Open Access

Design of Draw Resistance of Pressure Drop Standards for Tobacco Products Based on the Flow Distribution

, , , , ,  and   
Aug 10, 2024

Cite
Download Cover

Figure 1.

Optical gaging product (OGP) test instrumentarium.
Optical gaging product (OGP) test instrumentarium.

Figure 2.

Geometric structure and schematic diagram of pressure drop standards.
Geometric structure and schematic diagram of pressure drop standards.

Figure 3.

Schematic diagram of pressure drop standard calibration device based on the critical flow orifice (CFO) method.
Schematic diagram of pressure drop standard calibration device based on the critical flow orifice (CFO) method.

Figure 4.

Schematic diagram of the developing and fully developed flow sections in a capillary of the pressure drop standard.
Schematic diagram of the developing and fully developed flow sections in a capillary of the pressure drop standard.

Figure 5.

Velocity cloud diagrams of the inlet and outlet sections.
Velocity cloud diagrams of the inlet and outlet sections.

Figure 6.

Schematic diagram of segmentation in the developing section.
Schematic diagram of segmentation in the developing section.

Figure 7.

Flow chart of the computational algorithm. Where N represents the number of capillaries and Ak represents the cross-sectional area of each capillary.
Flow chart of the computational algorithm. Where N represents the number of capillaries and Ak represents the cross-sectional area of each capillary.

Figure 8.

Comparison of experimental and calculated values.
Comparison of experimental and calculated values.

Geometric parameters of pressure drop standard_

Parameter Capillary no. (mm)
d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8 d9 d10
Inner diameter of capillary 0.643 0.635 0.634 0.635 0.630 0.630 0.622 0.637 0.640 0.635
Diameter of pressure drop standard 7.981
Length of pressure drop standard 120.432

Inner diameter parameter table of different pressure drop standards_

Sample ID Capillary no. (mm)
d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8 d9 d10
1 0.643 0.635 0.634 0.635 0.630 0.630 0.622 0.637 0.640 0.635
2 0.538 0.532 0.543 0.539 0.545 0.548 0.544 0.548 0.536 0.542
3 0.479 0.484 0.485 0.477 0.491 0.486 0.481 0.484 0.478 0.480
4 0.452 0.442 0.480 0.463 0.454 0.458 0.450 0.463 0.445 0.452
5 0.432 0.417 0.429 0.422 0.418 0.417 0.427 0.416 0.413 0.424
6 0.413 0.422 0.412 0.415 0.432 0.428 0.420 0.418 0.414 0.427
7 0.372 0.376 0.376 0.378 0.380 0.389 0.374 0.376 0.400 0.384

Comparison of experimental and calculated values_

Sample ID Experimental draw resistance (Pa) Calculated draw resistance (Pa) Relative error (%)
1 980.6 974.39 −0.63
2 1972.0 1875.04 −7.10
3 2916.2 2903.03 −0.45
4 3805.2 3634.33 −4.49
5 4825.1 4836.75 0.24
6 5712.2 5377.19 −5.86
7 7971.9 7513.70 −5.75
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
General Interest, Life Sciences, Life Sciences, other, Physics, Physics, other