Cite

Fig. 1

Distribution of feline foamy virus Gag, Bet and Env antigens seroreactivity in 223 domestic cats from Poland. Dashed red lines indicate determined cut-off values
Distribution of feline foamy virus Gag, Bet and Env antigens seroreactivity in 223 domestic cats from Poland. Dashed red lines indicate determined cut-off values

Fig. 2

Detection of FFVfca-specific antibodies by immunoblotting assays with a cellular antigen in representative feline serum samples. M – prestained protein ladder; A – lane with Crandell-Rees feline kidney cells (CRFK)/FFVfca cells lysate as antigen; B – lane with uninfected CRFK cells lysate as antigen; P – FFVfca positive control serum; N – FFVfca negative control serum; 34/64, 34/79, 34/15 – representative samples with their ELISA reactivity to FFVfca Gag antigen (OD Gag)
Detection of FFVfca-specific antibodies by immunoblotting assays with a cellular antigen in representative feline serum samples. M – prestained protein ladder; A – lane with Crandell-Rees feline kidney cells (CRFK)/FFVfca cells lysate as antigen; B – lane with uninfected CRFK cells lysate as antigen; P – FFVfca positive control serum; N – FFVfca negative control serum; 34/64, 34/79, 34/15 – representative samples with their ELISA reactivity to FFVfca Gag antigen (OD Gag)

Fig 3

Scatter plot of ELISA results showing relationship between (A) feline foamy virus Gag and Bet and (B) Gag and Env antigens; correlation coefficients are indicated on both graphs. Circles indicate Gag ELISA negative and squares Gag ELISA positive samples
Scatter plot of ELISA results showing relationship between (A) feline foamy virus Gag and Bet and (B) Gag and Env antigens; correlation coefficients are indicated on both graphs. Circles indicate Gag ELISA negative and squares Gag ELISA positive samples

Fig. 4

Distribution of the cat serum samples’ reactivity to feline foamy virus Gag antigen by animal origin. Black circles indicate Gag ELISA-negative and grey squares Gag ELISA-positive samples; A – Warsaw; B– Gdańsk; C– Kraków agglomerations
Distribution of the cat serum samples’ reactivity to feline foamy virus Gag antigen by animal origin. Black circles indicate Gag ELISA-negative and grey squares Gag ELISA-positive samples; A – Warsaw; B– Gdańsk; C– Kraków agglomerations

Fig. 5

Box-plot distribution of feline foamy virus Gag-seropositive and -seronegative cat samples from the Gdańsk and Kraków agglomerations analysed by variables
Box-plot distribution of feline foamy virus Gag-seropositive and -seronegative cat samples from the Gdańsk and Kraków agglomerations analysed by variables

Serological prevalence of FFVfca in domestic cat populations from the Gdańsk and Kraków agglomerations aligned with demographic variables

Variable Number of cats
FFVfca seropositive Total
Gender Female 22 51
Male 37 61
Age Young (≤1 year) 10 22
Adult (1–10 years) 33 49
Old (>10years) 16 29
Contact with other cats Yes 48 86
No 10 23
eISSN:
2450-8608
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Molecular Biology, other, Microbiology and Virology, Medicine, Veterinary Medicine