D. (2011). 2487 (2006) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). Book of Standards, 4(08).ASTM, D. 24872011(2006) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)Book of Standards408Search in Google Scholar

ASTM, D. (2000). 698-00, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)), ASTM International. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 4.ASTM, D. 698-002000Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)), ASTM InternationalAnnual Book of ASTM Standards4Search in Google Scholar

ASTM, D. 4318-00. 2000. Standard test method for liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index of soils. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 4, 08.ASTM, D. 4318-002000Standard test method for liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index of soilsAnnual Book of ASTM Standards408Search in Google Scholar

British Standard, B. S. 1377 part 2. 1990. Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes General Requirements and Sample Preparation.British Standard, B. S. 1377 part 21990Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes General Requirements and Sample PreparationSearch in Google Scholar

ASTM, D. 2166 (2006). Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil. ASTM standard D, 2166.ASTM, D. 21662006Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soilASTM standard D2166Search in Google Scholar

Kværnø, S. H., & Øygarden, L. (2006). The influence of freeze–thaw cycles and soil moisture on aggregate stability of three soils in Norway. Catena, 67(3), 175–182.KværnøS. H.ØygardenL.2006The influence of freeze–thaw cycles and soil moisture on aggregate stability of three soils in NorwayCatena673175182Search in Google Scholar

Qi, J., Ma, W., & Song, C. (2008). Influence of freeze–thaw on engineering properties of a silty soil. Cold regions science and technology, 53(3), 397–404.QiJ.MaW.SongC.2008Influence of freeze–thaw on engineering properties of a silty soilCold regions science and technology533397404Search in Google Scholar

Gullu, H., & Hazirbaba, K. (2010). Unconfined compressive strength and post-freeze–thaw behavior of fine-grained soils treated with geofiber and synthetic fluid. Cold regions science and technology, 62(2–3), 142–150.GulluH.HazirbabaK.2010Unconfined compressive strength and post-freeze–thaw behavior of fine-grained soils treated with geofiber and synthetic fluidCold regions science and technology622–3142150Search in Google Scholar

Ghazavi, M., & Roustaie, M. (2010). The influence of freeze–thaw cycles on the unconfined compressive strength of fiber-reinforced clay. Cold regions science and technology, 61(2–3), 125–131.GhazaviM.RoustaieM.2010The influence of freeze–thaw cycles on the unconfined compressive strength of fiber-reinforced clayCold regions science and technology612–3125131Search in Google Scholar

Liu, J., Wang, T., & Tian, Y. (2010). Experimental study of the dynamic properties of cement-and lime-modified clay soils subjected to freeze–thaw cycles. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 61(1), 29–33.LiuJ.WangT.TianY.2010Experimental study of the dynamic properties of cement-and lime-modified clay soils subjected to freeze–thaw cyclesCold Regions Science and Technology6112933Search in Google Scholar

Hazirbaba, K., Zhang, Y., & Hulsey, J. L. (2011). Evaluation of temperature and freeze–thaw effects on excess pore pressure generation of fine-grained soils. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 31(3), 372–384.HazirbabaK.ZhangY.HulseyJ. L.2011Evaluation of temperature and freeze–thaw effects on excess pore pressure generation of fine-grained soilsSoil dynamics and earthquake engineering313372384Search in Google Scholar

Zaimoğlu, A. Ş., Hattatoğlu, F., Akbulut, R. K., & Yetimoğlu, T. (2012). Freeze-thaw behavior of fine grained soils subjected to surcharge loads. In 3rd International Conference on New Developments in Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 28–30.ZaimoğluA. Ş.HattatoğluF.AkbulutR. K.YetimoğluT.2012Freeze-thaw behavior of fine grained soils subjected to surcharge loadsIn3rd International Conference on New Developments in Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering2830Search in Google Scholar

Yarbaşı, N., Kalkan, E., & Akbulut, S. (2007). Modification of the geotechnical properties, as influenced by freeze–thaw, of granular soils with waste additives. Cold regions science and technology, 48(1), 44–54.YarbaşıN.KalkanE.AkbulutS.2007Modification of the geotechnical properties, as influenced by freeze–thaw, of granular soils with waste additivesCold regions science and technology4814454Search in Google Scholar

Kamei, T., Ahmed, A., & Shibi, T. (2012). Effect of freeze–thaw cycles on durability and strength of very soft clay soil stabilised with recycled Bassanite. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 82, 124–129.KameiT.AhmedA.ShibiT.2012Effect of freeze–thaw cycles on durability and strength of very soft clay soil stabilised with recycled BassaniteCold Regions Science and Technology82124129Search in Google Scholar

Czurda, K. A., & Hohmann, M. (1997). Freezing effect on shear strength of clayey soils. Applied clay science, 12(1–2), 165–187.CzurdaK. A.HohmannM.1997Freezing effect on shear strength of clayey soilsApplied clay science121–2165187Search in Google Scholar

Viklander, P., & Eigenbrod, D. (2000). Stone movements and permeability changes in till caused by freezing and thawing. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 31(2), 151–162.ViklanderP.EigenbrodD.2000Stone movements and permeability changes in till caused by freezing and thawingCold Regions Science and Technology312151162Search in Google Scholar

Ahmed, A., & Ugai, K. (2011). Environmental effects on durability of soil stabilized with recycled gypsum. Cold regions science and technology, 66(2–3), 84–92.AhmedA.UgaiK.2011Environmental effects on durability of soil stabilized with recycled gypsumCold regions science and technology662–38492Search in Google Scholar

Kamei, T., Ahmed, A., & Ugai, K. (2011). The performance of soft clay soil stabilized with recycled gypsum in wet environment. In Proceedings of the 14th Pan-American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.KameiT.AhmedA.UgaiK.2011The performance of soft clay soil stabilized with recycled gypsum in wet environmentInProceedings of the 14th Pan-American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical EngineeringSearch in Google Scholar

Yetimoglu, T., & Salbas, O. (2003). A study on shear strength of sands reinforced with randomly distributed discrete fibers. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 21(2), 103–110.YetimogluT.SalbasO.2003A study on shear strength of sands reinforced with randomly distributed discrete fibersGeotextiles and Geomembranes212103110Search in Google Scholar

Freilich, B. J., Li, C., & Zornberg, J. G. (2010). Effective shear strength of fiber-reinforced clays. In 9th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Brazil, 1997–2000.FreilichB. J.LiC.ZornbergJ. G.2010Effective shear strength of fiber-reinforced claysIn9th International Conference on GeosyntheticsBrazil1997–2000Search in Google Scholar

Zaimoglu, A. S. (2010). Freezing–thawing behavior of fine-grained soils reinforced with polypropylene fibers. Cold regions science and technology, 60(1), 63–65.ZaimogluA. S.2010Freezing–thawing behavior of fine-grained soils reinforced with polypropylene fibersCold regions science and technology6016365Search in Google Scholar

Tunç A. (2002). Geotechnic and Its Applications on Road Engineering. Atlas Publisher, İstanbul, Turkey [in Turkish].TunçA.2002Geotechnic and Its Applications on Road EngineeringAtlas Publisherİstanbul, Turkey [in Turkish]Search in Google Scholar

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo