Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced parameters and intravoxel incoherent motion facilitate the prediction of TP53 status and risk stratification of early-stage endometrial carcinoma

1. Miller KD, Ortiz AP, Pinheiro PS, Bandi P, Minihan A, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer statistics for the US Hispanic/Latino population, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 466–87. doi: 10.3322/caac.21695 MillerKD OrtizAP PinheiroPS BandiP MinihanA FuchsHE Cancer statistics for the US Hispanic/Latino population, 2021 CA Cancer J Clin 2021 71 466 87 10.3322/caac.21695 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Nakamura M, Obata T, Daikoku T, Fujiwara H. The association and significance of p53 in gynecologic cancers: the potential of targeted therapy. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20: 5482. doi: 10.3390/ijms20215482 NakamuraM ObataT DaikokuT FujiwaraH The association and significance of p53 in gynecologic cancers: the potential of targeted therapy Int J Mol Sci 2019 20 5482 10.3390/ijms20215482 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Jamieson A, Thompson EF, Huvila J, Gilks CB, McAlpine JN. p53abn endometrial cancer: understanding the most aggressive endometrial cancers in the era of molecular classification. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31: 907–13. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002256 JamiesonA ThompsonEF HuvilaJ GilksCB McAlpineJN p53abn endometrial cancer: understanding the most aggressive endometrial cancers in the era of molecular classification Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021 31 907 13 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002256 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, Bosse T, González-Martín A, Ledermann J, et al. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2016; 27: 16–41. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv484 ColomboN CreutzbergC AmantF BosseT González-MartínA LedermannJ ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Ann Oncol 2016 27 16 41 10.1093/annonc/mdv484 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Brooks RA, Fleming GF, Lastra RR, Lee NK, Moroney JW, Son CH, et al. Current recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69: 258–79. doi: 10.3322/caac.21561 BrooksRA FlemingGF LastraRR LeeNK MoroneyJW SonCH Current recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancer CA Cancer J Clin 2019 69 258 79 10.3322/caac.21561 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Makker V, MacKay H, Ray-Coquard I, Levine DA, Westin SN, Aoki D, et al. Endometrial cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021; 7: 88. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00324-8 MakkerV MacKayH Ray-CoquardI LevineDA WestinSN AokiD Endometrial cancer Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021 7 88 10.1038/s41572-021-00324-8 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Visser NCM, Reijnen C, Massuger LFAG, Nagtegaal ID, Bulten J, Pijnenborg JMA. Accuracy of endometrial sampling in endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: 803–13. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002261 VisserNCM ReijnenC MassugerLFAG NagtegaalID BultenJ PijnenborgJMA Accuracy of endometrial sampling in endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol 2017 130 803 13 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002261 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Garcia TS, Appel M, Rivero R, Kliemann L, Wender MC. Agreement between preoperative endometrial sampling and surgical specimen findings in endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 27: 473–8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000922 GarciaTS AppelM RiveroR KliemannL WenderMC Agreement between preoperative endometrial sampling and surgical specimen findings in endometrial carcinoma Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017 27 473 8 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000922 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9. Sala E, Rockall AG, Freeman SJ, Mitchell DG, Reinhold C. The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiology 2013; 266: 717–40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120315 SalaE RockallAG FreemanSJ MitchellDG ReinholdC The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to know Radiology 2013 266 717 40 10.1148/radiol.12120315 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Luomaranta A, Leminen A, Loukovaara M. Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of high-risk features of endometrial carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25: 837–42. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000194 LuomarantaA LeminenA LoukovaaraM Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of high-risk features of endometrial carcinoma: a meta-analysis Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015 25 837 42 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000194 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11. Khalifa F, Soliman A, El-Baz A, Abou El-Ghar M, El-Diasty T, Gimel’farb G, et al. Models and methods for analyzing DCE-MRI: a review. Med Phys 2014; 41: 124301. doi: 10.1118/1.4898202 KhalifaF SolimanA El-BazA Abou El-GharM El-DiastyT Gimel’farbG Models and methods for analyzing DCE-MRI: a review Med Phys 2014 41 124301 10.1118/1.4898202 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Ye Z, Ning G, Li X, Koh TS, Chen H, Bai W, et al. Endometrial carcinoma: use of tracer kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for preoperative risk assessment. Cancer Imaging 2022; 22: 14. doi: 10.1186/s40644-022-00452-8. YeZ NingG LiX KohTS ChenH BaiW Endometrial carcinoma: use of tracer kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for preoperative risk assessment Cancer Imaging 2022 22 14 10.1186/s40644-022-00452-8 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 168: 497–505. doi: 10.1148/radiology.168.2.3393671 Le BihanD BretonE LallemandD AubinML VignaudJ Laval-JeantetM Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging Radiology 1988 168 497 505 10.1148/radiology.168.2.3393671 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Bai Y, Lin Y, Tian J, Shi D, Cheng J, Haacke EM, et al. Grading of gliomas by using monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging and diffusion kurtosis MR imaging. Radiology 2016; 278: 496–504. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142173 BaiY LinY TianJ ShiD ChengJ HaackeEM Grading of gliomas by using monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging and diffusion kurtosis MR imaging Radiology 2016 278 496 504 10.1148/radiol.2015142173 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Liu C, Wang K, Chan Q, Liu Z, Zhang J, He H, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for breast lesions: comparison and correlation with pharmacokinetic evaluation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 3888–98. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4241-6 LiuC WangK ChanQ LiuZ ZhangJ HeH Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for breast lesions: comparison and correlation with pharmacokinetic evaluation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging Eur Radiol 2016 26 3888 98 10.1007/s00330-016-4241-6 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Shen N, Zhao L, Jiang J, Jiang R, Su C, Zhang S, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging analysis of diffusion and microperfusion in grading gliomas and comparison with arterial spin labeling for evaluation of tumor perfusion. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 44: 620–32. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25191 ShenN ZhaoL JiangJ JiangR SuC ZhangS Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging analysis of diffusion and microperfusion in grading gliomas and comparison with arterial spin labeling for evaluation of tumor perfusion J Magn Reson Imaging 2016 44 620 32 10.1002/jmri.25191 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Satta S, Dolciami M, Celli V, Di Stadio F, Perniola G, Palaia I, et al. Quantitative diffusion and perfusion MRI in the evaluation of endometrial cancer: validation with histopathological parameters. Br J Radiol 2021; 94: 20210054. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210054 SattaS DolciamiM CelliV Di StadioF PerniolaG PalaiaI Quantitative diffusion and perfusion MRI in the evaluation of endometrial cancer: validation with histopathological parameters Br J Radiol 2021 94 20210054 10.1259/bjr.20210054 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Fu F, Meng N, Huang Z, Sun J, Wang X, Shang J, et al. Identification of histological features of endometrioid adenocarcinoma based on amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and multimodel diffusion-weighted imaging. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2022; 12: 1311–23. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-189 FuF MengN HuangZ SunJ WangX ShangJ Identification of histological features of endometrioid adenocarcinoma based on amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and multimodel diffusion-weighted imaging Quant Imaging Med Surg 2022 12 1311 23 10.21037/qims-21-189 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Zhang Q, Yu X, Lin M, Xie L, Zhang M, Ouyang H, et al. Multi-b-value diffusion weighted imaging for preoperative evaluation of risk stratification in early-stage endometrial cancer. Eur J Radiol 2019; 119: 108637. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.08.006 ZhangQ YuX LinM XieL ZhangM OuyangH Multi-b-value diffusion weighted imaging for preoperative evaluation of risk stratification in early-stage endometrial cancer Eur J Radiol 2019 119 108637 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.08.006 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Meng N, Fang T, Feng P, Huang Z, Sun J, Wang X, et al. Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and multiple models diffusion-weighted imaging facilitates preoperative risk stratification of early-stage endometrial carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 54: 1200–11. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27684 MengN FangT FengP HuangZ SunJ WangX Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and multiple models diffusion-weighted imaging facilitates preoperative risk stratification of early-stage endometrial carcinoma J Magn Reson Imaging 2021 54 1200 11 10.1002/jmri.27684 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. Romeo V, Cavaliere C, Imbriaco M, Verde F, Petretta M, Franzese M, et al. Tumor segmentation analysis at different post-contrast time points: a possible source of variability of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters in locally advanced breast cancer. Eur J Radiol 2020; 126: 108907. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108907 RomeoV CavaliereC ImbriacoM VerdeF PetrettaM FranzeseM Tumor segmentation analysis at different post-contrast time points: a possible source of variability of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters in locally advanced breast cancer Eur J Radiol 2020 126 108907 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108907 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 105: 103–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.012 PecorelliS Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009 105 103 4 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.012 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Shieh G. Choosing the best index for the average score intraclass correlation coefficient. Behav Res Methods 2016; 48: 994–1003. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0623-y ShiehG Choosing the best index for the average score intraclass correlation coefficient Behav Res Methods 2016 48 994 1003 10.3758/s13428-015-0623-y Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Xu C, Yu Y, Li X, Sun H. Value of integrated PET-IVIM MRI in predicting lymphovascular space invasion in cervical cancer without lymphatic metastasis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48: 2990–3000. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05208-3 XuC YuY LiX SunH Value of integrated PET-IVIM MRI in predicting lymphovascular space invasion in cervical cancer without lymphatic metastasis Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021 48 2990 3000 10.1007/s00259-021-05208-3 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25. Wang F, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Liu C, Liang D, Xie L, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for assessing tumor staging and detection of lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer: correlation with p53 and Ki-67 expression. Mol Imaging Biol 2019; 21: 731–39. doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1295-7 WangF WangY ZhouY LiuC LiangD XieL Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for assessing tumor staging and detection of lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer: correlation with p53 and Ki-67 expression Mol Imaging Biol 2019 21 731 39 10.1007/s11307-018-1295-7 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26. Wang Y, Bai G, Zhang X, Shan W, Xu L, Chen W. Correlation analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient value and P53 and Ki-67 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 68: 183–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.01.011 WangY BaiG ZhangX ShanW XuL ChenW Correlation analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient value and P53 and Ki-67 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Magn Reson Imaging 2020 68 183 9 10.1016/j.mri.2020.01.011 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27. Shi C, Liu D, Xiao Z, Zhang D, Liu G, Liu G, et al. Monitoring tumor response to antivascular therapy using non-contrast intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI. Cancer Res 2017; 77: 3491–501. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2499 ShiC LiuD XiaoZ ZhangD LiuG LiuG Monitoring tumor response to antivascular therapy using non-contrast intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI Cancer Res 2017 77 3491 501 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2499 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

28. Pang Y, Turkbey B, Bernardo M, Kruecker J, Kadoury S, Merino MJ, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for prostate cancer: an evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from different b-value combinations. Magn Reson Med 2013; 69: 553–62. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24277 PangY TurkbeyB BernardoM KrueckerJ KadouryS MerinoMJ Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for prostate cancer: an evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from different b-value combinations Magn Reson Med 2013 69 553 62 10.1002/mrm.24277 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29. Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Sumi T, Obara M, Ichikawa Y, Nakamura T. Salivary gland tumors: use of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors. Radiology 2012; 263: 770–7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111248 SumiM Van CauterenM SumiT ObaraM IchikawaY NakamuraT Salivary gland tumors: use of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors Radiology 2012 263 770 7 10.1148/radiol.12111248 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30. Ang T, Juniat V, Patel S, Selva D. Evaluation of orbital lesions with DCE-MRI: a literature review. Orbit 2022 Nov 27; 1–9. [Ahead of print]. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2022.2149819 AngT JuniatV PatelS SelvaD Evaluation of orbital lesions with DCE-MRI: a literature review Orbit 2022 Nov 27 1 9 [Ahead of print]. 10.1080/01676830.2022.2149819 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31. Mazaheri Y, Akin O, Hricak H. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: a review of current methods and applications. World J Radiol 2017; 9: 416–25. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i12.416 MazaheriY AkinO HricakH Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: a review of current methods and applications World J Radiol 2017 9 416 25 10.4329/wjr.v9.i12.416 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32. Bredholt G, Mannelqvist M, Stefansson IM, Birkeland E, Bø TH, Øyan AM, et al. Tumor necrosis is an important hallmark of aggressive endometrial cancer and associates with hypoxia, angiogenesis and inflammation responses. Oncotarget 2015; 6: 39676–91. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5344 BredholtG MannelqvistM StefanssonIM BirkelandE BøTH ØyanAM Tumor necrosis is an important hallmark of aggressive endometrial cancer and associates with hypoxia, angiogenesis and inflammation responses Oncotarget 2015 6 39676 91 10.18632/oncotarget.5344 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

33. Vaupel P, Mayer A. Hypoxia in tumors: pathogenesis-related classification, characterization of hypoxia subtypes, and associated biological and clinical implications. Adv Exp Med Biol 2014; 812: 19–24. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0620-8_3 VaupelP MayerA Hypoxia in tumors: pathogenesis-related classification, characterization of hypoxia subtypes, and associated biological and clinical implications Adv Exp Med Biol 2014 812 19 24 10.1007/978-1-4939-0620-8_3 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

34. Haris M, Gupta RK, Singh A, Husain N, Husain M, Pandey CM, et al. Differentiation of infective from neoplastic brain lesions by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 531–40. doi: 10.1007/s00234-008-0378-6 HarisM GuptaRK SinghA HusainN HusainM PandeyCM Differentiation of infective from neoplastic brain lesions by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI Neuroradiology 2008 50 531 40 10.1007/s00234-008-0378-6 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

35. Liu C, Wang K, Chan Q, Liu Z, Zhang J, He H, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for breast lesions: comparison and correlation with pharmacokinetic evaluation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 3888–98. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4241-6 LiuC WangK ChanQ LiuZ ZhangJ HeH Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for breast lesions: comparison and correlation with pharmacokinetic evaluation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging Eur Radiol 2016 26 3888 98 10.1007/s00330-016-4241-6 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

36. Cho N, Im SA, Park IA, Lee KH, Li M, Han W, et al. Breast cancer: early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using parametric response maps for MR imaging. Radiology 2014; 272: 385–96. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14131332 ChoN ImSA ParkIA LeeKH LiM HanW Breast cancer: early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using parametric response maps for MR imaging Radiology 2014 272 385 96 10.1148/radiol.14131332 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar