Accès libre

Leveraging network-centric strategic goals in capabilities

Jo Erskine Hannay

Jo Erskine Hannay

Center for Effective Digitalization of the Public Sector Simula Metropolitan Center for Digital EngineeringLysaker, Norway
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Hannay, Jo Erskine
 et 
Eli Gjørven

Eli Gjørven

Norwegian Defence Research EstablishmentKjeller, Norway
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Gjørven, Eli
  
19 avr. 2021
Leveraging network-centric strategic goals in capabilities's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Catégorie d'article: Original Study
Publié en ligne: 19 avr. 2021
Pages: 90 - 104
Reçu: 22 juin 2020
Accepté: 05 mars 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jms-2021-0001
Mots clés
© 2021 Jo Erskine Hannay et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Fig. 1

Steps from strategy to capabilities.
Steps from strategy to capabilities.

Fig. 2

The NATO Consultation, Command and Control (C3) Taxonomy of capabilities.
The NATO Consultation, Command and Control (C3) Taxonomy of capabilities.

Fig. 3

Increments of the method when using the C3 Taxonomy. Operational level (pink), user-facing level (grey) and back-end COI level (orange).
Increments of the method when using the C3 Taxonomy. Operational level (pink), user-facing level (grey) and back-end COI level (orange).

Fig. 4

The NATO Network-Enabled Capability Maturity Levels and the NATO Networking and Information Infrastructure System Maturity Levels (abridged).
The NATO Network-Enabled Capability Maturity Levels and the NATO Networking and Information Infrastructure System Maturity Levels (abridged).

Fig. 5

Case 1: Epics and the capabilities they use.
Case 1: Epics and the capabilities they use.

Fig. 6

Case 2: Epics and the capabilities they use MSaaS, modelling and simulation as a service.
Case 2: Epics and the capabilities they use MSaaS, modelling and simulation as a service.

Fig. 7

Benefit points: Epics’ contributions to objectives. Operational level (pink), user-facing level (grey) and back-end level (orange). Fictitious example.
Benefit points: Epics’ contributions to objectives. Operational level (pink), user-facing level (grey) and back-end level (orange). Fictitious example.

Fig. 8

Lower-level objectives’ contributions to higher-level objectives. Fictitious example.
Lower-level objectives’ contributions to higher-level objectives. Fictitious example.
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
1 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Histoire, Sujets d'histoire, Histoire militaire, Sciences sociales, Science politique, Politique militaire
RSS Feed de la revue