Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced parameters and intravoxel incoherent motion facilitate the prediction of TP53 status and risk stratification of early-stage endometrial carcinoma
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Miller KD, Ortiz AP, Pinheiro PS, Bandi P, Minihan A, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer statistics for the US Hispanic/Latino population, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 466–87. doi: 10.3322/caac.21695MillerKDOrtizAPPinheiroPSBandiPMinihanAFuchsHECancer statistics for the US Hispanic/Latino population, 2021CA Cancer J Clin2021714668710.3322/caac.21695Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nakamura M, Obata T, Daikoku T, Fujiwara H. The association and significance of p53 in gynecologic cancers: the potential of targeted therapy. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20: 5482. doi: 10.3390/ijms20215482NakamuraMObataTDaikokuTFujiwaraHThe association and significance of p53 in gynecologic cancers: the potential of targeted therapyInt J Mol Sci201920548210.3390/ijms20215482Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jamieson A, Thompson EF, Huvila J, Gilks CB, McAlpine JN. p53abn endometrial cancer: understanding the most aggressive endometrial cancers in the era of molecular classification. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31: 907–13. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002256JamiesonAThompsonEFHuvilaJGilksCBMcAlpineJNp53abn endometrial cancer: understanding the most aggressive endometrial cancers in the era of molecular classificationInt J Gynecol Cancer2021319071310.1136/ijgc-2020-002256Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, Bosse T, González-Martín A, Ledermann J, et al. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2016; 27: 16–41. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv484ColomboNCreutzbergCAmantFBosseTGonzález-MartínALedermannJESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-upAnn Oncol201627164110.1093/annonc/mdv484Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brooks RA, Fleming GF, Lastra RR, Lee NK, Moroney JW, Son CH, et al. Current recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69: 258–79. doi: 10.3322/caac.21561BrooksRAFlemingGFLastraRRLeeNKMoroneyJWSonCHCurrent recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancerCA Cancer J Clin2019692587910.3322/caac.21561Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Makker V, MacKay H, Ray-Coquard I, Levine DA, Westin SN, Aoki D, et al. Endometrial cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021; 7: 88. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00324-8MakkerVMacKayHRay-CoquardILevineDAWestinSNAokiDEndometrial cancerNat Rev Dis Primers202178810.1038/s41572-021-00324-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Visser NCM, Reijnen C, Massuger LFAG, Nagtegaal ID, Bulten J, Pijnenborg JMA. Accuracy of endometrial sampling in endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: 803–13. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002261VisserNCMReijnenCMassugerLFAGNagtegaalIDBultenJPijnenborgJMAAccuracy of endometrial sampling in endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysisObstet Gynecol20171308031310.1097/AOG.0000000000002261Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Garcia TS, Appel M, Rivero R, Kliemann L, Wender MC. Agreement between preoperative endometrial sampling and surgical specimen findings in endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 27: 473–8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000922GarciaTSAppelMRiveroRKliemannLWenderMCAgreement between preoperative endometrial sampling and surgical specimen findings in endometrial carcinomaInt J Gynecol Cancer201727473810.1097/IGC.0000000000000922Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sala E, Rockall AG, Freeman SJ, Mitchell DG, Reinhold C. The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiology 2013; 266: 717–40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120315SalaERockallAGFreemanSJMitchellDGReinholdCThe added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to knowRadiology20132667174010.1148/radiol.12120315Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Luomaranta A, Leminen A, Loukovaara M. Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of high-risk features of endometrial carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25: 837–42. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000194LuomarantaALeminenALoukovaaraMMagnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of high-risk features of endometrial carcinoma: a meta-analysisInt J Gynecol Cancer2015258374210.1097/IGC.0000000000000194Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Khalifa F, Soliman A, El-Baz A, Abou El-Ghar M, El-Diasty T, Gimel’farb G, et al. Models and methods for analyzing DCE-MRI: a review. Med Phys 2014; 41: 124301. doi: 10.1118/1.4898202KhalifaFSolimanAEl-BazAAbou El-GharMEl-DiastyTGimel’farbGModels and methods for analyzing DCE-MRI: a reviewMed Phys20144112430110.1118/1.4898202Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ye Z, Ning G, Li X, Koh TS, Chen H, Bai W, et al. Endometrial carcinoma: use of tracer kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for preoperative risk assessment. Cancer Imaging 2022; 22: 14. doi: 10.1186/s40644-022-00452-8.YeZNingGLiXKohTSChenHBaiWEndometrial carcinoma: use of tracer kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for preoperative risk assessmentCancer Imaging2022221410.1186/s40644-022-00452-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 168: 497–505. doi: 10.1148/radiology.168.2.3393671Le BihanDBretonELallemandDAubinMLVignaudJLaval-JeantetMSeparation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imagingRadiology198816849750510.1148/radiology.168.2.3393671Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bai Y, Lin Y, Tian J, Shi D, Cheng J, Haacke EM, et al. Grading of gliomas by using monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging and diffusion kurtosis MR imaging. Radiology 2016; 278: 496–504. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142173BaiYLinYTianJShiDChengJHaackeEMGrading of gliomas by using monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging and diffusion kurtosis MR imagingRadiology201627849650410.1148/radiol.2015142173Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Liu C, Wang K, Chan Q, Liu Z, Zhang J, He H, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for breast lesions: comparison and correlation with pharmacokinetic evaluation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 3888–98. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4241-6LiuCWangKChanQLiuZZhangJHeHIntravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for breast lesions: comparison and correlation with pharmacokinetic evaluation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imagingEur Radiol20162638889810.1007/s00330-016-4241-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Shen N, Zhao L, Jiang J, Jiang R, Su C, Zhang S, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging analysis of diffusion and microperfusion in grading gliomas and comparison with arterial spin labeling for evaluation of tumor perfusion. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 44: 620–32. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25191ShenNZhaoLJiangJJiangRSuCZhangSIntravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging analysis of diffusion and microperfusion in grading gliomas and comparison with arterial spin labeling for evaluation of tumor perfusionJ Magn Reson Imaging2016446203210.1002/jmri.25191Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Satta S, Dolciami M, Celli V, Di Stadio F, Perniola G, Palaia I, et al. Quantitative diffusion and perfusion MRI in the evaluation of endometrial cancer: validation with histopathological parameters. Br J Radiol 2021; 94: 20210054. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210054SattaSDolciamiMCelliVDi StadioFPerniolaGPalaiaIQuantitative diffusion and perfusion MRI in the evaluation of endometrial cancer: validation with histopathological parametersBr J Radiol2021942021005410.1259/bjr.20210054Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fu F, Meng N, Huang Z, Sun J, Wang X, Shang J, et al. Identification of histological features of endometrioid adenocarcinoma based on amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and multimodel diffusion-weighted imaging. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2022; 12: 1311–23. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-189FuFMengNHuangZSunJWangXShangJIdentification of histological features of endometrioid adenocarcinoma based on amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and multimodel diffusion-weighted imagingQuant Imaging Med Surg20221213112310.21037/qims-21-189Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zhang Q, Yu X, Lin M, Xie L, Zhang M, Ouyang H, et al. Multi-b-value diffusion weighted imaging for preoperative evaluation of risk stratification in early-stage endometrial cancer. Eur J Radiol 2019; 119: 108637. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.08.006ZhangQYuXLinMXieLZhangMOuyangHMulti-b-value diffusion weighted imaging for preoperative evaluation of risk stratification in early-stage endometrial cancerEur J Radiol201911910863710.1016/j.ejrad.2019.08.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Meng N, Fang T, Feng P, Huang Z, Sun J, Wang X, et al. Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and multiple models diffusion-weighted imaging facilitates preoperative risk stratification of early-stage endometrial carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 54: 1200–11. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27684MengNFangTFengPHuangZSunJWangXAmide proton transfer-weighted imaging and multiple models diffusion-weighted imaging facilitates preoperative risk stratification of early-stage endometrial carcinomaJ Magn Reson Imaging20215412001110.1002/jmri.27684Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Romeo V, Cavaliere C, Imbriaco M, Verde F, Petretta M, Franzese M, et al. Tumor segmentation analysis at different post-contrast time points: a possible source of variability of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters in locally advanced breast cancer. Eur J Radiol 2020; 126: 108907. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108907RomeoVCavaliereCImbriacoMVerdeFPetrettaMFranzeseMTumor segmentation analysis at different post-contrast time points: a possible source of variability of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters in locally advanced breast cancerEur J Radiol202012610890710.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108907Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 105: 103–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.012PecorelliSRevised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometriumInt J Gynaecol Obstet2009105103410.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Shieh G. Choosing the best index for the average score intraclass correlation coefficient. Behav Res Methods 2016; 48: 994–1003. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0623-yShiehGChoosing the best index for the average score intraclass correlation coefficientBehav Res Methods201648994100310.3758/s13428-015-0623-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Xu C, Yu Y, Li X, Sun H. Value of integrated PET-IVIM MRI in predicting lymphovascular space invasion in cervical cancer without lymphatic metastasis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48: 2990–3000. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05208-3XuCYuYLiXSunHValue of integrated PET-IVIM MRI in predicting lymphovascular space invasion in cervical cancer without lymphatic metastasisEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging2021482990300010.1007/s00259-021-05208-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang F, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Liu C, Liang D, Xie L, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for assessing tumor staging and detection of lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer: correlation with p53 and Ki-67 expression. Mol Imaging Biol 2019; 21: 731–39. doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1295-7WangFWangYZhouYLiuCLiangDXieLApparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for assessing tumor staging and detection of lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer: correlation with p53 and Ki-67 expressionMol Imaging Biol2019217313910.1007/s11307-018-1295-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang Y, Bai G, Zhang X, Shan W, Xu L, Chen W. Correlation analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient value and P53 and Ki-67 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 68: 183–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.01.011WangYBaiGZhangXShanWXuLChenWCorrelation analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient value and P53 and Ki-67 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinomaMagn Reson Imaging202068183910.1016/j.mri.2020.01.011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Shi C, Liu D, Xiao Z, Zhang D, Liu G, Liu G, et al. Monitoring tumor response to antivascular therapy using non-contrast intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI. Cancer Res 2017; 77: 3491–501. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2499ShiCLiuDXiaoZZhangDLiuGLiuGMonitoring tumor response to antivascular therapy using non-contrast intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRICancer Res201777349150110.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2499Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pang Y, Turkbey B, Bernardo M, Kruecker J, Kadoury S, Merino MJ, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for prostate cancer: an evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from different b-value combinations. Magn Reson Med 2013; 69: 553–62. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24277PangYTurkbeyBBernardoMKrueckerJKadourySMerinoMJIntravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for prostate cancer: an evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from different b-value combinationsMagn Reson Med2013695536210.1002/mrm.24277Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Sumi T, Obara M, Ichikawa Y, Nakamura T. Salivary gland tumors: use of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors. Radiology 2012; 263: 770–7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111248SumiMVan CauterenMSumiTObaraMIchikawaYNakamuraTSalivary gland tumors: use of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumorsRadiology2012263770710.1148/radiol.12111248Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ang T, Juniat V, Patel S, Selva D. Evaluation of orbital lesions with DCE-MRI: a literature review. Orbit 2022 Nov 27; 1–9. [Ahead of print]. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2022.2149819AngTJuniatVPatelSSelvaDEvaluation of orbital lesions with DCE-MRI: a literature reviewOrbit2022Nov2719[Ahead of print].10.1080/01676830.2022.2149819Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mazaheri Y, Akin O, Hricak H. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: a review of current methods and applications. World J Radiol 2017; 9: 416–25. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i12.416MazaheriYAkinOHricakHDynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: a review of current methods and applicationsWorld J Radiol201794162510.4329/wjr.v9.i12.416Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bredholt G, Mannelqvist M, Stefansson IM, Birkeland E, Bø TH, Øyan AM, et al. Tumor necrosis is an important hallmark of aggressive endometrial cancer and associates with hypoxia, angiogenesis and inflammation responses. Oncotarget 2015; 6: 39676–91. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5344BredholtGMannelqvistMStefanssonIMBirkelandEBøTHØyanAMTumor necrosis is an important hallmark of aggressive endometrial cancer and associates with hypoxia, angiogenesis and inflammation responsesOncotarget20156396769110.18632/oncotarget.5344Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vaupel P, Mayer A. Hypoxia in tumors: pathogenesis-related classification, characterization of hypoxia subtypes, and associated biological and clinical implications. Adv Exp Med Biol 2014; 812: 19–24. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0620-8_3VaupelPMayerAHypoxia in tumors: pathogenesis-related classification, characterization of hypoxia subtypes, and associated biological and clinical implicationsAdv Exp Med Biol2014812192410.1007/978-1-4939-0620-8_3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Haris M, Gupta RK, Singh A, Husain N, Husain M, Pandey CM, et al. Differentiation of infective from neoplastic brain lesions by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 531–40. doi: 10.1007/s00234-008-0378-6HarisMGuptaRKSinghAHusainNHusainMPandeyCMDifferentiation of infective from neoplastic brain lesions by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRINeuroradiology2008505314010.1007/s00234-008-0378-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Liu C, Wang K, Chan Q, Liu Z, Zhang J, He H, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for breast lesions: comparison and correlation with pharmacokinetic evaluation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 3888–98. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4241-6LiuCWangKChanQLiuZZhangJHeHIntravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for breast lesions: comparison and correlation with pharmacokinetic evaluation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imagingEur Radiol20162638889810.1007/s00330-016-4241-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cho N, Im SA, Park IA, Lee KH, Li M, Han W, et al. Breast cancer: early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using parametric response maps for MR imaging. Radiology 2014; 272: 385–96. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14131332ChoNImSAParkIALeeKHLiMHanWBreast cancer: early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using parametric response maps for MR imagingRadiology20142723859610.1148/radiol.14131332Open DOISearch in Google Scholar