Connexion
S'inscrire
Réinitialiser le mot de passe
Publier & Distribuer
Solutions d'édition
Solutions de distribution
Thèmes
Architecture et design
Arts
Business et économie
Chimie
Chimie industrielle
Droit
Géosciences
Histoire
Informatique
Ingénierie
Intérêt général
Linguistique et sémiotique
Littérature
Mathématiques
Musique
Médecine
Pharmacie
Philosophie
Physique
Sciences bibliothécaires et de l'information, études du livre
Sciences des matériaux
Sciences du vivant
Sciences sociales
Sport et loisirs
Théologie et religion
Études classiques et du Proche-Orient ancient
Études culturelles
Études juives
Publications
Journaux
Livres
Comptes-rendus
Éditeurs
Blog
Contact
Chercher
EUR
USD
GBP
Français
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Panier
Home
Journaux
Journal of Veterinary Research
Édition 65 (2021): Edition 4 (December 2021)
Accès libre
Seroprevalence of feline foamy virus in domestic cats in Poland
Magdalena Materniak-Kornas
Magdalena Materniak-Kornas
,
Tadeusz Frymus
Tadeusz Frymus
,
Martin Löchelt
Martin Löchelt
et
Jacek Kuźmak
Jacek Kuźmak
| 29 oct. 2021
Journal of Veterinary Research
Édition 65 (2021): Edition 4 (December 2021)
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Résumé
Article
Figures et tableaux
Références
Auteurs
Articles dans cette édition
Aperçu
PDF
Citez
Partagez
Article Category:
Review article
Publié en ligne:
29 oct. 2021
Pages:
407 - 413
Reçu:
12 oct. 2021
Accepté:
25 oct. 2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2021-0059
Mots clés
feline foamy virus
,
domestic cats
,
ELISA
,
seroprevalence
© 2021 M. Materniak-Kornas et al. published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1
Distribution of feline foamy virus Gag, Bet and Env antigens seroreactivity in 223 domestic cats from Poland. Dashed red lines indicate determined cut-off values
Fig. 2
Detection of FFVfca-specific antibodies by immunoblotting assays with a cellular antigen in representative feline serum samples. M – prestained protein ladder; A – lane with Crandell-Rees feline kidney cells (CRFK)/FFVfca cells lysate as antigen; B – lane with uninfected CRFK cells lysate as antigen; P – FFVfca positive control serum; N – FFVfca negative control serum; 34/64, 34/79, 34/15 – representative samples with their ELISA reactivity to FFVfca Gag antigen (OD Gag)
Fig 3
Scatter plot of ELISA results showing relationship between (A) feline foamy virus Gag and Bet and (B) Gag and Env antigens; correlation coefficients are indicated on both graphs. Circles indicate Gag ELISA negative and squares Gag ELISA positive samples
Fig. 4
Distribution of the cat serum samples’ reactivity to feline foamy virus Gag antigen by animal origin. Black circles indicate Gag ELISA-negative and grey squares Gag ELISA-positive samples; A – Warsaw; B– Gdańsk; C– Kraków agglomerations
Fig. 5
Box-plot distribution of feline foamy virus Gag-seropositive and -seronegative cat samples from the Gdańsk and Kraków agglomerations analysed by variables
Serological prevalence of FFVfca in domestic cat populations from the Gdańsk and Kraków agglomerations aligned with demographic variables
Variable
Number of cats
FFVfca seropositive
Total
Gender
Female
22
51
Male
37
61
Age
Young (≤1 year)
10
22
Adult (1–10 years)
33
49
Old (>10years)
16
29
Contact with other cats
Yes
48
86
No
10
23