Open Access

Leveraging network-centric strategic goals in capabilities

Jo Erskine Hannay

Jo Erskine Hannay

Center for Effective Digitalization of the Public Sector Simula Metropolitan Center for Digital EngineeringLysaker, Norway
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Hannay, Jo Erskine
 and 
Eli Gjørven

Eli Gjørven

Norwegian Defence Research EstablishmentKjeller, Norway
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Gjørven, Eli
  
Apr 19, 2021
Leveraging network-centric strategic goals in capabilities's Cover Image
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Cite
Download Cover
Article Category: Original Study
Published Online: Apr 19, 2021
Page range: 90 - 104
Received: Jun 22, 2020
Accepted: Mar 05, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jms-2021-0001
Keywords
© 2021 Jo Erskine Hannay et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Fig. 1

Steps from strategy to capabilities.
Steps from strategy to capabilities.

Fig. 2

The NATO Consultation, Command and Control (C3) Taxonomy of capabilities.
The NATO Consultation, Command and Control (C3) Taxonomy of capabilities.

Fig. 3

Increments of the method when using the C3 Taxonomy. Operational level (pink), user-facing level (grey) and back-end COI level (orange).
Increments of the method when using the C3 Taxonomy. Operational level (pink), user-facing level (grey) and back-end COI level (orange).

Fig. 4

The NATO Network-Enabled Capability Maturity Levels and the NATO Networking and Information Infrastructure System Maturity Levels (abridged).
The NATO Network-Enabled Capability Maturity Levels and the NATO Networking and Information Infrastructure System Maturity Levels (abridged).

Fig. 5

Case 1: Epics and the capabilities they use.
Case 1: Epics and the capabilities they use.

Fig. 6

Case 2: Epics and the capabilities they use MSaaS, modelling and simulation as a service.
Case 2: Epics and the capabilities they use MSaaS, modelling and simulation as a service.

Fig. 7

Benefit points: Epics’ contributions to objectives. Operational level (pink), user-facing level (grey) and back-end level (orange). Fictitious example.
Benefit points: Epics’ contributions to objectives. Operational level (pink), user-facing level (grey) and back-end level (orange). Fictitious example.

Fig. 8

Lower-level objectives’ contributions to higher-level objectives. Fictitious example.
Lower-level objectives’ contributions to higher-level objectives. Fictitious example.
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
1 times per year
Journal Subjects:
History, Topics in History, Military History, Social Sciences, Political Science, Military Policy
Journal RSS Feed